|
I have been looking at the banner out of the corner of my eye all day and you finally got me. Downloading a client Probably going to play a mage unless there are way too many, that was my vanilla class. edit: I'm in as Zap the mage If anybody else is just starting out and wants to be leveling buddies let me know. lapse fucked around with this message at Oct 16, 2011 around 16:54 |
| # ¿ Oct 16, 2011 16:01 |
|
|
| # ¿ May 23, 2013 16:40 |
|
Cool Blue Reason posted:Ok was just about to make my guy, but I guess not. They were fine for healing, but not as useful as paladins to the raid, hence why you heard about it so much
|
| # ¿ Oct 16, 2011 17:22 |
|
Murdermedic posted:Here's the post Ricky wanted. What up What up. People are signing up for SA now to join this guild? It's goonswarm all over again.
|
| # ¿ Oct 19, 2011 06:34 |
|
SolidRed posted:Remember to vote ladies. I had never heard of this website before but I have been voting for this anyway.. hopefully it accomplishes something.
|
| # ¿ Oct 28, 2011 11:09 |
|
cupachabra posted:Never really was one for modding my UI when I played live but I have gone mod mad recently! You could get rid of a lot of your bars and free up some real estate if you added Cryolysis.
|
| # ¿ Oct 28, 2011 21:17 |
|
sliderule posted:Server down this morning? Stuck at Success, then realm select loops. They just rebooted about 15 minutes ago. Taking a little longer than normal but I wouldn't worry yet.
|
| # ¿ Oct 29, 2011 12:57 |
|
Westminster System posted:On the subject of absolutely awful what the hell were people thinking thinking vanilla UI's. These remind me of this:
|
| # ¿ Oct 29, 2011 13:40 |
|
derpachief posted:Why do people even want to DDoS a private wow server? What's in it for them!? It's almost certainly some other server admin that accepts "donations". Seems like it would be pretty expensive to keep something like this going for long.
|
| # ¿ Nov 3, 2011 21:25 |
|
I was planning to hit 60 today, too. Hopefully there will be some decent uptime tomorrow.
|
| # ¿ Nov 3, 2011 21:50 |
|
Sounds like they just banned the guy who was doing it and rebooted.
|
| # ¿ Nov 4, 2011 19:29 |
|
Suprfli6 posted:Yeah those ones are slightly different. The swarmers and also most of the other types underground in the tunnels spawn two bugs on death and those give exp. The Rotting Cadavers at the second field in WPL are the same. I noticed this same thing in the Tanaris hive... the bugs there spawn 2 mini bugs that can be 1-shotted and give full xp. I don't think it was like that in vanilla though so I pretty much just did the quest and left... I'd really rather level at a normal rate so I actually have time to level skills, run instances, get the appropriate level of rep, etc. etc. I am kind of OCD about actually finishing every quest in the zones I run. Power-leveling throws that off and makes it even more boring when you have to come back and grind rep or run the beginning steps of a chain, etc.
|
| # ¿ Nov 5, 2011 00:07 |
|
Wheelchair Stunts posted:So why didn't they just ban the people they found exploiting this and then put a temporary freeze on character creation while they iron out the bugs? Or just restrict script commands for all accounts that do not have at least one character over level X. Would someone really be willing to level a character to, say, level 30, just to grief the server one time and have their account banned? Would that work, or is there behind-the-scenes scripting that has to happen to make the game work? I don't really know how this stuff works
|
| # ¿ Nov 5, 2011 00:29 |
|
Server appears to be up edit: And down... Well I'm doing my best to hit 60 before MC (if that's still gonna happen with all the issues) 2 bars into 59 done during the uptime
lapse fucked around with this message at Nov 5, 2011 around 12:25 |
| # ¿ Nov 5, 2011 11:29 |
|
Gah I need like 6 bars of XP to hit 60. Need like an hour of uptime before MC time...
|
| # ¿ Nov 5, 2011 14:45 |
|
Null1fy posted:Oh fuuuuuuuuuuu I think it might be me that just crashed the server. :o Unless you might have done it all the other times too, I doubt it... What were you doing?
|
| # ¿ Nov 5, 2011 17:41 |
|
It only lasted like 15 minutes tops that time
|
| # ¿ Nov 5, 2011 18:15 |
|
Kind of funny watching the server come up and then instantly there are 250 people on
|
| # ¿ Nov 5, 2011 18:26 |
|
Gils posted:Does double XP stack with rested? Yep, a lot of us were doing 4X.
|
| # ¿ Nov 5, 2011 18:30 |
|
Server has been solid for 5 hours now, if anybody was being discouraged from the last post.
|
| # ¿ Nov 6, 2011 04:13 |
|
It was only up 10 minutes that time
|
| # ¿ Nov 6, 2011 22:09 |
|
CANON posted:I think we should ask freaky to provide a semi frequently updated page simply saying whether the server is up and the current population for use in our little status program instead of flooding the game server with individual TCP handshakes and scraping the entire status page. http://www.therebirth.net/?p=server&sub=realmstatus ?? Wouldn't this page be good enough for what you're wanting? Or am I misunderstanding?
|
| # ¿ Nov 7, 2011 01:34 |
|
CANON posted:That is the page my version of the realm checker currently scrapes for the server population number, as mentioned before, every time the page is requested it has to query the database and game server which will become taxing if too many people use the application. Ah I didn't realize that the page did an active query to the server every time you refresh it. I guess I assumed that something pushes data out to the page or something (I don't know how this stuff works)
|
| # ¿ Nov 7, 2011 01:46 |
|
Are you guys online right now? I can't get in ATM.
|
| # ¿ Nov 7, 2011 22:10 |
|
It's acting differently from yesterday - this time the login server isn't working either, and the forums, etc. More like what it was doing a few weeks ago when everyone was saying DDOS. edit: I got in just now and it seems fine, but some people are reporting bad lag. Sounds like the DDOS game again where one of the servers is getting hit. lapse fucked around with this message at Nov 7, 2011 around 22:26 |
| # ¿ Nov 7, 2011 22:12 |
|
Looks like there are still issues. Figures that it would work all day and then right when I get out of work, it seems to be having problems.
|
| # ¿ Nov 8, 2011 21:54 |
|
Exact same thing happened around this time yesterday according to people. Apparently this guy gets out of work or wakes up at this time... I was under the impression that DDOSing was pretty expensive though (or at least required a lot of people) How is one dude able to do this.
|
| # ¿ Nov 8, 2011 22:09 |
|
30.5 Days posted:It seems to be working fine for me, which probably means that it's a link in the chain that's being attacked instead of the server itself. Please tracert http://www.therebirth.net and PM it to me or post it to the site if you can or wait for service to be restored and then post it. code:lapse fucked around with this message at Nov 8, 2011 around 22:25 |
| # ¿ Nov 8, 2011 22:17 |
|
Gonna give up for now - Someone please post here if you are having issues, and it gets resolved. edit: actually, tried one last time and it's working now Interestingly, the tracert still chokes at iweb technologies lapse fucked around with this message at Nov 8, 2011 around 22:53 |
| # ¿ Nov 8, 2011 22:49 |
|
Just got booted instantly, no lag leading up to it. Sorry guys I was gonna run through SM... trying to log back in.
|
| # ¿ Nov 9, 2011 00:04 |
|
It might be worth noting, this is the first time I've ever had this exact issue happen. I've heard other people complaining about similar problems before but wasn't ever affected.
|
| # ¿ Nov 9, 2011 00:15 |
|
Noah posted:I'd like to possibly try setting up UBRS runs ahead of time. I think Tanreall now has a key too, and Masenko has a key. This is the problem nobody ever wants to run LBRS so I still haven't done step 1
|
| # ¿ Nov 12, 2011 16:45 |
|
Sackmo posted:I (Ugoff) need to do LBRS as well, both for the quest and to tame one of those drat worgs. We need a tank to commit a time to help with this so we can log in at the same time. Everyone hates LBRS but eventually we gotta do it. I'm Zap btw
|
| # ¿ Nov 12, 2011 23:51 |
|
I would support just leaving it as a roll system until the roster stabilizes a little bit. Yeah it sucks that someone might hit 60, get an epic, and then never log on again, but it seems like a lot of work to set up a DKP system this early, before a bunch of people have even hit 60. I would let the bulk of the people currently leveling hit 60, and then at that point, if the first 4 or 5 MC bosses are working pretty well by then, maybe that's the time to implement a system.
|
| # ¿ Nov 13, 2011 07:08 |
|
I still say /roll is fine until the bulk of the levelers hit 60 and the raid team stabilizes a bit. There is a pretty big group of 45-55s that have been coming up through the levels as a mob. Plus there seems to be a ton of people who are gone currently, poopsocking their way through Skyrim instead of WoW. Give it 2-3 weeks and have this discussion again. Personally I don't care what the system is after that. Lets review the 4 most common systems that have been discussed here. 1. Roll - Works fine for the place we're at right now, but long term it is tough to justify some dude who just hit 60 rolling in on his first raid and getting lucky on a roll for Thunderfury or something. 2. Loot council - Loot council seems to be used simultaneously by the best raid groups and the worst raid groups, and causes either no drama at all or total implosion depending on who sits on the council. With goons, I suspect it would not work. 3. Class leaders - Class leader system sounds fine the way it was just described, but I would add that you need class leaders that are willing to defer on the "best" items that everyone always wants. I have been in guilds where a class leader gets the idea that "I'll take all this other stuff after everybody else, but I'm the first guy that gets ________". That's fine if you're the main tank and the item matters for progression, but other than that, just breeds drama. The uber items should go first to non-class leaders whenever feasible. 4. DKP - DKP is fine but you need a clear explanation of exactly what "oversight" will take place and what "checks" it will have, or it will also breed drama when someone is forced to take a "upgrade" where they get an extra +2 spirit or something, and then the next boss drops what they actually needed. Exaggeration there, but everyone gets the point hopefully. lapse fucked around with this message at Nov 14, 2011 around 23:36 |
| # ¿ Nov 14, 2011 23:14 |
|
Christopher posted:How does the game generally feel with only a few hundred people online at a time? It seems like it would be a very desolate place with such a large world and so few players. It's not actually that bad if you're in the guild. I would imagine it would be tough if you were just some random guy though.
|
| # ¿ Nov 24, 2011 03:55 |
|
Sorry guys I was in BRD with, my internet is making GBS threads the bed every 30 seconds Probably cant come to ony tonight either
|
| # ¿ Dec 2, 2011 01:52 |
|
Why / where did people get the idea that it would be better anyway? Looks like just another random instant level server.
|
| # ¿ Dec 2, 2011 03:03 |
|
boji posted:Could you first train the other warlocks so they can meter stroke without constant aggro? That would be neat. I haven't really checked anybody's spec but I'm guessing the guys that keep pulling aggro don't have master demonologist? I just remember warlocks bitching in vanilla that their only spec option was MD/Ruin. For mages at least we should still have plenty of gap between tank threat and ourselves. I didn't pull anything with a flask last week, other than some random annihilator hits.
|
| # ¿ Dec 4, 2011 05:28 |
|
Gogey posted:If anyone has a hunter account they'd like to give away, whatever level, I'll be willing to take it. I played one through a decent chunk of Vanilla and picked it up again in TBC, and I like to think I was decent. Also, it doesn't feel like i last played 3 years ago jesus christ Speaking of which - with finals ending for students soon, the next couple weeks might be a good time to put up a recruitment banner, if anyone was thinking of doing so. I expect we'll see some people pop back online that were in active as well.
|
| # ¿ Dec 11, 2011 17:25 |
|
|
| # ¿ May 23, 2013 16:40 |
|
Tanreall posted:
Notice who is still alive in that shot. loving rogues
|
| # ¿ Dec 17, 2011 18:54 |








