|
VitalSigns posted:God can do anything if He really wants a child to be born, except get around a thin latex tube God has a plan to stymie that latex tube.  His plan being to spread misinformation on the efficacy of condoms so catholics are more likely to just rely on pulling out in time.
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2015 15:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 08:15 |
|
|
VitalSigns posted:E: Maybe that can be the way to allow it in. Just say "I'm open to having a kid, if it gets through my vasectomy, her birth control, RU-486, and the abortion clinic then it's meant to be and I'm open to it" Your kid is going to be the meanest motherfucker ever to stalk this globe if he fights off the abortion doc.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:Your kid is going to be the meanest motherfucker ever to stalk this globe if he fights off the abortion doc. "Oooh, Snake, tell 'em how you got that scar!" 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:"Oooh, Snake, tell 'em how you got that scar!" Excellent, Snake. Lack of age hasn't slowed you down one bit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
*Snake exfiltrates out of the Mother Base* Kept ya waiting, huh 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
You became a demon for such little weapons as that?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
Bad news Obummerquote:“Our country has changed so much, and we’ve seen the moral decline — and that moral decline being led by the Obama administration, and championing things like same-sex marriage, which is really defiance against God,” Graham said. “Same-sex marriage is a sin against God. God made us male and female.” “And then to say that marriage is between two men or two women, this is sin and the Obama administration is celebrating sin and they are pushing sin,” he continued. While Graham said that he wasn’t trying to bash gays and lesbians, he said that he wanted to let them know that their actions — in his eyes — are not in line with God’s purpose for their lives. As far as I know, his father wasn't close to the level of rear end in a top hat Franklin is.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 04:01
|
|
|
Funny, my God says the opposite of all that. I wonder whose religion is correct. If only there was some document describing which religion the state should establish. Oh well.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
Considering it still wasn't paid for after years maybe the repomen just made sure to get it ahead of the formal removal?
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 20:37
|
|
|
Come the gently caress on
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 22:58
|
|
|
WTF really? I didn't expect the Obama to take a position to the right of Hillary on an LGBT issue, that's not a place you want to be.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 23:07
|
|
|
Did someone hide the defunding of Planned Parenthood in this thing? What on earth is his justification in this day and age?
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 23:11
|
|
|
"I’m not prepared to say that yet,” [White House Press Secretary Josh] Earnest said. “This is a piece of legislation that the White House does continue to review. There’s significant consequences to this bill going into effect. It has an impact on housing law and a variety of other policies in the federal government, so it’s something that’s still being carefully reviewed by the administration.” full article Summary of the Act Text of the Act VVVV Clinton and Biden already have endorsed; that's why the press sec. got asked. Sanders is one of the cosponsors of the Senate bill. joat mon fucked around with this message at 23:21 on Oct 6, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 23:11
|
|
|
If Hillary/Sanders want to make smart move, support the Act and contrast yourself
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 23:11
|
|
|
I can't blame them for going over it with a fine-toothed comb if it's been across the desk of any House Republicans, but the fact that Obama has been extremely lukewarm on actual displays of support for socially liberal issues like LGBT rights, pot, etc means I'm still rolling my eyes a bit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 23:15
|
|
|
From the related washington blade article.quote:The White House’s delay in endorsing the Equality Act is consistent with the hesitation seen from major non-LGBT civil rights groups on the bill. The Leadership Conference on Civil & Human Rights and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People have to yet to endorse the bill. LCCHR has expressed concern about opening up the Civil Rights Act to amendments in Congress out of fear that could weaken the entire law. And here's a much longer run-down of a bunch of major and minor civil rights groups, and their reasons for feeling as they do about the Equality Act: http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/07/29/will-civil-rights-groups-come-to-support-equality-act/
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 23:18
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:I can't blame them for going over it with a fine-toothed comb if it's been across the desk of any House Republicans, but the fact that Obama has been extremely lukewarm on actual displays of support for socially liberal issues like LGBT rights, pot, etc means I'm still rolling my eyes a bit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 23:18
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:I can't blame them for going over it with a fine-toothed comb if it's been across the desk of any House Republicans, but the fact that Obama has been extremely lukewarm on actual displays of support for socially liberal issues like LGBT rights, pot, etc means I'm still rolling my eyes a bit. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2015 23:23
|
|
|
Care to elaborate? Single emoticon replies don't say much, which is why people get probated for them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:I can't blame them for going over it with a fine-toothed comb if it's been across the desk of any House Republicans It's a bill whose language no republican is involved in drafting. Also, it's not like congressional pages take one, singular paper copy of a bill office-to-office (or committee-to-committee) at the capitol, and everybody gets a chance to add/remove/line-item whatever they want.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
Booourns posted:Care to elaborate? Single emoticon replies don't say much, which is why people get probated for them. "Browbeaten" in this case means "having Joe Biden spoil it two days before it was to be officially announced".
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 01:06
|
|
|
Do It Once Right posted:It's a bill whose language no republican is involved in drafting. Also, it's not like congressional pages take one, singular paper copy of a bill office-to-office (or committee-to-committee) at the capitol, and everybody gets a chance to add/remove/line-item whatever they want. Not like congressional pages do anything now. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 01:23
|
|
|
Do It Once Right posted:It's a bill whose language no republican is involved in drafting. Also, it's not like congressional pages take one, singular paper copy of a bill office-to-office (or committee-to-committee) at the capitol, and everybody gets a chance to add/remove/line-item whatever they want. Basically, there's trepidation of even considering opening up the CRA for any amendments.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 03:46
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 03:50
|
|
|
Don't let those creepy car fetishists see this.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
Man, the Putt-Putt games got dark.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 06:37
|
|
|
Alkydere posted:Man, the Putt-Putt games got dark. Bigotry has that effect.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 08:16
|
|
|
I forgot the cover
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 13:45
|
|
|
And I see that car is some kind of subtle '80s gay stereotype
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 13:46
|
|
|
'Lock Wolverton'? That guy is totally gay.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 14:20
|
|
|
Gaydar more like Gay Car
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 16:20
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:And I see that car is some kind of subtle '80s gay stereotype It's not that subtle.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
Ha ha, look at those fuckers dying from an incurable disease, not like us! Love thine neighbour as yourself, everybody. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
I will jealously guard my car's sexuality like a Southern dad. How do I get a purity ring around a tire?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
deadly_pudding posted:I will jealously guard my car's sexuality like a Southern dad. How do I get a purity ring around a tire? Put it around the exhaust pipe instead. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 20:05
|
|
|
Buddy, that ain't where purity rings go.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 20:15
|
|
|
May this Purity Cockring ensure your blessed penis never touches an evil vagina.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 21:28
|
|
|
is oil really dripping out of that car's tailpipe from too much gay x?
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2015 01:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 08:15 |
|
|
Condiv posted:is oil really dripping out of that car's tailpipe from too much gay x? All he needs is an engine rebuild. Lazy doctor.
|
|
#
?
Oct 13, 2015 01:42
|
|
