|
This is pretty much the definition of frivolous pop history, but I've always had a soft spot for any history, even if its trivia, related to the Second World War. It seems that while he was serving in France Hitler may have knocked up a 16 year old French girl. The actual evidence seems incredibly tenuous and even if this were true it wouldn't really change the world or give us any new insights into the war, but its kinda fascinating all the same. All that having been said, I think that this story can provide us with some insights on our own day and age. Hitler's alleged son wrote a book: "Your Father's Name Was Hitler" some four decades ago, and yet the story has been virtually unknown until now. Suddenly - many years after Hitler's "son" died in 1985 - there is a big buzz about this and a new release of the book with "new evidence" and other supplementary material. I think its an interesting example of how history gets filtered through the lens of marketing as well as a fascinating anecdote in its own right. And who knows, maybe its even true! quote:Hitler's Son: Nazi Dictator May Have Fathered Child With French Teenager
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 21:43 |
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2013 11:54 |
|
I've read both volumes of Ian Kershaw's excellent biography of Hitler, with well over a thousand pages and God only knows how much source material. He didn't find anything like this. I doubt that HuffPo (or wherever they copy/pasted this thing from) snagged something like this. B-b-b-b-b-bullshit. Unless you want to count all his genetic clones in Brazil, because those are definitely around.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 21:49 |
|
I don’t know about biologically but Merkel is Hitler’s spiritual granddaughter and is finishing the job of conquering Europe that he never could. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 21:51 |
|
Junior G-man posted:I've read both volumes of Ian Kershaw's excellent biography of Hitler, with well over a thousand pages and God only knows how much source material. Its a short op. You should try reading it.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 21:51 |
|
Junior G-man posted:
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 21:59 |
|
Helsing posted:Its a short op. You should try reading it. Instead of accusing me of not reading the article, which I did, how about doing a tiny bit of critical analysis yourself before defending it. It's all hypothetics and what-if's: quote:Hitler had a son with a teenage French girl, new evidence claims to prove. It doesn't prove anything. It claims to do so. quote:"We saw a German soldier on the other side of the street," she told her son, years later. A German soldier who drew. I'm sure there were a number of them who did so, probably including any number who were yelling about the state of the war. quote:physiognomy (the way faces are aligned) Is this a real science? Because it sounds quite dodgy. I'm genuinely curious. Wikipedia calls it rubbish, and I'm inclined to agree. quote:The blood type of the two men are similar, and their faces suggest famial characteristics. They are similar, and their faces suggest. This is no proof positive, it's a very hedged bet. quote:Papers from the Germany and French army corroborate Loret's mothers story, showing that the Nazi dictator was serving in France at that time. True, but so were many hundreds of thousands of other German soldiers. No one is denying this. So no, it's complete and utter rubbish. It's a rubbish article that's been inserted into HuffPo by a PR agency that's hyping a rubbish book. This guy might as well have written about how he discovered that he's the last living descendant of Jesus.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 22:01 |
|
No. Five minutes of searching, shot down four years ago. http://translate.google.com/transla...%26prmd%3Dimvns After multiple trips between Germany, Austria, France and the United States, the journalist has tracked down individuals who had a relationship with Hitler. By comparing their DNA with that of Jean-Marie Loret, it does not share the Y chromosome with the U.S. back nephews that are all males of the same family, the hypothesis of hidden son of Hitler in French is found swept.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 22:01 |
|
Since the op apparently didn't make this clear enough, this isn't a thread claiming Hitler actually had a son. Its supposed to be an example of overly sensational history being driven by marketing imperatives. Its kinda besides the point to repeatedly point out how unlikely this is to be true when I already noted that in the first post.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 22:19 |
|
Junior G-man posted:Instead of accusing me of not reading the article, which I did, how about doing a tiny bit of critical analysis yourself before defending it. It's all hypothetics and what-if's: You seem to have read the article without reading my comments on it.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 22:19 |
|
Helsing posted:You seem to have read the article without reading my comments on it. Yes, you're right. I must have misread: quote:a fascinating anecdote in its own right. And who knows, maybe its even true!
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 22:21 |
|
Even taken completely out of context does that read like an endorsement of the article to you? Either way I'd rather this thread not become the two of us sniping at each other. I'm more interested in talking about the way history gets used as a vehicle for marketing than I am in berating you for bad reading comprehension.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 22:24 |
|
Helsing posted:Even taken completely out of context does that read like an endorsement of the article to you? Remember the hoopla a couple years back when a company called Steorn posted ads about their free energy machine in the Economist? Of course it turned out to be bullshit, but that ad appearing in a respectable publication like the Economist got a lot of people talking. I even remember quite a few threads about it on this very forum. This is the same thing, only instead of attaching their product to the Economist they get it embedded as a "news story" in a very popular aggregate site so people can Retweet/Facebook Like/Google +1 it. And yes, post about it in discussion forums complete with a backlink to the Huffington Post, which helps their SEO. In a world where nobody pays for news any more this sort of thing will be the norm. SEO is everything. Expect to see more and more sensationalist nonsense designed to generate the maximum number of Retweets and Facebook Likes appearing in between real news headlines. The most popular news sites on the Internet don't really do any actual reporting, they just regurgitate wire stories and make millions by slipping in the occasional corporate press releases dressed up as news. Has the Huffington Post jumped the shark yet? If "Hitler's Long Lost Son Bares All" is the sort of thing they do these days I really hope they spectacularly implode like pets.com or some other dot com disaster from the 90s. Almost makes me miss the days of Comet Cursor, Punch the Monkey and Bonzi Buddy. At least they were honest.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 22:53 |
|
Helsing posted:Even taken completely out of context does that read like an endorsement of the article to you? I see this is kind of an extension of the business of books about Hitler. Go to any major bookstore and a good 10% of the history section is books on Hitler, Nazis, and the Third Reich. The rest is military history with a few non-Western books for decoration. It's really embarrassing in Canadian bookstores like Chapters and Indigo. The Canadian history section is predominantly about war, and everything else is written by Pierre Berton. If you want to talk about history as marketing and branding, there's a great example: For a lot of people Pierre Berton is Canadian history. Canadian historians (and publishers) are terrible at marketing.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2012 23:15 |
|
![]() (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
| # ? Feb 24, 2012 11:20 |
|
Dr. Tall Hat posted:...How can you look at it and take more then 1milisecond to see it?
|
| # ? Feb 24, 2012 11:54 |
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2013 11:54 |
|
Putting an end to this before more dumb rear end image macros enter the forum.
|
| # ? Feb 24, 2012 11:57 |












