Search Amazon.com:
Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
«16 »
  • Post
  • Reply
Paramemetic
Sep 29, 2003

A gift from Coyote! Nothing could possibly go wrong here!


Zigmidge posted:

I'd like to bring up, am I crazy for thinking that there has been progressively more 'twang' in american pop music the last few years? I feel like it's slowly turning into country music written by club DJs.

It's kinda polarizing. I feel like there's a big more twang coming out of the still instrumentally driven rock pop stuff, Taylor Swift etc., but the main thing I've observed is that it's tending to become more electronic. I feel like it used to be much less electronic than it is now. A lot of synths in the mix, mostly synthetic drums, bass, lead synths, etc. But yeah, if there's instruments I think they are trending towards Teles.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

abigserve
Sep 13, 2009

It was not scary. It was just...abnormal.


I feel like music is marketed at a much yonger audience nowadays, at least pop music is. I'm only 21 but it seems like none of the music on the radio is relatable to me.

I love a huge variety of music, from country to dubstep to classic rock, all of which I can connect with on some personal level. When I turn on the radio and listen to the top 40 charts though, I don't really feel that connection so I get bored and turn it off.

HollisBrown
Apr 2, 2009

I'm nothing, a tramp, a hobo, a box car, a jug of wine, and a straight razor if you get too close to me.


abigserve posted:

I feel like music is marketed at a much yonger audience nowadays, at least pop music is. I'm only 21 but it seems like none of the music on the radio is relatable to me.

I love a huge variety of music, from country to dubstep to classic rock, all of which I can connect with on some personal level. When I turn on the radio and listen to the top 40 charts though, I don't really feel that connection so I get bored and turn it off.

I think that's true to a certain extent, although the subject matter is still decidedly adult. Music is also very escapist currently, we are in an upswing of ridiculousness, but pretty soon something is going to come along like Bob Dylan in the 60's, Springsteen in the 70's or Nirvana in the 90's and it's going to get decent again for awhile, and then lovely again for another longtime after that.

Clamps McGraw
May 6, 2009


Nessa posted:

Oddly enough, as much as I can't stand modern radio music, I adore J-pop.

"I hate radio music, but I love unlistenably twee bubblegum ear-poo poo from ~Glorious Nippon~!"

constantIllusion
Feb 16, 2010


abigserve posted:

I feel like music is marketed at a much yonger audience nowadays, at least pop music is. I'm only 21 but it seems like none of the music on the radio is relatable to me.

I love a huge variety of music, from country to dubstep to classic rock, all of which I can connect with on some personal level. When I turn on the radio and listen to the top 40 charts though, I don't really feel that connection so I get bored and turn it off.

Pop music has always been marketed to middle class teenagers. The reason for that is because teenagers have the highest disposable income of any age group. They have no bills to pay, they don't have to buy groceries, and they don't have to pay for their housing. Any money they receive from working or from allowances can be spent on anything they want, and teenagers want music, clothes, and to go out to the movies.

Alobar
Jun 21, 2011

HEY SEE THIS STUPID SHIT OVER HERE? IGNORE IT. I AM DRIVING THE BUS TO FLAVOR TOWN. ALL ABOARD FOR SHITTY FOOD AND BAD TUNES! PLEASE ASK ME ABOUT BLAND ASS 'CHILI'!


Zigmidge posted:

Real country loving sucks

http://youtu.be/bDJPnG3RDxU#t=20s
http://youtu.be/keQR4_7DBnM

Real country is only the roots of the vast majority of American music. Real country is some OG punk poo poo.

some old country musician posted:

Well if the ocean were whiskey, and I were a duck,
I'd fly to the bottom, lord, I'd never come up.

http://youtu.be/mqexThzOOC0

New "country" can be just as raw.

cat doter
Jul 27, 2006
Teenage Mutant Ninja Cripple

It's kinda bizarre how many people are defending or twisting this around to seem like a good thing. Come back, The Beatles, we miss you.

There's some great pop out there (Florence + the Machine, Regina Spektor, that sort of stuff) but America has mass produced pop music as a product for quite a while now. It's not a good thing. There definitely is a 'formula', so to speak.

Bubble-T
Dec 26, 2004

You know, I've got a funny feeling I've seen this all before.

HollisBrown posted:

I think that's true to a certain extent, although the subject matter is still decidedly adult. Music is also very escapist currently, we are in an upswing of ridiculousness, but pretty soon something is going to come along like Bob Dylan in the 60's, Springsteen in the 70's or Nirvana in the 90's and it's going to get decent again for awhile, and then lovely again for another longtime after that.

What's wrong with "escapist" music?

Nessa posted:

Oddly enough, as much as I can't stand modern radio music, I adore J-pop. Maybe it's because I can't understand the lyrics.

Partly that you can't understand the lyrics and partly that as the mass-market produce of a 'foreign' culture you (and many other people) are able to just enjoy it as pop music should be enjoyed without the massive societal hangups people have about pop music from their own mainstream culture. There's not really any musical reason to greatly enjoy J-pop but dislike Top 40.

Either that or you're a japanophile but then you might be able to understand the lyrics..

abigserve posted:

I feel like music is marketed at a much yonger audience nowadays, at least pop music is. I'm only 21 but it seems like none of the music on the radio is relatable to me.

I love a huge variety of music, from country to dubstep to classic rock, all of which I can connect with on some personal level. When I turn on the radio and listen to the top 40 charts though, I don't really feel that connection so I get bored and turn it off.

Apart from what constantIllusion said (don't worry, you're still being marketed to), do you go to clubs or even parties where they might play that kind of music? People can have a connection with top 40 that's as simple as "I had a great time dancing to this song last time I was out". It shouldn't be surprising that a lot of it's about drinking and dancing either.

Kaewan
May 29, 2008


HollisBrown posted:

I think that's true to a certain extent, although the subject matter is still decidedly adult. Music is also very escapist currently, we are in an upswing of ridiculousness, but pretty soon something is going to come along like Bob Dylan in the 60's, Springsteen in the 70's or Nirvana in the 90's and it's going to get decent again for awhile, and then lovely again for another longtime after that.

Ezra Furman for one gives me mad Bob Dylan vibes. So maybe you're on to something here.

TheJoker138
Jan 1, 2008

The Clown Prince
Of Crime


Alobar posted:

http://youtu.be/bDJPnG3RDxU#t=20s
http://youtu.be/keQR4_7DBnM

Real country is only the roots of the vast majority of American music. Real country is some OG punk poo poo.


http://youtu.be/mqexThzOOC0

New "country" can be just as raw.

Country music as it began was just a lamer version of the blues co-opted by white people. And now it's all about pick up trucks and jesus and how everyone singing it is secretly super loving gay and trying their hardest to cover it up with macho bullshit.

Earwicker
Jan 6, 2003



Hogburto posted:

If it ends in "step" or "core" I won't be listening to it. I still have a backlog of 10 years of indistinguishable drum and bass to listen to before then.
As for the state of the industry, I don't think there's any question that studio productions have supplanted actual creativity to an extent for a while now. The only question is how long it will last. Of course there are still people experimenting. That doesn't end. But as far as most people getting to hear it, those tunes might as well be locked up in a crate.

What are you talking about experimental musics have more of an audience now (and more ability to collaborate internationally) than ever before. There is a huge amount of diverse, interesting, and new music being created around the world right now and it is easier for a much larger percentage of the world's population to listen to it and even participate in it than at any previous point in history.

I also like how you use "studio productions" and "actual creativity" as though these were opposites.

Hogburto
Sep 26, 2005

BASELESS ACCUSATIONS

Earwicker posted:

What are you talking about experimental musics have more of an audience now (and more ability to collaborate internationally) than ever before. There is a huge amount of diverse, interesting, and new music being created around the world right now and it is easier for a much larger percentage of the world's population to listen to it and even participate in it than at any previous point in history.

I also like how you use "studio productions" and "actual creativity" as though these were opposites.
Obviously I was talking about the state of what gets played and popularized. It has always been true that you can find good music if you know where to look, but that's the trick isn't it. The average person doesn't have the track on this that a music aficionado would.
Forgive my loose usage of "studio productions." I was looking for a short phrase to convey ghost-written music churned out of music factories and was leaning on context to give the gist.
Naturally, I end up spending longer to explain that than if I had originally said it.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011


I'd just like to remind everyone decrying the death of music that in 1969, the year that gave us Led Zeppelin, Yellow Submarine, From Genesis to Revelation, and The Velvet Underground, the top single was -

Suger Sugar by The Archies

abigserve
Sep 13, 2009

It was not scary. It was just...abnormal.


Bubble-T posted:

Apart from what constantIllusion said (don't worry, you're still being marketed to), do you go to clubs or even parties where they might play that kind of music? People can have a connection with top 40 that's as simple as "I had a great time dancing to this song last time I was out". It shouldn't be surprising that a lot of it's about drinking and dancing either.

When I go out with the dudes we're either dancing to remixed tracks in a club or we're hanging out in some backpackers playing pool, usually with some older pop rock on in the background. When we do house parties or whatever we have our own music which is mostly 90's alt-rock.

I honestly can't remember in detail what songs I dance to because I'm usually blitzed out of my brain.

X23
Apr 22, 2010


Bubble-T posted:

What's wrong with "escapist" music?

Partly that you can't understand the lyrics and partly that as the mass-market produce of a 'foreign' culture you (and many other people) are able to just enjoy it as pop music should be enjoyed without the massive societal hangups people have about pop music from their own mainstream culture. There's not really any musical reason to greatly enjoy J-pop but dislike Top 40.

Either that or you're a japanophile but then you might be able to understand the lyrics..

I think you touch on something really interesting here, but J-pop, and in general pop music from different cultures or decades is quite different than American pop, and can appeal to people for that reason. Foreign pop music provides a 'fresh' sound for someone who has only heard the pop music of their country. There is a different aesthetic, and the style of the music is usually pretty different. I feel like, for example much of the Asian pop has a much stronger influence from 80s New Wave and Pop and electronic music in general.

I do think I do what you mention, I listen to a lot of New Wave and sometimes 80s pop, I think so much of it is underrated, and I see it get unfairly disparaged for the fashion and aesthetic sometimes when there are some really great, well written songs that have fallen into obscurity. Some of it, mostly the poppier stuff, really is just fun and shallow. I feel like many of the people who just like the cheesy pop music of the past, but thumb their nose at top 40 are doing what you mention. I do like some top 40 stuff once and a while, but I prefer the style of past pop music.

EDGECRUSHER
Feb 28, 2001

by Y Kant Ozma Post


het posted:

On behalf of your daughter, gently caress you Dad.

Does she get grounded for that? I mean, I've let her buy drat near everything from these guys but do I need to understand it?

I can't even say Nikki Minaj is decent to listen to because I'm just and all I want to do is find some commonality in what my kids listen to

het
Nov 14, 2002

So, would you like to freak?


Hogburto posted:

Obviously I was talking about the state of what gets played and popularized. It has always been true that you can find good music if you know where to look, but that's the trick isn't it. The average person doesn't have the track on this that a music aficionado would.
Setting aside the questionable implications that people will draw from the way they framed this, this study elides the fact that music is far more widely available due to the Internet, and loads of artists who would have basically died on the vine (or at best been only locally available) that are viable due to geographically diverse fanbases.

quote:

Forgive my loose usage of "studio productions." I was looking for a short phrase to convey ghost-written music churned out of music factories and was leaning on context to give the gist.
Seriously do you have any knowledge at all of pop music? This is in no way new, loads of beloved pop artists in decades past had nothing to do with the composition of the music. The idea of "ghost-written [pop] music" being either a recent development or a slam on the music is absurd.

Bubble-T
Dec 26, 2004

You know, I've got a funny feeling I've seen this all before.

Hogburto posted:

It has always been true that you can find good music if you know where to look, but that's the trick isn't it. The average person doesn't have the track on this that a music aficionado would.

I think Earwicker's point is that it's been easier than ever for the "average person" to have a track on whatever kind of music they'd like to explore.

It shouldn't be surprising that the advertising of music, like in other cultural industries, is dominated by a particular set of things. The barrier to saying "no actually I want something different" and actually finding it is pretty much lower than it's ever been in human history though, and the barrier to entry as a producer of alternatives is probably lower too (I don't make music so that's just my speculation).

TheJoker138
Jan 1, 2008

The Clown Prince
Of Crime


het posted:

Seriously do you have any knowledge at all of pop music? This is in no way new, loads of beloved pop artists in decades past had nothing to do with the composition of the music. The idea of "ghost-written [pop] music" being either a recent development or a slam on the music is absurd.

You know who's one of the most beloved musicians of all time? Frank Sinatra. You know how many of his songs he actually wrote himself? About 6. He's credited on that few as being a writer/composer. So with the argument Hogburto seems to be making, I guess Frank Sinatra is all bullshit.

Mixoux
Apr 10, 2008


Faust IX posted:

You've never heard a Four Chord Song?

Same four chords, repeated literally over 40 years of music. Cataphract, you and your band rock for compiling that into a sensible medley.

edit: Pardon, same chord structure, I V vi IV. The point still stands that pop music can be made by following a formula and that anyone can do it: chances are, you have heard of at least one song in that medley, its so distinctive. And after you hear it, you cant really un-hear it.

The funny part is one of their members is a goon here. Also my music theory teacher told us about this early on, and for our final when we had to write a song, we couldn't use the structure as our main chorus for this very reason.

Millstone
Dec 20, 2007


bad day posted:

The problem isn't just with mastering - ipods and other portable devices typically have really lovely digital-to-analog converters and 80% of people are now listening to music almost exclusively in this format. I can put together a bass masterpiece that sounds absolutely amazing on some nice speakers but it's going to include all sorts of frequencies that won't even register on your ipod headphones. Consequently things mastered for portable devices tend to be really loud and bright on quality systems.

Using vinyl you could cut deep and loud and use all sorts of tones that are removed in the mp3 algorithm - there's more to music that what you hear - there can be a feel and tone contributed by sounds you aren't even properly capable of hearing. Personally I like music that makes things rattle.

Honestly I think we'd see less of this sort of thing if Apple had initially used better d2a in their ipod line. Too late now, maybe we should have all gone with Zune.

I'm tired of people saying the iPod and iPhone have a lovely dac. Both devices can natively play 24/48 lossless files and have a very low noise level. With good in ear monitors the sound is quite good.

On the same token, stop the bullshit with vinyl sounding better. It doesn't. It's been processed heavily to stop the stylus from leaving the groove, and the sound gets shittier as the side plays on.

Canine Blues Arooo
Jan 7, 2008

when you think about it...i'm the first girl you ever spent the night with


Millstone posted:

I'm tired of people saying the iPod and iPhone have a lovely dac. Both devices can natively play 24/48 lossless files and have a very low noise level. With good in ear monitors the sound is quite good.

For whatever it's worth, I've never heard in-ear monitors that don't sound like rear end. If a set existed that could actually stand up to a quality set of amped monitors, I'd love to hear about it.

Hogburto
Sep 26, 2005

BASELESS ACCUSATIONS

het posted:

Seriously do you have any knowledge at all of pop music? This is in no way new, loads of beloved pop artists in decades past had nothing to do with the composition of the music. The idea of "ghost-written [pop] music" being either a recent development or a slam on the music is absurd.
That is something I do not like about pop music, we're largely discussing pop music, it's a valid criticism of pop music. Where's the confusion here or my lack of knowledge? It's like you agree with what I say, except think it's no big deal at all, therefore what I said is somehow wrong.
I think writing your own music is a big deal and (now apparently quantifiable) should be expected to lead to greater variety.

Bubble-T posted:

I think Earwicker's point is that it's been easier than ever for the "average person" to have a track on whatever kind of music they'd like to explore.
I struck that note pretty exactly with my first post, but the subject leaned a little deeper into pop music specifically, what the music industry likes to push, and what people wind up listening to.

Bwee
Jan 8, 2005
Still posting? I can't bwee-lieve it!

This is the best thread

cat doter
Jul 27, 2006
Teenage Mutant Ninja Cripple

One of the things that frustrates me the most when it comes to music is people that get bogged down in the process. WHO THE gently caress CARES. All that matters in music is the result. What does it sound like? Do you like that sound? Stop there.

How many of us have heard those tired old arguments trotted out every time pop music is mentioned? Vocal processing means someone can't sing! They didn't write that song! Electronic instruments aren't real! They aren't real musicians!

The reason this study is important is not the process, it's the result. Pop music is becoming demonstrably less diverse tonally and musically. That's a problem that won't be solved by arguing about who wrote the song. It's a more nuanced problem than that. It's suits sitting in meetings looking at pie charts with types of music that sell and making decisions based on that. Now we have the rap bridge in every female pop single. Well, not every one, but you get my point.

Dauq
Mar 21, 2008


I don't know i grew up listening to metal music which was objectively louder than the tame stuff kids listen to these days and in retrospect a whole bunch of it did sound very similar.
It wasn't exactly the height of musical sophistication .

het
Nov 14, 2002

So, would you like to freak?


Hogburto posted:

That is something I do not like about pop music, we're largely discussing pop music, it's a valid criticism of pop music. Where's the confusion here or my lack of knowledge? It's like you agree with what I say, except think it's no big deal at all, therefore what I said is somehow wrong.
I think writing your own music is a big deal and (now apparently quantifiable) should be expected to lead to greater variety.
I disagree strongly that it's a valid criticism, I think it's absolutely not valid at all. There's a ridiculous amount of terrific and beloved music that was performed/popularized by people other than the composers. You're basically dismissing Motown entirely, Billie Holliday, Patsy Cline, Elvis Presley, the list could continue for days. Is any modern performance of centuries old classical music immediately invalidated because the composer isn't alive anymore?

quote:

I struck that note pretty exactly with my first post, but the subject leaned a little deeper into pop music specifically, what the music industry likes to push, and what people wind up listening to.
The subject didn't just lean deeper into pop music, that is explicitly the topic of the thread. If your opinion is "pop music is and always has been trash" then that is not a particularly productive contribution.

Bubble-T
Dec 26, 2004

You know, I've got a funny feeling I've seen this all before.

Dauq posted:

I don't know i grew up listening to metal music which was objectively louder than the tame stuff kids listen to these days and in retrospect a whole bunch of it did sound very similar.
It wasn't exactly the height of musical sophistication .
Along the same lines, revisiting favourite albums I often find that the production is actually kind of lovely or uneven. Sometimes they get re-released with production that is lovely in a different way. They're still good albums and I don't really understand people who think modern production is ruining music.


Hogburto posted:

I think writing your own music is a big deal and (now apparently quantifiable) should be expected to lead to greater variety.

I don't quite understand why it matters so much that the writer is also the performer. Someone is writing the music either way.. probably someone better at writing and worse at performing compared to the performer. Why is that such a distasteful arrangement?

Hogburto
Sep 26, 2005

BASELESS ACCUSATIONS

het posted:

The subject didn't just lean deeper into pop music, that is explicitly the topic of the thread. If your opinion is "pop music is and always has been trash" then that is not a particularly productive contribution.
Nah, early in the thread, the issue was raised of people simply preferring whatever they grew up with over actual genre distinctions or anything else. Sort of an ageism thing, I suppose.

Don't put words in my mouth. I described a preference for something (and stated a reason why) and you turn that into me calling an entire genre of music trash (and classical, now, too). Obviously you're passionate about this subject, but if that means we absolutely must have some kind of heated argument instead of a discussion, I already know I'm not up for it.
In the spirit of avoiding "not particularly productive contribution" I'm just gonna watch other people go crazy on each other (as that seems to happen in every thread about art). It already feels like the smartest move I've made all month.

het
Nov 14, 2002

So, would you like to freak?


Hogburto posted:

Don't put words in my mouth. I described a preference for something (and stated a reason why) and you turn that into me calling an entire genre of music trash (and classical, now, too).
I apologize for putting words into your mouth, that was rude of me. That said, I'd be curious to hear your opinions of the pop artists I mentioned and your response to Bubble-T's point "Someone is writing the music either way.. probably someone better at writing and worse at performing compared to the performer. Why is that such a distasteful arrangement?"

abigserve
Sep 13, 2009

It was not scary. It was just...abnormal.


Bubble-T posted:

I don't quite understand why it matters so much that the writer is also the performer. Someone is writing the music either way.. probably someone better at writing and worse at performing compared to the performer. Why is that such a distasteful arrangement?

The fact that a singer does not compose their own music feeds further into the image that all pop music artists are basically puppets, created by big business in order to make easy bank. They sing what they are told to sing, promote what they are told to promote, etc.

In actuality this is a load of bullshit but it's pretty easy to see how you could get this impression if you only looked at the Perry's, Spear's, and the Biebers of the world.

mr. mephistopheles
Dec 2, 2009



Zigmidge posted:

Everyone posting real country music albums are doing it wrong.

These guys came in and swept the country music awards away from real country artists for good reason: Real country loving sucks

http://grooveshark.com/#!/album/12+...y+Greats/228606

Did you just say real country sucks and then site Ween as an example of good music?

I don't even like much country music, but Ween is one of those bands that only college students and weird manchildren listen to.

Hogburto posted:

Obviously I was talking about the state of what gets played and popularized. It has always been true that you can find good music if you know where to look, but that's the trick isn't it. The average person doesn't have the track on this that a music aficionado would.

Filter my posts I literally listed half a dozen good bands that are receiving Top 40 radio play right this very second. None of you people bitching even listen to the radio, do you?

EDGECRUSHER posted:

I can't even say Nikki Minaj is decent to listen to because I'm just and all I want to do is find some commonality in what my kids listen to

No one will hold a dislike for Nicki Minaj against you.

Disliking this poo poo is not a generational thing, it's just loving terrible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaC-zCMLTKU

She's like MC Chris with a vagina. Ugh.

Flynn Taggart
Jan 20, 2006



Oooh, are we still ing over the merits of country music? Because I think Hayes Carll might like a word with you all.

I feel like popular music has become more inane because intelectual listeners have abandoned it in favor of the internet. All they have left to market to are the people who literally only listen to the radio. And let's face it, that just isn't the brightest segment of our population.

Rhymenoceros
Nov 16, 2008
Ask me about white knighting for 13-year-olds.


Flynn Taggart posted:

I feel like popular music has become more inane because intelectual listeners have abandoned it in favor of the internet. All they have left to market to are the people who literally only listen to the radio. And let's face it, that just isn't the brightest segment of our population.
Yeah, listening to the radio is something done ironically.

FedoraDefender420
Feb 25, 2011

I don't care how much money or how many white boys 50 cent can shoot. In front of James Hetfield he is a little bitch


What exactly is pop music?

TheJoker138
Jan 1, 2008

The Clown Prince
Of Crime


Psalmanazar posted:

What exactly is pop music?

You kids with your POP-ular music. Technically pop music is any music that is not classical or folk/world music. So yeah, everything people are saying sucks and sounds the same isn't actually that at all. Unless they're only considering Top 40 to be pop music or something.

appropriatemetaphor
Jan 26, 2006



mr. mephistopheles posted:

No one will hold a dislike for Nicki Minaj against you.

Disliking this poo poo is not a generational thing, it's just loving terrible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaC-zCMLTKU

She's like MC Chris with a vagina. Ugh.

Holy poo poo , I kindof assumed she was like lady gaga or something...how...bad...

mr. mephistopheles
Dec 2, 2009



Flynn Taggart posted:

Oooh, are we still ing over the merits of country music? Because I think Hayes Carll might like a word with you all.

I feel like popular music has become more inane because intelectual listeners have abandoned it in favor of the internet. All they have left to market to are the people who literally only listen to the radio. And let's face it, that just isn't the brightest segment of our population.

My favorite thing to do when I'm driving in my car is listen to the Internet.

Because I am an "intelectual."

appropriatemetaphor
Jan 26, 2006



mr. mephistopheles posted:

My favorite thing to do when I'm driving in my car is listen to the Internet.

Because I am an "intelectual."

I have a turntable strapped to the passenger seat which I motion to with my mustache tattoo festooned finger while at stop lights.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ratios and Tendency
Apr 23, 2010

MURALI


More proof that country ain't so bad:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTyhcRtt1WY

  • Post
  • Reply
«16 »