|
Alkarl posted:I wouldn't exactly call it a glitch, more like... Taking advantage of an economic downturn to gain significant profits with which to actually afford something in this game More like engaging in insider trading and artificially inflating the price of a certain valuable material for fabulous wealth.  At least most of the time that money is going to a good cause.
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2013 01:55
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 07:08 |
|
|
Isn't Mondo it's a secret to everyone? *EDIT* Sorry about that, got ahead of the plot there. dotchan fucked around with this message at 21:58 on Dec 7, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2013 05:30
|
|
|
dude789 posted:Could you edit that out dotchan? I've been pretty lenient about spoilers thus far, but that's a pretty big one. Don't worry, we'll get there eventually. Oops, yeah, that's a pretty huge atomic flying spoiler. It's since been edited.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2013 21:59
|
|
|
Apparently, Hell looks like this because somebody made a very poorly thought out wish on a certain evil artifact from a certain quest. I'm sure the LP will go in depth about it once we get there.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2014 15:24
|
|
|
CmdrKing posted:Absolutely. What you do is, don't play the game at all, and instead marvel at the gorgeous sprite work, great character art, and quite possibly the best music Masashi Hamauzu has ever composed. Such good music that he basically recycled the Unlimited Saga battletheme into Final Fantasy XIII.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 07:39
|
|
|
Riki's Quest makes me wonder if one of the devs at Squaresoft has a hate-boner for Tolkien, as the plot is basically "The Lord of the Rings, but Darker and Edgier" (the hardest boss fight is even called "Ring Lord"!).
|
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2014 14:53
|
|
|
MightyPretenders posted:Do you think they would make any real changes to the plot in a remake? All of the in-engine cutscenes are now replaced by pre-rendered cutscenes filled with Quick-Time Events. 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2014 22:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 07:08 |
|
|
Heithinn Grasida posted:Certainly Edo period Japan had no particular problems with it, nor did China in periods before there was significant direct contact with Europeans. Well, no problem with it so long as you produced children to ensure the family name lived on. And didn't discuss about your "indiscretions" in public. It was the same with heterosexual relationships, really. Marriage was for procreation; for everything else, that's what mistresses and brothels were for.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2015 22:25
|
|