|
http://arstechnica.com/uncategorize...7000-plundered/quote:More than $87,000 worth of the virtual currency known as Bitcoin was stolen after online bandits penetrated servers belonging to Bitcoinica, prompting its operators to temporarily shutter the trading platform to contain the damage. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?t...21159#msg921159 quote:From what I gather, there are no backups of the database. Only partial records for accounting which is being used to extrapolate balances. I'm not sure of the exact details, but I think they need a full view of the claims before payouts begin (like a big jigsaw puzzle) to properly cross match records. Hopefully someone better informed will post more details. What an awesome 'security contractor', to stand by their idiotic decision after losing a production database with [NON FIAT] financial data on it. I'd assume a competent group would have taken one look at the setup, screamed holy hell, and taken it all offline until it was actually secure. quote:At last. All is explained. I can't hear you with my fingers in my ears. In other recent BitCoin news: http://www.zdnet.com.au/abcs-bitcoi...s-339338279.htm quote:The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) looked set to become a haven for Bitcoin virtual currency mining last year, after a so-called "miner" placed a piece of code in the production environment, which could have potentially netted to thousands of dollars. http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=156681 quote:FarmVilleFeed.com Partners with Bitcoin Advertising Service Most recent data from MtGOX: Last price:$5.11001 High:$5.14900 Low:$5.10600 Volume:20949 BTC The volume is down significantly from the bubble, but that's still more than $100K a day that they are taking 3% of. If you want even more BitCoin news, you're in luck, because BitCoin Magazine has finally gone to print quote:Bittalk Media Ltd, the Publisher of Bitcoin Magazine, is Pleased to Announce Release of the Very First Issue of Bitcoin Magazine. ![]() Pretty sure Guy Fawkes isn't talking about BTC in that picture, but what do I know, I get paid in fiat dollars. edit: Revener posted:I still have no clue what a Bitcoin is. An analogy is -- you have a set of bingo balls, and you pull one ball out at a time and write the result down on a piece of paper, making longer and longer numbers. You have a friend look at the number when it gets to a certain length, and based on what it looks like tells you that it's either "bad", in which case you throw it out, or "good" in which case you retain it because it's now worth five dollars. If you digitize this whole process and put in lots of Ron Paul references, you've basically got bitcoin. But, don't just take my word for it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um63OQz3bjo Mr Luxury Yacht posted:I'm not sure anything will ever top the last thread. spengler fucked around with this message at May 26, 2012 around 15:31 |
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:21 |
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2013 14:09 |
|
I still have no clue what a Bitcoin is.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:26 |
|
I'm not sure anything will ever top the last thread. It was pure insanity distilled down into thread form. Also, motherfucking CosbyCoins.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:29 |
|
Mr Luxury Yacht posted:I'm not sure anything will ever top the last thread. It was pure insanity distilled down into thread form.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:30 |
|
Revener posted:I still have no clue what a Bitcoin is. its value is roughly equivalent to a combination of the coins that mario picks up and the rings that sonic collects
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:31 |
|
Dubar posted:its value is roughly equivalent to a combination of the coins that mario picks up and the rings that sonic collects Now multiply by zero and you have the value of a bitcoin.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:32 |
|
reminder that this happened and people who society trusts to drive, own land and use sharp objects still listen to this mans every word http://falkvinge.net/2011/05/29/why...s-into-bitcoin/
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:32 |
|
Revener posted:I still have no clue what a Bitcoin is.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:32 |
|
Bitcoin is still the funniest thing to ever happen ever.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:33 |
|
Are the CosbyCoins still safe?
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:44 |
|
I love this picture especially how the Bill somehow found a picture of happy for once Ron Paul and put it next to quote about the importance of having a sound trusted currency.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:49 |
|
BitCoin is like being a little kid with an ant farm one summer and watching the little society of ants slowly break down and die. Only instead of ants it's full of libertarians.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 15:52 |
|
Meliv posted:Are the CosbyCoins still safe? Cosbycoins are inherently sound because they feed off the weaker currencies:
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:14 |
|
Yeah I'm pretty sure every single one of these "hacks" is one of the site admins deciding to cash out and teach internet libertarians a valuable lesson about unregulated free-market economics.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:21 |
|
How can we sit back and claim that Bitcoin is useless? Did we all forget Waffle Hound, the man behind the (only) legitimate Bitcoin enterprise? Top gems for top coin.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:24 |
Dubar posted:its value is roughly equivalent to a combination of the coins that mario picks up and the rings that sonic collects brb, getting some extra lives.
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:26 |
|
The concept is interesting, but holy poo poo, is there even any commercial service beyond some shady Viagra knock-off distributor, that actually takes Bitcoins as currency?! What's the point in all this? There has to be one, because novelty alone doesn't translate into a value, even if it's just 5 dollar.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:26 |
|
Combat Pretzel posted:The concept is interesting, but holy poo poo, is there even any commercial service beyond some shady Viagra knock-off distributor, that actually takes Bitcoins as currency?! What's the point in all this? There has to be one, because novelty alone doesn't translate into a value, even if it's just 5 dollar. I seem to remember you can buy Slim Jims with them.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:28 |
|
This is like watching someone trying to build a giant tower out of cheese, while ferociously arguing it in an engineering perspective as a sound construction material while it keeps crumbling and getting eaten by rats.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:29 |
|
How do you steal a bitcoin though? It's just a really long integer right? So wouldn't the bank still know what the integer is? And for that matter how do you trade them? I know fiat currency is "just a number on a ledger" but this is just a number. How do you prove or exchange ownership of an integer? Is it a high level crypto thing? I might not be getting the core concept, so no one feel obligated to go into any depth, but they seem like too stupid an idea for me to be understanding it correctly.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:30 |
|
I remember reading the first GBS thread through. A wild roller coaster of hilarity that delivered more value than Bitcoin ever has or ever will. And the first reply still holds true today: "Autism Kroners."
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:30 |
|
Bitcoins... wow, 2011 flashback. Hmm... I wonder if they're still going up up UP like Bruce promised.![]() Well. Stagnant price and swiftly-declining trade volume. That'll show those unstable fiat currencies what's what. Source of chart. (Had to try three different sites I remembered from last year before I found one that's still operating.)
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:34 |
|
betaraywil posted:How do you steal a bitcoin though? It's just a really long integer right? So wouldn't the bank still know what the integer is? And for that matter how do you trade them? I know fiat currency is "just a number on a ledger" but this is just a number. How do you prove or exchange ownership of an integer? Is it a high level crypto thing? It's a crypto thing, yes. Essentially, each bitcoin is an integer, but when you transfer them to another person, the integer changes, and only the new owner will know what it is. It's a lot more complex than that, but that's the core of it.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:36 |
|
betaraywil posted:How do you steal a bitcoin though? It's just a really long integer right? So wouldn't the bank still know what the integer is? And for that matter how do you trade them? I know fiat currency is "just a number on a ledger" but this is just a number. How do you prove or exchange ownership of an integer? Is it a high level crypto thing?
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:37 |
|
Who has the Bitcoin strawberry photos?
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:41 |
|
spengler posted:
Time works the same way.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:45 |
|
Cthulu Carl posted:Cosbycoins are inherently sound because they feed off the weaker currencies: They also have the added benefit of being convertible at any time into delicious jello puddin. As long as people have room for jello Cosbycoin will be sound.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:45 |
|
Thanks. That actually sounds kind of cool, in an absurdly complicated math kind of way. Is it just so complicated yet elegant that the bitcoin/integer is identifiable even after it's mutated, or do they upload the new number to some authentication database in Ron Paul's floating fortress? Also: It seems like if the individual coins have some sort of persistent individual identity, it would be possible (if not simple) to revert them in the case of theft. Like that sounds like a main advantage over other currencies/commodities. Why can't they do that? Or is it just that there's no governing body that would be able to do that? (Again, feel free to ignore me; I'm curious, but I feel like I'm so ignorant about this that I'm probably not even asking coherent questions.)
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:47 |
|
Bitcoin transactions can not be reverted, even if somebody steals your wallet and spends it all on Slim Jims you have no way to recover your BitCoins. Don't forget about the physical effects of BitCoin. ![]()
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:48 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Who has the Bitcoin strawberry photos? ![]()
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:48 |
|
betaraywil posted:How do you steal a bitcoin though? It's just a really long integer right? So wouldn't the bank still know what the integer is? And for that matter how do you trade them? I know fiat currency is "just a number on a ledger" but this is just a number. How do you prove or exchange ownership of an integer? Is it a high level crypto thing? This digital equivalent to keeping money under the bed is slow and inconvenient, so people store and transfer money via central bitcoin banks which provide a single place to hack and remove the only possible benefit from using the currency.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:56 |
|
How does one actually steal a bitcoin anyway? And how exactly would one exactly go about laundering several hundred thousand dollars worth of the stuff into real money? This poo poo is as fascinating as it is insane.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:57 |
|
Ashenai posted:It's a crypto thing, yes. Essentially, each bitcoin is an integer, but when you transfer them to another person, the integer changes, and only the new owner will know what it is. It's a lot more complex than that, but that's the core of it. Yup. From what I've read about the underlying structure, there's actually some pretty cool cryptographic math involved. And if I recall correctly, there hasn't actually been a successful attack against bitcoin itself -- the hilarity comes from people learning the hard way that "anonymous, irreversible transactions with NO higher authority" works for thieves too. Well, that and the fact that these people are happily buying and selling shares of absolutely nothing for real money.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 16:57 |
|
Yaos posted:Bitcoin transactions can not be reverted, even if somebody steals your wallet and spends it all on Slim Jims you have no way to recover your BitCoins. Isn't that a really bad investment? The sheer energy cost is probably higher than the bitcoins he earned.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 17:03 |
|
Why is it that people who espouse the free market system always have no idea how a free market actually works?
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 17:04 |
|
betaraywil posted:Thanks. That actually sounds kind of cool, in an absurdly complicated math kind of way. Is it just so complicated yet elegant that the bitcoin/integer is identifiable even after it's mutated, or do they upload the new number to some authentication database in Ron Paul's floating fortress? There is a public database (called the block chain) that has the complete transaction history of every bitcoin. Everyone who uses bitcoins has a copy of it on their computer. quote:Also: It seems like if the individual coins have some sort of persistent individual identity, it would be possible (if not simple) to revert them in the case of theft. Like that sounds like a main advantage over other currencies/commodities. Why can't they do that? Or is it just that there's no governing body that would be able to do that? It's not possible to single out a single transaction to revert in the block chain without loving up its cryptographic integrity. You could theoretically revert the entire block chain to a previous date (invalidating all transactions since then), but since it's a peer-to-peer database, you'd need consensus, like for every bitcoin user to go "yeah, everything that happened since May 4 was bullshit." That's just not going to happen. quote:(Again, feel free to ignore me; I'm curious, but I feel like I'm so ignorant about this that I'm probably not even asking coherent questions.) No, they're good questions. The fundamental concept and technical execution of bitcoins is actually quite solid, it's just that, well, internet libertarians.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 17:07 |
|
Does it really say "check mark here when bill has been used"?
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 17:08 |
|
Mulatto Butts posted:Does it really say "check mark here when bill has been used"? one use as soon as you pull off the sticker i believe?
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 17:10 |
|
Nothing like disgusting, hair/dust/dirt/Cheeto dust covered dehydrated berries.
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 17:13 |
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2013 14:09 |
|
Mulatto Butts posted:Does it really say "check mark here when bill has been used"? Yes, that's exactly what it says
|
| # ? May 26, 2012 17:16 |
































