|
Roman posted:3 new clips from Amazing Spider-Man: All three of those clips were impressive. I love that they are dealing with his strength like that, it's fantastic. I really like the injection of humor, which is kind of an important part of any Spidey movie.
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 01:20 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 17:18 |
|
|
That first clip was awesome.
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 01:44 |
|
|
The strength clip is the very definition of Parker Luck. This movie is going to be awesome.
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 02:55 |
|
|
Paul Allen posted:Why would they release 3 new clips for a summer tentpole movie in such an AWFUL format? I can't get over how lovely they look, to say nothing of the aspect ratio. As someone in marketing I'm blown away by the horrible execution. Because those are all scanned off a box of Kellog's cereal, and when you are 13 and using a box of cereal to watch movie clips, you do not care about quality, you just think it's so cool. I absolutely love the knife clip.
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 13:23 |
|
|
Finally a actually funny sarcastic Spider Man. Hurrrray! I loved all the humour scenes, I don't understand the 2nd clip though I can't tell what is happening. Something something then jumps on ceiling of train.
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 14:29 |
|
|
Hollis posted:Finally a actually funny sarcastic Spider Man. Hurrrray! I loved all the humour scenes, I don't understand the 2nd clip though I can't tell what is happening. Something something then jumps on ceiling of train. He's passed out on the subway and some joker/homeless man tries to balance a beer bottle on his forehead, which ends up surprising Peter who [instinctively?] leaps to the ceiling. This could be right after he's been bitten and is when he discovers his powers.
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 14:46 |
|
|
Hollis posted:Finally a actually funny sarcastic Spider Man. Hurrrray! I loved all the humour scenes, I don't understand the 2nd clip though I can't tell what is happening. Something something then jumps on ceiling of train.
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 15:17 |
|
|
SpaceMost posted:I wonder how funny sarcastic Spider-Man will affect the prospects of a Deadpool film. Sarcastic Spider-Man would probably be the best thing in the world for cameoes in other Marvel superhero movies, I think. During some particularly tough fight, the bad guy hears "Say cheese!" and spins around to see Spidey on the wall, taking a picture. Then he makes some joke about what's going on and leaves.  Come back here!
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 20:21 |
|
|
Barometer posted:During some particularly tough fight, the bad guy hears "Say cheese!" and spins around to see Spidey on the wall, taking a picture. Then he makes some joke about what's going on and leaves. That makes me wonder. I know Parker will take pictures of himself as Spider-Man in order to make money, but do the comics have instances where he uses his powers to actually advance his ability to perform real journalism? I'm mostly familiar with the movies, where his work as a newspaper photographer seems to be about as important to him, as a calling, as delivering pizzas.
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 20:47 |
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:That makes me wonder. I know Parker will take pictures of himself as Spider-Man in order to make money, but do the comics have instances where he uses his powers to actually advance his ability to perform real journalism? I'm mostly familiar with the movies, where his work as a newspaper photographer seems to be about as important to him, as a calling, as delivering pizzas. He would often team up with reporters to take the pictures for their stories, but I can't think of a time when Pete had his own non-Spider-Man exposé or anything. He's not really big into journalism, just stopping crime. Then again, my memory is poo poo so I could be wrong!
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 21:17 |
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:That makes me wonder. I know Parker will take pictures of himself as Spider-Man in order to make money, but do the comics have instances where he uses his powers to actually advance his ability to perform real journalism? I'm mostly familiar with the movies, where his work as a newspaper photographer seems to be about as important to him, as a calling, as delivering pizzas. He won a Pulitzer for taking pictures of the Sentry that was then wiped from everyone's memory to hide the existence of the Sentry and his ultimate evil second personality the Void.
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 23:12 |
|
|
Did he get to keep the Pulitzer?
|
| # ? Apr 3, 2012 23:17 |
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Did he get to keep the Pulitzer? It's Peter Parker. What do you think?
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 01:27 |
|
|
Welp, for all you Coulson fans...
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 13:47 |
|
|
Barometer posted:Sarcastic Spider-Man would probably be the best thing in the world for cameoes in other Marvel superhero movies, I think. Agreed, honestly I've always felt a scene like this should happen in every comic book movie no matter the company or tone.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 13:54 |
|
|
Nog posted:Welp, for all you Coulson fans... You know that actor has that poster hung up in his house. Because Clark "New Adventures of Old Christine" Gregg is not likely to get another badass poster like that for the rest of his life. Does he have an action figure?
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 13:59 |
|
|
thrawn527 posted:Does he have an action figure? If Patrick Dempsey can have one (for Dark of The Moon), than Gregg should too.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 14:04 |
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:That makes me wonder. I know Parker will take pictures of himself as Spider-Man in order to make money, but do the comics have instances where he uses his powers to actually advance his ability to perform real journalism? I'm mostly familiar with the movies, where his work as a newspaper photographer seems to be about as important to him, as a calling, as delivering pizzas. He did some paparazzi celebrity stalking briefly, but it was just to earn more cash. But he used his spider powers to hope fences and get all the juicy photos. Until guilt kicked in.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 14:19 |
|
|
Don't think this has been posted yet: new clip featuring Black Widow and Coulson
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 14:51 |
|
|
BrianWilly posted:Don't think this has been posted yet: new clip featuring Black Widow and Coulson -Edit I think it was pretty obvious they set up the shot specifically for that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...qfncpIjJM#t=29s quote:Does two seconds of bouncing boobs really ruin the film for you? It does bother me when its probably the only thing they are going to do with her. That type of scene is often used by Joss Whedon when he wants to establish one of his so-called "strong female characters". IShallRiseAgain fucked around with this message at Apr 4, 2012 around 15:13 |
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 14:57 |
|
|
IShallRiseAgain posted:Ugh, why the heck did they think making Joss Whedon the director was a good idea. I mean was the bouncing cleavage shot absolutely necessary? She has boobs. Those things bounce when you move around. How is that Joss Whedon's fault? I actually liked that clip. Kicking some rear end while in a chair is pretty rad.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:02 |
|
|
Does two seconds of bouncing boobs really ruin the film for you?
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:06 |
|
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:She has boobs. Those things bounce when you move around. How is that Joss Whedon's fault?
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:15 |
|
|
Yes because they made Joss Whedon the director of The Avengers, a woman's boobs bounce. THE HORROR. HOW DARE HE. Is this the part of the movie thread pipeline where we reach completely ridiculous levels of overreaction? I just wanna know what I can expect soon.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:16 |
|
|
The focus wasn't on the boobs, dude. There was nothing wrong with that clip as far as I could see Or do women have to cover themselves up when they do action scenes for it to be acceptable to you or something?
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:20 |
|
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:She has boobs. Those things bounce when you move around. How is that Joss Whedon's fault? Killer Elite has a similar action setup of Jason Statham fighting someone while tied to a chair (it's rad). Jason Statham has a dick. Without proper support, those bounce when you move around. And yet we didn't get a clear center-frame shot of that in the movie, because things like costuming and framing are active choices the director can control. Somewhere between a third and a half of the Youtube comments are about Scarlett Johansson's breasts. Marvel knows what they're doing here. Optimist with doubt posted:Does two seconds of bouncing boobs really ruin the film for you? Are two seconds of bouncing boobs really necessary for you to enjoy the film? It's hardly the worst example of sexism in the movie industry, but everything I've seen which promotes Scarlett Johansson's presence in the movie has relied on sexualizing her, and it's gross.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:21 |
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Somewhere between a third and a half of the Youtube comments are about Scarlett Johansson's breasts. Marvel knows what they're doing here. People that leave comments on youtube live in sewers and eat stray cats, I wouldn't use them as a cross-section for humanity.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:24 |
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Are two seconds of bouncing boobs really necessary for you to enjoy the film? No, i don't need any bouncing boobs, but two seconds of it isn't going to make me go "This is appalling. gently caress Joss Whedon!"
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:25 |
|
|
Comparing boobs to dicks in the classic gender-reversal litmus test, while admirable and applicable in many situations, is a total false equivalency in this specific situation because boobs and dicks are located on completely different parts of the body and it is a completely valid cinematic choice to aim your camera at an actor's upper chest and head instead of their groin in an action sequence focused on their upper chest and head. Scarlett's got big boobs and they're gonna bounce unless you literally strap them down. Is it a sexy shot? Sure. But there is nothing exploitative or demeaning or lewd about it. Shhhh, relax, it's okay.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:28 |
|
|
Did any of the Crank films have bouncing Stathem penis? If not, the third one should rectify this. In 3D.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:30 |
|
|
IShallRiseAgain posted:Ugh, why the heck did they think making Joss Whedon the director was a good idea. I mean was the bouncing cleavage shot absolutely necessary? What the gently caress are you talking about? I just watched the clip and her boobs bouncing around are incidental to the real focus of the action. If the clip were in slow motion while focused exclusively on her chest, then I might agree, but this is a stupid reaction.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:45 |
|
|
I was really looking forward to this movie, but then Joss Whedon had to go and allow a woman's breasts to conform to the laws of physics.  Guess I'll start getting amped up for TDKR instead!
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:47 |
|
|
Narciss posted:I was really looking forward to this movie, but then Joss Whedon had to go and allow a woman's breasts to conform to the laws of physics. I have bad news about Catwoman...
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:47 |
|
|
arioch posted:I have bad news about Catwoman... Jesus H. Christ, don't tell me she has boobs too...
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:49 |
|
|
Nog posted:Welp, for all you Coulson fans... I like how Nick Fury is apparantly cowering behind him.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:52 |
|
|
I don't care what anyone says. That clip was awesome  .Looking at the comments was (as always) a mistake, though.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:52 |
|
|
Nog posted:Welp, for all you Coulson fans... I actually kind of want this poster.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:56 |
|
|
Narciss posted:Jesus H. Christ, don't tell me she has boobs too... I went looking for a catwoman pic from TDKR but what I found was this:   Back on track--  I guess we can now also expect a derail into how dare Nolan emphasize Catwoman's ... other assets.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:58 |
|
|
I enjoyed that clip, but I read a YouTube comment pointing out that it looks like she's whipping the guy with her hair and now I see it every time I watch it. Looks a bit silly.
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 15:58 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 17:18 |
|
|
Your guys comments would be valid, if every drat thing that was marketing her character didn't have some sort of fanservice shot. Did everybody forget the poster where she has a pose showing off her butt, while everyone else just had one that made them look like a badass. How they are marketing her character reminds me of this comic  .
|
| # ? Apr 4, 2012 16:04 |
|
