|
Saint Sputnik posted:Funny, I thought the Wii would be the easiest thing to play with one hand. The Wii requires you to hold the remote in one hand, nunchuck in the other, and manipulate buttons on both. Its literally impossible. There have been advancements in electronic ones, some prosthetics with advanced grips and controlled by muscle movement. They are still slow, cumbersome, heavy and expensive as hell. Honestly, they are currently worse in almost every way then good ole wire and pulley ones. And these old fashioned ones are still inflexible and very limiting as it is, and realistically are never going to get better. Therefore I find myself much more able just on my own. Thats why stories like this are awesome. Bionic technology is the only way prosthetics will catch up to the rest of current tech. In short Famethrowa fucked around with this message at Feb 21, 2013 around 23:51 |
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 21:23 |
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2013 11:01 |
|
RabbitWizard posted:What? Maybe not in the next 10-20 years...but progress is made, so i can totally imagine improved limbs/organs in the future. Wiring nerves to electronics would have been magic some time ago, but here we are. Are there any medical limits, like you can't wire "every" nerv to something? Or is it technical? Well strictly speaking, the problem is that nature has spent BILLIONS of years figuring this out and we've been at it like maybe a couple decades. Also thermodynamically speaking most biological machines like the mitochodrial ATP synthase that generates "energy" for your cells operates at like 50% efficiency. Human engines might get up to 15% efficiency. We just aren't that good at doing thing yet. poo poo can happen but dont ever expect it to do much better than the original could, not in a holistic sense anyway. You might get a stronger hand for example but it won't be as deft or nimble.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 21:46 |
|
Robot arms that can punch through walls is basically magic for people that don't want to admit they believe in magic. In time our atomic batteries and carbon nanotubes will allow for a lightweight super exo-skeleton that allows me to upload my consciousness directly into my vibrating orbital penis, where I will ejaculate pure data forever. It's about as likely as riding a unicorn through the air on a rainbow, but you get to say "But science!" like you aren't a crazy person.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 22:14 |
|
Kommienzuspadt posted:Well strictly speaking, the problem is that nature has spent BILLIONS of years figuring this out and we've been at it like maybe a couple decades. Also thermodynamically speaking most biological machines like the mitochodrial ATP synthase that generates "energy" for your cells operates at like 50% efficiency. Human engines might get up to 15% efficiency. We just aren't that good at doing thing yet.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 22:26 |
|
Kommienzuspadt posted:Human engines might get up to 15% efficiency. We just aren't that good at doing thing yet. I'm confused, is this a different measure of efficiency than is used by people who work with engines? That number seems VERY low.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 22:35 |
|
Nope, it's pretty spot on. It's getting better all the time, but for the same general 'calories' a car might get 30 miles and a human 300. This of course varies wildly [not all cars are energy efficient, and not all people are in 'average' shape], but as a general rule your body kicks the living poo poo out of most engines humanity has come up with to date. Even if we got with roughly equal sizes as tiny scooter to human carrying poo poo, it still holds up. You are a pretty good machine, all things being equal.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 22:58 |
|
I'm kind of scared. I wasn't expecting humanity to develop a brain/machine interface so quickly and thought we'd have more time to think (as a society) of the implications.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 23:10 |
|
Space Monster posted:I'm kind of scared. I wasn't expecting humanity to develop a brain/machine interface so quickly and thought we'd have more time to think (as a society) of the implications.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 23:35 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:And we already have people complaining about amputees using super legs in competition, which I would think indicates a real possibility of artificial legs becoming just plain better than regular legs. Blade runners have an advantage on a straight flat surface where top speed is the goal. Put them in a race through a forest or around a mountain and you'll see just how superior human legs are. Kommienzuspadt posted:the problem is that nature has spent BILLIONS of years Billions of years of completely random trial and error, yes. We get to analyse and design. Not to mention copy.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 00:43 |
|
Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNZPRsrwumQ Just wire that badboy up to your central nervous system and away you go. BZZZZZ.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 01:08 |
|
Presuming we get to the point where cybernetic additions are able to outperform human parts - I don't think that there will ever reach a point where we feel the need to hack off our own limbs or transplant our brains into cyborg bodies, as per a lot of science fiction where people get body modification. Amputees and people with full body paralysis or similar things would be more likely to have that done to them. More likely we'll wind up using detachable limbs and enhancements that run off signals from our body's muscle and nervous systems, with no surgery required whatsoever. Think like Doctor Octopus before the tentacles were fused to his spine, and he could take off or put them on like a suit. Come to think of it though, I think that a lot of cyberpunk's already explored this idea - and so people in the lower dredges of society would get illegal enhancements done for whatever reason (for example, concealing a weapon inside a limb for a job as a hitman) with all the problems associated with doing that. (Infections, immune system rejecting the additions, malfunctions, phantom limb, etc.) Whereas people at the higher end of society in some stories might avoid cybernetic enhancement unless it was the top tier cutting edge thing. Also, a lot of science fiction seems to depict cybernetics as being fully articulated and smoothly integrated into the human body, driven exactly like how we drive our own limbs. I actually prefer science fiction that goes out of its way to show cybernetics that perform more like prosthetics - so instead of moving your limb around, you're working withing the confines of the limitations of the limb, and perhaps certain preprogrammed actions that can be taken with it. Taken further - a person with a 'full body cybernetic conversion' with just their brain would essentially be 'driving' the cyborg body the way someone drives a car. In that they are merely sending out certain brain impulses to cause the body to perform certain actions. (I.E. We push on a pedal to make the car accelerate rather than manually perform the full action of the car engine's conversion of energy to motion ourselves.) Over time they could get somewhere near natural as human movement, but are still 'faking' it the whole way. Cybernetic faces might even have preprogrammed reflex actions and twitches in them to make them appear more natural. Another idea I've seen explored in certain cyberpunk scifi - a subculture of cybernetic body programming, where literal 'life hackers' program new complex actions for their bodies or limbs & enhancements to be capable of performing. I could see people particularly skilled at creating and 'driving' such things being a part of some kind of cybernetic olympics too. Spacedad fucked around with this message at Feb 22, 2013 around 01:34 |
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 01:18 |
|
Angela Christine posted:Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs. The fact that it didn't tip over when he kicked it was just incredible.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 01:27 |
|
Angela Christine posted:Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 01:32 |
|
That's really interesting to get a firsthand account of, thanks. I know there's a goon cosplayer who uses a wheelchair, but I feel like I've heard of this girl who's an amputee who uses that in her costumes too? Spacedad posted:Presuming we get to the point where cybernetic additions are able to outperform human parts - I don't think that there will ever reach a point where we feel the need to hack off our own limbs or transplant our brains into cyborg bodies I agree, and it kind of bugs me when someone's first thought when hearing about advances in cybernetics is "I can't wait to chop off my own hand and get a Powerglove, it's so bad" rather than "oh cool this will help restore function to people who need it." But there will definitely be external cybernetics; we're seeing this now in Google Glass and HULCs (seriously the names of these things... there's a Japanese company that started in 2004 that named itself Cyberdyne. It's like people are dedicated to making sci-fi come true). quote:Another idea I've seen explored in certain cyberpunk scifi - a subculture of cybernetic body programming, where literal 'life hackers' program new complex actions for their bodies or limbs & enhancements to be capable of performing. I could see people particularly skilled at creating and 'driving' such things being a part of some kind of cybernetic olympics too. I hadn't thought of that either, and it makes perfect sense, since I've been comparing cybernetics to iPhones this whole time. Imagine "cracking" a bionic hand to crank up the p.s.i. of its grip.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 01:51 |
|
If they can perfect input and output there's nothing stopping somebody from sending a signal to a virtual body part and have feeling in that virtual body part come back out; as far as the brain is concerned it's a real arm you are controlling and not a software based one. I think that's much more interesting than replacing body parts since a virtual world would have no limitations.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 02:23 |
|
Angela Christine posted:Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs. Why would you want to do this? I mean, sure, you'd be an unflappable juggernaut, but rear end in a top hat hipsters would keep running up and kicking you.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 02:41 |
|
Angela Christine posted:Maybe someday we can all become cybernetic bigdog-centaurs. Be careful what you wish for: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXJZVZFRFJc
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 02:46 |
|
Yaos posted:If they can perfect input and output there's nothing stopping somebody from sending a signal to a virtual body part and have feeling in that virtual body part come back out; as far as the brain is concerned it's a real arm you are controlling and not a software based one. I think that's much more interesting than replacing body parts since a virtual world would have no limitations. Outside the box time - who's to say you limit this to body parts? If they can configure it so it "feels" like an extension of your own body then you could control huge cranes and manufacturing equipment using the power of your mind!
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 02:57 |
|
Boogaleeboo posted:Nope, it's pretty spot on. It's getting better all the time, but for the same general 'calories' a car might get 30 miles and a human 300. This of course varies wildly [not all cars are energy efficient, and not all people are in 'average' shape], but as a general rule your body kicks the living poo poo out of most engines humanity has come up with to date. Even if we got with roughly equal sizes as tiny scooter to human carrying poo poo, it still holds up. You are a pretty good machine, all things being equal. I mean it's in the ballpark for automotive gasoline engines but 15% hasn't been the upper bound for "human machines" in a long time.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 03:25 |
|
abigserve posted:Outside the box time - who's to say you limit this to body parts? If they can configure it so it "feels" like an extension of your own body then you could control huge cranes and manufacturing equipment using the power of your mind! Assuming you drop the feedback portion of it(or just use current senses as the feedback), if you configure and calibrate the computing/sensing hardware the right way, this is already reality. http://www.emotiv.com/ See: Dude controlling a wheelchair with a computer, what is more or less a very portable EEG sensor array, and his brain. The future truly is now.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 09:21 |
|
Wingless posted:Blade runners have an advantage on a straight flat surface where top speed is the goal. Put them in a race through a forest or around a mountain and you'll see just how superior human legs are.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 10:01 |
|
Looks like crowdfunding is also part of the future of cybernetics Throw Trucks With Your Mind: quote:I have wired an EEG headset that reads your brain into a video game to give you telekinetic super-powers controlled with your thoughts. The game uses first-person shooter controls, but it's not a first-person shooter. You'll fight entirely through NeuroSky's MindWave headset peripheral that reads the electrical activity of your brain...The game works by doing a bunch of crazy math on your brainwaves to determine how calm and focused you are. These two conditions act as the scalars on your psychic powers. Want to throw a truck into that pompous jerk strafing around in front of you? Just focus on it. The more focused you are, the harder you fling the truck and the more smushy he ends up. Footage of people playing it at the link.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 12:41 |
|
shovelbum posted:I mean it's in the ballpark for automotive gasoline engines but 15% hasn't been the upper bound for "human machines" in a long time. Wiki says that an efficient power plant will operate at ~60% thermal efficiency. My bad.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 13:31 |
|
Kommienzuspadt posted:Well strictly speaking, the problem is that nature has spent BILLIONS of years figuring this out and we've been at it like maybe a couple decades. Also thermodynamically speaking most biological machines like the mitochodrial ATP synthase that generates "energy" for your cells operates at like 50% efficiency. Human engines might get up to 15% efficiency. We just aren't that good at doing thing yet. I can easily see prosthetics getting 'better' than human limbs in strength and precision - I think the space where prosthetics will really fall down, for a long time, is durability. We can barely even make things with no moving parts that last 20 years - complex electronic systems with constantly moving flexible parts are probably going to have to go in for maintenance every 3 months. The only way we'll ever get around that is some sort of crazy future-tech with maintenance nanobots that also reproduce and look after themselves, and once those are introduced the next step is nanobots that go wrong and start fighting the other nanobots for who is supposed to be there; robot cancer! So, kids, that's the story of how carbon-based bio robots came to be already here.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 16:25 |
|
Beyond chopping off limbs for "I want to be a cyborg" reasons, what about people with diseases not yet advanced that will deteriorate a system beyond use? Folks who have glaucoma might opt to get bionic eyes rather than watch their eyesight become blindness. As someone who has genetic predisposition to glaucoma and macular degeneration, I'd sign up for that poo poo today.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 17:39 |
|
mrae posted:Beyond chopping off limbs for "I want to be a cyborg" reasons, what about people with diseases not yet advanced that will deteriorate a system beyond use? Folks who have glaucoma might opt to get bionic eyes rather than watch their eyesight become blindness. The nanobots will take care of all disease and tissue repair.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 17:59 |
|
Just because: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBjoWMA5d84 This is a harddrive 30 years ago. 250.000$, 38,5kg, 10mb. Today i can get for 60$ 64GB and it's as big as a fingernail. Humans are great at making things efficient. And I would totally chop of my hands if i could get hands that can feel stuff and have 8 fingers that i can move in ever direction, not to mention the 20 mouseclicks i could do in a second. Throw in a bitset and a rotating pinky and i'm sold.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 21:20 |
|
RabbitWizard posted:
You'd be pretty popular with the ladies.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 23:43 |
|
RabbitWizard posted:And I would totally chop of my hands if i could get hands that can feel stuff and have 8 fingers that i can move in ever direction, not to mention the 20 mouseclicks i could do in a second. Throw in a bitset and a rotating pinky and i'm sold.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 23:55 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:You're forgetting the ability to have your hand rotate completely around your wrist, so you can effortlessly swing a stick around like a kung fu master. (But really, that would probably be useful as well.)
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 00:05 |
|
roomforthetuna posted:Hold a propellor, point upwards, bam, helicopter hands. Now you're just describing Inspector Gadget. A bumbling, fedora-wearing cyborg: the goon of the future.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 00:32 |
|
Here's a rather unique prosthetics accomplishment that took some years before it was working properly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0zy9QITHMA&hd=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsO7D6l7zQI&hd=1
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 00:52 |
|
RabbitWizard posted:Just because: It's weird seeing a 6 pin molex connection on the back of that thing. I expected everything on that drive to be obsolete. Data transfer standards update and go obsolete every few years. But, a 50 year old power transfer standard is still trucking along just fine. I could plug that thing straight into my desktop PSU.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 03:09 |
|
Zorak posted:Here's a rather unique prosthetics accomplishment that took some years before it was working properly: This is a much simpler solution but here's Allison the sea turtle who got a sweet fin on her back to make up for her missing flipper. She could only swim in circles before. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjM-naSnxUI And here's German shepherd Cassidy who has been dogmented
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 19:08 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:You're forgetting the ability to have your hand rotate completely around your wrist http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcSQ943wLOQ#t=169s
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 19:25 |
|
Coincidentally, the FDA just approved the first eye implant that can restore limited vision. If this test run goes well, they will likely allow individuals with macular degeneration to receive the same treatment.quote:WASHINGTON — Patients who have lost their sight due to a rare disorder may be able to regain some vision using a new implantable device that takes the place of damaged cells inside the eye.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 20:39 |
|
RabbitWizard posted:Didn't mention that, because
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 20:47 |
|
RabbitWizard posted:Just because: The problem isn't that we can't improve the technology, the problem is that we have competing and somewhat incompatible goals for the technology. I was only half joking about the bigdog centaur. People want prothetics that are at least as strong as flesh, at least as flexible as flesh, at least as sensitive as flesh, at least as light as flesh (so it doesn't damage the flesh it is connected to), as durable as flesh, as easy to maintain as flesh, and most want something that looks as much like normal, healthy human flesh as possible. The larger and more complex the prosthetic, the more difficult it is to get all those requirements into one prosthetic. Just look at feet. The ones that look quite a lot like real feet are okay for walking, but not very good at all for sports. Want to run, jump, swim, hike through the woods, and ride a bike? Well for best performance those all require different prosthetic, at least for now. A foot amputee that wants to compete in a triathlon needs at least three prosthetic feet, and probably none of them will look convincingly like real feet. If that amputee lost his leg above the knee, things get much more complex. And if his legs and hips were damaged, then something like a bigdog centaur may be far easier to do than human style robot legs and hips. Despite the billions of years of evolution, human-style bipeds are kind of creaky, even with self-repairing flesh our crazy s-shaped spines eventually gifts 8 out of 10 of us with back pain. A centaur or drider style body plan (possibly with retractable wheels for fast travel on hard smooth surfaces) might be better in every measurable way compared to a normal human, but most people won't want to look like a freak. Better isn't always better. At least not as long as people are stuck with jumped up monkey brains. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcpz0l_TWOk#t=37s
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 23:36 |
|
Dusseldorf posted:Not to mention that the Cybogs can act in clear violation of the rules of robotics. But cyborgs aren't robots ![]() The only cyborg that would touch on the rules of robotics is one with a new brain.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 23:40 |
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2013 11:01 |
|
Angela Christine posted:The problem isn't that we can't improve the technology, the problem is that we have competing and somewhat incompatible goals for the technology. Whereas wheels or tank tracks versus legs is probably more the comparison we should be making. We suck at doing something nature does, but we're pretty good at doing something nature doesn't do. (Artificial hearts that pump with a fan rather than squeezing is another fun one - just as much blood flow, no pulse!)
|
| # ? Feb 24, 2013 02:21 |


























|