|
Don't know whether this is technically the right subforum for this, but the story has really taken me by surprise and I couldn't find a thread for it anywhere:quote:LAUSANNE, Switzerland -- For wrestling, this may have been the ultimate body slam: getting tossed out of the Olympic rings. The short of this is that Greco-Roman Wrestling is no longer a core Olympic sport. That a whole room of people working for the Olympics were able to come to such a decision without once realizing how ridiculous this sounds continues to puzzle me. Of all the sports currently played at the Olympics Wrestling is one of the few that was played at the original ones millenia ago. It has a broad international following from a wide group of diverse countries, many of which consider it the national sport. The Olympic Gold Medal is considered the highest possible accomplishment among practitioners of the sport. I can believe that it's not a ratings behemoth, but it seems like if there was any sport that should be given a pass for historical reasons, it would be Greco-Roman Wrestling. There's been a lot of complaints about this decision internationally, to the point I'm not at all sure how this decision was reached in the first place. It takes a pretty incredible effort for anyone to do something that pisses off both the American and Iranian governments enough for them to start building united delegations. My best guess as to what's going on here is that it's a combination of voting members looking at the Olympic Games in the most literally profitable terms as well as a general European bias. I'm at a loss as to what other explanation there could be and am hoping to be enlightened some by discussion here. Let's take a look at this list: quote:The other sports vying for a single opening in 2020 are a combined bid from baseball and softball, karate, squash, roller sports, sport climbing, wakeboarding and wushu, a martial art. These are the sports Wrestling has to compete with for inclusion in a single spot. For a sense of comparison, core Olympic Sports that are apparently sacrosanct include Penthathlon, Equestrian Sports, Rowing, Kayaking, and Sailing. Also all of these sports are apparently considered equal to the Olympic committee, whether they have two events or twenty. So, what am I missing here? How is the International Olympic Committee arriving at these decisions, and why?
|
| # ? Feb 20, 2013 19:59 |
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 01:58 |
|
Some Guy TT posted:How is the International Olympic Committee arriving at these decisions, and why? quote:It also benefited from the work of Juan Antonio Samaranch Jr., the son of the former IOC president who is a UIPM vice president and member of the IOC board. Welp, there you go.
|
| # ? Feb 20, 2013 20:23 |
|
First, this is freestyle wrestling too, not just Greco-Roman wrestling. Politics, it's almost all internal politics. The wrestling organization FILA, typically does not lobby or get involved with the IOC. Whereas modern pentathlon has a VP of its board on the IOC board too, so he was probably able to lobby enough other board members to keep the modern pentathlon on. It's pretty laughable that wrestling received a low rating for popularity at the games when it sold like 97% of it's available tickets, and received a higher total viewership than the modern pentathlon on TV. I have a hard time imagining that if you took a world wide poll that either the modern pentathlon or field hockey would beat wrestling in popularity, but I doubt that's ever been done. It's a real shame because wrestling is a core sport for almost every high school athletic program, and most colleges have a wrestling program too. It's a low cost sport, making it easy for schools to participate in, unlike the modern pentathlon, water sports like kayaking, or the equestrian sports. It's also a very pure sport, there aren't an overabundance of rules, it isn't a judged sport like gymnastics or diving, and of course it dates back to the original Olympic games. Here's hoping FILA can get on this poo poo and get it back in for 2020, the anger over this has been pretty high so far.
|
| # ? Feb 20, 2013 20:28 |
|
I'd rather see boxing removed after the debacle of the most recent Games.
|
| # ? Feb 20, 2013 21:28 |
|
First they came for baseball and I said nothing.
|
| # ? Feb 20, 2013 21:30 |
|
How the gently caress can they have horse dancing, but not wrestling? It's dumb that "equestrian sports" can have multiple sub sports. Cut any equestrian sport that doesn't bring in tons of money, and turn them into lasagna tv dinners.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 05:00 |
|
By 2100 they'll have video games as a medal sport
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 05:02 |
|
Meltathon posted:I have a hard time imagining that if you took a world wide poll that either the modern pentathlon or field hockey would beat wrestling in popularity, but I doubt that's ever been done. Field hockey would win your survey comfortably when a few hundred million Indians and Pakistanis vote for it.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 06:12 |
|
I guess I'm just confused as to how Wrestling gets cut but loving table tennis is considered a viable olympic sport.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 07:50 |
|
Look Around You posted:I guess I'm just confused as to how Wrestling gets cut but loving table tennis is considered a viable olympic sport. From a marketing stand point; table tennis is way more intriguing to watch than wrestling. But seriously if this decision was made on a purely financial basis than gently caress the organization.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 08:11 |
|
I think squash would do fine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5WbnadzK9M
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 08:41 |
|
Piggles posted:But seriously if this decision was made on a purely financial basis than gently caress the organization.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 09:21 |
|
On the other hand, no one cares to watch wrestling ever.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 10:45 |
|
I come from a college where the main event on campus is always the wrestling team. National quality, championships up and down the board. I can't say it's ever struck me as a personal favorite, but then I haven't been much into sports for a very long time. It'd certainly never have occurred to me that a modern sporting event designed around the Grecian classics would drop the event that is probably the first sport people would associate with Greece. I'm on the "bring it back" side. There are far less storied sports in the Olympics to cut.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 10:50 |
|
particle409 posted:How the gently caress can they have horse dancing, but not wrestling? It's dumb that "equestrian sports" can have multiple sub sports. Cut any equestrian sport that doesn't bring in tons of money, and turn them into lasagna tv dinners. I bet that the Royal Family pays them off to keep horse dancing so that they can enter their inbred children riding the best horses in the world, win a medal or two and brag about the royal blood being Olympians. There are a ton of poo poo sports that should get axed before Wrestling.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 12:32 |
|
Contra Duck posted:Field hockey would win your survey comfortably when a few hundred million Indians and Pakistanis vote for it. I didn't realize that field hockey was big in those two countries, I always figured it was a strictly European thing. Imperialism is to blame I guess.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 16:41 |
|
Maybe now they can finally add poker like that one publicity stunt was trying to get them to do a few years back. Hell, it's about as physically demanding as sitting on a prancing horse so why not?
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 19:14 |
|
Horse dancing wasn't up to get kicked out, modern pentathlon which is even more snooty was though. It also has way, way fewer participants than equestrian events or wrestling but IOC corruption woo. FILA really hosed up but that's why the head was immediately pushed out.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 19:24 |
|
Scirocco Griffon posted:Hell, it's about as physically demanding as sitting on a prancing horse so why not? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEtN_3zd5s4
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 20:56 |
|
What if we compromised and added horse wrestling?
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 20:57 |
|
I would take jousting or women's beach wrestling, or beach jousting.
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 22:02 |
|
R.D. Mangles posted:What if we compromised and added horse wrestling? Karelin would still dominate
|
| # ? Feb 21, 2013 22:37 |
|
I was surprised if only for the cost aspect. Wrestling must be a low cost event to put on; You don't need a specialized facility to be built.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 02:40 |
|
Honestly, the IOC should be ashamed of what went on with the boxing competition of the last Games and I'd much rather see boxing get the axe instead of wrestling. I also suspect that's exactly WHY wrestling is getting cut instead of boxing: not enough bribe money circulating around national federations.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 07:59 |
|
What happened with boxing? The article doesn't say how long it lasted, but it wasn't one of the five final sports up to be cut. Wrestling, Pentathlon, Field Hockey, Kayaking, and Tae-Kwon-Do, if you skimmed over that part of the article.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 15:50 |
|
Some Guy TT posted:What happened with boxing? The article doesn't say how long it lasted, but it wasn't one of the five final sports up to be cut. Wrestling, Pentathlon, Field Hockey, Kayaking, and Tae-Kwon-Do, if you skimmed over that part of the article. Every cycle boxing has massive bribery and judging scandals and 2012 was no different.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 16:23 |
|
Some Guy TT posted:What happened with boxing? The article doesn't say how long it lasted, but it wasn't one of the five final sports up to be cut. Wrestling, Pentathlon, Field Hockey, Kayaking, and Tae-Kwon-Do, if you skimmed over that part of the article. http://deadspin.com/5931226/was-thi...ing-match-fixed
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 17:49 |
|
So they basically cut THE sport that is most closely associated with the classic Olympic tradition. That's....somehow not surprising at all really.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 17:53 |
|
Everyone keeps talking about "get rid of horses" or "get rid of pentathlon" my question is, why the gently caress are the olympics limited to 26 sports? Like when they kicked out Baseball it made sense, only like 12 countries on earth play Baseball at a high level. Kicking out a sport because of some arbitrary number is garbage. It isn't like the IOC pays for anything.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 18:08 |
|
Peanut President posted:Everyone keeps talking about "get rid of horses" or "get rid of pentathlon" my question is, why the gently caress are the olympics limited to 26 sports? I have a related question. Apparently, swimming, diving, sychronized swimming, and *water polo* all together only count as 1 "sport". Yet boxing, wrestling, taekwondo and judo are considered 4 separate sports. What the hell?
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 19:12 |
|
Let's also not forget that Swimming has something like 15 different events that amount to "swim between 50 and 400 meters in a slightly different way". Michael Phelps is a great athlete and all, but it's just about physically impossible for any other athlete to match his medal account unless they're winning well into their seventies. I understood why swimming was divided like this a lot better when I found out that the fastest method of swimming, the front crawl, was originally created by Indians. I'm reasonably sure at this point that the IOC's decisions are based primarily on what gives rich white people the most self-esteem.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 20:26 |
|
Chilly McFreeze posted:I have a related question. Apparently, swimming, diving, sychronized swimming, and *water polo* all together only count as 1 "sport". Yet boxing, wrestling, taekwondo and judo are considered 4 separate sports. What the hell? The only way I can slightly defend the Olympics here is that there are several weight classes in wrestling, 7 for men's freestyle, another 7 for Greco-Roman, and I think 5 for women's freestyle, so you're giving out 19 gold medals in wrestling.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 21:10 |
|
Meltathon posted:The only way I can slightly defend the Olympics here is that there are several weight classes in wrestling, 7 for men's freestyle, another 7 for Greco-Roman, and I think 5 for women's freestyle, so you're giving out 19 gold medals in wrestling. But unlike swimming it is not possible for a single athlete to compete in more than one weight class while in swimming a single athlete will compete it multiple disciplines and distances
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 21:30 |
|
I'm sure it's more of a question for the MMA thread- but what's the timeframe of getting something UFC-based into the Olympics? I don't watch any boxing or wrestling... and have only seen a few main events on UFC. I'm far from a Tapout fanboy- but would love to see this sport make its way into the field. To me, it seems like boxing- except when they fall down they get to keep going! Even though I've never watched an event, it's a shame to see wrestling out. But then again, I think tug-of-war should still be in. What better way is there to judge nations than 'my 10 guys can pull a rope harder than your country'? Set a weight limit for each team and let them battle!
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 22:22 |
|
I don't see any way to stage a MMA tournament in that time frame without adding so many restrictions that it wouldn't really even be MMA anymore.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 22:31 |
|
GnarGnarBinks posted:I'm sure it's more of a question for the MMA thread- but what's the timeframe of getting something UFC-based into the Olympics? Never.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 22:40 |
|
Peanut President posted:Everyone keeps talking about "get rid of horses" or "get rid of pentathlon" my question is, why the gently caress are the olympics limited to 26 sports? Like when they kicked out Baseball it made sense, only like 12 countries on earth play Baseball at a high level. Kicking out a sport because of some arbitrary number is garbage. It isn't like the IOC pays for anything. It's getting to be really crazy expensive to host the Olympics that a lot of countries are beginning to balk at handling the IOC bundles of cash for the privilege of hosting a games. They agreed to limit the field in order to help lower some of the costs.
|
| # ? Feb 22, 2013 23:24 |
|
So they eliminated a sport that could be held in the basketball arena. Neat.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 00:12 |
|
Funny you should mention that... The Olympics could probably add all the proposed new sports and more if they didn't insist on building brand new world-class facilities for everything. I doubt very much that any of the cost problems they're having right now have anything directly to do with the sports. Most of it's probably in the bureaucracy.
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 00:41 |
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2013 01:58 |
|
I honestly just want to see a piss-poor response in the number of cities competing to host the Olympics next time, to the point where it's really evident that nobody likes the direction it's going. They really have become way too bloated in their own bullshit hype. I can't remember the last time I actually enjoyed watching the Olympics, even when it was being hosted in my city. Right now I no longer think of it as "the greatest sporting event". I just see it as that annoying time of the 2-4 years in which there is nothing on TV other than 6 hours of swimming, 1 hour of rowing, another on weightlifting (which is pretty cool) and the rest of the day spent on bullshit horse sports. They are surprised that the World Cup is leagues more popular than the Olympics?
|
| # ? Feb 23, 2013 01:06 |

























