|
westborn posted:This one was just voted Worst Movie Poster of the year.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2012 05:49 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 20:28 |
|
Desperado Bones posted:Sometimes you have professional graphic designers doing a bad job, and sometimes you have a kid that barely knows how to use Photoshop: Bad? Really? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGPz-uxhJt0 code:
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2012 07:35 |
|
Oh man, I can't believe quote/edit finally tripped me up
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2012 07:36 |
|
cloudchamber posted:No Country... had so great posters: Why is he wearing socks in a field?!
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2012 03:20 |
|
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2012 06:58 |
|
Robert Denby posted:Rageaholic Monkey posted:Two cops walking through an explosion. How does that in ANY way shape or form tell me that they go undercover as high school students to find the supplier of a new drug?
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2012 07:35 |
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:Early reviews are saying it's amazing. Considering it's from the guys who did Clone High, I can't wait. Yeah, this was pretty much the only thing I could hear that would make me excited for the movie, and it worked.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2012 08:31 |
|
Jedit posted:While neither Hill nor Tatum are on the level of a Rogen or an Arterton, either of whose presence basically ensures the movie is awful (honourable exception: Donnie Darko) Somebody hasn't seen Pineapple Express
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2012 10:13 |
|
penismightier posted:http://artsandfaith.com/t100/ Where's Groundhog Day
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2012 21:40 |
|
Farbtoner posted:This is why I can't watch I can't watch Jeopardy! without thinking of Capcom. Oh, you rear end in a top hat.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2012 06:46 |
|
Legion of One posted:
Dane Cook posted:Dear Diary
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2012 05:36 |
|
A CRUNK BIRD posted:I kinda like it. I haven't seen the movie but it looks kinda like sound waves hitting an abstract ear which, from what I gather about the film, seems appropriate. That's a poster for a different movie called "The Artist."
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2012 03:44 |
|
kiimo posted:
How much of Zac Efron's bicep were you contractually obligated to show?
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2012 20:14 |
|
Mierenneuker posted:
Yup. In the trailers it's reversed -- Robbins is first on the left (but lower) and Lawrence is on the right (but at the top). Kro-bar posted:It's odd to me that the statue in the poster isn't the Statue of Liberty. Can anyone ID what it actually is? It's The National Monument to the Forefathers, and Cameron is crying because it's a monument to the Pilgrims and their Christian beliefs, and it is LITERALLY FALLING APART
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2012 08:22 |
|
GonSmithe posted:Hahahahaha what the gently caress. There is no way this was actually released. No way. I don't believe it. No, they revised the artwork before releasing it.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2012 05:57 |
|
westborn posted:It's not so much just in the teaser as it is the teaser. I'm pretty sure there was never supposed to be a WTC scene (or at least not that one) in the movie itself and the whole thing was made as a very early stand-alone teaser, and that's why... Yeah, the teaser was shot separately from the rest of the film, although I think I remember hearing that the climax of the movie was originally going to take place on top of the World Trade Center (which was definitely the case for Men in Black 2).
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2012 02:05 |
|
jojoinnit posted:I will be lining up to see this. Thats the best one line description I've ever heard, and it looks like Rob Pattinson is turning into a real actor. Good on him. I've always liked Robert Pattinson, because he seemed to have a sense of humor about the Twilight films (which it was obvious he loving hated).
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2012 17:35 |
|
For everyone knocking Hard Candy for Ellen Page's character being a "super-smart kid who knows everything," wasn't it strongly implied that she was really a university-level medical student?
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2012 06:57 |
|
Cantskate43 posted:Explain. I don't remember anything of the sort but it sounds really interesting. Whoops, new page. These are spoilers for Hard Candy. I thought the fact that she has access to medical textbooks and tranquilizers strong enough to knock Jeff out within minutes were clues, but looking at the plot summary on Wikipedia, I guess it wasn't as explicit as I remember. I think there was also some dialogue near the end where Jeff accused Hayley of not being named Hayley -- and probably not even being 14?
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2012 22:30 |
|
MorgaineDax posted:Oh look, finally a poster is made so people can't complain that the names don't match the order of the faces! Are you happy now, Sockser? These People Are In Big Trouble:
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2012 06:24 |
|
Gonz posted:If I remember correctly, that movie was pushed back and re-edited to take out several scenes involving a bomb on a plane. Yeah, it never made its September 21, 2001 release date.
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2012 06:52 |
|
User-Friendly posted:It's worth noting also that as the movies went on, the WB studio card before the film got dingier and rustier looking. I thought it was pretty neat. The WB logo has seen some poo poo:
|
# ¿ May 22, 2012 08:31 |
|
kiimo posted:That foot is inhuman. It is a crime against nature. This is what Mac from Super Troopers has been reduced to
|
# ¿ May 25, 2012 01:06 |
|
CRINDY posted:Oh, come the gently caress on. Ice Age 3: Dawn of the Dinosaurs was To be fair, this seems to be a Dutch poster. Maybe 3 wasn't released in 3D there?
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2012 07:03 |
|
Vagabundo posted:
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2012 11:09 |
|
Kiimo will appreciate this: http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/25546ac0df/steve-carell-s-movie-poster-contract
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2012 03:55 |
|
I really like the fact that they brought on the directors of Catfish for 3 and 4. I'm not gonna watch them, I just like it.
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2012 20:34 |
|
This thread
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2012 18:52 |
|
HoldYourFire posted:And either their grammar is appalling or they had to put 'guilty' in scare quotes for legal reasons. The expression is usually "to protect the innocent," so maybe they're just trying to emphasize the difference. Also, that's appalling punctuation, not grammar
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2012 23:26 |
|
Robert Denby posted:Say you're a studio. You've got a big fall movie, big names, some Oscar potential, and a director with two solid productions under his belt. You've got to come up with a poster that'll put butts into seats. All I can see is this:
|
# ¿ Sep 1, 2012 19:00 |
|
Wow wow wow:
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2012 07:29 |
|
|
# ¿ Oct 17, 2012 05:05 |
|
ruddiger posted:and here's a poster that I've always loved, the blurb about Animal House is so out of place, yet so right. I'll take any opportunity to remind people how awesome this is:
|
# ¿ Oct 17, 2012 09:47 |
|
Hey wait a minute:
|
# ¿ Oct 19, 2012 08:04 |
|
Uh... I think Diane Kruger's feet are on backwards.
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2013 23:58 |
|
Vagabundo posted:Nothing to see here, everyone. Move along now. Maybe this poster would be better if we replaced all the faces:
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2013 06:00 |
|
Wait, back in the '90s you could just buy 8mm prints?
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2013 11:05 |
|
ZackHoagie posted:Nah, the titles wouldn't change position. No, he's right: the cover for the Blu-Ray/DVD re-release was lenticular.
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2013 03:56 |
|
Hasters posted:I haven't enjoyed shredding a screener that much since Tree of Life. Wait, I don't understand: is it a bad movie or not?
|
# ¿ Jan 30, 2013 08:29 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 20:28 |
|
|
# ¿ Feb 1, 2013 07:19 |