|
It's a bug and blizz knows about it, they're probably just busy fixing the gold issue.
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 15:26 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 23:07 |
|
|
Inigo is back, he is back down to 2 bill gold im suprised he didnt get a permaban or all of his gold removed.
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 17:58 |
|
|
farcry posted:Inigo is back, he is back down to 2 bill gold im suprised he didnt get a permaban or all of his gold removed. He's playing on EU on a new account and someone hooked him up with two beez.
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 17:58 |
|
|
Can't they just blacklist the dude and ban him whenever he shows up or something? At least show that they're not willing to tolerate poo poo like this ever again or something?
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 18:01 |
|
|
toasterwarrior posted:Can't they just blacklist the dude and ban him whenever he shows up or something? At least show that they're not willing to tolerate poo poo like this ever again or something? What poo poo? He figured that they'd be rolling everything back. He started way after everything had already gone to poo poo. A dude who duped a few bill and so he could laugh online about buying terrible legendaries for TWO BEEZ, thinking they'd be rolling everything back like any sane person would. Inigo rules and has a cool dog.
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 18:08 |
|
|
Ruddha posted:What poo poo? He figured that they'd be rolling everything back. He started way after everything had already gone to poo poo. A dude who duped a few bill and so he could laugh online about buying terrible legendaries for TWO BEEZ, thinking they'd be rolling everything back like any sane person would. Inigo rules and has a cool dog. Ah, so it wasn't a Kripp-GW2 situation? My bad, I assumed he made the exploit public by streaming it and feeding the fire, sorry.
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 18:17 |
|
|
toasterwarrior posted:Ah, so it wasn't a Kripp-GW2 situation? My bad, I assumed he made the exploit public by streaming it and feeding the fire, sorry. Nah there were already a TON of people doing it, and other streamers brought it out first. The b-net forums just REALLY had inigo right now for some reason hahaha.
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 18:18 |
|
|
Ruddha posted:Nah there were already a TON of people doing it, and other streamers brought it out first. The b-net forums just REALLY had inigo right now for some reason hahaha. Making an assumption of a roll back was his mistake. Also, Blizzard sent emails to top D3 streamers specifically telling them NOT to stream exploits or face the ban hammer. He was probably high when he read the email (if he did at all) and already forgot but he streamed the exploit to thousands, got banned. He was also taunting with fake ban screenshot he had as his background. He thought he was invincible from a ban, violated ToS even when Blizzard told him specifically there would be zero tolerance... He deserves his accounts being banned.
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 18:23 |
|
|
Billy Elliot posted:Making an assumption of a roll back was his mistake. Also, Blizzard sent emails to top D3 streamers specifically telling them NOT to stream exploits or face the ban hammer. He was probably high when he read the email (if he did at all) and already forgot but he streamed the exploit to thousands, got banned. He was also taunting with fake ban screenshot he had as his background. He deserved the ban, I agree. But it's also loving funny. He doesn't expect to be unbanned, and is enjoying playing. TWO BEEZ. SNIPED. DONE !!
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 18:28 |
|
|
The best part about Inigo is how very punchable his face looks. He kinda looks like a Mexican Theon Greyjoy. I can dig that.
|
| # ? May 10, 2013 22:08 |
|
|
If Blizzard started permabanning people they would lose too much profit. A banned streamer will just pay/have somebody pay $ and that's good enough. It wouldn't be wise of Blizzard to not only deprive themselves from profit but also waste resources on tracking reregs.
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 12:50 |
|
|
Palpek posted:If Blizzard started permabanning people they would lose too much profit. A banned streamer will just pay/have somebody pay $ and that's good enough. It wouldn't be wise of Blizzard to not only deprive themselves from profit but also waste resources on tracking reregs. EVE online does it. If you RMT or bot a lot they perma ban your accounts and all accounts tied to the IP address and ban you based on your hardware profile if you try to come back and they are a much smaller company. Should be no reason why Blizzard can't have the same stance.
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 20:19 |
|
|
So I wanted to buy some gold and saw it's like, ~$2 for ~8 million gold. It's also about $2 for 2 Radiant Star Rubies which sell for ~28 million gold each. This is probably SUPER old news for most of you guys but I just discovered this (saw someone post a hint about this a couple of pages back I think). Seems like if you knew what to look for you could take that gold, buy good items and then sell those for cash.
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 20:44 |
|
|
Dr. Glasscock posted:So I wanted to buy some gold and saw it's like, ~$2 for ~8 million gold. It's also about $2 for 2 Radiant Star Rubies which sell for ~28 million gold each. This is probably SUPER old news for most of you guys but I just discovered this (saw someone post a hint about this a couple of pages back I think). Seems like if you knew what to look for you could take that gold, buy good items and then sell those for cash. Yeah that's the standard way to go.
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 20:55 |
|
|
Speaking of radiant star rubies, could someone tell these idiots to stop making them? They're driving the cost of flawless squares through the goddamn roof, and are selling at a 3m loss at the radiant star level now. At 17k a goddamn flawless square, why would you even consider making the radiant stars?
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 21:11 |
|
|
pyromance posted:Speaking of radiant star rubies, could someone tell these idiots to stop making them? They're driving the cost of flawless squares through the goddamn roof, and are selling at a 3m loss at the radiant star level now. At 17k a goddamn flawless square, why would you even consider making the radiant stars? I suspect people are buying flawless squares in order to make the next level up gem to then make amulets and thats how the price is being driven up past the point of economically making higher level gems.
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 21:16 |
|
|
I'd guess that the only people buying in sizes large enough to drive the price up that much are the people making radiant stars, because that takes 729 a pop.
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 21:19 |
|
|
Dr. Glasscock posted:So I wanted to buy some gold and saw it's like, ~$2 for ~8 million gold. It's also about $2 for 2 Radiant Star Rubies which sell for ~28 million gold each. This is probably SUPER old news for most of you guys but I just discovered this (saw someone post a hint about this a couple of pages back I think). Seems like if you knew what to look for you could take that gold, buy good items and then sell those for cash. You could buy 1bil for $20 on playerauctions like last week. Check that place if you're trying to buy some gold. It's pretty legit.
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 21:47 |
|
|
washow posted:You could buy 1bil for $20 on playerauctions like last week. Check that place if you're trying to buy some gold. It's pretty legit. I'd be all about this if I wasn't so afraid of being banned. I've got my WoW account tied to the same B.Net account and I'd hate to get poo poo on over some dumb diablo gold.
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 22:52 |
|
|
They only ban the d3 part of your battle net account, at least that's what happened to me when I was botting the auction house at release. I'd say just use playerauctions, it's much cheaper than buying gold from blizzard.
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 23:14 |
|
|
Ya'll should let this thread die.  If the thread creator is still around it would be nice if they could close this one so we can discuss our brownie batter blizzard game in the shiny new thread. 
|
| # ? May 13, 2013 23:47 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 23:07 |
|
|
Randabis posted:Ya'll should let this thread die. Here you go: http://forums.somethingawful.com/sh...hreadid=3548660 I'll ask Incoherence to close this one.
|
| # ? May 14, 2013 00:36 |
|
