Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jimlad
Jan 8, 2005
Just to clear things up because there seems to be some confusion: purple fringing is a form of chromatic aberration, more specifically axial (longitudinal) CA. It's caused by shorter wavelengths not being quite as focused as longer wavelengths in non-apochromatic lens designs, resulting in a violet halo around high contrast areas. It also contributes to general haziness much like spherical aberration, reducing overall image contrast. You'll generally get the effect more in bright sunlight at large apertures.

The only lenses I've seen that don't significantly exhibit this behaviour are fairly specialist ones like the top-end Zeiss APO lenses (and you can still get those to do it a tiny bit if you really try). I wouldn't freak out about it in normal lenses; it's pretty common especially in cheaper, large-aperture lenses, but you can easily correct it in post with minimal loss of image quality. It's more the general result of lower contrast that I personally care about, but sometimes it can be a desirable effect. :eng101:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

kdabr
Feb 17, 2011
Has anyone else noticed that a lot of the Olympus micro four thirds lenses have recently dropped in price to the lowest they've ever been? Is this temporary? Any idea why most of the line is so discounted?

http://camelcamelcamel.com/Olympus-25mm-f1-8-Interchangeable-Lens/product/B00HWMP0XG?context=browse
http://camelcamelcamel.com/Olympus-Zuiko-Digital-12-40mm-Interchangeable/product/B00EY3YGBS?context=browse
http://camelcamelcamel.com/Olympus-ED-M-300mm-f4-8-6-7-Zoom/product/B00B3QYBIW?context=browse

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

Strong dollar.

LiquidRain
May 21, 2007

Watch the madness!

Lenses are made in Japan. (the good ones anyway :D ) The companies that make them are in Japan. The yen is weakening (on purpose) and the dollar is strengthening. (on purpose)

Lens prices here in Japan haven't shifted at all.

TheGoatTrick
Aug 1, 2002

Semi-aquatic personification of unstoppable douchery

LiquidRain posted:

Lenses are made in Japan. (the good ones anyway :D )
None of those lenses is made in Japan. The only Olympus lens I've seen recently that was made in Japan was a 75 mm. Even my 12-40 was made in China.

curried lamb of God
Aug 31, 2001

we are all Marwinners
It's a summer sale, probably ending this month

http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/featured_weekly_deals?icn=topnav&ici=savingsnav_featured-weekly-deals-chip

RCK-101
Feb 19, 2008

If a recruiter asks you to become a nuclear sailor.. you say no
So I tried out the Sony a7 full frame camera recently, and my god it is a good camera. It's light, full frame and unexpectedly balanced(though because of my man hands I will have to get the grip), and I was wondering if anyone in the thread has used it, or any other mirrorless cameras with a viewfinder.

Doctor w-rw-rw-
Jun 24, 2008

Ryand-Smith posted:

So I tried out the Sony a7 full frame camera recently, and my god it is a good camera. It's light, full frame and unexpectedly balanced(though because of my man hands I will have to get the grip), and I was wondering if anyone in the thread has used it, or any other mirrorless cameras with a viewfinder.

I have an a7S. I like it a lot.

Ropes4u
May 2, 2009


Replacing the 17 and 45 with a12-40mm that is both bigger and heavier is Tempting stupid right?

TheGoatTrick
Aug 1, 2002

Semi-aquatic personification of unstoppable douchery

Ropes4u posted:

Replacing the 17 and 45 with a12-40mm that is both bigger and heavier is Tempting stupid right?
Yes, you should keep all three.

Dr. Despair
Nov 4, 2009


39 perfect posts with each roll.

The 12-40 owns.

Corb3t
Jun 7, 2003

So I got my X-T10 with 18-55mm lens, and I'm pretty happy with it. There is one thing that makes me wish I had gone with the X-T1 - the grip is a bit small for my hands. I doubt it's worth spending the extra $400, but I do wish it was a little bigger.

It's a beautiful camera and I like how solid it feels compared to the entry level D-SLRs that I've used in the past.

Corb3t fucked around with this message at 04:56 on Aug 3, 2015

HPL
Aug 28, 2002

Worst case scenario.

Ryand-Smith posted:

So I tried out the Sony a7 full frame camera recently, and my god it is a good camera. It's light, full frame and unexpectedly balanced(though because of my man hands I will have to get the grip), and I was wondering if anyone in the thread has used it, or any other mirrorless cameras with a viewfinder.

Sorry, we're not allowed to talk about Sony cameras in here because of firmware updates lol lol lol. Fuji chat only.

But yes, I have an A7S and it owns.

MMD3
May 16, 2006

Montmartre -> Portland
Has anybody read any good reviews regarding low light performance of the A7RII that they can point me to?

Really really considering dumping the Canon dslr rig in favor of a mirrorless setup but I'm kind of thinking I want to wait till Fuji's X-T2 is announced to make any commitments to a platform. I'm just loving my X100T's control layout too much to jump over to Sony so quickly.

Star War Sex Parrot
Oct 2, 2003

Star War Sex Parrot posted:

I just did the former and am most likely doing the latter before my next vacation in a month or so. I was just playing with the X-T1 again at Best Buy today. I'm glad they have the kit zoom on there since it makes it easy to compare the 23mm and 35mm focal lengths to see which prime I want first.
Ended up grabbing the X-T1 and 23mm over the weekend. I decided to wait on the 35mm prime to see how the f/2 version turns out later this year. I like the compact look of it.

It's going to take a little while to transition from the 5DIII's controls, and also figure out how to get the Fuji set up just the way I like it.

Doctor w-rw-rw-
Jun 24, 2008

MMD3 posted:

Has anybody read any good reviews regarding low light performance of the A7RII that they can point me to?

https://www.cinema5d.com/sony-a7rii-review-first-impressions-footage/
https://www.cinema5d.com/sony-a7rii-a7s-lab/

MMD3
May 16, 2006

Montmartre -> Portland

Thanks, but I'm really looking for reviews of stills performance. I don't shoot video at all.

LiquidRain
May 21, 2007

Watch the madness!

Star War Sex Parrot posted:

Ended up grabbing the X-T1 and 23mm over the weekend. I decided to wait on the 35mm prime to see how the f/2 version turns out later this year. I like the compact look of it.

It's going to take a little while to transition from the 5DIII's controls, and also figure out how to get the Fuji set up just the way I like it.
I was wondering how long it'd take for you to crack. :) All that sweet, sweet Canon gear gone, for something you can actually bring around with you if you want!

You know where to find me if you have any questions. :D

Xabi
Jan 21, 2006

Inventor of the Marmite pasty
I have a question I was hoping you could help me with.

I bought an OM-D E-M5 earlier this year, but I've hardly used it. It's not really compact enough for me to bring it everywhere and thus I often end up preferring my D700, my analogue Olympus XA2 or even my phone instead. I also find the OM-D a bit slow and clunky (party because I haven't used it enough to have all the buttons remembered in my fingers). With the D700 or the XA2 I can fire off an exposure within a second.

So for me, the OM-D is like a big compact or small DSLR but without the image quality and speed of the D700 or the simplicity and speed of a point-and-shoot like the XA2.

I'm using it with the Lumix 14 mm. Is there a simpler and smaller camera I can replace it with, and perhaps still keep the lens? Or am I better off simply selling both camera and lens? The X100 series looks pretty nice, but they're a bit too big to my taste and also a bit slow to use compared to a DSLR (or so says my friend). Do they even make cameras that fit my description? If I could make a camera from scratch, I'd make a fixed-lens point-and-shoot with zone focusing like the XA2 but I'm perhaps the only one wanthing something like that.

spog
Aug 7, 2004

It's your own bloody fault.

Xabi posted:

I have a question I was hoping you could help me with.

I bought an OM-D E-M5 earlier this year, but I've hardly used it. It's not really compact enough for me to bring it everywhere and thus I often end up preferring my D700, my analogue Olympus XA2 or even my phone instead. I also find the OM-D a bit slow and clunky (party because I haven't used it enough to have all the buttons remembered in my fingers). With the D700 or the XA2 I can fire off an exposure within a second.

So for me, the OM-D is like a big compact or small DSLR but without the image quality and speed of the D700 or the simplicity and speed of a point-and-shoot like the XA2.

I'm using it with the Lumix 14 mm. Is there a simpler and smaller camera I can replace it with, and perhaps still keep the lens? Or am I better off simply selling both camera and lens? The X100 series looks pretty nice, but they're a bit too big to my taste and also a bit slow to use compared to a DSLR (or so says my friend). Do they even make cameras that fit my description? If I could make a camera from scratch, I'd make a fixed-lens point-and-shoot with zone focusing like the XA2 but I'm perhaps the only one wanthing something like that.

Panasonic GF6 / GF7 fit your bill?

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

Isn't that just about the same size?

alkanphel
Mar 24, 2004

Star War Sex Parrot posted:

Ended up grabbing the X-T1 and 23mm over the weekend. I decided to wait on the 35mm prime to see how the f/2 version turns out later this year. I like the compact look of it.

It's going to take a little while to transition from the 5DIII's controls, and also figure out how to get the Fuji set up just the way I like it.

You're gonna love that combo a lot. I also switched to the X-T1 and 23/1.4 from a 5D2 and 35L - the Fuji combo is much better!

spog
Aug 7, 2004

It's your own bloody fault.

evil_bunnY posted:

Isn't that just about the same size?

267g. 108 x 67 x 37 mm
469g. 124 x 85 x 45 mm

Depends on your opinion, I guess.

I think the GFx bodies are about as small as you can get with m4/3

Ropes4u
May 2, 2009

Mr. Despair posted:

The 12-40 owns.

How giant does it feel on the camera, and in the camera bag?

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


Xabi posted:

I have a question I was hoping you could help me with.

I bought an OM-D E-M5 earlier this year, but I've hardly used it. It's not really compact enough for me to bring it everywhere and thus I often end up preferring my D700, my analogue Olympus XA2 or even my phone instead. I also find the OM-D a bit slow and clunky (party because I haven't used it enough to have all the buttons remembered in my fingers). With the D700 or the XA2 I can fire off an exposure within a second.

So for me, the OM-D is like a big compact or small DSLR but without the image quality and speed of the D700 or the simplicity and speed of a point-and-shoot like the XA2.

I'm using it with the Lumix 14 mm. Is there a simpler and smaller camera I can replace it with, and perhaps still keep the lens? Or am I better off simply selling both camera and lens? The X100 series looks pretty nice, but they're a bit too big to my taste and also a bit slow to use compared to a DSLR (or so says my friend). Do they even make cameras that fit my description? If I could make a camera from scratch, I'd make a fixed-lens point-and-shoot with zone focusing like the XA2 but I'm perhaps the only one wanthing something like that.

Depending how small you want to go, I'd look at either a Gx7 (pretty much the same size, but a bit less clunky form factor) or GM1 (no viewfinder but teeny) if you wanted to stick with the format. I've never really had a good look at Olympus outside of fiddling with them in shops, but for user interface, most reviewers seem to prefer Panasonic for intuitiveness and ease of use.

Finger Prince fucked around with this message at 12:31 on Aug 3, 2015

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

spog posted:

267g. 108 x 67 x 37 mm
469g. 124 x 85 x 45 mm

Depends on your opinion, I guess.

I think the GFx bodies are about as small as you can get with m4/3
I thought the GM were smaller

Wengy
Feb 6, 2008

evil_bunnY posted:

I thought the GM were smaller

They are

spog
Aug 7, 2004

It's your own bloody fault.

evil_bunnY posted:

I thought the GM were smaller

There's a very good reason why I didn't mention that one and that is because I forgot about it



The M5 is somewhere between the GX7 and G6?

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

spog posted:

There's a very good reason why I didn't mention that one and that is because I forgot about it
Hahaha nice. I kinda wanted a GM5 but I looked through the viewfinder and it made me sad.

Xabi
Jan 21, 2006

Inventor of the Marmite pasty
Thanks a lot! The GX7 is about the same size as the X100 so a bit too big for me, I'd think. The GM1 looks interesting though. No viewfinder is probably not a problem, I'd use a camera like this for vacations and mostly snapshotty stuff anyway. What was so sad about the GM5's viewfinder?

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

It's not bad per se, it's just small, and I was comparing it to my d800's, and a short stint with an XT-1.

whatever7
Jul 26, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

spog posted:

There's a very good reason why I didn't mention that one and that is because I forgot about it



The M5 is somewhere between the GX7 and G6?

GF7 is the lightest m43 body with a flip screen, only 63 gram heavier than the GM1.

TheAngryDrunk
Jan 31, 2003

"I don't know why I know that; I took four years of Spanish."
Infrared X-T1!

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4180583057/fujifilm-announces-x-t1-ir-for-infrared-photography

Phone
Jul 30, 2005

親子丼をほしい。

Hey, do you or anyone else with an X100T willing to share what you're using/traveling with? I'm going to be picking one up within the next few months, and want to know what are some things to consider.

Animal
Apr 8, 2003

Phone posted:

Hey, do you or anyone else with an X100T willing to share what you're using/traveling with? I'm going to be picking one up within the next few months, and want to know what are some things to consider.

I have backpacked quite a bit with mine, and am constantly traveling with it (airline pilot). All I bring is a Snapr 20 sling (I rarely use the included case), a lens hood, an extra battery or two, charger, and maybe a Gorillapod.

HPL
Aug 28, 2002

Worst case scenario.

MMD3 posted:

Has anybody read any good reviews regarding low light performance of the A7RII that they can point me to?

Really really considering dumping the Canon dslr rig in favor of a mirrorless setup but I'm kind of thinking I want to wait till Fuji's X-T2 is announced to make any commitments to a platform. I'm just loving my X100T's control layout too much to jump over to Sony so quickly.

All indicators seem to point to the A7RII being very good, but not quite at A7S levels with regards to high ISO performance. If I were you, I'd wait for the A7SII. If they bring the AF improvements and stabilization to the S series and up the resolution, it would be a no-brainer for you.

mes
Apr 28, 2006

Phone posted:

Hey, do you or anyone else with an X100T willing to share what you're using/traveling with? I'm going to be picking one up within the next few months, and want to know what are some things to consider.

Extra batteries for sure, generic ones are really cheap, the camera chews through batteries really quickly. I would also recommend getting a filter adapter so you can use a generic lens cap; the camera comes with a nice push on cap, but it's a bit bulky and would probably be annoying to replace if you lose it.

Dren
Jan 5, 2001

Pillbug

Phone posted:

Hey, do you or anyone else with an X100T willing to share what you're using/traveling with? I'm going to be picking one up within the next few months, and want to know what are some things to consider.

couple of extra batteries stored in tic tac boxes and put in my pocket + a tripod if i feel like it

timrenzi574
Sep 11, 2001
Brought mine to Beijing earlier this year - just the camera , nissin i40 and a few extra batteries. I had it all in a little thinktank mirrorless mover shoulder bag.

Airport security made me throw out most of my batteries on my way out of the country though, apparently China has strict limits on how many li-on batteries you can have on a plane with you. Good thing they were all cheap sterlingtek ones.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Splinter
Jul 4, 2003
Cowabunga!

Phone posted:

Hey, do you or anyone else with an X100T willing to share what you're using/traveling with? I'm going to be picking one up within the next few months, and want to know what are some things to consider.

My kit included (didn't always bring everything): MeFoto Backpacker, GorillaPod Hybrid, 49mm filter adapter, 49mm polarizer, 49mm 10 stop ND, short cable release.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply