|
hcenvirons posted:It's weird. It doesn't seem like it's on all of the pictures and I can't quite figure out what it is. You had the 16:9 aspect ratio selected. The aspect ratio you select in the menu applies to JPEGs, not just video. RTFM
|
# ¿ May 2, 2013 05:46 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 10:24 |
|
hcenvirons posted:Except I didn't change any settings between those two shots or at all that day? The cropping just happens randomly regardless of which lens was being used as well. I get what you're saying but I'm not following why there are times that there's no cropping in the jpeg vs the raw. RAWs will never be cropped. Were you changing modes at all, like between green box and PASM? Green box mode has its own set of settings.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2013 16:45 |
|
SoundMonkey posted:Be reeeeeal careful of "Brooklyn" sellers who end up just trying to upsell you on dumb poo poo until you cancel your order. There's quite a few. Doing that upsell/cancel bait and switch bullshit as an eBay seller will get you powerfucked by eBay. The accessories are agreed to be pretty much complete poo poo, yes.
|
# ¿ May 22, 2013 04:56 |
|
StarkingBarfish posted:I have a question about using histograms, based on some good feedback in the photo a day thread: Thanks to digital quantization, there's way more information in bright areas than in dark areas. That's the idea behind exposing to the right. Whether you want to do the extra work in post to make the final result look the way you want is up to you.
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2013 18:58 |
|
dukeku posted:JPEGs are lower quality, always. That's just called "compression". It's also called "bit depth!" I've taken perfectly exposed photos where there was nasty posterization in the sky in the JPEG. RAW (or TIFF in the case of film scans) for me, thanks.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2014 03:30 |
|
junidog posted:Thanks for replying, but is there a more technical answer? How is the filter changing the lightpath to increase FOV? I've tried googling around, but since they're garbage/newbie bait everything I can find is just people warning others not to buy them.
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2014 18:59 |
|
The lenses for the Nikkormat are pre-AI and won't mount on a D700. None of those lenses are particularly good.
|
# ¿ Oct 13, 2015 21:17 |
|
windex posted:Realistically, though - if this is a hobby she has been into for awhile and has already exceeded phone cameras, the middle ground fixed lens cameras are good moves from that on a budget, but she'll hit the limits of them promptly if I had to guess. $2000 for an APS-C camera? lol just lol
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2016 20:00 |
|
blowfish posted:$500 body Yes, a teenager just starting out should definitely spend $2500 on camera equipment. What are you smoking and will you share it with me?
|
# ¿ Aug 2, 2016 17:39 |
|
Maybe after they develop the technology to prevent you from taking pictures that aren't level they can use it to prevent windex from posting.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2016 17:26 |
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:corel still exists??? nah but really, thanks for the actual helpful reply. i might do the trial for lightroom (and for this knockoff) to see if they are in any way comparable Are you familiar with the concept of "false economy"?
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2016 22:58 |
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:yeah, well, this means close to nothing to me, because i am not a caveman who thinks organizing computer files is some kind of dark magic. if this is one of the major selling points of lightroom, well, that makes sense in terms of the praise it apparently has earned here, but for those of us who put our cyberpants on by ourselves it is merely a cute affectation that we need not bother ourselves with Good luck finding the cyberpants you wore 6 years ago on the exact day you took photos of a person who is now dead (killed by your bad posting, perhaps) and you want to find a picture to bring to their memorial service. If anybody here is it's you for claiming you'd never possibly have any use for keywords.
|
# ¿ Dec 2, 2016 00:27 |
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:right because the only way to tag a computer file with keywords is through lightroom. it's not like this has been a solved problem for decades, and the solutions in question here are ones which i have profitably used for over half of my conscious life How many of those other solutions also ingest photos from memory cards, process your photos, and prepare photos for output? Regardless of your strong feelings about keywords, the less expensive options also just aren't nearly as good at processing photos, which is, you know, the main thing you want to do. You said you're already using RawTherapee, so if that suits you why bother switching at all?
|
# ¿ Dec 2, 2016 00:35 |
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:i apologize for bumping this thread for nothing, but this post is too precious not to archive in all its confused stupidity good post
|
# ¿ Dec 2, 2016 00:54 |
|
ExecuDork posted:LR's catalogue-management system (and associated file tagging and star-rating and pick/reject and batch actions and so on) does look like a pointless redundancy over basic file-management systems built into a computer's operating system. But, because you can build an efficient workflow around how LR works - it makes a difference to me if I have to constantly switch from mouse to keyboard, or be constantly moving the mouse from one small click target to another, over and over again, for example - you can use LR to speed up the collection of tasks involved in doing anything with a group of photos that might number in the hundreds or thousands for a single session of work. Look, you don't understand. A power user like Lutha Mahtin already doesn't need to use a mouse What kind of pleb do you think he is?
|
# ¿ Dec 2, 2016 17:02 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 10:24 |
|
Dog Case posted:Just don't do it if they think that human-touched things are trash for poors In which case you should break up with them and find someone less entitled.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2016 00:35 |