Search Amazon.com:
Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
«16 »
  • Post
  • Reply
Almost Smart
Sep 14, 2001

so your telling me you wasn't drunk or fucked up in anyway. when you had sex with me and that monkey

clownskull posted:

Now finally I decided something about this issue because even though I don't own a gun, many people I know do and they rationalize it like that as well. I'll tell you one thing that's for certain--if it ever gets to a point in the good old United States of America where people carrying guns to protect themselves ever sounds like a great idea to me, well, I'd rather be shot to death.

You'll eat those words when the commies/zombies/commiezombies come a'knockin.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Israfel
Apr 23, 2010

HAIL SATAN


Devil Wears Wings posted:

No it's not. No matter how much you value your box of jewelry or big-screen TV, human life should always be more important than someone's property.

Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground are poisonous laws that only serve to encourage the type of senseless gun violence that this country already has too much of.

In a home invasion you should always always assume the perpetrator is fully willing and prepared to kill you or your family members. Property has nothing to do with anything at all and it should never be assumed "this guy is just here for my stuff".

People who are there to steal your sweet tv do it when you aren't home.

Thundercracker
Jun 25, 2004

Proudly serving the Ruinous Powers since as a veteran of the long war.


Man Florida, you aren't even trying anymore. Well, let your crazy flag fly I guess.

Lucy Heartfilia
May 31, 2012

Step 1: A anime with a friend.
Step 2: A anime to keep the cold out.
Step 3: A anime too much.
Step 4: Drunk and riotous.
Step 5: The summit attained. Jolly companions, a confirmed waifu.
Step 6: Poverty and Disease.
Step 7: Forsaken by Friends
Step 8: Desperation and crime
Step 9: Death by suicide

It's coming right for us!!!
http://www.southparkstudios.com/cli...ng-right-for-us

Yes, I already posted that in the Anaheim police murder thread, but it's so fitting.

Rujo King
Jun 28, 2007

I say old chap have you any of the good sort of catnip if you know what I mean... harrumphaarmaammhhhmm


In my state (Virginia) the only aspect of mental illness the background check covers is whether or not you've been committed to an institution or adjudicated to be mentally unfit. But even if you have, it doesn't completely rule out buying a gun legally, it just makes it a little more complicated to get the transfer.

As far as CCW permits go, I think the same restrictions apply, only you also have to show proof that you've gone through some kind of gun safety course. (But if you're worried that leaving your "castle" might expose you to blacks and hispanics "zombies" and "bad guys", you can take a course online, allowing you to spend all your time planting STANAG magazines and improvised flashbangs around your Soldier of Fortune-festooned bunker, you paranoid motherfucker.)

I collect historical firearms as a hobby and so I consider myself to be generally in favor of gun rights. But there has to be some kind of regulation of the drat things, and not the "oh, whatever, buy 25,000 rounds of really hot hollow-point ammo, just don't get a rifle with a barrel shorter than 16 inches" kind of poo poo we've got today. I'm talking about perfectly logical measures like drivers-license-like permits and interviews and waiting periods, things that make buying guns possible for people who have legitimate reasons for owning them, while making it much more difficult for people who are either batshit insane or just awful.

When I'm driving down the road, I expect the people driving the cars around me to know enough about the law, their cars and human life that they won't ram me off the road or drive the wrong way while sucking back Private Stock. Is it asking too much to want gun ownership to be the same way?

Mutant Headcrab posted:

I'm interpreting this as they found 14 so far, but haven't ruled out the possibility he has more hidden somewhere.

Maybe he had multiple upper and lower receivers for an AR-15 platform, so they're now trying to figure out if it's just one per barrel or if they've got to work in combinatorics somehow.

Toffile
Sep 10, 2008

   'Cause she's so high
      High above me,
       she's so lovely

                - Everclear

Thoughtless posted:

Can someone who understands American law explain why he's being charged with second-degree instead of first? It was a straight-up execution and it most certainly was premeditated, considering the victim was laying on the ground.

Premeditation means that the act was rationally planned out ahead of time. It clearly wasn't in this case. No prosecutor is going to attempt to prove that he was thinking rationally in between the shots, barring something unknown. Its too small of a timeframe, and the prosecutor would most likely lose.

Mans
Sep 14, 2011


If he was an off duty cop he'd probably get a two week paid vacation while his union dealt with turning the salesman into a possible gangbanger.

rodbeard
Jul 21, 2005
I'm a spud boy; I've got eyes all around

Rujo King posted:

I collect historical firearms as a hobby and so I consider myself to be generally in favor of gun rights.

Well since you claim to be a collector, you would know that antique guns generally don't require a permit and are even easier to obtain than modern firearms. Regulations don't apply to guns over a certain age. You're either not a very knowledgeable collector or being willfully dense. So gently caress you I guess and gently caress everyone that's against stricter gun regulations, since the only argument any of you come up with is "I'm responsible so I should be able to buy guns no questions asked."

Is it too much to ask that you just deal with it being slightly more difficult for you to get a gun so we can keep the crazies and dangerous people from also getting guns? Is it really worth people dying so you can collect guns easier?

ghetto wormhole
Sep 15, 2008


rodbeard posted:

Well since you claim to be a collector, you would know that antique guns generally don't require a permit and are even easier to obtain than modern firearms. Regulations don't apply to guns over a certain age. You're either not a very knowledgeable collector or being willfully dense. So gently caress you I guess and gently caress everyone that's against stricter gun regulations, since the only argument any of you come up with is "I'm responsible so I should be able to buy guns no questions asked."

Is it too much to ask that you just deal with it being slightly more difficult for you to get a gun so we can keep the crazies and dangerous people from also getting guns? Is it really worth people dying so you can collect guns easier?

Holy poo poo dude did you just completely stop reading his post when you quoted that part?

Mr Underhill
Feb 14, 2012

Sowshulizm.


Pro-gunners, do you consider having a mandatory psychiatric examination prior to purchasing a gun/ammo gun restriction? Wouldn't you rather just weed out all the psychos making you look so bad? Of course that wouldn't eliminate the gangsters and plain trigger-happies, but it would be a start that'd surely avoid tragedies such as Aurora or the case in the OP. How exactly would that infringe on your constitutional right to bear arms?

A FUCKIN CANARY!!
Nov 9, 2005



rodbeard posted:

Well since you claim to be a collector, you would know that antique guns generally don't require a permit and are even easier to obtain than modern firearms.

Because nothing historical has happened since 1899. No wars or anything like that. Nope.

Archonex
May 2, 2012

MY OPINION IS DOGSHIT IGNORE MY BRAIN DAMAGED RAMBLINGS


Mr Underhill posted:

Pro-gunners, do you consider having a mandatory psychiatric examination prior to purchasing a gun/ammo gun restriction? Wouldn't you rather just weed out all the psychos making you look so bad? Of course that wouldn't eliminate the gangsters and plain trigger-happies, but it would be a start that'd surely avoid tragedies such as Aurora or the case in the OP. How exactly would that infringe on your constitutional right to bear arms?

I'm pretty much firmly in the "regulate it intelligently category". So I can't speak for the pro-deregulate it types.

However, I will say that at this point any sort of meaningful regulation would be probably be next to impossible to enforce. Guns are very common in the U.S. Even if you tried to increase regulations, people who were determined to get a gun to use for something nefarious would be able to do it. It'd probably end up more being a case of it affecting people who had little to no interest in committing a crime with one.

The supply is quite high, in terms of availability. My understanding is that the economics and business side of the gun trade are geared so that if you were absolutely determined, you could get one under the table if you really wanted one. Gun shows are a good example of this, as apparently a certain amount of under the table stuff goes on at many of the more shadier ones. Likewise, there's apparently a fairly large number of unregistered/untracked guns floating around due to dickery with how regulating/tracking them was handled in the past.


Plus, there's the issue of the NRA. Most people assume the NRA is a lobbying/advocacy group. In reality, they're more like a trade consortium/group that makes money off of the advocation of de-regulating/messing with the selling of guns.

If you think for a moment that they're going to go for any sort of stricter regulations, you're out of your mind. You're basically asking them to accept a decrease in yearly profits. And since they have quite a bit of influence in many of the more conservative areas of the United States, I wouldn't hold your breath on anything happening.

Just to give you an idea of what sort of money the NRA pulls in, this was taken from wikipedia.

quote:


Annual revenues for the NRA were around $150 million in 1994, up from $66 million in 1986. It spent $15 million on a new headquarters in the 1990s.

The NRA Office of Advancement[43] was created in 2005 to focus on building the NRA's endowment and underwriting programs and projects through strategic, planned, and corporate gifts across the organization – including the NRA, the NRA Foundation, NRA-ILA, the NRA Freedom Action Foundation, the NRA Whittington Center, and the Civil Rights Defense Fund. In 2007, the NRA Office of Advancement launched a new donor recognition society called the Ring of Freedom[44] In 2010, the NRA Foundation was designated a Four Star Charity by Charity Navigator for the eighth consecutive year. The Office of Advancement also coordinates the "I'm the NRA and I Give" advertising campaign[45] and publishes the Ring of Freedom magazine.[46]

According to the Better Business Bureau's web site, the NRA does not fall within the BBB's scope of Standards for Charity Accountability. They do note the following financials for the NRA as of December 31, 2004. The NRA's CEO, Wayne LaPierre, received a yearly salary of $895,897 in 2004. They also indicated that fundraising costs accounted for 46% of the contributions received. The NRA is a 501(c)(4) organization and indicated that the NRA's total income in 2004 was $205,402,491 and had expenses of $206,886,970. Total NRA assets at the end of 2004 were $222,841,128.

Klisejo
Apr 13, 2006

Who else see da' Leprechaun say YEAH!

Mr Underhill posted:

Pro-gunners, do you consider having a mandatory psychiatric examination prior to purchasing a gun/ammo gun restriction? Wouldn't you rather just weed out all the psychos making you look so bad? Of course that wouldn't eliminate the gangsters and plain trigger-happies, but it would be a start that'd surely avoid tragedies such as Aurora or the case in the OP. How exactly would that infringe on your constitutional right to bear arms?

In Alabama, you have to take a Hunting Safety course and provide proof you took it in order to get your permit. You have to take a test to get your boating license. Same with your Drivers License. Trucks and Heavy Machinery require a CDL. Want to fly a plane? Have to get a license.

I own a few firearms. I'm "pro-gun" I guess you could say. But I'm amazed at how easy it is to get a gun. I think if we put a few more basic checks than just paying the cc fee and a wait period we might catch some of these psychopaths before they kill anymore 6 year olds.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002



How is this different from the Hattori murder? The guy got off on that one.

J.theYellow
May 7, 2003



Almost Smart posted:

You'll eat those words when the commies/zombies/commiezombies come a'knockin.

Selling brain steaks, door to door.

K. Farb
Aug 6, 2009

I'd give you a ride, but I got Karl Farbman here.

InternetJunky posted:

How is this different from the Hattori murder? The guy got off on that one.

That's entirely different as he went into the home. He didn't deserve to be shot but he wasn't a salesman standing outside.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002



K. Farb posted:

That's entirely different as he went into the home. He didn't deserve to be shot but he wasn't a salesman standing outside.
Really? My only account of the story is what was on wikipedia: "Hattori and Haymaker rang the front doorbell but, seemingly receiving no response, began to walk back to their car. " Is this incorrect then?

wilfredmerriweathr
Jul 11, 2005


I enjoy shooting and I think that we do indeed have a right in the US to own weapons but good god we need to adjust the system we have in place. It's easier to get a conceal carry permit than a credit card.

Or just ban anyone in the state of florida from owning a gun.

K. Farb
Aug 6, 2009

I'd give you a ride, but I got Karl Farbman here.

InternetJunky posted:

Really? My only account of the story is what was on wikipedia: "Hattori and Haymaker rang the front doorbell but, seemingly receiving no response, began to walk back to their car. " Is this incorrect then?

Yeah, I can't read. I read "to the wrong house" as "into the wrong house." The OP story has a man identifying himself as a salesman, though, and there were no language barriers/confusion.

Preoptopus
Aug 25, 2008


And people always gasp when I say Ive never been to Florida. They go "dude Florida is SO AWESOME!" Ya, gently caress that place, have zero desire to set foot in that state.

joshske
Jul 31, 2004
Paid to be an idiot

God drat America you guys are just flat out hosed up. Your self entitlement to own a gun because you have a small dick and need to compensate for this fact resulting in murder is a loving joke. I don't know how anyone can own up to being an American these days, and what is worse is that there are clowns defending this flat out batshit insane murderer.

Preoptopus
Aug 25, 2008


joshske posted:

God drat America you guys are just flat out hosed up. Your self entitlement to own a gun because you have a small dick and need to compensate for this fact resulting in murder is a loving joke. I don't know how anyone can own up to being an American these days, and what is worse is that there are clowns defending this flat out batshit insane murderer.

In America, we call it freedom

K. Farb
Aug 6, 2009

I'd give you a ride, but I got Karl Farbman here.

joshske posted:

God drat America you guys are just flat out hosed up. Your self entitlement to own a gun because you have a small dick and need to compensate for this fact resulting in murder is a loving joke. I don't know how anyone can own up to being an American these days, and what is worse is that there are clowns defending this flat out batshit insane murderer.

I love these posts. Yes, everyone in our country of immigrants are the same.

wilfredmerriweathr
Jul 11, 2005


Preoptopus posted:

And people always gasp when I say Ive never been to Florida. They go "dude Florida is SO AWESOME!" Ya, gently caress that place, have zero desire to set foot in that state.

Yeah goddamn I hate this. When I lived in Canada people were always like "Florida is my favorite state! It's THE BEST!!"


You have got to be making GBS threads me.

Carl Seitan
May 20, 2004



InternetJunky posted:

Really? My only account of the story is what was on wikipedia: "Hattori and Haymaker rang the front doorbell but, seemingly receiving no response, began to walk back to their car. " Is this incorrect then?

No. K. Farb is talking out of his rear end.

Thundercracker
Jun 25, 2004

Proudly serving the Ruinous Powers since as a veteran of the long war.


IzzyFnStradlin posted:

My question is why do all his neighbors interviewed in the accompanying video have thick New York accents? If I was a native Floridian with mental problems, I'd probably wanna kill someone too if I was forced to be surrounded by obnoxious white trash guidos! Yankee carpet baggers need to stay put!

If you sell a house/apt in a decent New York/New Jersey area you'll get at least a million for it, which is more than enough to buy a much bigger house in Florida and retire in comfort.

Flameingblack
May 11, 2011

The world is a mess
And I am the one
Who will rebuild it


As much as I would like to shoot solicitors who constantly bother me some days, I really don't think a thousand no-trespassing signs should enable you to actually shoot them.

Just like alcoholics shouldn't own cars, crazy people shouldn't own guns. But there's just no way of telling which is which when you give them a license, weapon, or car.

VVVVVV

Fimbulvinter posted:

Gun control debate in a violent shooting thread?!?! MODS?!?!?
There really isn't much else to talk about. Florida, guns, it's the same topic that pops up every couple months. It's become a bad cliche.

Fimbulvinter
Nov 6, 2008

by elpintogrande


Gun control debate in a violent shooting thread?!?! MODS?!?!?

Mr Underhill
Feb 14, 2012

Sowshulizm.


Oh please. Where I live there are no guns, anywhere. I know no one who'd even know anyone who owns a gun. Only homicides happening - every once in a while some hick will get drunk off his rear end and drive a pitchfork through another hick for looking at his girl the wrong way. And I don't believe Americans are inherently more homicidal than my conationals or anyone else on this blue planet. Plus, what with globalization and everything, we're pretty much all watching the same movies and playing the same violent games. It just makes sense that leaving stones all over the place is likelier to result in smashed windows than not doing so.

K. Farb
Aug 6, 2009

I'd give you a ride, but I got Karl Farbman here.

Carl Seitan posted:

No. K. Farb is talking out of his rear end.

Are you saying the situations are exactly the same or did you miss my second post?

wilfredmerriweathr
Jul 11, 2005


Mr Underhill posted:

And I don't believe Americans are inherently more homicidal than my conationals or anyone else on this blue planet.
I think maybe you haven't met enough Americans. I love my country but holy gently caress do we breed crazy.

Mr Underhill
Feb 14, 2012

Sowshulizm.


Oh, gently caress, I already got probated 3 days ago for discussing gun control in a mass homicide thread, go figure. Can anyone advise per safety so I can get the gently caress out of dodge in time?

Fimbulvinter
Nov 6, 2008

by elpintogrande


Mr Underhill posted:

Oh, gently caress, I already got probated 3 days ago for discussing gun control in a mass homicide thread, go figure. Can anyone advise per safety so I can get the gently caress out of dodge in time?

Congratulations on being Everything Wrong With America.

Flameingblack
May 11, 2011

The world is a mess
And I am the one
Who will rebuild it


Mr Underhill posted:

Oh please. Where I live there are no guns, anywhere.
Have you ever stopped to think that guns aren't the problem in America, it's the people? If someone just took away everyone's guns at once, we would still find ways to murder one another. Of course there are countries with low murder rates, people in those countries grew up completely different than Americans. They have different environments and living standards, maybe they've got lower stress on a daily average.

America

Earwicker
Jan 6, 2003



Mr Underhill posted:

And I don't believe Americans are inherently more homicidal than my conationals or anyone else on this blue planet.

Inherently or not, we are currently more homicidal than any other developed nation.

Although that's no longer such a good comparison, seeing as we also have a bigger income disparity than most other developed nations.

IRQ
Sep 9, 2001


Mr Underhill posted:

Oh, gently caress, I already got probated 3 days ago for discussing gun control in a mass homicide thread, go figure. Can anyone advise per safety so I can get the gently caress out of dodge in time?

Gun control is a third rail not only in our lovely politics but even on our internet forums. That should tell you about all you need to know.

A man is dead because he was trying to sell some crappy steaks, but MAH GUNZ!

Archonex
May 2, 2012

MY OPINION IS DOGSHIT IGNORE MY BRAIN DAMAGED RAMBLINGS


Earwicker posted:

Inherently or not, we are currently more homicidal than any other developed nation.

Although that's no longer such a good comparison, seeing as we also have a bigger income disparity than most other developed nations.

This isn't a gun control thing, so I guess it's a derail of the derail now, but I have to wonder how much of that is attributable to the simple rules of statistics.

The United States has a fairly massive population which is spread across many different regions. By default, any statistics reported that relate to population would be higher than most other countries. This is due to the fact that comparatively speaking, we have way more people living in the country than most other countries do.

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011
CARDIOVORAX BELIVES A POLICEMAN WHO GROPES A WOMAN SHOULD LOSE HIS JOB, AND DO A HUNDRED HOURS OF COMUNITY SERVICE UNDER THE PAIN OF GOING TO PRISON IF HE BREAKS HIS PAROLE


Archonex posted:

This isn't a gun control thing, so I guess it's a derail of the derail now, but I have to wonder how much of that is attributable to statistics.

The United States has a fairly massive population which is spread across many different regions. By default, any statistics relating to population that were reported would be higher than most other countries, simply due to the fact that comparatively speaking, we have way more people living in the country than most of them do.
It isn't, really. Those statistics are always averaged out over the population in order to provide a meaningful point of comparison. The income disparity is bigger on average, so although you have both more poor people and more rich people, you still have less middle class in comparison.

Unbelievably Fat Man
Jun 1, 2000

Innocent people. I could never hurt innocent people.

reflir posted:

How can counting be so hard that he owns 'approximately 14 firearms'?

Well, he had a couple rail guns, but it's questionable if those qualify as "firearms". No fire, you see, they propel their projectile with magnets.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Scenty
Feb 8, 2008




I really dislike guns and I wish the US had much stricter regulation. I believe that, yes, people would still murder one another, but a gun makes it much easier. You can stand back six feet or more from a person and kill them. With something like a knife you have to get up close and personal. That alone might be enough to deter some people. Would this crazy guy have stabbed the salesman? Maybe, I won't pretend to know the answer to that.

My partner and I are trying to get pregnant and now I have thought seriously about getting a handgun for protection, and that makes me sad.

  • Post
  • Reply
«16 »