|
Just a quick review for the new thread - I just bought a Nikon DX AF-S 50-200mm f/4-5.6 G ED VR, and I adore it.
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2012 02:29 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 10:29 |
|
Menorah on Fire posted:Why isn't the first bit of advice just "BUY A MANFROTTO 190XPROB"? I wish that had been my first piece of advice. I have 3 tripods, and all of them sliiiiide down under the weight of my RB67 or 4x5. Even with my Nikons or Pentax 6x7 they're awkward to use and plasticy feeling. ...granted, they were all handmedowns, but still.
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2012 13:28 |
|
evil_bunnY posted:Unless you use it professionally or buy collectibles, photo gear isn't really an investment. If you get lucky and find a cheap Hasselblad or Leica you can potentially sell it for more money down the road. I guess that's an investment, but I guess that also counts as "collectibles". A guy on Craigslist was selling a 500CM outfit with 80mm T* lens (Planar maybe?) for $500. I have never mashed the e-mail button faster in my life, but he had JUST sold it to someone else
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2012 13:54 |
|
That's why I go to as many antique stores and garage sales as I can... ONE DAY. One day.
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2012 14:56 |
|
Mr. Despair posted:Even the Pentax ME Super? You and I are like the Bebop and Rocksteady of ME Super advocacy. (I call Bebop)
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2012 18:36 |
|
Paul MaudDib posted:And I'm the cheapskate who keeps pointing out that MEs are just as good 99% of the time and even cheaper Unless you want to shoot manual
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2012 19:33 |
|
Mr. Despair posted:Someone's a Poser. ME Supers: the Zimbabwe dollars of photography.
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2012 21:36 |
|
signalnoise posted:I've got a 75-300mm lens I use for taking pictures of animals from my porch. What should I look for if I want my camera to magnify more? Right now getting a picture of a finch on a telephone wire gives me a good picture in one ninth of the actual area of the photo. Do I just want more mm's on the lens? Please give the answer to me as if I know less than nothing about anything. I don't mean to patronize you, but you did say act like you know nothing... Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_length About halfway down, there's 4 photos all taken from the same spot with different lenses (with different "mm's"). The longer your focus length, the more zoomed in things will be.
|
# ¿ Jul 17, 2012 00:05 |
|
Mr. Despair posted:I think you're doing it wrong, although I commend you for attempting to use a Pentax ME Super for everything. Can we be Dorkroom BFFs?
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2012 00:22 |
|
ThisQuietReverie posted:Slattern. Well this is awkward...
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2012 00:49 |
|
Mr. Despair posted:we need to make a Pentax ME Superposters gang tag. I would pay real life money for this. Probably about 5ɱɛ (five Pentax ME Supers).
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2012 01:28 |
|
The Pentax ME Super + SMC 50mm 1.4 is my favorite thing to shoot with, and that's out of like... 15 cameras or something including small/medium/large formats and digital. Ellen and a Tree by iantuten, on Flickr ~`*BOKEH*`~
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2012 01:52 |
|
TQR, that was a creepy post to read until I saw who it was, then I was like "oh it's just my bro TQR."
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2012 15:02 |
|
Mightaswell posted:Count me in Protip: It's never going to happen.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2012 21:46 |
|
KEH is having a 10% off sale on all film cameras through the end of the month.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2012 22:23 |
|
Unfortunately, that camera is probably only going to fetch $10 or so. Also, it uses a proprietary film type that doesn't exist anymore (Agfa Rapid Film). I would say it'd be more valuable to keep as a memory of your father than to try and get any money out of.
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2012 19:45 |
|
DJExile posted:Yeah, if you want it as something to gently caress around with, go to town. I've made much worse decisions with $35. Yeah seriously. $35 is like, a trip to the movies for 2 people or something. For that kind of money buy it and try it out.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2012 18:53 |
|
powderific posted:The AF-D lenses aren't particularly nice to manually focus either—the rings are super loose in MF mode. I love the 35 F2.0 on my D800, but the 35DX is optically better and costs less. Yeah, I had a 50mm 1.8 AF-D once and haaaated it on my F3. On my F4 it autofocused so I didn't care, but powderific is right.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2013 19:06 |
|
Why can't every company just make their mounts in the same style as Adaptall I mean COME ON
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2013 21:37 |
|
I'm getting out of film and into digital, and I'm trying to make the decision between Nikon (which I know and have used in the past), Canon, or a beefy M4/3 setup like an OM-D. Am I right in thinking that Canon is lacking in the primes area? I know with Nikon I had a bunch of G lenses, AF-D lenses, AI, AIS, whatever I wanted to use, but the selection doesn't seem to be there with Canon, they seem to focus more on zooms. Am I wrong there? With the 800 or so that I'm looking to spend, I'm thinking of a 50D and a Tamron 17-50 (399 + 300 or so). The other option is a Nikon D90 + Tamron 17-50.
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2013 22:36 |
|
Noted on both accounts! Canon has been calling me with its sweet siren song, but my photographer ex-gf blinded me to the ways of Nikon and I never looked back
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2013 23:10 |
|
I'm looking at buying a new flash. I used to shoot on manual film cameras only, so I bought a manual-only flash, and it worked out pretty well. Now, however, I've switched to digital and have entered a whole new confusing world of TTL crap. Since I have a manual flash that I could use in studio situations, I'm looking for a TTL flash to use at events and walkabouts that I won't have to fiddle with nonstop. I just want something that will meter and adjust the flash accordingly, with whatever flash compensation I set in camera. I'm a cheapskate and can't afford an official Canon Speedlite, so I'm looking at alternatives. Bower SFD728C TTL Autofocus Flash for Canon E-TTL II - $38 YongNuo YN-468 II E-TTL Speedlite With LCD Display, for Canon 50D 40D T1i Xsi XS - $89 Yongnuo YN-565EX ETTL Speedlite Flash for Canon $160 Since I'm looking for something full-auto, is there any reason not to go with the cheapest option? It says it has ETTL II, which I'm assuming is the most current technology there, and seems to have decent power behind it. What would I be gaining for $50 or $120 more?
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2013 17:40 |
|
Spime Wrangler posted:I have a 468-II and it works with canon's on-body flash exposure compensation controls. Yes, this is what I meant by "auto"... no need to fiddle with the flash, but still able to fiddle with the compensation on the camera. Of course I understand the need for flash exposure compensation. Cool, the 468-II is what I'm leaning toward, so that's good to hear.
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2013 18:29 |
|
mAlfunkti0n posted:Anyone have experience with the Yongnuo YN-560 II flash? I am wanting to get a flash, and really do not want to pay for the Canon. This one seems like a great alternative (fantastic reviews), full manual which I am fine with (especially for the price). I have the YN-560, not the II, and it's a great flash if you're okay with manual. Literally no complaints. I'm also selling it in the Gear Selling Thread if you want to check it out
|
# ¿ May 7, 2013 16:36 |
|
xzzy posted:The Goja cheap set comes with an 8 stop filter: You know, even just for a set of adapters and Cokin holder, that's pretty tempting... edit-- everything's made of plastic including the filters Count Thrashula fucked around with this message at 16:02 on May 17, 2013 |
# ¿ May 17, 2013 15:59 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 10:29 |
|
On full frame, how big of a gain is 40mm over 50mm? I already have the 50 1.8 II, but the 40mm is so darned cheap.
|
# ¿ May 28, 2013 16:29 |