|
New Caro video where he explores an ammo dump and breaks into a box of mortar shells http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYgQLeGUGvM
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 15:04 |
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2013 17:43 |
|
Furnok Dorn posted:Wow, mining the border is just... They're bottling up the protesters in Hama and Homs. They are playing the exact same scenario like in 1982. Make sure no significant number of dissidents escape (more than 10k), eliminate deserters swiftly and reinforce sectarian divides. Couple of months, maybe years, after the movement is all dead and done, continue business as usual. I'm pretty sure the Syrian government was in some way prepared for this, or at least expecting it.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 15:11 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:Pretty much just to send a message to the US that Fixed that. Not to say the rest of the world didn't agree there, but it's important to remember, not just with Obama but with every year, that the Peace Prize is the odd one out of the Nobel prizes. Each has a small committee that collects and screens nominations then makes suggestions, while a larger body from an outside organization actually makes the decision. With the Nobel Peace Prize, the same five people handle the whole process, and between that and the nature of the prize itself this makes it immensely shaped by the personal views of a few people, who themselves are chosen by a national parliament and will reflect its current politics. As a result, its historical quality is pretty variable even without taking hindsight into account. I remember speculation from some Norwegians at the time that the committee was like many probably starstruck by Obama and wanted a chance to meet him. Might be exaggeration, but maybe not far off. Brown Moses posted:New Caro video where he explores an ammo dump and breaks into a box of mortar shells When I was a kid I once thought "ammo dump" meant just like a cartoon garbage dump only ammo, rather than any sort of deliberate storage. My child self feels redeemed. Killer robot fucked around with this message at Nov 1, 2011 around 15:23 |
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 15:16 |
|
quote:Libya Plans Law to Pave Way for Islamic Bond Sales: Arab Credit
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 15:37 |
|
Islamic banking is actually quite interesting for anyone interested in looking at the basis for the principles of interest. I realize this is not a large group.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 15:41 |
|
Any word on how the NTC/new government plans to reign in vigilante mobs? That article Brown Moses linked earlier is pretty damning. I can understand (without condoning) how the guys who fought Gaddafi's men feel they have a right to continue rounding up people they view as enemies, but they need to stop that kind of stuff ASAP before they decide they're some kind of secret/state security police.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 15:49 |
|
Narmi posted:Any word on how the NTC/new government plans to reign in vigilante mobs? That article Brown Moses linked earlier is pretty damning. I can understand (without condoning) how the guys who fought Gaddafi's men feel they have a right to continue rounding up people they view as enemies, but they need to stop that kind of stuff ASAP before they decide they're some kind of secret/state security police. I've not seen anything solid yet, various proposals by various groups, but that should be decided when the new PM puts together a cabinet.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 15:57 |
|
Killer robot posted:Fixed that. Not to say the rest of the world didn't agree there, but it's important to remember, not just with Obama but with every year, that the Peace Prize is the odd one out of the Nobel prizes. Each has a small committee that collects and screens nominations then makes suggestions, while a larger body from an outside organization actually makes the decision. With the Nobel Peace Prize, the same five people handle the whole process, and between that and the nature of the prize itself this makes it immensely shaped by the personal views of a few people, who themselves are chosen by a national parliament and will reflect its current politics. As a result, its historical quality is pretty variable even without taking hindsight into account. I remember speculation from some Norwegians at the time that the committee was like many probably starstruck by Obama and wanted a chance to meet him. Might be exaggeration, but maybe not far off. Giving it to Obama as a way of congratulating the US populace on not being totally retarded might not be business as usual for the Peace Prize, but it's not like most other recipients have been that deserving. Carter got the reward partly to say to the Americans that Bush was retarded as well, so they send the message twice to make sure it got through. Killer robot posted:When I was a kid I once thought "ammo dump" meant just like a cartoon garbage dump only ammo, rather than any sort of deliberate storage. My child self feels redeemed.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 15:58 |
|
Brown Moses posted:I've not seen anything solid yet, various proposals by various groups, but that should be decided when the new PM puts together a cabinet. That should have been planned a long long time ago.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 16:07 |
|
Jut posted:That should have been planned a long long time ago. The major problem they would have had in planning anything is the lack of authority the NTC had over different regions. Each candidate for PM had to outline their vision for the future of Libya and how they would achieve it, so hopefully the new PM actually has a plan he now has the authority to put into action. CJ Chivers, who you might remember from earlier on in the conflict for writing a series of excellent articles in Misrata and Nafusa, has started following me on Twitter, seemingly after seeing one of my Tweets linking to Caro's videos of ammo dumps near Sirte. It feels dirty and wrong.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 16:21 |
|
".....Killing one single person is tantamount to killing all humanity...." Or more complete... [005:032] We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Whatever Erdogan, whatever. However, the message for Syria is there and is strong. Will it be NATO again but this time through the renewed Turkish imperialism? (Note: I am personally really in two minds about intervention in Syria. A perfect example of damned if you do, very damned if you don't...)
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 16:40 |
|
Just in on Syriaquote:Syrian state television said on Tuesday a final agreement had been reached between Syrian authorities and an Arab League committee tasked with finding a solution to end seven months of unrest. Brown Moses fucked around with this message at Nov 1, 2011 around 16:54 |
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 16:44 |
|
http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-worl...ns-1214172.html Atomic Syria? UN uncovers new evidence? "WASHINGTON — U.N. investigators have identified a previously unknown complex in Syria that bolsters suspicions that the Syrian government worked with A.Q. Khan, the father of Pakistan's atomic bomb, to acquire technology that could make nuclear arms...."
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 16:51 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Just in on Syria You got your link a bit messed up there. Try this one.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 16:52 |
|
Thanks, fixed it.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 16:55 |
|
Ultras Lazio posted:http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-worl...ns-1214172.html Not exactly a surprise, at least to anyone who's had their ear to the ground on this stuff. The entire Syrian reaction to the Israeli raid was the biggest heads up that it was actually a nuclear site. That said god drat did AQ Khan really hustle on selling out.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 16:55 |
|
Realistically, if Syria was enriching plutonium, what could anyone doÉ Follow the Iran path of sanctions? Another Israeli air raid? Anything they do seems like it would be counter-productive to the protesters goals right now.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 16:58 |
|
Narmi posted:Realistically, if Syria was enriching plutonium, what could anyone doÉ Follow the Iran path of sanctions? Another Israeli air raid? Anything they do seems like it would be counter-productive to the protesters goals right now. I'm usually not one for conspiracies however...the timing of this is suspect and it pushes things towards intervention. Shall I bomb Syria and risk an "earthquake", shall I not and gently caress the prosters Shall I bomb Syria and risk an "earthquake", shall I not and gently caress the prosters Shall I bomb Syria and risk an "earthquake", shall I not and gently caress the prosters Shall I bo....got it! They are building nukes so, bomb the fuckers and put Turkish boots on the ground! Done. Phew...you see, it's really easier than it looks. oh...and Caro, you've seen what a cracked skull looks like "live", quit while you're ahead.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 17:13 |
|
Caro cannot be that insane to enter Syria. There's no loving way he'd go that far, and if he did, gently caress, he'd be dead within a month.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 17:32 |
|
quote:Analysis: Libya's NTC struggles to stay the "good guys"
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 17:32 |
|
Being "good guys" or "bad guys" never made a difference in international support, at least compared to the real question: do they represent our interests? As Truman once said, "He's a bastard, but he's OUR bastard!"
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 17:38 |
|
ThePutty posted:Caro cannot be that insane to enter Syria. There's no loving way he'd go that far, and if he did, gently caress, he'd be dead within hours. Fixed that for you. Compared to the security apparatus in Syria, anything Caro would have faced in Libya would be equivalent to a troop of boy scouts armed with BB guns.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 17:42 |
|
Ultras Lazio posted:I'm usually not one for conspiracies however...the timing of this is suspect and it pushes things towards intervention. Why would it push things towards intervention? Explain, please. And how do you imagine that would work, bomb a cotton-spinning plan that might some time in the past been used for nuclear program? What would that do? Syria's connections to Khan is nothing new. More over, USA already got epically burned after its "smoking gun evidence" of Iraqi nuclear weapons turned out to be hot air. Obama voted against the 2003 war and has been very reserved about Iranian nuclear program compared to Republicans, he's not going to start drawing nuclear bogeymen now. This story is a completely unrelated red herring and you actually are a consiracy theorist if you don't recognize that instead.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 17:47 |
|
Except it may not be the US that would bomb that site, it would more likely be Israel or perhaps Turkey. Israel has never needed a pretext to bomb reactors in other countries (Osirak in 1983, the other Syrian site in 2007) so this would be par for the course for them. Additionally, Turkey's been taking a way harder stance towards Syria in recent months, even allowing an insurgent group to operate from its border region. Saudi Arabia just got itself a hawkish new crown prince who has no tolerance for Iran and its allies, of which Syria is one. It's not outside the realm of possibility that one of these three might take action on their own.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 17:53 |
|
suboptimal posted:Except it may not be the US that would bomb that site, it would more likely be Israel or perhaps Turkey. Israel has never needed a pretext to bomb reactors in other countries (Osirak in 1983, the other Syrian site in 2007) so this would be par for the course for them. Additionally, Turkey's been taking a way harder stance towards Syria in recent months, even allowing an insurgent group to operate from its border region. Saudi Arabia just got itself a hawkish new crown prince who has no tolerance for Iran and its allies, of which Syria is one. It's not outside the realm of possibility that one of these three might take action on their own. No further comment your honour. Thanks. Actually, I would add that this could serve Turkey's new big local guy stance.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 17:57 |
|
suboptimal posted:Except it may not be the US that would bomb that site, it would more likely be Israel or perhaps Turkey. Israel has never needed a pretext to bomb reactors in other countries (Osirak in 1983, the other Syrian site in 2007) so this would be par for the course for them. Additionally, Turkey's been taking a way harder stance towards Syria in recent months, even allowing an insurgent group to operate from its border region. Saudi Arabia just got itself a hawkish new crown prince who has no tolerance for Iran and its allies, of which Syria is one. It's not outside the realm of possibility that one of these three might take action on their own. So would Syria respond/fight against Israel or Turkey? I mean they would have internal and external fronts being fought. My guess they'd let them bomb the site and do nothing but fight to keep in power.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 18:00 |
|
Darth123123 posted:So would Syria respond/fight against Israel or Turkey? I mean they would have internal and external fronts being fought. My guess they'd let them bomb the site and do nothing but fight to keep in power. A war with Israel could actually be one of the things that ends the anti-government protests. I recall some protesters mocking the government for using the army to crack down on protesters rather than liberating the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. While hate for the government may not be uniform throughout the populace, I'd wager that hate for Israel is much more of a common feature. If Syria gets its rear end kicked, then Assad gets to say it was all an Israeli plan to draw them into a war they couldn't win. A fight between Turkey and Syria would be something without precedent. I'd imagine there's a good parity of arms between the two countries, with Turkey maybe having a slight edge in terms of combat readiness (since they're already on a war footing due to their incursion into Kurdistan). I really have no idea how that would pan out.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 18:35 |
|
suboptimal posted:Except it may not be the US that would bomb that site, it would more likely be Israel or perhaps Turkey. Israel has never needed a pretext to bomb reactors in other countries (Osirak in 1983, the other Syrian site in 2007) so this would be par for the course for them. Additionally, Turkey's been taking a way harder stance towards Syria in recent months, even allowing an insurgent group to operate from its border region. Saudi Arabia just got itself a hawkish new crown prince who has no tolerance for Iran and its allies, of which Syria is one. It's not outside the realm of possibility that one of these three might take action on their own. How does Obama and the Rotschilds fit into this all? If you are going to suggest that the IAEA is part of the conspiracy, then who is controlling them? Was Operation Orchard also a part of the plan to overthrow the Syrian government or was that unrelated to this conspiracy? And what should Israel/Turkey/the Reptiloids actually bomb, a cotton plant? There's no sense in this. You're just picking up unrelated bits and pieces, rolling them together and thinking "yep, that proves it, IAEA is part of them now."
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 18:46 |
|
suboptimal posted:A fight between Turkey and Syria would be something without precedent. I'd imagine there's a good parity of arms between the two countries, with Turkey maybe having a slight edge in terms of combat readiness (since they're already on a war footing due to their incursion into Kurdistan). I really have no idea how that would pan out. It would depend who instigates it, wouldn't it? Turkey's a NATO country, so all the other NATO countries have to back them up if Syria attacks them. As for Turkey attacking Syria, they're still dealing with the aftermath from that earthquake, so that would take some of the wind out of an attack by them. At the moment at least, itès in the best interest of both sides not to start anything, though with the stance Turkey has been taking recently who knows what could happen.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 18:48 |
|
Nenonen posted:How does Obama and the Rotschilds fit into this all? If you are going to suggest that the IAEA is part of the conspiracy, then who is controlling them? Was Operation Orchard also a part of the plan to overthrow the Syrian government or was that unrelated to this conspiracy? And what should Israel/Turkey/the Reptiloids actually bomb, a cotton plant? There's no sense in this. You're just picking up unrelated bits and pieces, rolling them together and thinking "yep, that proves it, IAEA is part of them now." I've re-read this post like five times and I still have no idea what the gently caress you're talking about here. Where on earth did I ever claim that there was some sort of conspiracy against Syria? All I did point out was that there are regional powers other than the US that could act against a purported Syrian nuclear complex on their own initiative.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 18:54 |
|
Narmi posted:It would depend who instigates it, wouldn't it? Turkey's a NATO country, so all the other NATO countries have to back them up if Syria attacks them. As for Turkey attacking Syria, they're still dealing with the aftermath from that earthquake, so that would take some of the wind out of an attack by them. I would argue with the presumption that Turkey would call NATO in. To do so would completely undermine their position as an emergent regional power. This isn't an existential threat for Turkey, its a challenge based on its perception of its authority as the prototypical Islamic democracy. Calling in NATO would be a disaster for them.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 18:54 |
|
suboptimal posted:
At the risk of of starting a Tom Clancy derail, I was under the impression that the Turkish military was second only to Israel in the region and Syria was just another middle eastern circus troupe used to stifle internal dissent but not to fight a serious war.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 19:02 |
|
suboptimal posted:A fight between Turkey and Syria would be something without precedent. I'd imagine there's a good parity of arms between the two countries, with Turkey maybe having a slight edge in terms of combat readiness (since they're already on a war footing due to their incursion into Kurdistan). I really have no idea how that would pan out. IM_DA_DECIDER posted:At the risk of of starting a Tom Clancy derail, I was under the impression that the Turkish military was second only to Israel in the region and Syria was just another middle eastern circus troupe used to stifle internal dissent but not to fight a serious war. suboptimal posted:
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 19:18 |
|
In regards to the hypothetical Turkey-Syria war, there basically is no parity. The Turkish armed forces are not only larger, but more importantly much more advanced and better trained than their Syrian counterparts. Aside from basically always having a better economy to equip the military, being a NATO member for 50 years, and one of the most strategically placed NATO members, has its advantages. Heck just look at the difference in military spending: http://www.globalsecurity.org/milit...ld/spending.htm Syria on paper has a lot of armor, but a lot of it is old, wiki says it has around 1,000 T-72s as it'a main battle thank, of which 100 something were upgraded by an Italian firm. God knows how many of them are actually running. Also Turkey hasn't face many defections from military units during ongoing mass protests against their government.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 19:27 |
|
Jut posted:That should have been planned a long long time ago. ThePutty posted:
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 19:32 |
|
Killer robot posted:
One thing I've taken away from Caro's videos is that this Libya conflict seems almost like a video game sometimes, even every FPS trope about storing weapons and ammunition.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 19:32 |
|
Amused to Death posted:In regards to the hypothetical Turkey-Syria war, there basically is no parity. The Turkish armed forces are not only larger, but more importantly much more advanced and better trained than their Syrian counterparts. Aside from basically always having a better economy to equip the military, being a NATO member for 50 years, and one of the most strategically placed NATO members, has its advantages. Heck just look at the difference in military spending:
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 19:46 |
|
THE HORSES rear end posted:One thing I've taken away from Caro's videos is that this Libya conflict seems almost like a video game sometimes, even every FPS trope about storing weapons and ammunition. Plus barrels, don't forget those.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 19:48 |
|
suboptimal posted:
You stepped in to support Ultras Lazios when he said "I'm usually not one for conspiracies however..." and didn't clearly say that you disagreed with his insinuation, so of course I would assume that you agreed that it is a conspiracy. In this thread (nay, in Internet) it's more than likely, anyway. But even without conspiracy theories, I can't see where the connection is here. 1) What would Israel bomb based on this? 2) If that happened, what would it do to remove Assad, if anything? 3) If 1 happened, wouldn't Israel have done it even without the protests going on? 4) Why should Turkey care about Syria's nuclear program? 5) Why should Saudi Arabia care about Syria's nuclear program? There's just absolutely nothing tying the IAEA report to any real or imagined intervention plans aimed at removing Assad.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 19:57 |
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2013 17:43 |
|
Nenonen posted:You stepped in to support Ultras Lazios when he said "I'm usually not one for conspiracies however..." and didn't clearly say that you disagreed with his insinuation, so of course I would assume that you agreed that it is a conspiracy. In this thread (nay, in Internet) it's more than likely, anyway.
|
| # ? Nov 1, 2011 20:09 |

















