|
About surveillance, there's lots of things that you can do to improve your (kinda fuzzy on the english-language word here) metrics i.e. what data you get out from your equipment. Like magtriggers on every door, pressure plates, that whole 3d laser scanning thing and so on. However, improved metrics don't necessarily translate to something working better. If you use a camera system for surveillance, you probably want to know how a possible intruder looks like and what they are doing. Improving your metrics doesn't really add much to that, especially since the costs start to go up ten- or hundredfold.
|
#
¿
May 28, 2013 10:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 16, 2024 20:35 |
|
|
themrguy posted:Interesting answers, thanks. They're not a thing in general due to liability issues because the chance of someone working somewhere failing to enter an alarm code an triggering an alarm is always greater than actual B&E. Some lethal defensive security measures have been around at various points and various installations in history, but generally speaking, they're not a thing. Unless you count cheap systems that spray out OC when a motion sensor is triggered. And I wouldn't get one of those, motion detectors are rather notorious about giving false alarms.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2013 12:43
|
|
|
Cameras aren't still my specific area of expertise, but I can tell you that your budget is way too low. It's the kind of budget that makes me yell to clients.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2013 10:00
|
|