|
They should just get the same guy to play both Quicksilvers and not acknowledge it at all.
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 01:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 08:17 |
|
|
computer parts posted:They should just get the same guy to play both Quicksilvers and not acknowledge it at all. That would be great, especially if he's a more conventional villain in one and a hero in the other. With the exact same costume. It'd be like comics where you buy a cross over because you like a character, but he just acts likes a petulant rear end.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 02:02
|
|
|
computer parts posted:They should just get the same guy to play both Quicksilvers and not acknowledge it at all. No, Marvel should take a page from DC and cast one of the X-Men as their Quicksilver. Fox will be forced to once again kill off a character in a petulant hissy fit. Come on Fastbender or McAvoy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 03:08
|
|
|
I prefer further riling up people expecting a crossover by casting actors of completely different ethnicity.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 03:29
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:I prefer further riling up people expecting a crossover by casting actors of completely different ethnicity. We could get Halle Berry to be Marvel's Quicksilver and just check all the boxes I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 03:42
|
|
|
Gyges posted:No, Marvel should take a page from DC and cast one of the X-Men as their Quicksilver. Fox will be forced to once again kill off a character in a petulant hissy fit. Come on Fastbender or McAvoy. I blanked, what are you referencing? It sounds hilarious.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 03:43
|
|
|
AGirlWonder posted:I blanked, what are you referencing? It sounds hilarious. Cyclops in The Last Stand. He was killed off because James Marsden followed Bryan Singer to be in Superman Returns.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 03:47
|
|
|
AGirlWonder posted:I blanked, what are you referencing? It sounds hilarious. My understanding is the reason Cyclops died off screen in the opening moments of X-Men 3 was because Masden had the audacity to go and play a character in that traitor Singer's Superman. Which was of course only a problem because FOX moved up production on X-Men to compete with Superman, or some other such nonsense.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 03:50
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Cyclops in The Last Stand. He was killed off because James Marsden followed Bryan Singer to be in Superman Returns. Right. Ugh, I'd blocked that all out. Thanks, though!
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 04:25
|
|
|
He was also the best part of Superman Returns.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 10:04
|
|
|
Gyges posted:My understanding is the reason Cyclops died off screen in the opening moments of X-Men 3 was because Masden had the audacity to go and play a character in that traitor Singer's Superman. Which was of course only a problem because FOX moved up production on X-Men to compete with Superman, or some other such nonsense. I don't think they moved up production because of Superman, production was rushed because if they take too long between X-Men films the rights revert back to Marvel.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 10:46
|
|
|
computer parts posted:They should just get the same guy to play both Quicksilvers and not acknowledge it at all. I wouldn't mind that. It worked for the not in same continuity Justice League and Teen Titan cartoon using the same voice for Speedy and Flash, but no connection between the two other then the same voice and in the case of Speedy, appearance.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 15:34
|
|
|
Tezcatlipoca posted:He was also the best part of Superman Returns. There's a feather in your cap.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 17:24
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:I don't think they moved up production because of Superman, production was rushed because if they take too long between X-Men films the rights revert back to Marvel. Right, it's pretty much the same case that Sony has with Marvel. Though, I don't know how upset Marvel/Disney would be if Fox lost rights to X-Men. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 17:42
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:I don't think they moved up production because of Superman, production was rushed because if they take too long between X-Men films the rights revert back to Marvel. Not necessarily. At least in the sense that they took like 4 years between The Last Stand and Wolverine: Origins and there wasn't any real talk about the rights reverting to Marvel, and there were five years between Spider-Man 3 and ASM. Plus there's been even longer between Rise of the Silver Surfer and Fox's Reboot of The Fantastic Four. Whatever the terms of that deal seem to be, it's not solely based on time elapsed.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 18:22
|
|
|
I think they have to be at least believably working on progressing forward with a new film, right? That's why once talks on that Daredevil reboot fell through, the rights went back to Marvel, I think.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 18:30
|
|
|
Travis343 posted:I think they have to be at least believably working on progressing forward with a new film, right? That's why once talks on that Daredevil reboot fell through, the rights went back to Marvel, I think. My understanding was that Fox intentionally let the Daredevil rights lapse as a favour to Marvel so they could get an extension on the Fantastic Four rights.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 18:49
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:I don't think they moved up production because of Superman, production was rushed because if they take too long between X-Men films the rights revert back to Marvel. It absolutely wasn't that. As soon as Singer and WB announced that Superman Returns was coming out at the end of June, Tom Rothman at Fox got hellbent on rushing The Last Stand out by May. That aggressive schedule was what caused Vaughn to bail -- he wasn't at all happy with the script that Kinberg and Penn had written, and he wanted time to rewrite it or bring another writer in, but that would have pushed production past the July 2005 start date needed to make the May release window.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 19:05
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:I don't think they moved up production because of Superman, production was rushed because if they take too long between X-Men films the rights revert back to Marvel. Edit: ^^What he said.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 23:28
|
|
|
Here's Winter Soldier. If you don't want to see him, don't hover over the spoiler!
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 03:40
|
|
|
Deadpool posted:Here's Winter Soldier. If you don't want to see him, don't hover over the spoiler! wow, he actually looks pretty loving great.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 05:30
|
|
|
Neowyrm posted:wow, he actually looks pretty loving great. Yeah he does. I kinda don't like the mouth mask thing, hasn't his mask always been the opposite with the eyes covered? what happens if he has to sneeze??
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 06:14
|
|
|
My guess is one of two things: 1. It's his pre-liberation mask, and we'll see the domino look when he's regained control over himself 2. Marvel just couldn't figure out how to make a Domino mask not look goofy. What has me really interested is that in the original story Cap liberates Bucky via the Cosmic Cube. Avengers has made that kind-of impossible unless they want to be contrived and either involve Asgard or pull some "other cube" out of their asses. So how's the mind-liberation going to go down?
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 07:21
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:My guess is one of two things: He's going to hit him in the head REALLY hard.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 08:37
|
|
|
He's going to scream "I believe in you, fight it!" or "I know it's you in there!" 20 times.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 10:07
|
|
|
Deadpool posted:Here's Winter Soldier. If you don't want to see him, don't hover over the spoiler! It looks like they're gonna CGI in at least the elbow joint of his robot arm, which is a little odd. I'd think that a good looking robot arm wouldn't be that difficult for the costume department. Red Bones fucked around with this message at 12:09 on Jun 10, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 12:07
|
|
|
Red Bones posted:It looks like they're gonna CGI in at least the elbow joint of his robot arm, which is a little odd. I'd think that a good looking robot arm wouldn't be that difficult for the costume department. It's probably less about the difficulty for the costume/prop department and more of how much of a pain in the rear end it would be to perform choreography fights / act with one attached over your entire arm.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 12:12
|
|
|
Someone on Neogaf posted a clipping supposedly from a Scottish newspaper that reveals who Karen Gillan will play in Guardians of The Galaxy. It's apparently the Gaiman-created immigrant from Image Comics, Angela. (not a plot spoiler, I just don't want to ruin the surprise) http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=580889
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 13:32
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Someone on Neogaf posted a clipping supposedly from a Scottish newspaper that reveals who Karen Gillan will play in Guardians of The Galaxy. It's apparently the Gaiman-created immigrant from Image Comics, Angela. (not a plot spoiler, I just don't want to ruin the surprise)  Well...they're not wasting any time, are they?
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 14:38
|
|
|
Red Bones posted:It looks like they're gonna CGI in at least the elbow joint of his robot arm, which is a little odd. I'd think that a good looking robot arm wouldn't be that difficult for the costume department. nah the people who unthawed him/ gave him his robitty arm just have a really low budget.
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 16:22
|
|
|
Warner Bros has already begun production of a Man of Steel sequel, with both director Zach Snyder and writer David S. Goyer signed on. Christopher Nolan's status on this project is still unknown. http://www.deadline.com/2013/06/man-of-steel-sequel-underway-with-zack-snyder-and-david-s-goyer/
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2013 02:03
|
|
|
I'm not even a little surprised as the film has already made it's budget back in ticket presales.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2013 02:07
|
|
|
Looking forward to Superman having to suppress an insidious anti-corporate protest in the sequel.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2013 03:36
|
|
|
Neowyrm posted:nah the people who unthawed him/ gave him his robitty arm just have a really low budget. Well they are Russians so this is actually entirely possible.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2013 07:14
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:My guess is one of two things: Cap is going to give him a heartwarming speech about how awesome America is, I mean yeah, we have our problems, but we defeated Fascism and invented Rock and Roll.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2013 09:49
|
|
|
And then, they shall finally kiss.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2013 10:34
|
|
|
Yeah Captain America is really good at beating someone up and then gently explaining to them why they're wrong.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2013 17:14
|
|
|
Neowyrm posted:nah the people who unthawed him/ gave him his robitty arm just have a really low budget.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2013 07:18
|
|
|
Kurzon posted:Which is more expensive, a CGI arm or a costume arm? CGI, I'm sure.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2013 18:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 08:17 |
|
|
Kurzon posted:Which is more expensive, a CGI arm or a costume arm? Depends on how good the costume arm is. If they want a really good one, they can pay out the rear end, but you could get a lovely one for cheap.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2013 04:22
|
|