|
Helsing posted:It feels like you're writing a movie script rather than a short story. This is the exact feeling I had when I read your piece, ViggyNash. I can see the way it would be shot; a far-off shot of the harbour, then a closer shot of an alley where we see a young girl gripping a fence, a sleek woman pointing a gun at the girl and a grey-haired man ready to attack the woman. But you can't, or at least shouldn't, show every detail of a scene in writing. In a movie it might take ten seconds to do that, but in writing you're using several paragraphs. That makes the reader think these guys are just standing around for ten minutes doing nothing. And it gets boring - like others have pointed out. If I were you I'd just forget about the scenery. Don't worry whether or not your reader will imagine something different than you intended - that usually happens. You have to capture your audience using words - not by describing scenes you want them to see. Maybe it would help if you tried to think in words to begin with, rather than visualizing the scene and then trying to put it into words. ViggyNash posted:I keep posting my introduction because I wasn't really sure how to start. How about you skip the intro and start somewhere else? Even if you're not sure on how to introduce your characters, just start writing the story. You can always go back an add some introductory elements if you think they're needed. shooz fucked around with this message at 23:52 on Aug 11, 2013 |
# ¿ Aug 11, 2013 23:46 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 03:36 |
|
CommissarMega posted:The obelisk stood before Shara, eldritch runes glowing red on its obsidian surface, pulsing with the rhythm of a great beast’s breaths. The chamber was silent,I think you need a period or an "and" here. Without one or the other, you're implying that the chamber was silent because there was no other light source. the sole illumination The hook isn't working for me. Shara, whose name my brain keeps auto-correcting to Sarah, needs to buy a new engine. If she doesn't succeed, she can either a) return to her dad who is gonna gloat or b) return to her best friend Torch's hive and her father would gloat. This isn't really a risk though, since she has the money for a new engine, so I expect we're gonna see her go buy a new engine and possibly lose her crew. Not super interesting. Then again, I guess it's fine as long as something interesting happens in the next chapter/we find out what's at stake. The dialogue is boring. The characters sound the exact same, and use "funny" stock phrases, especially toward the end. The dialogue reminds me of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which worked well enough on screen, but I'm not sure if it works here. I guess you're trying to show the two joking around with each other, having fun etc. But it's not funny when I read it. There's also a lack of description, or just plain out showing what's going on. As far as description goes, I do not mean that you should describe every single thing in the room. I'm talking about adding a detail here, a detail there - details that make the story a little more tangible. Same goes for the action between the dialogue - which is bland. She sighs, groans and runs her hand through her hair. The reason we obviously use these types of descriptions is to show, rather than tell, how a character feels. And there's nothing wrong with these words in themselves, I suppose, but they are so often used as labels for a feeling that they are almost invisible to me. They aren't precise, and so the story isn't vivid. Here's a bad and exaggerated example of what I mean: He unbuttoned his suit jacket and sat down. He cleared his throat. The man on the other side of the table looked at him and smiled. versus He unbuttoned his suit jacket - a cheap two-piece he picked up at H&M - and sat down in the squeaky chair. He cleared his throat. The man on the other side of the table was observing him, his lips stretched into a thin smile. Personally, I get a lot more mood and info from the second version. The first one is ambiguous. I don't know anything about the situation. The second one tells me he's probably embarrassed about his cheap suit, that the room is silent and that the situation is awkward etc. The problem with the first example is that it's not giving me much of anything - I'm not immersed in the story. Now, less is also more, so one should never over-do it, but excluding the bit about the mandibles and stuff, you're not giving me anything much to go on here. I realize that the wall of text might seem harsh. Your writing isn't bad, however; it's clear and to the point. Nor did I need to force myself to read through it. The things I criticised didn't jump at me, I had to think long and hard about why I didn't get into it. And I'm obviously not sure that I'm right about any of it. I still hope I was of some use.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2014 00:32 |
|
CommissarMega posted:Would it be too much if I reposted a corrected version later? I'm not in charge here, but I'd love to read a revised version. And btw, the last quote in your post is by Djeser, not me.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2014 17:57 |
|
Rollofthedice posted:Shifting Sometimes I like writing that describes weather or surroundings. Good descriptions can really make me feel like I'm there. Your piece had some nice moments, but occasionally I was distracted. Mostly because some of your descriptions don't answer to any weather phenomenon that I am familiar with, and you aren't always consistent. l already mentioned that falling leaves, blossoms and snow don't tend to happen at the same time. Also, I've never seen orange moon light. Maybe I've just been really unlucky. Then you mention it's night, but still the narrator seems to see all the grave stones clearly, the red colour of blood on snow etc. You start the whole piece with "a decade ago", yet you don't ever return to the present so to speak. How is it relevant that it was a decade ago? Does it still haunt the narrator? Is he thinking of this before putting a gun to his own head? What's the point here? I liked the tone of your writing, which was mostly bleak and depressing. It suited your story. All in all your writing is clear and you convey a lot of feeling. Just previewed this before posting and noticed that Djeser has already given you a crit. I'm slow at this critting business. Posting it anyway.
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2014 15:42 |