|
Aquila posted:I am speccing out some database servers that will be running SSD raid arrays and wanted see if there are any models I should be considering but have missed. My initial choices were either Intel DC S3700 or 520 ssds, but both are mostly unavailable, at least in 400GB+ sizes. The Samsung 840pro appears to not perform well at all in raids, leaving Sandforce drives as my only option it seems. I've already purchased some Sandisk Extreme 480GB ssds for testing and will be getting some Mushkin Chronos Deluxe in my next order. Reliability and consistency are my main concerns, followed by price and performance. What kind of write loads are you expecting? Because unless it's no more ~10 GB per day or less, you will be replacing consumer drives very quickly (without TRIM, the write amplification will be a lot higher, so 10 GB of host writes could easily become 40 overprovisioned, or 100 on a full drive). With drives as big as you're looking for, I kinda doubt that your writes will be that small. The Micron P400m (not P400e, make sure the m is there) is Micron/Crucial's DC S3700 competitor. Might want to look at that. Newegg has the 400 GB ones for $600 each. But the DC S3700 is the better drive.
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 03:05 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2013 21:35 |
|
|
I have an Early 2011 13" MBP with 8g memory. I'm looking to replace my HD with a 480g SSD drive. Going off the op I've narrowed it down to 2 and am wondering which would be the best to put in there as the only HD in my laptop. Option 1: Mushkin Enhanced Chronos Deluxe 480g 1.8" SATA III http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16820226393 Option 2: OWC Aura Pro 480GB 1.8" SATA I http://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/SSDAP81480/ Would both of these work and is there one that is preferred over the other for MBP's? Do I need to purchase anything else with either drive so it fits/connects properly?
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 14:41 |
|
|
Personally I'd get a Samsung because they have the kind of controllers that Apple themselves use in many models. I know trim blah blah, for me a solid controller is worth more than a small amount of performance I probably wont notice.
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 15:02 |
|
|
Pretty sure your looking at the same SSD there, OWC doesn't make SSDs, they just rebrand other SSDs and they have used Mushkin before. The downside to going OWC is that it is more difficult to upgrade to the latest firmware.
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 15:06 |
|
|
Alfalfa posted:I have an Early 2011 13" MBP with 8g memory. Why are you looking at 1.8" drives? Your MBP will use any 2.5" drive in either 9.5mm or 7mm thickness
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 15:26 |
|
|
So considering my laptop only supports sata-300 internally i might as well upgrade to the 512GB Samsung 840 non-pro instead of the pro since according to the OP the larger non-pro models are fine and i can't make use of the extra performance anyway? Or am i missing other essential differences? I'd mostly use it for database activity writing shitloads of temporary table data. RoadCrewWorker fucked around with this message at May 14, 2013 around 16:22 |
| # ? May 14, 2013 16:18 |
|
|
ChiralCondensate posted:You should definitely put your OS on the SSD. I know, but that is a project for the next time I have to install an OS.
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 16:28 |
|
|
RoadCrewWorker posted:So considering my laptop only supports sata-300 internally i might as well upgrade to the 512GB Samsung 840 non-pro instead of the pro since according to the OP the larger non-pro models are fine and i can't make use of the extra performance anyway? Or am i missing other essential differences? Why yes, get a drive known to use low-endurance NAND for writing "shitloads" of the most write-intensive data ever. And it has poor write consistency under that kind of load, even better! You should probably get a big Sandforce drive instead.
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 16:28 |
|
|
Factory Factory posted:Why yes, get a drive known to use low-endurance NAND for writing "shitloads" of the most write-intensive data ever. And it has poor write consistency under that kind of load, even better!  difference while still being below the 840 pro. 
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 16:51 |
|
|
It's not reliability issues in the sense of bugs, it's that the NAND burns out way faster than normal, and that's entirely intended (use the junk NAND for a cheap drive). With larger drives, there's just so much NAND that it still last a while regardless - at least, for normal desktop workloads.
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 16:56 |
|
|
Colonel Sanders posted:Pretty sure your looking at the same SSD there, OWC doesn't make SSDs, they just rebrand other SSDs and they have used Mushkin before. The downside to going OWC is that it is more difficult to upgrade to the latest firmware. OWC boasts that their SSDs are assembled in the USA, and they're made out of blue aluminum, as well. I haven't read anything about them using rebranded drives. And regarding updates, even though the OWC software is poo poo (you can just use a generic SandForce updater on their drives), they are up to date with firmware. If anything, the highly-regarded SanDisk is one that lags on firmware updates. Mushkin: 5.0.7 OWC: 5.0.7 SanDisk 5.0.4 (released as "R211")
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 16:59 |
|
|
Bob Morales posted:Why are you looking at 1.8" drives? Your MBP will use any 2.5" drive in either 9.5mm or 7mm thickness I was just going off the names listed in the op and they all popped up 1.8" These are the only 2.5" Mushkin 480GB Chronos drives I can find. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16820226372 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16820226255 I can't find a 480g Deluxe one other than the 1.8" Alfalfa fucked around with this message at May 14, 2013 around 17:25 |
| # ? May 14, 2013 17:12 |
|
|
Alfalfa posted:I was just going off the names listed in the op and they all popped up 1.8" You can use a 1.8" drive but you need a 1.8" to 2.5" SATA adapter.
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 17:29 |
|
|
Factory Factory posted:What kind of write loads are you expecting? Because unless it's no more ~10 GB per day or less, you will be replacing consumer drives very quickly (without TRIM, the write amplification will be a lot higher, so 10 GB of host writes could easily become 40 overprovisioned, or 100 on a full drive). With drives as big as you're looking for, I kinda doubt that your writes will be that small. The Micron P400m looks interesting, I had quickly checked http://thessdreview.com/ssd-database/ and thought all the enterprise Micron drives use the 9174 controller and haven't been too impressed with single Crucial (Micron) consumer SSDs in database test roles. Write endurance is another thing that's got me concerned. I can't hold up the project to get the SSDs of my choice. I would estimate that we're at less than 50GB a day on average (on a 1TB usable raid 10 array of 8 drives). For various frustrating reasons I cannot get smart info for the SSD's (Intel 320's I believe) my host is using on the DB's we're currently leasing. In fact, if someone could provide me with a method to get smart info for ssd's on an Areca 1882 controller in linux I will buy you a forum upgrade of your choice.
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 17:51 |
|
|
Call a downtime, tear out a drive and degrade the array while you plug the drive into your workstation?
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 18:14 |
|
|
The 240GB Sandisk Extreme is on sale at Newegg today only for $159 with promo code.
|
| # ? May 15, 2013 16:24 |
|
|
Newegg has a sale on the SanDisk Extreme SDSSDX-240G-G25 2.5" 240GB SATA III Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) for $160 until Midnight - is it worth it? EDIT: poo poo, didn't see above. Would I be able to throw this in a desktop for the time being until I get a laptop a few months down the road? (I'm really new to SSDs, which is why I'm checking) T-Shaped fucked around with this message at May 15, 2013 around 16:31 |
| # ? May 15, 2013 16:27 |
|
|
Sure, why wouldn't you be able to? If you mean "can I mount it in the case," some cases don't offer 2.5" mounts, it's true, but  have no moving parts. They're perfectly happy danging from the cables, duct-taped to the case wall, whatever.
Factory Factory fucked around with this message at May 15, 2013 around 17:08 |
| # ? May 15, 2013 16:40 |
|
|
Factory Factory posted:Sure, why wouldn't you be able to? If you mean "can I mount it in the case," some cases don't offer 2.5" mounts, it's true, but SATA drives have no moving parts. They're perfectly happy danging from the cables, duct-taped to the case wall, whatever. Alright, cool. I got an old Dell Dimension E520 I need to keep alive a bit longer until Haswell comes around, and I don't feel like paying extra for an SSD when I buy a new laptop anyways. I'll probably pick it up.
|
| # ? May 15, 2013 16:49 |
|
|
Alfalfa posted:I was just going off the names listed in the op and they all popped up 1.8" I ran into this same problem and figured out by comparing Mushkin part numbers that the "Mushkin Enhanced" "Chronos Deluxe" (first part is make, second is model) is called the "Mushkin Enhanced" "Deluxe" on Newegg. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16820226255 Look for the DX at the end of the part number, DX7 for 7mm. I'm ordering one now for testing and will report if it's not what I'm expecting.
|
| # ? May 15, 2013 18:21 |
|
|
Tom's Hardware takes a look at the Samsung 840 Pro vs the Samsung 840 Pro in RAID. 128GB, 128GBx2, 256GB, 256GBx2, and 512GB configurations are all tested.
|
| # ? May 15, 2013 20:53 |
|
|
Just a heads up that there is new firmware showing for my Samsung 840 250 (DXT08B0Q)
|
| # ? May 16, 2013 00:24 |
|
|
Factory Factory posted:It's not reliability issues in the sense of bugs, it's that the NAND burns out way faster than normal, and that's entirely intended (use the junk NAND for a cheap drive). With larger drives, there's just so much NAND that it still last a while regardless - at least, for normal desktop workloads. It's not that the NAND in the non-Pro 840 is "junk" per se, it's that the 840 Pro uses 2-bit per cell MLC while the non-Pro 840 uses 3-bit per cell TLC NAND. The trade-off is that the non-Pro needs less silicon for a given capacity in exchange for lower endurance and a lower price.
|
| # ? May 16, 2013 06:28 |
|
|
Ordered that Sandisk Extreme from yesterday, but didn't see any migration guide in the OP. What's the best way to do a full migration (steering away from the "just reinstall Win7 option)?
|
| # ? May 16, 2013 16:35 |
|
|
T-Shaped posted:Ordered that Sandisk Extreme from yesterday, but didn't see any migration guide in the OP. Macrium Reflect
|
| # ? May 16, 2013 16:53 |
|
|
Confirming that the Mushkin Enhanced Deluxe ssd as listed on newegg is the Mushkin Enhanced Chronos Deluxe: root@office-ubuntu-2:~/smartmontools-6.1# ./smartctl -a /dev/sda smartctl 6.1 2013-03-16 r3800 [x86_64-linux-3.5.0-23-generic] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, http://www.smartmontools.org === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family: SandForce Driven SSDs Device Model: MKNSSDCR480GB-DX Edit: Boo the linux firmware tool is X only, wtf.
|
| # ? May 16, 2013 23:31 |
|
|
T-Shaped posted:Ordered that Sandisk Extreme from yesterday, but didn't see any migration guide in the OP. Alternately, cut your system drive's used space down to around 80% the capacity of the SSD. Then back up a system image with Windows Backup and restore it with a Windows install disk. This only really works with a backup drive (which you should have anyway), although admittedly I never tried backing up to the drive Windows was already on.
|
| # ? May 17, 2013 00:04 |
|
|
I'm looking to upgrade to a SSD around 250GB in size, but I'm unsure of what would be compatible with my motherboard. Can someone reccomend a SSD around 250GB for this board? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16813188046
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 04:55 |
|
|
1) Read the OP. 2) The only motherboards that have issues with SSDs (more accurately with SATA 6Gbit/sec devices) are those with nVidia chipsets, which haven't been sold for a while now. 3) 240GB. 250/256 don't have built-in overprovisioning, and while you can get a similar effect by not partitioning the entire drive it's not quite as effective a bulwark against the drive's degradation. (Or at all on a drive that's been previously full-partitioned, if you don't take certain steps involving Secure Erase - which is a bad idea if you haven't backed up your SSD.) 4) Seriously, there's some brand/firmware issues that are important to discuss and they're covered in the OP. Go back and read it.
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 05:15 |
|
|
Sir Unimaginative posted:1) Read the OP. Sorry, I was pretty tired last night when I was looking over the OP. I did read about the brand issues, but I just wanted to make sure there wouldn't be any motherboard issues, that was something I just wasn't sure about. Thanks for the help though! I started looking at the Mushkin drives suggested on Newegg. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...name=SATA%20III The first two here are the deluxe ones from the OP I beleive. Can someone explain to me the difference between the two? Would the $300 one be a vast improvement over the $180?
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 16:54 |
|
|
Tanners posted:Sorry, I was pretty tired last night when I was looking over the OP. I did read about the brand issues, but I just wanted to make sure there wouldn't be any motherboard issues, that was something I just wasn't sure about. Thanks for the help though! That $300 240GB a 1.8" model which you don't want or need, and it's high price is a bit strange, there are 480GB 1.8 Chronos Deluxes for not much more. I'd recommend this specific one: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...N82E16820226226 It's the 240GB Chronos Deluxe and is only $5 more than the regular 240GB Chronos.
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 17:13 |
|
|
Tanners posted:Sorry, I was pretty tired last night when I was looking over the OP. I did read about the brand issues, but I just wanted to make sure there wouldn't be any motherboard issues, that was something I just wasn't sure about. Thanks for the help though! The $300 one is 1.8" - only certain netbooks or older ultraportable laptops require those. Otherwise the 2.5" is the same drive, just in a much more popular form factor = that's why it's cheaper
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 17:13 |
|
|
Bob Morales posted:The $300 one is 1.8" - only certain netbooks or older ultraportable laptops require those. That makes sense. The form factor was the only thing different I could find, but the small amount of research I did on that didn't yield much. Thanks again. Aquila posted:That $300 240GB a 1.8" model which you don't want or need, and it's high price is a bit strange, there are 480GB 1.8 Chronos Deluxes for not much more. Awesome, I think I'll go with this one. Thanks a lot guys.
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 17:21 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2013 21:35 |
|
|
Mushkin is great! I bought a new sealed Chronos Deluxe off ebay for $150 and never really installed it for months. When I did, the SSD was dead and Mushkin replaced it even though it was a private sale more or less.
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 20:23 |
|
