|
AlbieQuirky posted:That's soooooo Obama all over. Given that he's teleported to Mars, I don't think its so unlikely that Obama also has time-travelled too. No-one can really guess the damage that Kenyan-Secret-Muslim-Atheist-Communist usurper has wrought.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 00:22 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2013 10:24 |
|
|
I sure drive a lovely car for being backed by Big Porn.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 00:26 |
|
|
goodreverend posted:I sure drive a lovely car for being backed by Big Porn. You're still in-training. When you graduate, you'll be rolling in Big Porn dollars.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 00:30 |
|
|
ryde posted:You're still in-training. When you graduate, you'll be rolling in Big Porn dollars. All singles, regrettably.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 00:31 |
|
|
Mr. Fed posted:Let me tell you, it's deucedly difficult to deposit those things at an ATM. I'm sure you could deposit one in there.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 00:37 |
|
|
Mr. Fed posted:It keeps getting better.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 00:46 |
|
|
I want to see a legal fight to the death between Blade and Leonard J. Crabs. This Blade guy seems to have a worrying lack of latin phrases dotted through his correspondence. He's a rubbish pretend lawyer. Real pretend lawyers understand that nullum crimen sine lege to use superfluous, misunderstood latin at the locus, and barring novus actus interveniens results in a de facto victory. Quod et demonstrandum (bitches).
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 00:52 |
|
|
Wait, he's got a bona fide legal pain train coming his way, and he's doubling down with a fake blog about BIG PORN to turn the opinions of the masses or something? What a loving idiot. Can't complain though, anything he does to make this worse for him is better. Won't make up for the lovely things he's done, but it will still make things more satisfying on a primal level. Give 'em hell, lawyers.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 01:06 |
|
|
IsAnyoneDown.com posted:Hello. The people that are making false accusations about us and our website/business – have you wondered why? Here’s the truth. They’re paid by the Big Porn companies to sabotage our website, to try and drive us out of business. Click here to read more on our brand new website, http://www.trolldown.com. These people are financed by the mafia, by drug money and blood money – and they’ll do anything to get you to be their fall guys. Click here or go to http://www.trolldown.com. Blood money, do you hear me, BLOOD MONEY! edit: interestingly enough, http://isanyoneup.net now redirects to NWS! http://yougotposted.net, which looks to be the exact same thing. Smashurbanipal fucked around with this message at Nov 2, 2012 around 01:16 |
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 01:08 |
|
|
Smashurbanipal posted:Blood money, do you hear me, BLOOD MONEY! is that why my $1s are all red? I was afraid to ask.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 01:28 |
|
|
Smashurbanipal posted:Hello. The people that are making false accusations about us and our website/business – have you wondered why? Here’s the truth. They’re paid by the Big Porn companies to sabotage our website, to try and drive us out of business. Click here to read more on our brand new website, http://www.trolldown.com. These people are financed by the mafia, by drug money and blood money – and they’ll do anything to get you to be their fall guys. Click here or go to http://www.trolldown.com. I don't get this latest message; what's the point of trying to win a PR game if it'll accomplish precisely nothing? Who are they trying to convince? Is there a hardcore following that they're trying to retain? If so, someone should let these two retards know that their "fans" don't give a gently caress, they just want their porn.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 01:31 |
|
|
Smashurbanipal posted:Blood money, do you hear me, BLOOD MONEY! Yes Obama has contacts in Sierra Leone, he's from around that area. He's using illegal offshore trusts to funnel blood diamonds and convert them into blood money in order pay NV lawyers to shut their website down. What's not clear here?
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 01:31 |
|
|
keyvin posted:Unfortunately, they are my senators. I don't know about Rand Paul, I've never had any dealing with him. I do not agree with his politics or his party, but I do think Mitch McConnell is a decent person. This is something that would upset most decent people. With Paul and other conservative types, it's probably wise to play up the porn angle more, especially the nonconsensual and underage angles.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 01:38 |
|
|
Smashurbanipal posted:Blood money, do you hear me, BLOOD MONEY! Any of the lawyers who are onboard licensed to practise in NY? quote:I agree that by entering this website, I am subjecting myself, and any business entity in which I have any legal or equitable interest, to the personal jurisdiction of the State of New York, should any dispute arise at any time between this website, myself and/or such business entity; quote:Filthy Studios, is currently the publisher and operator of the following Sites, and this Agreement applies to all of them equally: This clause is priceless. quote:However, if You fail to electronically sign this Agreement, You stipulate to and agree to pay the Publisher $250 each time You access the Site as liquidated damages for unauthorized access and use, and You agree to pay all of our costs and expenses, including Attorney’s fees and costs, incurred in collecting this unauthorized access fee from You. And hey look, they're trying to impose licence conditions on material they don't even own. quote:This is a license to use and access the Site for its intended purpose and is not a transfer of title. You will not copy or redistribute any of the content appearing on this Site. Publisher reserves the right to terminate this license at any time if You breach or violate any provision of this Agreement, in which case You will be obligated to immediately destroy any information or materials You have downloaded, printed or otherwise copied from this Site. Violators of this limited license may be prosecuted to the fullest extent under the applicable law. quote:You were asked to verify your birth date on the Birth Date Verifier form as a condition of entry onto the Site, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746. Accordingly, if You provided incorrect information on the Birth Date Verifier page, You committed an act of perjury, this perjury was recorded, and this perjury may be used against You in any court proceeding or other tribunal of any kind. Isn't perjury lying under oath? And sweet Jesus (bolding mine) quote:You hereby release Us and all other members of the Site from any liability for invasion of privacy, defamation, false light, and related torts, in the event that your communications or profile are made public – even if they are made public for the sole purpose of amusing others at your expense. quote:You may send your Notice of Claimed Infringement to: http://yougotposted.com/terms-of-use/ I want these scumbags taken down so badly.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 01:58 |
|
|
ZeroDays posted:Who are they trying to convince? They're probably trying to spin it into a big-business-vs-little-guy internet-freedom style of cause. I mean, they referred to Crystal Cox case, and I can only assume that they're trying to pull a similar move.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 02:03 |
|
|
Don't worry guys. His submit content page says:quote:Anyone who submits illegal content will be prosecuted. comments are still unlocked at: http://yougotposted.com/privacy-policy/ uG fucked around with this message at Nov 2, 2012 around 02:13 |
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 02:09 |
|
|
Mr. Fed posted:It keeps getting better. This argument is hilarious Some Idiot posted:Basically, the claimants will get left with the hook and will get all of the negative public attention that comes with a high profile lawsuit – and the real backers will not even be mentioned from their hiding places in the shadows. Don't sue us because of the bad publicity it will cause you. Just ignore the bad publicity that being on our site will cause. Do they think that publishing this from a server in Romania is going to protect them from a libel suit in the US? Actually looking into it, it looks like all their web pages are hosted at the same IP address. drat, Romanian bandwidth looks expensive. 150GB for $10. I get 2 terabytes for $7.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 02:19 |
|
|
bonestructure posted:I think there's been a misunderstanding. What's being quoted is from this screengrab of the Complaints page at isanybodyup.com, and it's what one of the women posted on the site wrote to Craig. Apologies. I misunderstood the context of the screen grabs.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 02:25 |
|
|
ZeroDays posted:I don't get this latest message; what's the point of trying to win a PR game if it'll accomplish precisely nothing? Who are they trying to convince? Is there a hardcore following that they're trying to retain? If so, someone should let these two retards know that their "fans" don't give a gently caress, they just want their porn. I for one get it perfectly: Now he's posted libelous statements in TWO places! 
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 02:28 |
|
|
I think I want Marc Randazza's babies. His legal arguments are fun to read.quote:Furthermore, conventional towers and obelisks are intentional derivatives of a phallus – meant to portray strength, fertility and power. The Applicant should not be denied the right to protect these Alpha-male characteristics just because the USPTO feels threatened by them. After all, America is an Alpha nation, and such a Beta position cuts against the very fabric of the symbolism that tells the tale of the American experience. http://www.popehat.com/wp-content/u...nd-exhibits.pdf
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 02:36 |
|
|
goodreverend posted:I sure drive a lovely car for being backed by Big Porn. No said being a male in Big Porn payed well, we all know it all goes to the female performers. Also on a serious note we don't do 'lol' or other memes/leet speak here. I want to hear your thoughts on this case, so please be careful. NutritiousSnack fucked around with this message at Nov 2, 2012 around 03:01 |
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 02:58 |
|
|
Lolie posted:I think I want Marc Randazza's babies. His legal arguments are fun to read. 
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 03:02 |
|
|
twitter meltdowns are loving hilarious https://twitter.com/KataishinNinja
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 03:28 |
|
|
They probably actually believes this Big Porn conspiracy nonsense. Someone acting out of the good of their own heart is probably such a foreign concept that the conspiracy was the only thing that made sense to them. By the way, isn't impersonating a lawyer, the whole give the 'lawyer' $250 to get your picture taken down scam, a criminal offense?
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 03:32 |
|
|
thunderspanks posted:twitter meltdowns are loving hilarious True ninjas? Don't tell me he is a juggalo to boot?
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 03:39 |
|
|
Have Chance, Craig et al been given their own ED pages yet?
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 03:43 |
|
|
Shithouse Dave posted:True ninjas? Don't tell me he is a juggalo to boot? It would explain.. everything. What terrible people, even looking at them really does communicate at some primal level "This dude needs a punching". I sincerely hope these fine pieces of human trash get go to jail charges since somehow I suspect civil damages might be a bit impractical due to the horrible government conspiracy working to hold these winners down. Edit: Watching the twitter meltdown somehow makes me think of xbox live. Apparently some of those shrieking twelve year olds who just learned profanity don't ever actually grow up. We should fund some kind of wrist band campaign or something to fight this. evil imp fucked around with this message at Nov 2, 2012 around 04:35 |
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 03:48 |
|
|
thunderspanks posted:twitter meltdowns are loving hilarious This keeps getting better and better.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 03:49 |
|
|
So when do these people get sued for all their belongings and money? Because if that doesn't happen I will feel cheated.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:02 |
|
|
evil imp posted:I sincerely hope these fine pieces of human trash get go to jail charges since somehow I suspect civil damages might be a bit impractical due to the horrible government conspiracy working to hold these winners down. These are the kinds of cases I always hope will end up before a judge who delivers scathing judgements and creative sentences.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:12 |
|
|
thunderspanks posted:twitter meltdowns are loving hilarious He's crackin. Also busting mad rhymes now.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:14 |
|
|
Exactly one hour ago, this Chance gently caress lost his goddamn mind. ALL CAPS ALL THE TIME NOW, FAGGOTS COME STEP UP TO THIS NINJA, LIMP BIZKIT STYLE. Wow, he tweeted 10 more times since I posted this a few minutes ago.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:17 |
|
|
Lolie posted:I think I want Marc Randazza's babies. His legal arguments are fun to read. These are the kinds of opinions and briefs that inspired me to take a personal interest in law, and if I were a bit more gullible I'd have enrolled in L1 already. (This apparently doesn't stop me from looking up the evidentiary issues with websites.) Lolie posted:This clause is priceless. I kind of wonder what these people (and people like, say, Freemen on the Land) think law actually is when they write that stuff. It seems like the concept of a unilateral instant-amendment clause probably not being enforceable¹ would be simple enough, but I don't really think these people even thought that far. Googling certain phrases in the ToS pretty much confirms that it's all boilerplate they probably copied in with even really reading. I don't know where the source is from and couldn't find it, but it's probably from one of those "FREE LEGAL HELP FORMS L@@K" sites you find all over the place. ¹ For the nerds that don't want to do the footwork I already did: Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc., 669 F.3d 202 (5th Cir. 2012) (holding that the contract was illusionary because of the clause allowing defendant to "retain the unilateral right to modify or terminate the arbitration provision" at any time); In re Zappos.com Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 2012 WL 4466660 (D. Nev. 2012) (denying a motion to compel arbitration because the contract that would compel arbitration was illusionary for a similar clause). EgillSkallagrimsson posted:By the way, isn't impersonating a lawyer, the whole give the 'lawyer' $250 to get your picture taken down scam, a criminal offense? This seems like a pretty clear case of unauthorized practice of law, which is usually a felony or equivalent thereof in most states, and New York is no exception. N.Y. Jud. Law § 478 (2010) posted:[...] or to hold himself out to the public edit: I can't remember the last time I saw a Twitter meltdown this intense, holy poo poo E4C85D38 fucked around with this message at Nov 2, 2012 around 04:23 |
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:19 |
|
|
thunderspanks posted:twitter meltdowns are loving hilarious It's been a while since we had a Christoforo/Barstow level Twitter meltdown. This just made my night.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:30 |
|
|
Jesus Christ, he's still going. I think something snapped in his mind.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:33 |
|
|
The best part was when he said how excited he was for RoboCop 2013 right in the middle of the meltdown.
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:35 |
|
|
So is this psycho even remotely curious why a shitload of strangers are tweeting him taunts/ironic support or is he just BASKING in it
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:42 |
|
|
Epic High Five posted:The best part was when he said how excited he was for RoboCop 2013 right in the middle of the meltdown. To be fair, who isn't excited for Robocop 2013? (Me, but that's just cause I just found out there's a robocop 2013) EDIT: Wait, he's a loving shark now?
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:43 |
|
|
Dark Weasel posted:So is this psycho even remotely curious why a shitload of strangers are tweeting him taunts/ironic support or is he just BASKING in it Pretty sure that rationality no longer applies in his mind and thinking about it too much is pointless. For posterity: 
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:45 |
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2013 10:24 |
|
|
From Chance's other Twitter account.quote:I have the power to ruin anyone i set my sights on, don't become a target. http://twitter.com/manxhuman
|
| # ? Nov 2, 2012 04:48 |
|
