|
mr. stefan posted:Clearly, the only option available is to start our own fiction wiki, free of the oppressive fascist censorship of tvtropes! with more blackjack and hookers! There's a trope for that. Very useful one, too; it usually either succeeds, or it fails. Why, that covers all the bases! It doesn't at all look like a trope made solely for the purpose of referencing a Futurama line.
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2012 22:14 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 05:42 |
|
|
You guys. CrazyGoggs uploaded a new video. It is amazing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O60H...&feature=colike
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2012 22:40 |
|
|
I'm having way too much fun in the video comments
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2012 23:31 |
|
|
Apparently you made one of them mad enough to buy you a custom title.  Awww, which one of you is the troper? Come on, fess up. It'll be easier on all of us if you do.
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2012 23:49 |
|
|
And of course DarkErikDraven or whatever his name is has come to defend his pedophilia in the comments.
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2012 23:52 |
|
|
Yeah Man posted:Apparently you made one of them mad enough to buy you a custom title. Nah it wasn't a troper, I know who it was.
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2012 23:55 |
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:And of course DarkErikDraven or whatever his name is has come to defend his pedophilia in the comments. I'm amused at how persistent he is, despite being banned from both TV Tropes proper and its offshoot. The guy must really love his pedophilia.
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2012 23:55 |
|
|
Urdnot Fire posted:I'm amused at how persistent he is, despite being banned from both TV Tropes proper and its offshoot. The guy must really love his pedophilia. Draven posted:It wasn't my fault. They kept calling pedophilia a mental disorder, it pissed me off. I was only banned after some SomethingAwful goons brought my posts up in their thread anyway. Mister Muckracker posted:What kind of responses did you envision that you'd get when you came here with your sob story about getting banned for being a pedophile? Seriously? Draven posted:No one hates surprise sex fetishists, or BDSM people, or whatever. As long as it's fantasy, no one should care.  He just doesn't get it, does he?
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2012 23:58 |
|
|
Only on TV Tropes can you get the impression that being a pedophile or having a surprise sex fetish is okay.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:00 |
|
|
You haven't seen the comments for that scene in Irreversible, have you? 
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:02 |
|
|
Eh, YouTube comments in general aren't exactly fonts of wisdom.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:05 |
|
|
MadRhetoric posted:Fake Edit: Yo Alien, I called S&WH40K first. Don't make me do Thousand Shinji. Really? Crap, I must have missed where you said that. Ah well, no worries, I hadn't actually started yet. Floor's yours. (I recommend non-slip shoes.) If you give up or need a break, let me know. Cyrai posted:Hahaha, oh lord. Well this helps explains why the TVT forums don't have anything nice like breadcrumb navigation  Seriously? One table = one thread? I cannot laugh for crying. Why would you do that?
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:12 |
|
|
FureonNectarmoon posted:Wow. So I'm watching the video, and there's all the banter about this [TATMNBN] thing. I don't know what the hell it is, so I do a Google search. I open up the Images... ka-boom. You people tell me THIS isn't catering to pedophiles?! Like, what the poo poo? Are you loving blind or just out of your loving mind? Sexually suggestive situations DON'T come up in fiction by THEMSELVES, FOR gently caress'S SAKE. How more obvious should it for those people to see why those things are made the way they are? Draven posted:It's actually kind of deep. I would have preferred if it stuck to humor like early episodes instead of getting so serious, in fact. Tell me more about how you prefer your pedoshit.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:14 |
|
|
purple_sammich posted:You guys. CrazyGoggs uploaded a new video. It is amazing. They will never reach awareness will they?
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:15 |
|
|
Urdnot Fire posted:Only on TV Tropes can you get the impression that being a pedophile or having a surprise sex fetish is okay. surprise sex fantasies are pretty common though. But they, you know, happen between consenting adults who understand that it is fantasy and won't be terrible scarred for life.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:17 |
|
|
MonolithRattus posted:Please, explain the context in which sex with a child is not child molestation. Draven posted:Like, if she wants it, I guess? I'm not talking about real life. Sex with a child is always dangerous and tramatizing. Anime lolis are different in that the characters are more mature and sex won't hurt them.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:20 |
|
|
Alien Arcana posted:Seriously? One table = one thread? I cannot laugh for crying. Why would you do that? You underestimate Eddie's incompetence. purple_sammich posted:Tell me more about how you prefer your pedoshit. I love how he says the thin veneer of a plot is still too deep for him. I guess the guy doesn't want any seriousness interrupting his pedoshit.Improbable Lobster posted:surprise sex fantasies are pretty common though. But they, you know, happen between consenting adults who understand that it is fantasy and won't be terrible scarred for life. Ah yes, too bad Tropers can't separate fantasy from reality at all. Namtab posted:Bolding mine Holy poo poo, this guy just refuses to believe that children cannot consent, ever.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:20 |
|
|
Hmm, been lurking in here a while, and figured I might as well take the plunge if other people are. Does anyone have a recommendation for a dramatic reading?
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:24 |
|
|
Is This dark Eric person 14 or 16 years old? He claimed to be 16 on that troper offshoot forum and now he's saying he's younger than lolacat in the YouTube comments. Also I wonder whether those tropers who were arguing that they were treating him badly are kicking themselves now since its obvious he never took any of the therapies he promise the Internet he will have. I guess "therapy" means online paedophilia roleplaying sessions.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:30 |
|
|
The Saddest Rhino posted:Is This dark Eric person 14 or 16 years old? He claimed to be 16 on that troper offshoot forum and now he's saying he's younger than lolacat in the YouTube comments. No he said he's a year older, so 16. Also the comments for the video are literally everyone dogpiling on him and he's still defending himself.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:32 |
|
|
Namtab posted:Bolding mine Yeah, I have no idea how he thought that was a good idea. I'm not even sure why he responded to my question. Or responds at all.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:33 |
|
|
These comments are really something.ErictheMultipleMan posted:I don't care about justifying it. Everyone else just freaks out about it and keeps insulting me. It's insane. This guy honestly doesn't understand why people might be angry at him for sexualising children, because at least he's not actually going out and loving kids, right? Plus he likes consensual loli, apparently. Truly, the people calling him out are insane.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:33 |
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:surprise sex fantasies are pretty common though. But they, you know, happen between consenting adults who understand that it is fantasy and won't be terrible scarred for life. I think there might be a difference here between having surprise sex fantasies and being a surprise sex fetishist. Or maybe it's just a matter of degree, I'm not sure exactly what terminology people like to use. I know surprise sex victims often have surprise sex fantasies but for them it can be a coping mechanism. And, like you said, there are couples who like roleplaying it but it's ultimately consenting. The problem is when you think legitimately raping someone is sexy and totally ok, which I'm sure is what tropers mean when they talk about having a surprise sex fetish.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:34 |
|
|
Every time Youtube says "This comment has received too many negative votes", all I can think is, "There is no such thing as too many in this case."quote:South Park has child sex scenes and no one gets upset because it's western trash.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:35 |
|
|
I literally don't know why I'm still there trying to convince him he's wrong. Kid's gonna grow up and be a monster.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:37 |
|
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:Every time Youtube says "This comment has received too many negative votes", all I can think is, "There is no such thing as too many in this case."
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:39 |
|
|
I'm honestly sort of concerned that he can't see what's wrong with what he's saying, plus he genuinely thinks that his being a 'hero' (whatever the gently caress that means in this context) makes him incapable of wrongdoing.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:40 |
|
|
And to think that when this guy first appeared (either at the tail-end of the previous thread or the beginning of this one; I can't quite remember) we all thought he seemed like rather a decent sort. But here he is, well on the way to becoming Chagen 2.0.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:46 |
|
|
Did he seriously call young girls "Loli" with no irony at all.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:46 |
|
|
bionic vapour boy posted:I'm honestly sort of concerned that he can't see what's wrong with what he's saying, plus he genuinely thinks that his being a 'hero' (whatever the gently caress that means in this context) makes him incapable of wrongdoing. Holy poo poo, I thought you were kidding. TheDarkPedoDraven posted:I'm not going to surprise sex anyone. I told you, I'm a hero, okay? How broken do you have to be to think this? Not just that having a sexual attraction to kids is okay, but that you're "a hero"? Does he think he's in one of his anime?  Metal Loaf posted:And to think that when this guy first appeared (either at the tail-end of the previous thread or the beginning of this one; I can't quite remember) we all thought he seemed like rather a decent sort. I realized the same thing earlier. It's rather disappointing
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:47 |
|
|
The Saddest Rhino posted:Did he seriously call young girls "Loli" with no irony at all. Yup. And his need to dehumanise his objects of affection isn't problematic at all! He claims to have 'purged himself' of his desire to gently caress children; quote:I don't need help, though. I don't have any impulses like that. I've completely purged myself of any desire to have actual sex with actual children.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:48 |
|
|
This guy clearly has trouble telling fantasy from reality. I am seriously concerned that he will actually hurt someone some day, when he becomes convinced they want it.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:49 |
|
|
TVTropes the Fifth: I've Completely Purged Myself Of Any Desire To Have Actual Sex
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:50 |
|
|
quote:I don't need help, though. I don't have any impulses like that. I've completely purged myself of any desire to have actual sex with actual children. More likely than not he's just transformed his desire to have actual sex with actual children into a desire to have sex with anime children and convinced himself that this means he's "purged" himself of it. It's essentially the same desire, but in his mind it's not the desire itself that's an issue.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:55 |
|
|
It's terrifying because he's said he's gonna buy himself an anime child gently caress pillow at some point.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:56 |
|
|
Snow Pedophile posted:I'm not going to surprise sex anyone. I told you, I'm a hero, okay? Dude musta watched the FFXIII LP and got the completely wrong message from it.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:59 |
|
|
He's not the "hero" TvTropes wants, he's the "hero" TvTropes deserves. Edit: Slime is a cool dude.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:59 |
|
|
At least all he will be hurting is a pillow. In the meantime in the forums http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.ph...1026600&page=18 Martello is probably on the verge of quitting now that he had the misfortune to read a few pages of child pornography comics. He is also shouted down by a bunch of tropers for finding the usage of cutesy words like "noncon" and "chimo" disgusting, and was accused of yelling. I love how people on this site constantly undermines the website.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 00:59 |
|
|
The Saddest Rhino posted:At least all he will be hurting is a pillow. I love their defence quote:A few images in six volumes' worth of material, with each volume numbering between 150-200 pages, is a rather small sample to judge things, personally speaking. At the very least, one should take a good look at how the whole thing progresses and/or ends; what starts as apparently pandering does not necessarily have to end like that.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 01:02 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 05:42 |
|
|
It's the sheer obstinancy that honestly baffles me. I mean, they think that Google is only pursuing them because they were reported either by trolls of ex-tropers with an axe to grind, but that won't change the fact that Google is pursuing them over this and they A lot of the people complaining about the proposed changes seem to give the impression of believing that, because the people who reported them to Google did so to troll them, they shouldn't have to modify their content, because it's not their fault they were reported. Does that make sense? It barely makes sense to me.
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2012 01:07 |
|
