Search Amazon.com:
Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
«117 »
  • Post
  • Reply
Three Olives
Apr 10, 2005

Go on daaaahhhhling...


Reuters posted:

(Reuters) - North Korea said on Thursday it would carry out further rocket launches and a nuclear test that would target the United States, dramatically stepping up its threats against a country it called its "enemy".

The announcement by the country's top military body came a day after the United Nations Security Council agreed a U.S.-backed resolution to censure and sanction the country for a rocket launch in December that breached U.N. rules.

"We are not disguising the fact that the various satellites and long-range rockets that we will fire and the high-level nuclear test we will carry out are targeted at the United States," North Korea's National Defence Commission said, according to state news agency KCNA.

North Korea is believed by South Korea and other observers to be "technically ready" for a third nuclear test, and the decision to go ahead rests with leader Kim Jong-un who pressed ahead with the December rocket launch in defiance of the U.N. sanctions.

"Whether North Korea tests or not is up to North Korea," Glyn Davies, the top U.S. envoy for North Korean diplomacy, said in the South Korean capital of Seoul as KCNA released its statement.

"We hope they don't do it. We call on them not to do it," Davies said. "This is not a moment to increase tensions on the Korean peninsula."

The North was banned from developing missile and nuclear technology under sanctions dating from its 2006 and 2009 nuclear tests.

The concern now is that Pyongyang, whose only major diplomatic ally, China, endorsed the latest U.N. resolution, could undertake a third nuclear test using highly enriched uranium for the first time, opening a second path to a bomb.

Its previous tests have been viewed as limited successes and used plutonium, of which the North has limited stocks.

North Korea gave no time-frame for the coming test and often employs harsh rhetoric in response to U.N. and U.S. actions.

Its long-range rockets are not seen as capable of reaching the United States mainland and it is not believed to have the technology to mount a nuclear warhead on a long-range missile.

"The UNSC (Security Council) resolution masterminded by the U.S. has brought its hostile policy towards the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (North Korea) to its most dangerous stage," the commission was quoted as saying.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013...E90N03I20130124

It's interesting that this happened right after the last diplomatic mission to the country including Eric Schmidt and a very unflattering account by his daughter who accompanied him:

https://sites.google.com/site/sophieinnorthkorea/home

With China publicly stepping back and many suspicious that the political handoff to Kim Jong-un has been rumored to be very complicated it's interesting that their rhetoric has been amped up so high. Isn't this basically a declaration of war?

They are alrighty highly sanctioned by the U.S. and the U.N., with China steeping back what do they have to gain by publicially threatening the U.S.?Iit seems like a Seoul threat would be much more effective in making them seem dangerous and not completely nuts.

Three Olives fucked around with this message at Jan 24, 2013 around 04:32

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Green Puddin
Mar 30, 2008

Console Gamer


Welp, guess it's time to stop sending them food packages.

Gravel Gravy
Apr 3, 2008

Worst. Venue. Ever.

I see it as North Korea using the nuclear program as a bargaining chip in order to gain international aid and a lowering of sanctions, like from "The Mouse that Roared". Assuming that North Korea is a rational actor, they would never use the bomb even if they managed to have a perfectly operational one tomorrow. Basically its the equivalent of Kim-Jong-Un personally dialing up the White House and asking for stuff.

BigHead
Jul 25, 2003
Huh?

Fun fact: Alaska just built a big rear end airport in the middle of absolutely nowhere with, like, 90% of the purpose of the airport being support for war with North Korea and China. Seriously, the big rear end airport is on a tiny uninhabited island across from another tiny island with a town that has a population of 713.

It's here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akun_Island

But someone should update that Wikipedia article because the runway was finished.

What I'm trying to say is that we got it covered. If North Korea invades, Alaska snow forces are on it.

dj_clawson
Jan 12, 2004

We are all sinners in the eyes of these popsicle sticks.

If anyone's interested in learning a ton about North Korea, there's a bunch of good documentaries streaming on Netflix.

Apparently it loving sucks there. As in "if you gently caress up this paperwork we'll send your grandchildren to live their lives in concentration camps" sucks.

Three Olives
Apr 10, 2005

Go on daaaahhhhling...


Gravel Gravy posted:

I see it as North Korea using the nuclear program as a bargaining chip in order to gain international aid and a lowering of sanctions, like from "The Mouse that Roared". Assuming that North Korea is a rational actor, they would never use the bomb even if they managed to have a perfectly operational one tomorrow. Basically its the equivalent of Kim-Jong-Un personally dialing up the White House and asking for stuff.

That's the thing, testing ballistic missiles under the presence of launching peaceful satellites was the bargaining chip and they had the protection of China, threatening to target the U.S. with nuclear weapons with China stepping back is not a bargaining chip, it's just insane and makes them look like they aren't anything close to rational actors anymore.

evensevenone
May 12, 2001
Glass is a solid.

Three Olives posted:

With China publicly stepping back and many suspicious that the political handoff to Kim Jong-un has been rumored to be very complicated it's interesting that their rhetoric has been amped up so high. Isn't this basically a declaration of war?

Yes. Luckily, sophisticated military analysis has shown that the inevitable North Korean invasion of the Pacific Northwest will be turned around by a plucky bunch of high schoolers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoqlBHSePw0

ShadowCatboy
Jan 22, 2006

E purr si muove.


Christ. Couldn't they have just stayed happy keeping their population hostage?

This is without a doubt the most batshit insane decision I've ever heard. Even Kim Jong Il knew that nuclear threats would lead to a major clusterfuck. There's gotta be something internal going on... maybe Jong Eun is just trying to flex his muscles among his subordinates to show that he won't puss out when it comes to international relations, an attempt to solidify his position.

It'd be quite a reversal from the conciliatory and slightly more open attitude he's expressed so far though, so I don't know what the gently caress.

Gravel Gravy
Apr 3, 2008

Worst. Venue. Ever.

^^^ That is also a likely explanation. Granted you don't have to maintain consistency when you control the media and everything else.

Three Olives posted:

That's the thing, testing ballistic missiles under the presence of launching peaceful satellites was the bargaining chip and the had the protection of China, threading to target the U.S. with nuclear weapons is not a bargaining chip, it's just insane and makes them look like they aren't anything close to rational actors anymore.

I'm supposing that they didn't get all of what they wanted during that round. Using an atomic missile against South Korea, Japan, (doubtfully could even hit the US at the moment) would be the moment that everybody with an iota of power in North Korea will effectively see it vanish away. The thing with assholes in power is that they want to stay in power.

Gravel Gravy fucked around with this message at Jan 24, 2013 around 04:41

pengun101
Feb 14, 2012


I am assuming it will be another bluff, but you never know anymore

pengun101 fucked around with this message at Jan 24, 2013 around 04:46

SniperWoreConverse
Mar 20, 2010



It's such a hosed up situation over there.

On the other hand, great leader is from the matrix:

"bla bla bla, witty quote from a fifteen year old movie"

Omnicarus
Jan 16, 2006



You know I'd really hate to be a painter in North Korea. You gently caress up KJI's eyebrow and that's it for you and all the generations of traitors around you.

Retail Slave
Nov 25, 2011
"..and on the pedestal these words appear: My name is Retail Slave, Goon of Goons. Look on my white noise posts, ye Mighty, and despair."

pengun101 posted:

I am assumeing it will be another bluff, but you never know anymore

It's a bluff. If they nuke anything, they know they're getting wiped off the planet. China will have no choice but to back away from them, and then they'll be left all alone.

Right now they're just waving their dicks around, shouting about how much bigger theirs are than anyone elses.

Cemetry Gator
Apr 3, 2007

Walgreens Representative


Three Olives posted:

That's the thing, testing ballistic missiles under the presence of launching peaceful satellites was the bargaining chip and they had the protection of China, threatening to target the U.S. with nuclear weapons with China stepping back is not a bargaining chip, it's just insane and makes them look like they aren't anything close to rational actors anymore.

I'm not too worried about an attack on US soil from North Korea, because launching a war with us would be insanity. All support from China would definitely drop, and China isn't exactly too supportive of them right now. Honestly, though, I think we should be more concerned about an attack on South Korea or Japan. But this may just amount to a really stupid move by a country with very stupid leadership.

FATWOLF
Jan 24, 2006



OP, have you taken any special precautions to protect your condo from North Korean attack? If so please post some pictures of your condo in its upgraded state. Thanks in advance

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Three Olives
Apr 10, 2005

Go on daaaahhhhling...


pengun101 posted:

I would assume it will be another bluff, but you never know.

That's the thing, it's not a bluff, there is absolutely zero chance of NK hitting the U.S. with a ballistic missile, it's an irrational, insane and very direct threat to the U.S. which makes it difficult to assume that NK is a rational actor making bluffs.

Omnicarus
Jan 16, 2006



FATWOLF posted:

OP, have you taken any special precautions to protect your condo from North Korean attack? If so please post some pictures of your condo in its upgraded state. Thanks in advance

Come to mention it, it is pretty weird that this threat comes so soon after we got pictures of the Keurig coffee machine. Maybe Kim Jong Un is a coffee aficionado and hates Keurigs as much as GWS does.

Liar
Dec 14, 2003

Smarts > Wisdom


So all this time that poo poo game Homefront was training us for the inevitable? Finally, I can justify having bought it.

I honestly have to question if the N. Koreans genuinely believe China would absolutely support them if they decided to go all out and attack America.

Dead Beef
Apr 24, 2007



Goddamnit the North Korean government is completely insane

HackerJoeGuy
Apr 18, 2007



Yeah, the NK leadership knows the second they launched a working nuke towards the South, Japan, or the US their entire country would be wiped off the face of the earth. I'm leaning towards the Jong-un consolidation of power angle, too. It's crazy, stupid, but not exactly that much more than any of the threats his father made over his lifetime.

ShadowCatboy
Jan 22, 2006

E purr si muove.


It's not like North Korea needs to defend itself from anything. No one wants to invade them. Not because we're awed by their military might, or even the fear that we'd be stuck in another quagmire of a war after Afghanistan and Iraq. It's more because no one wants to loving deal with cleaning up their shithole of a country. You've got a population of 20-ish million that is grossly uneducated, unskilled, with little to no infrastructure to speak of. It'd take an occupation force decades to make them self-sufficient.

Don't get me wrong, I really really feel for the plight of North Korea, and I would love it if the current regime could be removed. I'd love it if agricultural infrastructure could be rebuilt so the populace no longer has to poo poo in specially designated ditches to reserve their feces for fertilizer. I desperately want to see proper schools open up so kids learn something other than praises and parables of the Kim dynasty. If the DPRK fell into ruin, I'd be one of the first to sign up to fly over and do volunteer work there once I get my medical degree.

But even if the US is nice enough to take North Korea under its wing, this'd make China nervous in doing so. And it could hardly ask China to establish sovereignty over the region, because why the hell would China care about 20 million uneducated peasants. In either case, China loses a buffer state.

Some Other Guy
Dec 30, 2004


North Korea has a history of making these types of threats as sort of a bargaining ploy, as others have pointed out. The only difference now is they actually managed to launch a satellite.

It would be completely irrational for them to ever to attempt this, and despite the apparent irrationality of the regime, I think it's a leap to say that their top level officials are actually this crazy.

But as Three Olives pointed out, that's kind of the rub. Everyone knows it's impossibly crazy, so why would they actually think the threat would get them anywhere? My guess is a propaganda move of some sort. Either Jung-Un is trying to secure his position by appearing tough, or it's an attempt to placate his citizens, or both.

ohjoshdarnit
Nov 2, 2005
Adventurer

This article is odd to me. Some of the statements seem misleading. If the missiles "would" target us, wouldn't they be attacks and not tests? Or are they just testing weapons that COULD reach a target as far away as say... the U.S., and Koreaa has said that is the message they want to send.

Piisamirotta
Oct 30, 2012



Three Olives posted:

That's the thing, it's not a bluff, there is absolutely zero chance of NK hitting the U.S. with a ballistic missile, it's an irrational, insane and very direct threat to the U.S. which makes it difficult to assume that NK is a rational actor making bluffs.

Maybe the leadership of NK is trying to shift the attention of their populace away from problems inside the country? Outside threats have been used in other dictatorships for that before.

Three Olives
Apr 10, 2005

Go on daaaahhhhling...


Liar posted:

I honestly have to question if the N. Koreans genuinely believe China would absolutely support them if they decided to go all out and attack America.

You don't, China didn't support them in their very thinly veiled nuclear ballistic missile test, ramping it up to a direct threat to attack the U.S, with nuclear weapons is beyond into crazyville,

Three Olives fucked around with this message at Jan 24, 2013 around 04:56

Gravel Gravy
Apr 3, 2008

Worst. Venue. Ever.

Keep in mind...

BBC posted:

In a statement carried by KCNA news agency,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21175466
It's a statement from the North Korean news agency, which isn't a stranger to bombastic language such as this. And given the tendency for media to sensationalize for attention, this isn't anything to get too worked up about.

Three Olives posted:

You don't, China didn't support them in their very thinly via veiled nuclear ballistic missile test, ramping it up to a direct threat to attack the U.S, with nuclear weapons is beyond into crazyville,

Which only ramps up the absurdity of the concept that they'd try to seriously attack anyone. They don't really have a friend in the world.

Gravel Gravy fucked around with this message at Jan 24, 2013 around 04:57

evensevenone
May 12, 2001
Glass is a solid.

BigHead posted:

Fun fact: Alaska just built a big rear end airport in the middle of absolutely nowhere with, like, 90% of the purpose of the airport being support for war with North Korea and China. Seriously, the big rear end airport is on a tiny uninhabited island across from another tiny island with a town that has a population of 713.

It's here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akun_Island

But someone should update that Wikipedia article because the runway was finished.

What I'm trying to say is that we got it covered. If North Korea invades, Alaska snow forces are on it.

Uh no, that airport is just a way to spend ARRA money. Plus it's not a very big airport, I don't even think it has a terminal.

Plus Cold Bay is only like 100mi away and that's a much bigger airport (and one of the places they already divert commercial flights too). I'm sure there's already some military airstrips or something up there as well.

Plus we already have tons of poo poo in Japan and South Korea.

HondaRider271
Jul 19, 2007

it's always good to have more


If North Korea was actually interested in a war they would just bomb the gently caress out of South Korea. They know they can't attack us and they know we know they can't attack us.

GreenCard78
Apr 25, 2005

It's all in the game, yo.


HackerJoeGuy posted:

Yeah, the NK leadership knows the second they launched a working nuke towards the South, Japan, or the US their entire country would be wiped off the face of the earth. I'm leaning towards the Jong-un consolidation of power angle, too. It's crazy, stupid, but not exactly that much more than any of the threats his father made over his lifetime.

The NK government has to be able to access liveleak. Those JDAMS look like they'd bust Dear Leader's bunker any day. They just want some food.

ShadowCatboy
Jan 22, 2006

E purr si muove.


Omnicarus posted:

You know I'd really hate to be a painter in North Korea. You gently caress up KJI's eyebrow and that's it for you and all the generations of traitors around you.

I once read a biography of a kid who escaped North Korea and he reportedly wanted to be an artist when he grew up. One day he was doodling Kim Jong Il's face in school, and a classmate saw him and ratted him out. I think his teacher freaked out and shrieked at him about being a traitor or something because only specially designated artists had permission to depict the Kims.

Things calmed down though, but he was pissing in terror when he realized he might get sent to a camp because of it.

Handen
Jun 29, 2003


This may be a little off topic, but I went searching on a tangent to see whether or not the Korean war was ever technically called off or not, and found these:

Miss Atomic Bomb 1955


Miss Atomic Bomb 1957


If poo poo goes sour, I wanna see a Miss Atomic Bomb 2013.

Cemetry Gator
Apr 3, 2007

Walgreens Representative


HondaRider271 posted:

If North Korea was actually interested in a war they would just bomb the gently caress out of South Korea. They know they can't attack us and they know we know they can't attack us.

North Korea has nothing to gain in a war. Any one with half a brain can say that one of the most impoverished nations in the world would not be able to make a single foothold in the world, and the amount of power that would come crushing down on them would be impressive, to say the least. They really have no bargaining power, so they got to talk big in hopes of getting people to try and offer them something just to shut them up.

I think we have a greater chance of seeing a coup-de-tat with these guys than we do an external war.

Three Olives
Apr 10, 2005

Go on daaaahhhhling...


HondaRider271 posted:

If North Korea was actually interested in a war they would just bomb the gently caress out of South Korea. They know they can't attack us and they know we know they can't attack us.

The most important part of making a threat is that the person being threatened has even the tiniest bit of concern that is possible, it's the difference between humor and a hostage situation.

Their threat is completely rediculious and impossible and North Korea does not have a sense of humor so that leaves them being insane.

HATE CURES TRANNYS
Aug 16, 2005

PUSSY ALL NIGHT!

It's ok goons, I will protect you.

Gravel Gravy
Apr 3, 2008

Worst. Venue. Ever.

Three Olives posted:

The most important part of making a threat is that the person being threatened has even the tiniest bit of concern that is possible, it's the difference between humor and a hostage situation.


Whether or not their government and military leaders believe it isn't the concern. Its what the populations believe and fear that matter.

Edit: The South Korean elections were just held. Perhaps its an attempt to start a dialog with the incoming president?

Normal states would just use a phone or diplomat, but you know, whatever.

Gravel Gravy fucked around with this message at Jan 24, 2013 around 05:09

HondaRider271
Jul 19, 2007

it's always good to have more


Three Olives posted:

The most important part of making a threat is that the person being threatened has even the tiniest bit of concern that is possible, it's the difference between humor and a hostage situation.

Their threat is completely rediculious and impossible and North Korea does not have a sense of humor so that leaves them being insane.

Is it not possible to do and say crazy things, but not be crazy? Their entire existence is predicated on this exact strategy of "acting crazy and irrational." But it's so predictable now that "acting crazy" is the expected norm, and no longer crazy.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009



I will support any efforts to eradicate the lair of corruption that is Three Olives' condo. Alas, this is not it.

Three Olives posted:

Isn't this basically a declaration of war?

No? You must have misunderstood the "test is targeted at USA" bit. An action can be targeted politically at someone which is a whole different thing from a physical target. Or if you mean them calling USA an 'enemy', still no.

indoflaven
Dec 10, 2009


This is a good watch: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=....41248874,d.aWM

Vice Guide to North Korea

Lumberjack Bonanza
Feb 27, 2011

I'LL CUT THAT POST TO PIECES!


Nenonen posted:

No? You must have misunderstood the "test is targeted at USA" bit. An action can be targeted politically at someone which is a whole different thing from a physical target. Or if you mean them calling USA an 'enemy', still no.

To be fair, if someone says "I'm testing my new gun and you're the target," there aren't a lot of people who would assume "Oh, they're just going to shoot at the wall to send me a message."

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Michael Corleone
Mar 30, 2011



Everyone seems to agree NK is probably doing this to get some aid thrown their way. Why don't they just stop being dickwads and I'm sure the world would bent over backwards to help them get up to 21st century standards of living. What am I missing?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply
«117 »