|
I'm guessing you burned out on the name comments because my man....you missed Clowney and Dix
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2013 14:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 11:34 |
|
|
A team should be happy with Stafford imo
|
|
#
¿
Oct 27, 2013 06:48
|
|
|
please stop responding to mcmagic how many times must it be said
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2013 23:34
|
|
|
Eifert Posting posted:Not to mention over 8 YPA. He's 6th in the league in YPA, 4th in TDs and yards, 8th in percentage. I think he's OK. It's funny, I wouldn't say Dalton has any elite skills but he's still really good and productive. I think I look forward to the Browns playing him more than Big Ben just because Dalton isn't some fucktard golem you can't tackle so at least when we get a good rush we get a sack out of it. But yeah Dalton and the Bengals offense moves the ball pretty easily so it doesn't matter if he could theoretically throw it five yards fewer than Matt Stafford or whoever.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2013 03:20
|
|
|
It's all still up in the air, but if Clowney proves himself absolutely incredible at DE then you just take him and take a QB in round 2. And sign Jason Campbell or Matt Schaub or Josh Freeman or whoever hits the market that year. I don't think trading down is a wise option, it's hard to get a fair return for it.jeffersonlives posted:Throwing picks away on a quarterback just because that's what you're "supposed" to do is how you get in Jacksonville's talent paucity scenario to begin with. If that's the only reason, then yeah, but if Bridgewater or Mariota or any QB has a top-5 grade (which they do, it seems) then it would be JUST because that's what they're supposed to do, it would also be a defensible pick in its own right.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2013 01:56
|
|
|
Roasted Donut posted:MACtion, bitch. Who you guys scoping with your top 5 pick my man
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2013 19:22
|
|
|
RGIII
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2013 18:07
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:The Raiders were so bad in the 2000's from a good mixture of both, but the coaching played a huge role. Oakland ran pretty much ONLY Man coverage due to Al Davis' insistence. If certain plays weren't called "right" he'd call down the field from the Owners box and make the calls himself. So yeah I miss al
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2013 23:21
|
|
|
WinnebagoWarrior posted:Oh God Cleveland trading up for Mettenberger I wish this was real The browns already have the Colts' first round pick welcome to week 3
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2013 17:14
|
|
|
Arschlochkind posted:
first of all flip @Colts to a W
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2013 01:21
|
|
So, uh...
|
Declan MacManus posted:It's all so clear now oh so the Fins get a winning record and you up and forget How It Is when you're thinkin draft starting week 14
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2013 17:49
|
|
|
One prospect over another ain't worth the pain of seeing the Raiders defeat your team tho
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2013 18:45
|
|
|
i don't know if "less of a friend of the family" is really a comparison you racist piece of poo poo!!!!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 28, 2013 16:20
|
|
|
One of the hardest things about Jason Campbell starting for the Browns is announcers asserting he has "mobility" and just thinking, well, not at all, but gently caress we just started Brandon Weeden so I guess they're kinda right
|
|
#
¿
Dec 28, 2013 16:56
|
|
|
The Daltos Game is walking crowded streets with your head bobbing up and down, constantly guessing the race of the people in front of you based on rear end, Thighs or Both (half credit)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 28, 2013 17:03
|
|
|
TheChirurgeon posted:I think the biggest mistake that most people make is thinking that teams have good information about what other teams are after. Teams largely have no idea after the earliest picks and that's when they start worrying about whether a player they like will be available later on. I'm more of the mind that if you get the guys you want, then some minor "reaching" isn't a bad thing. Yep I remember getting all Mad at people here for laughing at the Browns for that one Chuck Klosterman article when he was in their draft room. People were laughing at them for like watching ESPN to see what other teams were gonna do. Like what do we think they have spies in the Jaguars and Titans draft rooms secretly texting them like the Departed or some poo poo grahhh
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2014 17:44
|
|
|
Yep that ain't very useful info at this stage
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
I thought they pissed themselves because depending on position some guys want to weigh more so they go nuts drinking water before weigh-in
|
|
#
¿
Jan 20, 2014 18:04
|
|
|
Mack and Ward both have very good reason to leave, and I think both said the Chud firing would influence their decision. So if nothing else firing Chud lost the Browns two starters yay
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2014 07:37
|
|
|
Grozz Nuy posted:It seemed like Mack was already disgruntled even before the Chud firing, wasn't there some story during the offseason that he was pissed that management never even approached his camp about an extension before his walk year? That happens all the time and both sides get past it though. But either way yeah he can't be happy with the front office now
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2014 08:49
|
|
|
poo poo I didn't know "OL" was just one category. Otherwise I'd say Mack if we could just do the average of the top 5 centers. Hm...I've been so down on Ward recently but overall he is above average.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2014 09:12
|
|
|
If you need 6 yards, don't run it
|
|
#
¿
Jan 26, 2014 23:29
|
|
|
Aniki posted:Are there any other Arab American QBs besides Jeff George and Johnny Manziel? I'm half-jokingly waiting for scouts to start stereotyping Arab QBs. Did not know that about any of those guys. Do any of them identify as Arab-American? Flutie's great-grandfather immigrated from Lebanon, Wikipedia tells me, but is that a close enough tie for him to see himself as Arab-American?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2014 22:38
|
|
|
Doltos posted:I wouldn't start either of them. If my QB goes down I'd much rather have McCarron waiting in the wings than Boyd. You won't be more likely to win with either but you'd be more likely to lose with Boyd. So either you don't really get logic or you think McCarron is more likely to cause your team to tie
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2014 19:23
|
|
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:I think everyone understood what he meant. He won't win you guys by himself but he's much less likely to melt down and lose them singlehandedly I understood nothing. Me 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2014 19:58
|
|
|
Ehud posted:Aaron Rodgers first year starting: Good God I would literally...cry if a Browns QB put this up. I'd sob and hit my dick
|
|
#
¿
Jan 31, 2014 02:04
|
|
|
I hope teams look at the offseason as a whole unit and say "We need to come out of this offseason with two starting-caliber safeties. Right now we have zero." But then hopefully they don't care whether they get the safeties through the draft or in free agency.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2014 00:38
|
|
|
I think comp picks are a really stupid idea.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2014 03:36
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:I googled "pickles quarterback" and all I got was Jimmy Clausen's wiki page for some reason, and a Rugrats all grown up fanfic where Tommy Pickles is a high school football star who wants to bang Lil. Who are you talking about? Pickles is Clausen's nickname because of his last name and because spelling doesn't matter any more
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2014 21:46
|
|
|
not to mention Pup Bo suggested a Ravens game was better
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2014 20:03
|
|
|
So the game was your reading and the ending was your posts
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2014 20:06
|
|
|
Well this is a great conversation fellas but
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2014 21:40
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:Who do you want the Browns to get at 4, Rap? Clowney? Yeah it's my understanding that he's the best prospect in the whole draft. Outside of him, I mean, I think I lean toward the pocket passer model so I'd say Bridgewater or Bortles but it's hard to say. A team could probably win with Manziel. Mostly I'd rather not see us trade to move up. Want that second first-round pick more than I want Manziel over Bridgewater or Bridgewater over Manziel or whatever the preference is.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2014 21:56
|
|
|
Hardfl1p posted:stick to the lgbt and bullying threads, if you dont want to read posts about football that's a really good idea that i definitely like
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2014 21:57
|
|
|
NippleFloss posted:I don't think there's any way that Clowney is around at 4. I think St Louis either takes him or trades back with a team that wants him. I guess I just can't see the first 3 picks all being qbs, which is the only way Clowney falls to 4. Yep same. I've seen mocks putting people like OT Greg Robinson in the top 3 and poo poo but I don't really buy it. In drafts lacking QBs, like 2013's, you might see some of these OTs as top picks because teams go the safe route (where Dion Jordan, Barkevious or Ziggy Ansah might represent the not-safe route). But in drafts with huge QB prospects, 2012 for instance, I think you see QBs and marquee skill players go together at the top (Trent, Justin Blackmon, Mo Claiborne). I think maybe teams start to think about impact guys they want if they can't have a QB. Either way, even if that's not true, Clowney has the high rep to get taken in the top 3 for sure.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2014 22:21
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:Yeah, there's a really small chance that trading their other first would end up worth it. I'm all in for Clowney, but I'd probably look towards Barr or something if he wasn't there. Not sure how I feel about drafting a top QB with a roster this lovely. Browns actually have enough pieces that they could make it work, with some luck. Ol Walter suggests Sammy Watkins for the Raiders?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2014 22:22
|
|
|
Doltos posted:I'm sure Nawrocki doesn't mind if he's getting used either way. He's obviously a hack but even hacks need to make a paycheck. actually only hacks need to make a paycheck
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2014 05:34
|
|
|
Ugh how does he not go by Bob
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2014 18:49
|
|
|
how can i work in my hatred of women into this brief football prospect writeup
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2014 20:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 11:34 |
|
|
Doltos posted:It's an ultra tough decision. Might be the hardest choice for a team in the history of having a #1. Wouldn't this theoretically be an ideal situation for trading down? When there's a prospect everyone else seems to value more than you might, you trade down. In this case it's not that Houston values Clowney less but that they'd like that QB they could take a few picks later.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2014 17:43
|
|