Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

DocFrance posted:

What does the Koran say about moneylending?

Generally, it's pretty bad, and has remained so, unlike in the West.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

Ilanin posted:

The Islamic world is much less unified

And additionally, they weren't hit nearly so hard by the Mongols as they were OTL - still pretty bad, but they had a somewhat successful reconquest which can be romanticised. Those two factors might well lead to a much more open and outward looking Islamic world than OTL, and potentially a less aggressive one, especially given the lack of European interest in crusading against Islam in the later part of CK. All of which suggests that Islamic (and, for that matter, Christian) co-tolerance is making some progress. With no unified Islamic power, Italy will dominate the Mediterranean anyway (probably - I suppose Egypt and Syria have a little to say about that, but probably not a lot), so there's less need in their few for Holy Leagues, unless, of course, the Sultans won't give them access to the markets in Damascus or Alexandria. That could go either way.

The European Age of Discovery was largely driven by the Ottomans' blockade of the Middle East; considering the fractured nature of the Muslim world and a powerful Italy, there may be less of an impulse to go out exploring for everyone.

In addition, if Italy takes Rome, what happens to Catholicism? If it happens before the Protestant Reformation, and there's not an internationally recognized successor, you might end up with a radically decentralized system of churches, throwing everything after 1450 completely out the window, up to and including one of the major sources of colonists in the Americas.

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."
1) Did Timur die during his first military campaign? - No.
2) Did Zabulistan successfully resist the Ghaznavid invasion? - Yes.
3) Did the Mongol invasion of Japan succeed in reaching the island? - No, but maybe the Yuan Dynasty took Hokkaido.
4) Did the megafauna in Australia/New Zealand survive human migration into the continent? - Only in New Zealand. (could be due to a complete lack of humans; the Maori don't show up until about the 1300s CE)
5) Did Sundiata Keita die in exile? No.

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

Leperflesh posted:

1 and 2 are implausible but also don't necessarily lead to megafauna survival; in no other place that humans colonized, did the megafauna wholly avoid extinctions. (Africa was not colonized by humans, and OK, indian elephants survived too, perhaps because human ancestors arrived there particularly early, I dunno), so one could easily argue that even without the burning, any human culture would have wiped out those animals in one way or another. And 3 is basically handwaving.

This is exactly why I think an uninhabited NZ compromise is far more plausible.

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

C, riba what riba?

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

A

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."


Gov: A
Idea: C

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."
Now that we have Morocco, the obvious thing to do is liberate al-Andalus. :hist101:

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."


Power to the people already in charge!

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."
Honestly, I think all this internal tension is exciting and should be reflected in the narrative somehow.

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."
The entire notion of continental philosophy, especially anything derived from Hegel, has proven itself by most standards to be quite a Bad Thing, as seen from the mountains of corpses in the twentieth century.

Part of the reason for this is that historicist thought tends to be inherently anti-scientific; you end up with highly eschatological systems which can be described as at least para-religious (Juche comes to mind).

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."
We really should just convert to Orthodox and get on with it; all the good provinces are on their side.

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

Flavius Belisarius posted:

That's the gamey kind of move Wiz is trying to avoid, or so I would assume. Plus, having an entire Shura suddenly convert is much less likely than a single monarch.

I more meant that in a sense that they'd resent their "rulers" and might force the issue with their hegemony.

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."


I know it's unpopular, but do we want rebels messing up our recent gains?

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

sniper4625 posted:

I'm pretty sure Wiz has managed to play more CK2 MP since release than actual time elapsed since,

You might call that... a Paradox. :smug:

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."
Let's finish this before EU4!

(oh, Paradox)

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."
For reference, the book 1421 was literally just the author making poo poo up.

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

Phlegmish posted:

I would say the era of virtually uncontested European global dominance was limited to the period between the early 19th century and 1945. That's still a century and a half, of course. My point is that the fact that the West was on the rise from the Renaissance on doesn't mean they were physically dominating the rest of the world with the greatest of ease.

That timing probably indicates the fast take-off of Western Europe was due to the capital obtained from the New World paying off with both the Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution directly leading into the Napoleonic era.

Once you have the scientific method, your rate of technological progress is going to quickly leave everyone else behind for a few decades until they catch on.

So European dominance really doesn't seem that inevitable. Given that the expansion of Islam was essentially proto-colonialism, and Islamic science was much more advanced until the Renaissance, I bet that if you sent a chronoassassin to kill al-Ghazali, we'd end up with a eerily parallel world that, nine times out of ten, would end up with a center of power much more southeasterly.

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

Servant posted:

The more you complicate the explanation for why one continent dominates over another, the less likely it is for your explanation to ever be falsified or proven wrong. And if it can never be proven wrong, then it could never be proven right either.

In principle, we could falsify or verify it if we had a sufficiently powerful and accurate simulation of an Earth-like planet and its inhabitants, and then ran it several times with different variables.

But, alas, such experimental sociology is far off, so we are stuck with simple induction from a small sample size, so it may be best to implicitly qualify any given hypothesis about historical dynamics given in this context with "the author believes this there is slightly greater prior probability for this hypothesis compared to similarly complex alternatives".

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

MaybeNever posted:

Uncivilized refers to all non-westernized nations no matter how far along they are, while primitive is a more specific term for a nation that has zero (or maybe just 1-2, I forget the exact cut-off) westernization upgrades. At a certain point of westernization, a primitive nation will become "partially westernized", and, after finishing the process, a civilized nation. Most uncivs will be nothing but colony fodder, but some have a good shot at westernizing. Japan and China, mostly.

I'm kind of surprised that the Mali Empire has this status, considering its OTL ludicrous wealth and TTL survival. Though I guess it moved sort of southwards.

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."

Rincewind posted:

It doesn't really seem super out there that the elites of an empire would be comfortably bilingual, though. Look at how Greek and Latin co-existed in the Roman Empire, for example.

I could imagine Arabic displacing whatever the Zhen used to speak; at the end of the day, it is easier to write and read, and other countries speak and write it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cardinal Ximenez
Oct 25, 2008

"You could call it heroic responsibility, maybe," Harry Potter said. "Not like the usual sort. It means that whatever happens, no matter what, it's always your fault."
ABB

  • Locked thread