|
Doccers posted:Theoretically by calling it an EU action and not a NATO action...
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 23:50 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2024 16:45 |
|
From the Guardian live blog Mr Hague said that, as well as laying charter planes, he was not ruling out the possibility of using military flights "without permission".
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2011 20:13 |
|
davebo posted:Didn't someone say Obama was going to speak like an hour ago? Did that happen yet?
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2011 21:07 |
|
How do I use twitterfall.com? #Tripoli isn't listed under trends, and if I put it in "Lists" or "Searches" nothing happens. I don't really use Twitter so forgive my ignorance. Edit: OK- seems to be working now. Is there a way to have a timestamp on the tweets? Ewan fucked around with this message at 18:38 on Feb 25, 2011 |
# ¿ Feb 25, 2011 18:35 |
|
SERPUS posted:Not goons, but media outlets. EDIT: Image that describes the combinations from Wikipedia (link to the discussion too) Ewan fucked around with this message at 20:25 on Feb 25, 2011 |
# ¿ Feb 25, 2011 20:21 |
|
Jut posted:They won't act because it's not in the Security councils mandate to act unless a genocide is going on. UNSCR 1674 commits the UN to act to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. I have used "crimes against humanity" thrown around a lot in reference to these current events in Libya, including I am sure by David Cameron and I seem to recall the Ban Ki-Moon However, I am sure that imposing Sanctions counts as "acting". Ewan fucked around with this message at 21:25 on Feb 25, 2011 |
# ¿ Feb 25, 2011 21:22 |
|
The RAF has evacuated ~150 Brits from the desert areas using 2 x C130 Hercules - this has been confirmed by our Defence Secretary. The BBC News security correspondent has said the operation involved the use of SAS & SBS also involved dealing with "heavily armed people". The fact this is written as fact rather than "reports suggest" means to me he's got the info from somewhere credible. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12588947
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2011 19:54 |
|
harskarenjag posted:Ghadaffi, Gaddafi, Qaddafi...What the gently caress is his name? I've seen so many different spellings of it and no one article ever mentions why they chose a specific one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_al-Gaddafi#Name ^^ This has some good information on it (including which press outlets use which spellings) as well as a cool diagram showing the different alternatives (which I posted earlier in the thread). EDIT: In fact, the diagram above is the one I am referring to.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2011 12:04 |
|
The Guardian blog has posted this funky piece http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBY-0n4esNY (Special thanks to anyone who can find me what the source of the girl dancing vid is )
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2011 18:16 |
|
Interesting article from the former British Ambassador to Libya. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8350014/We-must-stand-ready-to-intervene-in-Libya.html He discusses why he thinks we should be looking at "armed humanitarian intervention" - he's talking the next step on from no-fly zones.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2011 19:06 |
|
Patter Song posted:Just a quick point about N. Korea, because I know it's a digression, but it's been talked about a lot here. Whatever respect Kim himself has will not necessarily transfer to his son (and, by all accounts, isn't transferring very well). There's a more than decent chance that the DPRK's military will decide after KJI's death that they don't want to be ruled by a roly-poly, imbecilic fellow in his mid-20s and organize a coup and a military regime. Whether that'd be an improvement is a tough question, but it'd be a hell of a change.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2011 19:39 |
|
Not seen this mentioned in the thread, but one of the Hercules that was involved in the second (of two) RAF evacuations came under small arms fire and was damaged yesterday. The BBC's Frank Gardner says on Twitter: Im told the group who fired on the RAF rescue Hercules yesterday mistook it for a regime plane and have apologised
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2011 21:40 |
|
BBC News are reporting on the TV that the SAS guys have been released. The report suggests there were eight people, of which 6 were SF. They landed by helicopter at around 0200 near Benghazi and were arrested after they were found to be carrying weapons, explosives and documents (including passports of multiple nationalities). Libyan State TV has played what it says is a recording of a telephone conversation between the British Ambassador to Libya and a Rebel Commander, where he is talking about what they can do to help "clear up this misunderstanding".
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2011 18:42 |
|
Love it @dhdfisher Syria Traffic Update: seems to be some disruptions to public transport in #Damascus due to recent events There are a few tweets coming in now that Iran's IRGC Qods Foorce commander Soleimani was also killed in yesterday's bombings. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/158048#utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=fanpage Unverified of course, but I would expect significant if true.
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2012 19:14 |
|
Capt Murphy posted:The Guardian Liveblog has the draft of the resolution as well as some more quotes. The one that was vetoed: http://un-report.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/uk-draft-resolution-on-syria-unsmis.html The proposed UK draft: http://un-report.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/uk-draft-resolution-to-renew-unsmis.html The one that has just been agreed by the UNSC (Which was another UK draft) http://un-report.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/security-council-resolution-2059-on.html
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2012 17:36 |
|
my dad posted:Can Turkey invoke Article 5 because of this? Is Ankara not being in Europe an issue, and does this terrorist attack qualify as an attack on Turkey if it turns out it was caused by ISIS? (edit: Or "caused by ISIS") Article IV, however, allows any NATO country to request consultations should they consider their security to be threatened. It was under this that Turkey requested consultations twice in 2012 after their jet was shot down and some cross-border shelling, leading to the deployment of US and German Patriots. Turkey also requested consultations under Article IV after the bombings in July this year. It may well request them after this, too. Aside from an earlier Turkish request (2003), the only other time Article IV consultations has occurred was at the request of Poland after Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea.
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2015 23:34 |
|
I'll take with a pinch of salt for now the conspiracy theories about the Turkish gov or "deep state" being behind the Ankara bombing. Not ruling it out, but it seems there'd be far too much to lose in such an act than to gain. Nevertheless, it clearly isn't going to help tensions, not least with Turkey conducting air strikes against the PKK the day after... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34501617 The Turkish government turned down a ceasefire from the PKK on Saturday - does anyone have any more on that..? http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/11/us-turkey-kurds-airstrikes-idUSKCN0S50B620151011
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2015 23:59 |
|
MothraAttack posted:Going to post this before one of our more knowledge Kurdish affairs posters weighs in, but apparently Turkey attacked the YPG today and said that any attempt to cross the Euphrates' western bank (I.e. toward Jarablus) would be met with firepower.
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2015 16:12 |
|
Dusty Baker 2 posted:I made a map of the global war against ISIS, are there any fixes/anything I missed/labelled improperly? It's rather simplified and doesn't go into the difference between supporting governments and local factions but still. Also you have UK as 'fighting ISIS in multiple locations'. It's only Iraq for the UK, unless you're counting the single drone strike in Syria (which, whether you agree with/believe it or not, was due to the British government assessing an imminent threat from the individual against the UK). And NATO isn't really relevant either. Its mission (Resolute Support) in Afghanistan is about building the Afghan Security Forces, helping them in the fight against primarily the Taleban. I'm sure US forces will his IS targets there, but that will probably be a unilateral US decision under Op Freedom Sentinel (which is US not NATO).
|
# ¿ Nov 7, 2015 18:30 |
|
http://aa.com.tr/en 97.9 counted, 51.57% yes, 48.43% no By my maths, it's a 470k gap, with a similar number left to count so it's gonna end up a very narrow "Yes"
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2017 17:41 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2024 16:45 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2017 18:05 |