Search Amazon.com:
Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us $3,400 per month for bandwidth bills alone, and since we don't believe in shoving popup ads to our registered users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
  • Post
  • Reply
Famethrowa
Oct 5, 2012


Saint Sputnik posted:

Funny, I thought the Wii would be the easiest thing to play with one hand.

I know non-electronic prosthetics have had some breakthroughs in recent years, is there anything you're keeping an eye on in that area?

The Wii requires you to hold the remote in one hand, nunchuck in the other, and manipulate buttons on both. Its literally impossible.

There have been advancements in electronic ones, some prosthetics with advanced grips and controlled by muscle movement. They are still slow, cumbersome, heavy and expensive as hell. Honestly, they are currently worse in almost every way then good ole wire and pulley ones. And these old fashioned ones are still inflexible and very limiting as it is, and realistically are never going to get better. Therefore I find myself much more able just on my own.

Thats why stories like this are awesome. Bionic technology is the only way prosthetics will catch up to the rest of current tech.

In short

Famethrowa fucked around with this message at Feb 21, 2013 around 23:51

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Kommienzuspadt
Apr 28, 2004

This bear is tops blooby


RabbitWizard posted:

What? Maybe not in the next 10-20 years...but progress is made, so i can totally imagine improved limbs/organs in the future. Wiring nerves to electronics would have been magic some time ago, but here we are. Are there any medical limits, like you can't wire "every" nerv to something? Or is it technical?

Well strictly speaking, the problem is that nature has spent BILLIONS of years figuring this out and we've been at it like maybe a couple decades. Also thermodynamically speaking most biological machines like the mitochodrial ATP synthase that generates "energy" for your cells operates at like 50% efficiency. Human engines might get up to 15% efficiency. We just aren't that good at doing thing yet.

poo poo can happen but dont ever expect it to do much better than the original could, not in a holistic sense anyway. You might get a stronger hand for example but it won't be as deft or nimble.

Boogaleeboo
Sep 13, 2011
Probation
Can't post for 11 days!


Robot arms that can punch through walls is basically magic for people that don't want to admit they believe in magic. In time our atomic batteries and carbon nanotubes will allow for a lightweight super exo-skeleton that allows me to upload my consciousness directly into my vibrating orbital penis, where I will ejaculate pure data forever.

It's about as likely as riding a unicorn through the air on a rainbow, but you get to say "But science!" like you aren't a crazy person.

Cardiovorax
Jun 5, 2011
CARDIOVORAX BELIVES A POLICEMAN WHO GROPES A WOMAN SHOULD LOSE HIS JOB, AND DO A HUNDRED HOURS OF COMUNITY SERVICE UNDER THE PAIN OF GOING TO PRISON IF HE BREAKS HIS PAROLE


Kommienzuspadt posted:

Well strictly speaking, the problem is that nature has spent BILLIONS of years figuring this out and we've been at it like maybe a couple decades. Also thermodynamically speaking most biological machines like the mitochodrial ATP synthase that generates "energy" for your cells operates at like 50% efficiency. Human engines might get up to 15% efficiency. We just aren't that good at doing thing yet.
Nature doesn't "figure out" anything, it just happens. The baseline for evolutionary designs is "not actively harmful," and even then there's wiggle room. Because of that you end up with stupid things like the laryngeal nerve, which is substantially longer than it needs to be (15 feet longer, in the case of giraffes.) There are definitely ways to improve on natural designs, we just don't have the technological capabilities yet.

shovelbum
Oct 21, 2010

The managers always talked about having the view from 30,000 feet. The only problem with having the view from 30,000 feet, is at that height, everybody looks like ants.


Kommienzuspadt posted:

Human engines might get up to 15% efficiency. We just aren't that good at doing thing yet.

I'm confused, is this a different measure of efficiency than is used by people who work with engines? That number seems VERY low.

Boogaleeboo
Sep 13, 2011
Probation
Can't post for 11 days!


Nope, it's pretty spot on. It's getting better all the time, but for the same general 'calories' a car might get 30 miles and a human 300. This of course varies wildly [not all cars are energy efficient, and not all people are in 'average' shape], but as a general rule your body kicks the living poo poo out of most engines humanity has come up with to date. Even if we got with roughly equal sizes as tiny scooter to human carrying poo poo, it still holds up. You are a pretty good machine, all things being equal.

Space Monster
Mar 13, 2009



I'm kind of scared. I wasn't expecting humanity to develop a brain/machine interface so quickly and thought we'd have more time to think (as a society) of the implications.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011


Space Monster posted:

I'm kind of scared. I wasn't expecting humanity to develop a brain/machine interface so quickly and thought we'd have more time to think (as a society) of the implications.
Don't worry, soon we'll have machines thinking about the implications for us!

Wingless
Mar 3, 2009

Gloves: So as not to touch this filthy reality.


A Buttery Pastry posted:

And we already have people complaining about amputees using super legs in competition, which I would think indicates a real possibility of artificial legs becoming just plain better than regular legs.

Blade runners have an advantage on a straight flat surface where top speed is the goal. Put them in a race through a forest or around a mountain and you'll see just how superior human legs are.

Kommienzuspadt posted:

the problem is that nature has spent BILLIONS of years

Billions of years of completely random trial and error, yes. We get to analyse and design. Not to mention copy.

Angela Christine
Oct 4, 2008

LIL CUTIES


Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNZPRsrwumQ

Just wire that badboy up to your central nervous system and away you go. BZZZZZ.

Spacedad
Sep 11, 2001

We go play orbital catch around the curvature of the earth, son.

Presuming we get to the point where cybernetic additions are able to outperform human parts - I don't think that there will ever reach a point where we feel the need to hack off our own limbs or transplant our brains into cyborg bodies, as per a lot of science fiction where people get body modification. Amputees and people with full body paralysis or similar things would be more likely to have that done to them. More likely we'll wind up using detachable limbs and enhancements that run off signals from our body's muscle and nervous systems, with no surgery required whatsoever. Think like Doctor Octopus before the tentacles were fused to his spine, and he could take off or put them on like a suit.

Come to think of it though, I think that a lot of cyberpunk's already explored this idea - and so people in the lower dredges of society would get illegal enhancements done for whatever reason (for example, concealing a weapon inside a limb for a job as a hitman) with all the problems associated with doing that. (Infections, immune system rejecting the additions, malfunctions, phantom limb, etc.) Whereas people at the higher end of society in some stories might avoid cybernetic enhancement unless it was the top tier cutting edge thing.

Also, a lot of science fiction seems to depict cybernetics as being fully articulated and smoothly integrated into the human body, driven exactly like how we drive our own limbs. I actually prefer science fiction that goes out of its way to show cybernetics that perform more like prosthetics - so instead of moving your limb around, you're working withing the confines of the limitations of the limb, and perhaps certain preprogrammed actions that can be taken with it. Taken further - a person with a 'full body cybernetic conversion' with just their brain would essentially be 'driving' the cyborg body the way someone drives a car. In that they are merely sending out certain brain impulses to cause the body to perform certain actions. (I.E. We push on a pedal to make the car accelerate rather than manually perform the full action of the car engine's conversion of energy to motion ourselves.) Over time they could get somewhere near natural as human movement, but are still 'faking' it the whole way. Cybernetic faces might even have preprogrammed reflex actions and twitches in them to make them appear more natural.

Another idea I've seen explored in certain cyberpunk scifi - a subculture of cybernetic body programming, where literal 'life hackers' program new complex actions for their bodies or limbs & enhancements to be capable of performing. I could see people particularly skilled at creating and 'driving' such things being a part of some kind of cybernetic olympics too.

Spacedad fucked around with this message at Feb 22, 2013 around 01:34

NTT
Nov 14, 2011


TIME TO END
THIS SO THE
FANS CANS STOP
COMPLAINING
LIKE LITTLE CRY
BABY BITCHES

Angela Christine posted:

Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNZPRsrwumQ

Just wire that badboy up to your central nervous system and away you go. BZZZZZ.

The fact that it didn't tip over when he kicked it was just incredible.

John Big Booty
Jan 31, 2008
Living in the 8th Dimension, things get rough.


Angela Christine posted:

Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs.
I'm gonna be an Adrienne Barbeau-bot.

Saint Sputnik
Mar 31, 2007

yeah swing low, sweet
jewel-encrusted chariot
make me young again
make me well


That's really interesting to get a firsthand account of, thanks. I know there's a goon cosplayer who uses a wheelchair, but I feel like I've heard of this girl who's an amputee who uses that in her costumes too?

Spacedad posted:

Presuming we get to the point where cybernetic additions are able to outperform human parts - I don't think that there will ever reach a point where we feel the need to hack off our own limbs or transplant our brains into cyborg bodies

I agree, and it kind of bugs me when someone's first thought when hearing about advances in cybernetics is "I can't wait to chop off my own hand and get a Powerglove, it's so bad" rather than "oh cool this will help restore function to people who need it." But there will definitely be external cybernetics; we're seeing this now in Google Glass and HULCs (seriously the names of these things... there's a Japanese company that started in 2004 that named itself Cyberdyne. It's like people are dedicated to making sci-fi come true).

quote:

Another idea I've seen explored in certain cyberpunk scifi - a subculture of cybernetic body programming, where literal 'life hackers' program new complex actions for their bodies or limbs & enhancements to be capable of performing. I could see people particularly skilled at creating and 'driving' such things being a part of some kind of cybernetic olympics too.

I hadn't thought of that either, and it makes perfect sense, since I've been comparing cybernetics to iPhones this whole time. Imagine "cracking" a bionic hand to crank up the p.s.i. of its grip.

Yaos
Feb 22, 2003

She is a cat of significant gravy.

If they can perfect input and output there's nothing stopping somebody from sending a signal to a virtual body part and have feeling in that virtual body part come back out; as far as the brain is concerned it's a real arm you are controlling and not a software based one. I think that's much more interesting than replacing body parts since a virtual world would have no limitations.

The White Dragon
Nov 14, 2007

a dragon that is
uh

Angela Christine posted:

Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs.

Why would you want to do this? I mean, sure, you'd be an unflappable juggernaut, but rear end in a top hat hipsters would keep running up and kicking you.

etalian
Mar 20, 2006



Angela Christine posted:

Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs.


Be careful what you wish for:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXJZVZFRFJc

abigserve
Sep 13, 2009

It was not scary. It was just...abnormal.


Yaos posted:

If they can perfect input and output there's nothing stopping somebody from sending a signal to a virtual body part and have feeling in that virtual body part come back out; as far as the brain is concerned it's a real arm you are controlling and not a software based one. I think that's much more interesting than replacing body parts since a virtual world would have no limitations.

Outside the box time - who's to say you limit this to body parts? If they can configure it so it "feels" like an extension of your own body then you could control huge cranes and manufacturing equipment using the power of your mind!

shovelbum
Oct 21, 2010

The managers always talked about having the view from 30,000 feet. The only problem with having the view from 30,000 feet, is at that height, everybody looks like ants.


Boogaleeboo posted:

Nope, it's pretty spot on. It's getting better all the time, but for the same general 'calories' a car might get 30 miles and a human 300. This of course varies wildly [not all cars are energy efficient, and not all people are in 'average' shape], but as a general rule your body kicks the living poo poo out of most engines humanity has come up with to date. Even if we got with roughly equal sizes as tiny scooter to human carrying poo poo, it still holds up. You are a pretty good machine, all things being equal.

I mean it's in the ballpark for automotive gasoline engines but 15% hasn't been the upper bound for "human machines" in a long time.

Rorac
Aug 19, 2011



abigserve posted:

Outside the box time - who's to say you limit this to body parts? If they can configure it so it "feels" like an extension of your own body then you could control huge cranes and manufacturing equipment using the power of your mind!


Assuming you drop the feedback portion of it(or just use current senses as the feedback), if you configure and calibrate the computing/sensing hardware the right way, this is already reality.

http://www.emotiv.com/

See: Dude controlling a wheelchair with a computer, what is more or less a very portable EEG sensor array, and his brain.



The future truly is now.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011


Wingless posted:

Blade runners have an advantage on a straight flat surface where top speed is the goal. Put them in a race through a forest or around a mountain and you'll see just how superior human legs are.
I wasn't arguing that the current technology was better though? Just that it might be in the future. I do agree with what others have said though, about progress in these sorts of technologies basically being a way for amputees and others to get functionality back, not everyone chopping off their arms and legs to get sweet new mechanical ones.

Saint Sputnik
Mar 31, 2007

yeah swing low, sweet
jewel-encrusted chariot
make me young again
make me well

Looks like crowdfunding is also part of the future of cybernetics

Throw Trucks With Your Mind:

quote:

I have wired an EEG headset that reads your brain into a video game to give you telekinetic super-powers controlled with your thoughts. The game uses first-person shooter controls, but it's not a first-person shooter. You'll fight entirely through NeuroSky's MindWave headset peripheral that reads the electrical activity of your brain...The game works by doing a bunch of crazy math on your brainwaves to determine how calm and focused you are. These two conditions act as the scalars on your psychic powers. Want to throw a truck into that pompous jerk strafing around in front of you? Just focus on it. The more focused you are, the harder you fling the truck and the more smushy he ends up.

Footage of people playing it at the link.

Kommienzuspadt
Apr 28, 2004

This bear is tops blooby


shovelbum posted:

I mean it's in the ballpark for automotive gasoline engines but 15% hasn't been the upper bound for "human machines" in a long time.

Wiki says that an efficient power plant will operate at ~60% thermal efficiency. My bad.

roomforthetuna
Mar 22, 2005

I don't need to know anything about virii! My CUSTOM PROGRAM keeps me protected! It's not like they'll try to come in through the Internet or something!


Kommienzuspadt posted:

Well strictly speaking, the problem is that nature has spent BILLIONS of years figuring this out and we've been at it like maybe a couple decades. Also thermodynamically speaking most biological machines like the mitochodrial ATP synthase that generates "energy" for your cells operates at like 50% efficiency. Human engines might get up to 15% efficiency. We just aren't that good at doing thing yet.

poo poo can happen but dont ever expect it to do much better than the original could, not in a holistic sense anyway. You might get a stronger hand for example but it won't be as deft or nimble.
This is a pretty terrible argument because nature sucks at wheels, which are a buttload more efficient than legs. Yes, legs are more flexible (ha ha), but you know what's more flexible and more efficient? Legs plus retractible wheels. Nature never did manage to come up with that, over its BILLIONS of years (well, unless you consider the human brain inventing things to be part of nature, in which case clearly our robot limbs can also be improvements because they are also going to be invented as part of nature's BILLIONS of years of progress.)

I can easily see prosthetics getting 'better' than human limbs in strength and precision - I think the space where prosthetics will really fall down, for a long time, is durability. We can barely even make things with no moving parts that last 20 years - complex electronic systems with constantly moving flexible parts are probably going to have to go in for maintenance every 3 months.

The only way we'll ever get around that is some sort of crazy future-tech with maintenance nanobots that also reproduce and look after themselves, and once those are introduced the next step is nanobots that go wrong and start fighting the other nanobots for who is supposed to be there; robot cancer!

So, kids, that's the story of how carbon-based bio robots came to be already here.

mrae
Feb 6, 2013


Beyond chopping off limbs for "I want to be a cyborg" reasons, what about people with diseases not yet advanced that will deteriorate a system beyond use? Folks who have glaucoma might opt to get bionic eyes rather than watch their eyesight become blindness.

As someone who has genetic predisposition to glaucoma and macular degeneration, I'd sign up for that poo poo today.

Dollas
Sep 16, 2007

$$$$$$$$$


mrae posted:

Beyond chopping off limbs for "I want to be a cyborg" reasons, what about people with diseases not yet advanced that will deteriorate a system beyond use? Folks who have glaucoma might opt to get bionic eyes rather than watch their eyesight become blindness.

As someone who has genetic predisposition to glaucoma and macular degeneration, I'd sign up for that poo poo today.

The nanobots will take care of all disease and tissue repair.

RabbitWizard
Oct 21, 2008


Just because:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBjoWMA5d84
This is a harddrive 30 years ago. 250.000$, 38,5kg, 10mb.
Today i can get for 60$ 64GB and it's as big as a fingernail. Humans are great at making things efficient.

And I would totally chop of my hands if i could get hands that can feel stuff and have 8 fingers that i can move in ever direction, not to mention the 20 mouseclicks i could do in a second. Throw in a bitset and a rotating pinky and i'm sold.

Full Metal Jackass
Jan 22, 2001



RabbitWizard posted:


And I would totally chop of my hands if i could get hands that can feel stuff and have 8 fingers that i can move in ever direction, not to mention the 20 mouseclicks i could do in a second. Throw in a bitset and a rotating pinky and i'm sold.

You'd be pretty popular with the ladies.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011


RabbitWizard posted:

And I would totally chop of my hands if i could get hands that can feel stuff and have 8 fingers that i can move in ever direction, not to mention the 20 mouseclicks i could do in a second. Throw in a bitset and a rotating pinky and i'm sold.
You're forgetting the ability to have your hand rotate completely around your wrist, so you can effortlessly swing a stick around like a kung fu master. (But really, that would probably be useful as well.)

roomforthetuna
Mar 22, 2005

I don't need to know anything about virii! My CUSTOM PROGRAM keeps me protected! It's not like they'll try to come in through the Internet or something!


A Buttery Pastry posted:

You're forgetting the ability to have your hand rotate completely around your wrist, so you can effortlessly swing a stick around like a kung fu master. (But really, that would probably be useful as well.)
Hold a propellor, point upwards, bam, helicopter hands.

Saint Sputnik
Mar 31, 2007

yeah swing low, sweet
jewel-encrusted chariot
make me young again
make me well

roomforthetuna posted:

Hold a propellor, point upwards, bam, helicopter hands.

Now you're just describing Inspector Gadget. A bumbling, fedora-wearing cyborg: the goon of the future.

Zorak
Nov 7, 2005


Here's a rather unique prosthetics accomplishment that took some years before it was working properly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0zy9QITHMA&hd=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsO7D6l7zQI&hd=1

Dr. Stab
Sep 12, 2010


RabbitWizard posted:

Just because:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBjoWMA5d84
This is a harddrive 30 years ago. 250.000$, 38,5kg, 10mb.
Today i can get for 60$ 64GB and it's as big as a fingernail. Humans are great at making things efficient.

And I would totally chop of my hands if i could get hands that can feel stuff and have 8 fingers that i can move in ever direction, not to mention the 20 mouseclicks i could do in a second. Throw in a bitset and a rotating pinky and i'm sold.

It's weird seeing a 6 pin molex connection on the back of that thing. I expected everything on that drive to be obsolete. Data transfer standards update and go obsolete every few years. But, a 50 year old power transfer standard is still trucking along just fine. I could plug that thing straight into my desktop PSU.

Saint Sputnik
Mar 31, 2007

yeah swing low, sweet
jewel-encrusted chariot
make me young again
make me well

Zorak posted:

Here's a rather unique prosthetics accomplishment that took some years before it was working properly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0zy9QITHMA&hd=1

This is a much simpler solution but here's Allison the sea turtle who got a sweet fin on her back to make up for her missing flipper. She could only swim in circles before.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjM-naSnxUI

And here's German shepherd Cassidy who has been dogmented

RabbitWizard
Oct 21, 2008


A Buttery Pastry posted:

You're forgetting the ability to have your hand rotate completely around your wrist
Didn't mention that, because Simpsons Deus Ex did it and that would maybe somehow undermine my point.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcSQ943wLOQ#t=169s

QuoProQuid
Jan 12, 2012


Coincidentally, the FDA just approved the first eye implant that can restore limited vision. If this test run goes well, they will likely allow individuals with macular degeneration to receive the same treatment.

quote:

WASHINGTON — Patients who have lost their sight due to a rare disorder may be able to regain some vision using a new implantable device that takes the place of damaged cells inside the eye.

The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday approved the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System as the first treatment for an inherited disorder that causes the breakdown of cells in the retina, a membrane inside the eye.
The technology will initially only be available to a small number of patients, but could eventually be used to treat vision disorders that affect millions of people. The device was previously approved in Europe in late 2011.

The system includes a small video camera and transmitter mounted on a pair of glasses. Images from the camera are processed into electronic data that is wirelessly transmitted to electrodes implanted into the patient’s retina.

FDA says that while the device will not fully restore patients’ vision, “it may allow them to detect light and dark in the environment,” which could help them perform daily tasks.

The FDA approved the device from Second Sight Medical Products for patients 25 years and older who have advanced retinitis pigmentosa. Starting in their twenties, people with the disease slowly lose vision as the light-sensitive cells that line the retina deteriorate. Over a period of decades the condition eventually leads to blindness.

“It’s like looking down a tunnel that gradually narrows until it disappears entirely,” said Dr. Robert Greenberg, CEO and founder of Second Sight. “What we’re doing is reopening the window that had closed on them.”

Greenberg first proposed the technology for the Argus device as a doctoral student at Johns Hopkins University’s medical school about 20 years ago. He founded Second Sight to develop the technology in 1998.

About 100,000 people in the U.S. have retinitis pigmentosa, though the FDA estimates fewer than 4,000 will initially receive the device under its currently approved indication. Patients must have little to no light perception in both eyes but a prior history of being able to make out basic shapes and forms. They must also have signs of at least some remaining retinal function.

Results from a study of 30 patients with the condition showed that most were able to perform daily activities better with the implant than without it. Activities included navigating sidewalks and curbs, matching different color socks and recognizing large words or sentences.

Second Sight hopes to eventually win approval to treat a wide variety of vision disorders, including macular degeneration, the leading cause of blindness in developed countries.

Research and development of the Argus II was supported by $100 million in grant funding from the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy.

Second Sight Medical Products, Inc. is a privately held company based in Sylmar, Calif.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011


RabbitWizard posted:

Didn't mention that, because Simpsons Deus Ex did it and that would maybe somehow undermine my point.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcSQ943wLOQ#t=169s
Well, Deus Ex really set the bar for what augmented arms should be able to do, no reason to settle for non-rotating hands.

Angela Christine
Oct 4, 2008

LIL CUTIES


RabbitWizard posted:

Just because:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBjoWMA5d84
This is a harddrive 30 years ago. 250.000$, 38,5kg, 10mb.
Today i can get for 60$ 64GB and it's as big as a fingernail. Humans are great at making things efficient.


The problem isn't that we can't improve the technology, the problem is that we have competing and somewhat incompatible goals for the technology. I was only half joking about the bigdog centaur. People want prothetics that are at least as strong as flesh, at least as flexible as flesh, at least as sensitive as flesh, at least as light as flesh (so it doesn't damage the flesh it is connected to), as durable as flesh, as easy to maintain as flesh, and most want something that looks as much like normal, healthy human flesh as possible. The larger and more complex the prosthetic, the more difficult it is to get all those requirements into one prosthetic.

Just look at feet. The ones that look quite a lot like real feet are okay for walking, but not very good at all for sports. Want to run, jump, swim, hike through the woods, and ride a bike? Well for best performance those all require different prosthetic, at least for now. A foot amputee that wants to compete in a triathlon needs at least three prosthetic feet, and probably none of them will look convincingly like real feet.

If that amputee lost his leg above the knee, things get much more complex. And if his legs and hips were damaged, then something like a bigdog centaur may be far easier to do than human style robot legs and hips. Despite the billions of years of evolution, human-style bipeds are kind of creaky, even with self-repairing flesh our crazy s-shaped spines eventually gifts 8 out of 10 of us with back pain. A centaur or drider style body plan (possibly with retractable wheels for fast travel on hard smooth surfaces) might be better in every measurable way compared to a normal human, but most people won't want to look like a freak.


Better isn't always better. At least not as long as people are stuck with jumped up monkey brains.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcpz0l_TWOk#t=37s

booshi
Aug 14, 2004

||||||||||


But cyborgs aren't robots

The only cyborg that would touch on the rules of robotics is one with a new brain.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

roomforthetuna
Mar 22, 2005

I don't need to know anything about virii! My CUSTOM PROGRAM keeps me protected! It's not like they'll try to come in through the Internet or something!


Angela Christine posted:

The problem isn't that we can't improve the technology, the problem is that we have competing and somewhat incompatible goals for the technology.
Also the example of 64GB fingernail sized hard drives, while a good example of us making progress, is still a terrible example of us matching nature, since DNA and brains can both store way more data in a way smaller space. It's like saying we can make better legs than nature because we used to only be able to make robots that go on tank tracks but now they can have clumsy heavy poorly balanced inefficient slow legs. The tech has improved but it still sucks.

Whereas wheels or tank tracks versus legs is probably more the comparison we should be making. We suck at doing something nature does, but we're pretty good at doing something nature doesn't do. (Artificial hearts that pump with a fan rather than squeezing is another fun one - just as much blood flow, no pulse!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply