|
I thought the most pervasive truther rant was in relation to the Pentagon, claiming that nobody ever saw a plane there or something. To me the most absurd argument is that the twin towers were rigged to fall. As if being struck by a jumbo jet wouldn't be enough to bring down any office building. I guess in answer to the OP, my real answer is, I can't explain them to you. :P But I'd love to see someone really carefully outline their arguments and either debunk them or explain where there are reasonable question marks.
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2013 03:07
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 18:51 |
|
|
Install Windows posted:Yeah people somehow expect that a plane crashing into a massive building at 400 miles per hour would just crumple up + explode exactly like a cartoon or something. It's bizarre. If I remember correctly they were basing it on some low security cam like 30 feet from the point of impact, and all you could see on it was a blur. OMG Missile attack!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2013 05:37
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:There's also the fact that the hole in the Pentagon is circular instead of somehow being like a cartoon cut out of a plane. Oh... you mean like in this awesome TV show that I really truly honestly did not make up? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hole_in_the_Wall_(U.S._game_show) Sorry... couldn't resist the reference, it fits the absurdity of the truther argument though.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2013 05:44
|
|