|
I've watched a couple of the down-to-earth truther videos and while I'm pretty convinced there's no conspiracy to be found but I do find some of their main points to be interesting and worth discussing. I'd appreciate if someone could help refute some of their more moderate claims. "The building collapses happened at almost free-fall speeds." "If the core columns were cut or melted at the point where the planes collided then the building collapses would have been through the path of least resistance from those points, which is, out and to the sides instead of straight down." "The core columns were made of tempered steel, who's melting point is higher than the temperature that jet fuel burns at." "An office fire in BLDG7 wouldn't burn nearly hot enough to cause a catastrophic collapse." It's definitely a valid conspiracy theory if these questions have never been covered in the commission reports though.
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2013 01:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 08:08 |
|