|
Do they actually drive that thing with a goddamn ladder hanging in front of the windshield?
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 01:29 |
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 12:11 |
|
Doppelganger posted:Do they actually drive that thing with a goddamn ladder hanging in front of the windshield? They need the ladder ready to deploy at a moment's notice after they plow into oncoming traffic or run off the road on Lombard Street so their "operators" can get out safely. That's why it's called a "rescue" vehicle!
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 01:34 |
|
I just want to know what that thing can do that a firetruck can't, other than turn a sharper corner.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 01:37 |
|
It can justify and additional $X on next year's budget, for one.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 01:38 |
|
Cthulu Carl posted:They need the ladder ready to deploy at a moment's notice after they plow into oncoming traffic or run off the road on Lombard Street so their "operators" can get out safely. I like to think the ladder juts out in front like that so they can ram people off the road while using the lights/sirens to help clear traffic on the way to Starbucks, with possible decapitation involved for extra excitement. I actually saw this happen once (The lights/sirens on the way to starbucks part, not the "ram and decapitate them with an APC" part)
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 01:43 |
|
Rah! posted:Yeah, pretty much. Not every police department has one, but plenty do. Here's more evidence, aside form all those pictures posted so far: The San Francisco Police Department has one of these: Oh come on, those vehicles are clearly meant for rescue operations. I mean, they even have "Rescue" spraypainted right on them.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 04:24 |
|
a handful of dust posted:Ah, ok. I never paid attention to their badges or anything. That's not the TSA or a VIPR team.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 05:29 |
|
Jiro Kage posted:That's not the TSA or a VIPR team. I know, that was kind of the point. You see regular cops on trains all the time, it doesn't really seem like there's a security hole that needs to be plugged by a bunch of poorly trained rent-a-cops.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 06:43 |
|
Trap Star posted:every pot seller has a loaded shotgun beside him at all times A little late, but most of the time that is true.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 06:58 |
|
I find that the people who fly the least are the ones that complain the most.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 07:05 |
|
The Bible posted:Oh come on, those vehicles are clearly meant for rescue operations. I mean, they even have "Rescue" spraypainted right on them. Our local police bought one of those BearCat things last year and on Sunday some kids robbed an old lady with a firearm at the local train station and that thing turned up with a bunch of tooled up dudes. To be fair when we walked past they were standing in groups smoking, so not sure what the point was really.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 07:21 |
|
Skyworks posted:Our local police bought one of those BearCat things last year and on Sunday some kids robbed an old lady with a firearm at the local train station and that thing turned up with a bunch of tooled up dudes. If they don't drive it the odometer will never say funny words!
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 14:03 |
|
GAY RETARD posted:A little late, but most of the time that is true. No, it isn't. Most drug dealers aren't willing to murder police to protect their stash, and if anything the reason they have weapons is to protect against robberies, another nice by-product of the black market nature of the substance.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 14:22 |
|
I seriously doubt anyone here has any kind of realistic data on what "most pot dealers" own weapons-wise or what their mentality on using weapons is.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 14:34 |
|
Earwicker posted:I seriously doubt anyone here has any kind of realistic data on what "most pot dealers" own weapons-wise or what their mentality on using weapons is. Nobody has presented anything really concrete in here except "Guns and tanks are scary and I'm mad that the cops have some."
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 14:46 |
|
Cage Kicker posted:Nobody has presented anything really concrete in here except "Guns and tanks are scary and I'm mad that the cops have some." a handful of dust posted:The militarization of police is definitely a thing in the US, it's not just hippies scared of guns or whatever: If the police want to increasingly use APC's and other military gear, the burden should be on them to prove to the population that this is necessary and beneficial. Not the other way around.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 14:49 |
|
Earwicker posted:http://www.theatlantic.com/national...-police/248047/ I especially liked this part: The point here is not to suggest that police officers in the field should not take advantage of every tactic or piece of equipment that makes them safer as they carry out their often challenging and strenuous duties. Nor do I mean to suggest that a police officer, once trained in military tactics, will now seek to kill civilians. It is far too easy for Monday-morning quarterbacks to unfairly second-guess the way police officers perform their jobs while they are out on the streets waging what must, at times, feel like a war.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 14:55 |
|
My city (Aurora Colorado) banded together with a few other smaller cities and got an APC. The official justification for it was something about the ability to bust through exterior walls to rescue kids in case of another Columbine-style attack. While that sounds good I guess, I can't help but wonder just how well that would go, since the news coverage immediately after the attack mentioned that most of the children were up against those exterior walls with makeshift barricades out of tables and such. As far as I know, the APC has only been outside its hangar for the photo op in the paper, and when they taught someone how to drive it. I think the only real benefit from it though, is that they had an excuse to not tear down the building they store it in, as the PD took over part of an Air Force base that closed down some years ago.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 15:01 |
|
Skyworks posted:Our local police bought one of those BearCat things last year and on Sunday some kids robbed an old lady with a firearm at the local train station and that thing turned up with a bunch of tooled up dudes. I was told the general procedure in my area is to activate SWAT if there's the potential of someone using a firearm (ie: a domestic call where there are firearms in the house, armed robberies, etc...). They get brought on scene in case things go sideways, so they don't have to take 30 minutes to grab their gear and drive out if a meth head starts shooting at people during a routine call. My understanding is most of the time they don't have to do anything and do a lot of smoking and joking. It's a "just in case" thing.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 15:07 |
|
a handful of dust posted:I know, that was kind of the point. You see regular cops on trains all the time, it doesn't really seem like there's a security hole that needs to be plugged by a bunch of poorly trained rent-a-cops. BART PD exists because back in the 70s when the system was built people in the suburbs were terrified that
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 15:11 |
|
Earwicker posted:I seriously doubt anyone here has any kind of realistic data on what "most pot dealers" own weapons-wise or what their mentality on using weapons is. Of the 'most pot dealers' I know, I once saw one pretend to use a spent bong like a shotgun. Chik-chik, POW you're hosed up dude! Those crazy potheads, I can totally see why we have all these laws.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 17:33 |
|
Speaking from experience, small time drug dealer's attitudes toward weapons are as variable as the general public's.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 19:03 |
|
Cardiovorax posted:That's almost kind of awesome again. "APC? We don't need any of that pussy poo poo, just bolt a bit o' them thar steel scrap to the ol' Bronco and call it a day. It kind of is, but we have no use for it at all. If I were to walk out my back door, through the yard, and through the trees behind the house, I'd be looking at the police station. To get to me in case I needed cops for whatever reason would take them roughly 15-20 minutes. The shortest route to me is about 1/8th of a mile. When the gun shop down the street from me was "robbed" (inside job by the owner's son to make a competing shop's break in look less suspicious) it took them 22 minutes to travel 2207 feet. From the station to the shop was a left, a right, another right, and you're there. Our police force is a loving joke. Hell, we rent an officer from a nearby town to enforce traffic laws on school days. We have zero need for an uparmored vehicle.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 19:46 |
|
babies havin rabies posted:Speaking from experience, small time drug dealer's attitudes toward weapons are as variable as the general public's. I know more white supremacists with weapons than drug dealers.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 19:56 |
|
Cthulu Carl posted:Hell, on the loving retarded 'Sons of Guns' show, they outfitted a Sheriff's boat with an M240 machine gun and a MK19 GRENADE LAUNCHER. I used to laugh at that show and enjoy it for the "LoL Southerners" Aspect. Soon as I heard them say, we need a grenade launcher on a sheriff's boat. I turned it off and haven't watched it since. Trivial things that unreasonably enrage you, indeed.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 21:04 |
|
VendaGoat posted:I used to laugh at that show and enjoy it for the "LoL Southerners" Aspect. It's really a toss-up for what the most enraging aspect of that show is: The constant fellating of LEOs/PMCs ("You want a gyro-mounted machine gun to help you kill browns from a helicopter better? Hell we can do that!") or their default solution to any problem of modifying assault rifles ("Need to hunt boar? Have a tacticLOLed AR-15!" "Let's make a sniper AK for NO REASON!") I have no idea why I watch shows I hate...
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 21:28 |
|
Cthulu Carl posted:It's really a toss-up for what the most enraging aspect of that show is: The constant fellating of LEOs/PMCs ("You want a gyro-mounted machine gun to help you kill browns from a helicopter better? Hell we can do that!") or their default solution to any problem of modifying assault rifles ("Need to hunt boar? Have a tacticLOLed AR-15!" "Let's make a sniper AK for NO REASON!") Watching shows you hate.... Please venture into The Walking Dead thread and stand in AWE! These people have taken their hate for this show into the highest form of love imaginable.
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 21:56 |
|
Cage Kicker posted:Nobody has presented anything really concrete in here except "Guns and tanks are scary and I'm mad that the cops have some." http://forums.somethingawful.com/sh...5#post392159492
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 22:04 |
|
Currently going through the thread, but on the first/second page of it there were a lot of comments along the lines of "People avoid flying because of this sort of stuff". I'm curious, has that actually been proven that the number of flyers is down, and more specifically that the cause is due to the TSA's policies? There's always been a strong disconnect between how people react to the TSA on forums/etc and how the general public reacts. Didn't anti-security folks try and stall out the TSA scanners when the scanners came online, but it didn't work since the majority of passengers just go through without issue?
|
| # ? Mar 5, 2012 23:34 |
|
FRINGE posted:Perhaps several thousand points of data by way of videos, anecdotes, and new reports? COTB was a horrible abortion of a thread full of a bunch of stupid hippies jacking each other off over how much they hate the cops, and this thread is just a diet version of that.
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:31 |
|
Cage Kicker posted:COTB was a horrible abortion of a thread full of a bunch of stupid hippies jacking each other off over how much they hate the cops, and this thread is just a diet version of that. While I haven't read the entirety of it, I've read enough to know that it sources its claims a lot better than you source yours.
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:38 |
|
Cage Kicker posted:COTB was a horrible abortion of a thread full of a bunch of stupid hippies jacking each other off over how much they hate the cops, and this thread is just a diet version of that.
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:41 |
|
The Bible posted:While I haven't read the entirety of it, I've read enough to know that it sources its claims a lot better than you source yours. Which claims would those be?
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:41 |
|
Cage Kicker posted:Which claims would those be?
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:42 |
|
FRINGE posted:You are not taking cracks at a several years long series of threads without actually reading them are you? No.
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:43 |
|
Cage Kicker posted:Which claims would those be? Hmm. Cage Kicker posted:COTB was a horrible abortion of a thread full of a bunch of stupid hippies jacking each other off over how much they hate the cops, and this thread is just a diet version of that.
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:44 |
|
Cage Kicker posted:COTB was a horrible abortion of a thread full of a bunch of stupid hippies jacking each other off over how much they hate the cops, and this thread is just a diet version of that. You couldn't possibly be any more stupid. e: take the long erection of the law out of your mouth and rear end and actually read some of the threads to prove you aren't a complete moron, please and thanks. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:44 |
|
Trap Star posted:You couldn't possibly be any more stupid. What are you, illiterate? I did read them. They were all horrible. The Bible posted:Hmm. You want me to source my opinion?
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:46 |
|
Cage Kicker posted:What are you, illiterate? I did read them. They were all horrible. Whether you are trolling or just literally this stupid, thanks for letting everyone know your opinions are complete garbage and not worth paying attention to. You've done GBS a great service.
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:47 |
|
|
| # ? May 18, 2013 12:11 |
|
Cage Kicker posted:What are you, illiterate? I did read them. They were all horrible. Why? Were the sources incorrect, or was there just no sourcing at all? What specific problem did you have with them to make you believe that the data in them is not factual? Cage Kicker posted:You want me to source my opinion? No, I want you to explain why you think the threads are horrible. Seeing as they are largely well-sourced and filled with actual factual data, I'd really like to see a solid reason as to why you'd disagree with them.
|
| # ? Mar 6, 2012 00:48 |


























