|
It depresses me that films like The 400 Blows get into the Criterion Collection but Cobra and RoboCop don't. The system is broken.  vvv Wait a minute, I knew that, the hell was I thinking? I have the drat thing on DVD somewhere. Slim Killington fucked around with this message at 06:53 on Jan 18, 2013 |
#
¿
Jan 18, 2013 06:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 13:21 |
|
|
Might as well make a related contribution since I brought up my favorite movie ever:  
|
|
#
¿
Jan 18, 2013 07:03
|
|
|
When did Luke Wilson get mumps?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2013 06:22
|
|
|
Red_Museum posted:
That's because it's actually two posters and they couldn't make up their mind which to keep, so we get a top with no bottom and a bottom with no top. Throw the text in the middle, no one will notice!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2013 20:18
|
|
|
I don't care how old a film is, there's no excuse for promoting the format with typeface that's almost the same size as the title. That's just tacky. But I guess that's acceptable seeing as how this is a 3D release for literally the gayest film ever made.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2013 20:18
|
|
|
I actually had to look for Steve Carrell when the original poster was put up, I thought he wasn't on it.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2013 22:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2013 23:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2013 01:50
|
|
|
Held by really tiny fingers.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2013 02:39
|
|
|
Look at the year Chicago won Best Picture and tell me that's not complete and utter horse poo poo.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2013 18:45
|
|
|
"Hi, we'd like to contract you to make a poster for our re-release." "Great! Can we have your modeling for use?" "No." "Uh, okay... how about some stills at least?" "No." "...Fine, gently caress you, here."
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2013 23:21
|
|
|
Robert Denby posted:This is a good 'For Your Consideration' poster too: This makes Bane look like he's texting in the middle of the "proceedings" or whatever it is. e: vvv don't remember, I've thankfully been able to forget most of that movie. Slim Killington fucked around with this message at 23:39 on Feb 22, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2013 23:25
|
|
|
 Bonus: 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2013 06:44
|
|
|
I don't get the anticipation for this movie, all the marketing has had the opposite effect on me. I never want to see this movie ever.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2013 05:01
|
|
|
If you can call J-Law fat and mean it in earnest, then I feel bad for you and your pitiful self-confidence issues.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2013 09:42
|
|
|
Tewratomeh posted:I like the idea of what they're doing with the film, but calling it "World War Z" at this point, with the direction they've taken it, is meaningless. I'm worried about this, but for different reasons than you I think. The novel is a telling of how numerous countries dealt with the growing problem and it provided what was, at the time, a unique take on the genre: zombie apocalypse in a different country. That I think is the most interesting thing about the novel, experiencing what's happening in Russia and Israel and China and so on. I feel that the movie is going to be almost entirely centered around the United States and Brad Pitt's family there, with the other countries relegated to "updates" via news clips and things to that effect. That will entirely miss the concept of the novel, and I'm banking on that happening.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2013 05:43
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:The splash page inside one of the books from the 00s: It could've just been a live action still of this exact thing and it would have been beautiful.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2013 23:50
|
|
|
"I'm just gonna casually kneel somberly at the edge of the bay of this banking plane, totally unaffected by wind. Or gravity."
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2013 19:36
|
|
|
Lance Streetman posted:It has a trailer out now: I'm buying this because RoboCop gun.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2013 23:02
|
|
|
I was worried that all this was some "that's the joke" stuff going over my head, because yes, that is a terrible poster in every way.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2013 21:08
|
|
|
It's a good still. The still conveys the mood and feeling you're talking about. The still is a tiny part of the poster, which is a horrible total product. Yes there's a great still in it, but the poster itself still has two feet of black space and poor typeface and layout management. It is a beautiful still, yes, in the middle of a poo poo poster. Dropping even the best imagery straight out of the film into the middle of a black sheet is about the laziest thing a human being can do. That poster took all of four minutes to design. A film that is that memorable deserves a hell of a lot more effort.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2013 22:37
|
|
|
That one's awesome because it's impossible to not pay attention to. If it were on a wall a hundred feet away it would pull your eye.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2013 22:43
|
|
|
Here's the original without the MS painted-on Russian title:
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2013 22:51
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2013 04:02
|
|
|
FauxGateau posted:My favorite movie art would be them literally cropping a scene from the movie. If this means Aguirre, that frame in some format is literally the only thing posters of the movie have ever been made of. They're all just that picture. Also thanks thread for bringing this movie up, I thought after suffering through it the last time I'd never have to see it again.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2013 21:25
|
|
|
penismightier posted:For a pretty good forums poster, you have horrendous taste. Aguirre is one of a handful of classic "you must like this" cinema that I just can't take. I recognize its merit and even celebrate its achievement, but it is absolutely insufferable from end to end. I feel everyone's allowed to have bad films as guilty pleasures, as well as a few classics they're allowed to hate.
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2013 01:10
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:Something like this is definitely preferable. "No, no — the lens flare needs to be at least 3/4 of the overall print width. Longer!"
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2013 09:29
|
|
|
Principal Strickland, played by James Tolkan.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2013 09:44
|
|
|
Oh my God, this is great.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2013 08:24
|
|
|
Nikaer Drekin posted:Maybe him and Jenny going together "like peas and carrots?" Hahahahaha, gently caress
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2013 01:38
|
|
|
Noxville posted:I like how the sun is right behind them but they're clearly being heavily lit from the side. Except the guy foreground left, he's clearly already in the moonlight which is somehow 6 feet in front of the other people.
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2013 07:35
|
|
|
I do like though that a literal train wreck is present in the marketing material for this movie.
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2013 08:33
|
|
|
Palpatine MD posted:I know nothing about Superman, can someone explain to me why this guy gets the huge silly S on his chest? It's the family crest of El, Superman's birth family. This guy is his dad. e: f,b
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2013 12:00
|
|
|
Shoehead posted:People know about House? I love that movie! Is House II any good? House happens to have my favorite tagline of any movie ever. 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2013 11:53
|
|
|
Mondo sucks poo poo but dear GOD this is stunning.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2013 23:55
|
|
|
pjotr ring all you need is kill no
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2013 23:16
|
|
|
LeJackal posted:It was as about a big a secret as the twist in From Duck 'Til Dawn I really want to see this.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2013 04:54
|
|
|
I'm getting a big Gilbert Grape vibe off of Leo in that, which is helping me imagine this film as a successor to it. vvv I hate the Catching Fire poster. It's the boring, safe approach to that film and it lacks any sort of heart whatsoever. It's literally a picture of her face with the film title because that's all it needs to be to put asses in seats. Anything would have been better than that. Maybe I'm just grumpy from having it stare me in the face every time my train stops. Slim Killington fucked around with this message at 23:03 on Dec 3, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2013 23:01
|
|
|
So it's Spider-man versus a Zord. Great.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 4, 2013 05:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 13:21 |
|
|
I just bought this in a one-sheet to hang in a blank space in my theatre room: Zero regrets.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2013 21:25
|
|