|
Scrotos posted:Well you know who I want so if it gets to me Art feel free to auto pick for me. No can do. I will skip in front of you and take Sandy
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 20:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 04:29 |
|
|
ArtVandelay posted:No can do. I will skip in front of you and take Sandy Welp than I will get whatever I get. I just accepted an awesome new job and will be out all weekend partying  Steaks for everyone! Because I am a baller!
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 20:43
|
|
|
Scrotos posted:Welp than I will get whatever I get. I just accepted an awesome new job and will be out all weekend partying Give me your job, I need a real job. Even with a goddamn Schedule A letter, I can't get the government to even give me an interview. I'm pretty sure that's illegal!
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 20:46
|
|
|
ArtVandelay posted:Give me your job, I need a real job. You can't handle my job  You probably could, I think being ADD is a requirement for programmers.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 20:56
|
|
|
Alright, spoonfed has joined and we are full. I'm sending out sitemails to the next in line right now.
ArtVandelay fucked around with this message at 21:54 on May 13, 2011 |
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 21:47
|
|
|
Scrotos posted:Well you know who I want so if it gets to me Art feel free to auto pick for me.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 22:37
|
|
|
I just want to take a second and say my Low A team in Harold Reynolds is 22-0 and I don't even have my A prospects there.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 23:09
|
|
|
 http://www.whatifsports.com/slb/Boxscore.aspx?gid=14694993&pid=1&pbp=1
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 23:12
|
|
|
AlleyViper posted:
What's Dutch Leonard's beef with Mike Carey?!? e: I originally wrote Dennis Leonard because I hadn't looked at the full boxscore. But I suppose that could have been feasible as well.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 23:15
|
|
|
We seem to have hit an absolute wall in the 2 man band. I guess I shouldn't really expect anything tonight, though. Everybody besides me has lives and is probably going out tonight 
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2011 23:21
|
|
|
Gotta admit making a pick before monday seems farfetched for me
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 01:33
|
|
|
toadee posted:Gotta admit making a pick before monday seems farfetched for me You're probably right. Anyone want to tell manifunk it's his turn to pick?
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 01:49
|
|
|
ArtVandelay posted:Anyone want to tell manifunk it's his turn to pick? ...but it's not? (if you're still referring to 2-Man Band)
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:14
|
|
|
nasboat posted:...but it's not? It is. Clk just went, now it is manifunks turn.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:17
|
|
|
ArtVandelay posted:It is. Clk just went, now it is manifunks turn. What about dodgebob and Calhoop?
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:18
|
|
|
nasboat posted:What about dodgebob and Calhoop? They are in the hitters draft. Manifunk is in the pitchers draft.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:20
|
|
|
ArtVandelay posted:They are in the hitters draft. Manifunk is in the pitchers draft. Why are the two drafts separate? I don't understand why we're not just going in order, with everyone picking either a hitter or pitcher, whichever one they didn't take first time around.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:21
|
|
|
nasboat posted:Why are the two drafts separate? I don't understand why we're not just going in order, with everyone picking either a hitter or pitcher, whichever one they didn't take first time around. This is what tdoak did last season. I think it's better this way.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:24
|
|
|
nasboat posted:Why are the two drafts separate? I don't understand why we're not just going in order, with everyone picking either a hitter or pitcher, whichever one they didn't take first time around. There's really no reason to do it as a single draft or as two drafts, but this way I get to start considering my pitcher as soon as manifunk picks so I don't mind. The way things are going (Gibson was my standout hope) I'll need the extra time 
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:24
|
|
|
So dumb and extra confusing, really. Who's to say that the last guy that picked even site-mailed the correct person?
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:26
|
|
|
nasboat posted:Who's to say that the last guy that picked even site-mailed the correct person? If the rules are explained properly ahead of time it shouldn't be an issue.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:27
|
|
|
gently caress. sorry, Art. Didn't check page 3.  also, I see that both drafts go at the same time, so that's not as bad....if dodgebob would get going! Art, might not be a bad idea to take your post from page 3 and edit it into the OP, since I was going back to it to see who had been drafted and what the draft order was. nasboat fucked around with this message at 02:31 on May 14, 2011 |
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:28
|
|
|
nasboat posted:So dumb and extra confusing, really. Who's to say that the last guy that picked even site-mailed the correct person? This is not at all confusing. I posted the draft order on page 3. Nobody in season 2 had a problem understanding this.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:28
|
|
|
I actually like it better as two separate ones now that I am aware that both of them go at the same time, and theoretically, it should speed up the whole process. That was actually my whole concern in the first place...waiting for no reason. Please ignore my previous annoyances.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:33
|
|
|
Ignored  Gyroball and gardenald, you are up next in selecting Pitchers!
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 02:54
|
|
|
Yeah so I figured Gibson or Perry would make it this far, gimmie fifteen minutes or so 
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 03:08
|
|
|
gently caress Tim Keefe got taken now what am I gonna do
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 03:19
|
|
|
There's going to be literally no pitching left by the time it gets back to me
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 03:50
|
|
|
I'm seeing options. Not ideal options but they are options, and some of them probably won't be picked
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 04:05
|
|
|
All my targets blacklisted or off the board...totally lost...Deacon Phillippe? Yeah I don't even know who that is.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 04:10
|
|
|
gyroball posted:All my targets blacklisted or off the board...totally lost...Deacon Phillippe? Yeah I don't even know who that is. Phillippe's not a bad pick, I was looking at before deciding I'd look for someone with less innings on account of having Ruth's to fall back on. Actually a good pick who's still around is Bob "loving" Caruthers, but I'm leaning for someone more like Toad Ramsey.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 04:18
|
|
|
Although I've just come across another option, that really only works for me because Ruth has 900 innings. Lady Baldwin has 2 really good years, one 270 innings one 640 innings, and like nothing after that. The question is whether 1800 innings total is enough for only Ruths as fielders in Coors, especially with 640 of them being one pitcher and sort of hard to draw innings from.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 04:32
|
|
|
Male. Bi. Unix. posted:Although I've just come across another option, that really only works for me because Ruth has 900 innings. Lady Baldwin has 2 really good years, one 270 innings one 640 innings, and like nothing after that. The question is whether 1800 innings total is enough for only Ruths as fielders in Coors, especially with 640 of them being one pitcher and sort of hard to draw innings from. I'd say, for this league, you need at least 2000 innings. But it really depends on if those Ruth/Baldwin years are REALLY good. Because there is going to be lots of passed balls and errors.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 05:20
|
|
|
The Baldwin years are great. Ruth's are pretty good, but not great. Overall the team would end up with roughly 1800 quality innings and then another 200-300 poo poo innings. It'd be an interesting experiment, I think, and it's actually a situation unique to Ruth so I'm the only one who can try it. I might go for it on that basis alone.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 06:04
|
|
|
Male. Bi. Unix. posted:Phillippe's not a bad pick, I was looking at before deciding I'd look for someone with less innings on account of having Ruth's to fall back on. Actually a good pick who's still around is Bob "loving" Caruthers, but I'm leaning for someone more like Toad Ramsey. Bob Caruthers would be an awesome pick if you wanted to draft a short career deadballer like King Kelly and needed extra bats to go with him. As is, Bob's ERC# isn't really competitive with guys that are even left and his pitcher hitting doesn't matter so he's kind of lovely.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 08:45
|
|
|
kensei, I believe it's your pick in the hitter draft for Two Man Band. Please don't take who I want.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 18:45
|
|
|
Did that dude seriously just pick lave cross. Oookay.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 18:56
|
|
|
How bad are MIF in the OF, anyway?
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 19:05
|
|
|
ArtVandelay posted:Did that dude seriously just pick lave cross. Oookay. I was considering Lave Cross too FWIW
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 19:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 04:29 |
|
|
Maybe I'm not giving enough weight to defense, but I feel like there are two clearly better offensive choices sitting out there that I have ranked 1/2, I'm just not sure in which order. Also, I was looking at Rod Carew, but I'm not sure how he'd work. ArtVandelay posted:Did that dude seriously just pick lave cross. Oookay. Are you seriously posting here on the forums when I'm making proxy picks for you in the prog draft? 
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2011 19:12
|
|