Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
LemonDrizzle
Mar 28, 2012

neoliberal shithead

Cat Mattress posted:

Is there any chance at all than an anti-austerity party might get a plurality of seats in the EP?

Yes. The S&D are anti-austerity and have a good chance of taking the greatest number of seats.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Phlegmish
Jul 2, 2011



The_Franz posted:

You need to remember that the €1000 a month figure is after taxes whereas most listed US wages are pre-tax so taxes and Social Security will still be taken out of that sum. Any job with a $16k USD salary is also part-time and will require you to pay for things like health insurance yourself while the taxes taken out of the euro salary already include health care costs.

It's important to note that the wages in the Eurostat link posted by Effectronica are before taxes and social security deductions, and Belgium has some of the highest tax rates in the world. A net minimum wage of € 1500 would be crazy. The actual minimum wage would depend on your personal situation but is probably indeed somewhere close to € 1000.

e: I used an online calculator and I guess it's actually closer to € 1300. Much more than I thought.

Phlegmish fucked around with this message at 23:58 on May 11, 2014

Jabe
Nov 18, 2006

APPLE IS A SHIT COMPANY GOD I WISH THEY WOULD JUST GO DIE OR SOMETHING JEEZ

The bruto wage is basically meaningless since it's a heavily complicated system to see how much you keep after taxation. The golden rule of belgian socialism is that everyone ends up being around the €1500 average. No such thing as income inequality here. Or self-made rich people.

So it has it's up- and downsides.

Char
Jan 5, 2013
The median in Italy for 2011 was 15,723 €/y, after taxes.
It is pretty normal here to have a 900-1200 €/month wage, especially if you don't live in a big city (and there's only a handful of them).

Which is fine if you live with your parents and yadda yadda that's why we have 40 years old living with parents.

Char fucked around with this message at 14:47 on May 12, 2014

Mans
Sep 14, 2011

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Nektu posted:

I dont think that he wants to talk about the finer points of how much income is "low" (that of him and his buddies is far below that "low").

He sounds desparate and angry (with good reason), and does not seem to think that bruessels takes his situation seriously (they may take it seriously, but they cannot change it because austerity is literally the only solution anybody came up with to keep the euro alive at this point, so eh).


I also doubt that your arguing of technicalities is helping...

This and again, talking about the hardship of living with a thousand euros literally makes about 50% of the European population turn it's head in confusion. It's the way he expressed himself that gives us concern, because it shows that he's talking to a NW audience, to NW hardships and giving weak-hearted arguments regarding austerity but never actually says "yeah this stupid thing has run it's course and we need a serious economic change in the EU".


LemonDrizzle posted:

Yes. The S&D are anti-austerity and have a good chance of taking the greatest number of seats.
Are they? Locally their S&D satelite has been pretty adamant in saying that the changes of the recent years can't be abandoned and that this course is the way to go but with Change! and Improvement! and every positive word they can find but without actually saying anything concrete.

If our future are private education, private healthcare, bare bones public sector, massive taxes on everyone without a clear explanation to where our taxes go and our country being nothing more than a tourism\service sector colony, without barely any industry, agriculture or even fishing, what is the difference between "austerity" and "not-austerity but still living as you were in austerity times"? We know that from S&D rightwards this is not a concern to them, but S&D keeps toeing a line where they oppose austerity yet there's no indication of what they would do different.

Antwan3K
Mar 8, 2013

Mans posted:

This and again, talking about the hardship of living with a thousand euros literally makes about 50% of the European population turn it's head in confusion. It's the way he expressed himself that gives us concern, because it shows that he's talking to a NW audience, to NW hardships and giving weak-hearted arguments regarding austerity but never actually says "yeah this stupid thing has run it's course and we need a serious economic change in the EU".

Are they? Locally their S&D satelite has been pretty adamant in saying that the changes of the recent years can't be abandoned and that this course is the way to go but with Change! and Improvement! and every positive word they can find but without actually saying anything concrete.

If our future are private education, private healthcare, bare bones public sector, massive taxes on everyone without a clear explanation to where our taxes go and our country being nothing more than a tourism\service sector colony, without barely any industry, agriculture or even fishing, what is the difference between "austerity" and "not-austerity but still living as you were in austerity times"? We know that from S&D rightwards this is not a concern to them, but S&D keeps toeing a line where they oppose austerity yet there's no indication of what they would do different.

Well as you know only Germans can vote for him.

NihilismNow
Aug 31, 2003
It is almost as if Portugal/Greece and Germany shouldn't be in the same economical union because their societies and economies are nothing alike.

Electronico6
Feb 25, 2011

NihilismNow posted:

It is almost as if Portugal/Greece and Germany shouldn't be in the same economical union because their societies and economies are nothing alike.

Agreed.


Kick Germany out of the Euro.

NihilismNow
Aug 31, 2003

Electronico6 posted:

Agreed.


Kick Germany out of the Euro.

Belgium, Netherlands, Austria and Germany form a new euro, you can keep the old one.

Electronico6
Feb 25, 2011

NihilismNow posted:

Belgium, Netherlands, Austria and Germany form a new euro, you can keep the old one.

Get the Czech Republic and Poland on that scheme why won't you.

Mans
Sep 14, 2011

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Just make economic unions based on how much sun that country gets. Southern Europe+ Turkey and Southern France gets a union where everyone is tanned and happy, Germany, Benelux and Scandinavia have their freezing cold union and Britain can stand proudly alone with their never ending rain.

LemonDrizzle
Mar 28, 2012

neoliberal shithead

Mans posted:

Are they? Locally their S&D satelite has been pretty adamant in saying that the changes of the recent years can't be abandoned and that this course is the way to go but with Change! and Improvement! and every positive word they can find but without actually saying anything concrete.

If our future are private education, private healthcare, bare bones public sector, massive taxes on everyone without a clear explanation to where our taxes go and our country being nothing more than a tourism\service sector colony, without barely any industry, agriculture or even fishing, what is the difference between "austerity" and "not-austerity but still living as you were in austerity times"? We know that from S&D rightwards this is not a concern to them, but S&D keeps toeing a line where they oppose austerity yet there's no indication of what they would do different.

http://socialistsanddemocrats.eu/sites/default/files/sd_100_days_updated_april_2014_EN.pdf

quote:

An end to austerity
Throughout the crisis, the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament has fought against the damaging conservative obsession with cuts in public services and investment.
We have offered a different, more forward-looking political agenda. We have also started, through our work in the European Parliament, to construct new rules for the financial sector. This will reduce the instability we have all suffered because of deregulated financial markets. But more must still be done to bring stability, growth and employment back to our European economy.

Their policies include a europe-wide jobs guarantee for unemployed people under 25 and abolishing the Troika, among other things.

KoldPT
Oct 9, 2012

LemonDrizzle posted:

http://socialistsanddemocrats.eu/sites/default/files/sd_100_days_updated_april_2014_EN.pdf


Their policies include a europe-wide jobs guarantee for unemployed people under 25 and abolishing the Troika, among other things.

Yes, but it's important to look at, say, the french example to realize just how much of those policies are bullshit.

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747
It's quite important to keep in mind that what politicians say has absolutely no bearing on what they'll do.

Char
Jan 5, 2013

NihilismNow posted:

It is almost as if Portugal/Greece and Germany shouldn't be in the same economical union because their societies and economies are nothing alike.

This is true all over Europe.
Italy doesn't even have a legally established minimum wage, and the cost of living spaces from the high (1400€/m are realistic) costs of Milan and the big cities to the low (500€/m) costs for the small towns.

MiddleOne
Feb 17, 2011

Cat Mattress posted:

It's quite important to keep in mind that what politicians say has absolutely no bearing on what they'll do.

Depends on the country and political party. Some have really good track records on winning elections and then turning the vast majority of their promises into actual legislation. :eng101:

Others don't quite... :eng99:

uncleTomOfFinland
May 25, 2008

The Danish government's voter participation campaign is.. interesting. :nws:

Deltasquid
Apr 10, 2013

awww...
you guys made me ink!


THUNDERDOME

uncleTomOfFinland posted:

The Danish government's voter participation campaign is.. interesting. :nws:

This is basically what it feels like to live in Belgium, a country where voting is compulsory. Voteman is our government. His fists are our constitution.

Electronico6
Feb 25, 2011

I'm actually okay with compulsory voting, and I wish we had a Portuguese Voteman. Especially considering who doesn't vote around here.

The other day they were doing a vox pop in Fatima, asking the pilgrims if they were going to vote, and there was a dumb old woman saying "I'm not voting again. I'm done with elections!". You should know better you old hag. :argh:

KoldPT
Oct 9, 2012

Electronico6 posted:

I'm actually okay with compulsory voting, and I wish we had a Portuguese Voteman. Especially considering who doesn't vote around here.

The other day they were doing a vox pop in Fatima, asking the pilgrims if they were going to vote, and there was a dumb old woman saying "I'm not voting again. I'm done with elections!". You should know better you old hag. :argh:

75% abstention rates incoming.

I guess that's all you can expect when you can't even get a loving debate of the candidates going on in public TV :shrug:

baka kaba
Jul 19, 2003

PLEASE ASK ME, THE SELF-PROFESSED NO #1 PAUL CATTERMOLE FAN IN THE SOMETHING AWFUL S-CLUB 7 MEGATHREAD, TO NAME A SINGLE SONG BY HIS EXCELLENT NU-METAL SIDE PROJECT, SKUA, AND IF I CAN'T PLEASE TELL ME TO
EAT SHIT

uncleTomOfFinland posted:

The Danish government's voter participation campaign is.. interesting. :nws:

Birgitte would never have signed off on that

Electronico6
Feb 25, 2011

KoldPT posted:

75% abstention rates incoming.

I guess that's all you can expect when you can't even get a loving debate of the candidates going on in public TV :shrug:

Urg. This was already terrible during the municipals, it became worse when PS and PSD-CDS tried to change the law to reduce the fair coverage to just parliamentary parties, and added a line to have the State decide what is kosher and isn't to be debated, giving the media the proper excuse they were looking to never cover an election again.

It's like they benefit from it or something.

Mans
Sep 14, 2011

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
The prohibition of public debates is the only way someone like Nuno Melo can run without embarrassing himself.

NihilismNow
Aug 31, 2003

KoldPT posted:

75% abstention rates incoming.

I guess that's all you can expect when you can't even get a loving debate of the candidates going on in public TV :shrug:

But even if you could you can't vote for them because you live in the wrong country.

LemonDrizzle
Mar 28, 2012

neoliberal shithead

KoldPT posted:

Yes, but it's important to look at, say, the french example to realize just how much of those policies are bullshit.

You can't really blame the EP for actions taken by national governments - they're separate entities. The S&D have been quite vocal and consistent about their criticisms of austerity, and I don't really see any particular reason to doubt their sincerity.

NihilismNow posted:

But even if you could you can't vote for them because you live in the wrong country.
Which of the major EP blocs aren't running candidates in your country?

Anyway, UK national polls now have UKIP taking a plurality of the vote. GG.

LemonDrizzle fucked around with this message at 09:05 on May 14, 2014

Nektu
Jul 4, 2007

FUKKEN FUUUUUUCK
Cybernetic Crumb

LemonDrizzle posted:

You can't really blame the EP for actions taken by national governments - they're separate entities. The S&D have been quite vocal and consistent about their criticisms of austerity, and I don't really see any particular reason to doubt their sincerity.
I think we are doubting the feasibility, not the sincerity. Also, please don't pretent that the EP has the power to go against the council's wishes at the current time.

That even Hollande had to throw the towel IS a bad sign for the anti-austerity crowd...

Nektu fucked around with this message at 09:24 on May 14, 2014

9-Volt Assault
Jan 27, 2007

Beter twee tetten in de hand dan tien op de vlucht.

LemonDrizzle posted:

You can't really blame the EP for actions taken by national governments - they're separate entities. The S&D have been quite vocal and consistent about their criticisms of austerity, and I don't really see any particular reason to doubt their sincerity.

Which of the major EP blocs aren't running candidates in your country?

Anyway, UK national polls now have UKIP taking a plurality of the vote. GG.

Just make the UK a US state and be done with it.

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.

Electronico6 posted:

I'm actually okay with compulsory voting,

I think it's a good idea if and only if there's a "none" option at the top of the list. Forcing ignorant and uninterested people to vote isn't a good way to fix politics, and it'll magnify the list bias. Also it would help determine how many people genuinely don't give a poo poo.

Phlegmish
Jul 2, 2011



I've long wondered if it makes any difference at all. Belgium's voting patterns are nothing out of the ordinary aside from the split between the linguistic communities (which is a different matter).

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

Charlie Mopps posted:

Just make the UK a US state and be done with it.

The proper way for us to do it would be to make it at least 3 states, and realistically more like 4 or 5. :v:

IceAgeComing
Jan 29, 2013

pretty fucking embarrassing to watch

Charlie Mopps posted:

Just make the UK a US state and be done with it.

let us Scots get out first before you do that!

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

IceAgeComing posted:

let us Scots get out first before you do that!

We'll get you some kind of reservation. No guarantees on the location, though- we're thinking maybe just outside Sedona?

NihilismNow
Aug 31, 2003
The fine for not voting in Belgium is €5-10, considering the time it takes to vote that is a fair tradeoff. And if i am reading this correctly after 4 times you don't have to vote again for another 10 years.

So it is a extra tax of about 20 euro a year to not have to vote (second, third and fourth fines are higher), hardly significant.

Phlegmish
Jul 2, 2011



In reality no one ever gets fined, the Minister of Justice (Annemie Turtelboom) a few years back even explicitly stated that there would be no legal consequences for those that didn't show up to vote. It makes me wonder why they bother keeping the law on the books.

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

Phlegmish posted:

In reality no one ever gets fined, the Minister of Justice (Annemie Turtelboom) a few years back even explicitly stated that there would be no legal consequences for those that didn't show up to vote. It makes me wonder why they bother keeping the law on the books.

Lack of political will to formally abolish it, as it's probably some random group's pet issue to keep it on the books.

LemonDrizzle
Mar 28, 2012

neoliberal shithead

Nektu posted:

I think we are doubting the feasibility, not the sincerity. Also, please don't pretent that the EP has the power to go against the council's wishes at the current time.

That even Hollande had to throw the towel IS a bad sign for the anti-austerity crowd...

I don't think you can assume that what was true in the past will remain true in future. The Parliament has gained a lot of power in recent years that it didn't previously have and may be effectively determining the composition of the Commission. That gives it indirect control over one arm of the Troika and the EU's executive body, which would further strengthen its position relative to the national governments.

The FT's got an interesting article that covers the expansion of the Parliament's powers and its conflicts with national governments: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8b347498-d9c4-11e3-b3e3-00144feabdc0.html

quote:

Once derided as a powerless talking shop, the parliament has through perseverance and some low cunning grabbed hold of almost all EU policy: financial reform, banker pay, trade pacts, data protection rules and a trillion-euro budget.

Mr Welle, as much as anyone, has helped to further that transformation since being appointed to its top job five years ago. It was a Welle-fostered powerplay, for example, that has yielded a new system of using the parliamentary elections to select the presidency of a more revered Brussels institution – the European Commission.

...

Even though the commission holds a near monopoly on initiating legislation, Anand Menon, a professor of European politics at King’s College London, describes it as already “held to ransom by the parliament”.

With party groups for the first time nominating lead candidates in this month’s election, the parliament is marching into a new grey zone. More than just influence over the commission work, it is looking to supply its president for the next five years and dictate its priorities.

The two leading candidates, Martin Schulz for the Socialists and Jean-Claude Juncker for the EPP, may yet fail. Seeking to put the parliament in its place, Britain and other national governments want member states to propose their own candidates for the parliament to approve.

But that may require bowing to parliament on other fronts. “There will be a price to pay and it will set a lasting precedent,” said one senior EU official. This could include ceding some power to the parliament to initiate reforms, or heeding its ideas.

...

What distinguishes Mr Welle is his clear-sighted vision for the institution. His model is the US Congress. To him, Brussels is already working to an American-style “two chamber system” where the European Council “represents member states” and the parliament is “representing the citizens”.

Given the public’s ignorance of the European Parliament’s workings – let alone its MEPs – it is a presumption that rankles national leaders, such as the UK’s David Cameron, who enjoy the legitimacy of robust, popular elections.

I don't think the Council of ministers would be overly bothered if Juncker became Commission president, but Schultz could set some feathers flying.

Lagotto
Nov 22, 2010

LemonDrizzle posted:

I don't think the Council of ministers would be overly bothered if Juncker became Commission president, but Schultz could set some feathers flying.

The general view of Juncker is that he's an alcoholic who is passed his prime and who kept on bungling poo poo up in the debt crisis because he couldn't keep his mouth shut. I honestly am not convinced any of the 'candidates' are acceptable.

KoldPT
Oct 9, 2012

Lagotto posted:

The general view of Juncker is that he's an alcoholic who is passed his prime and who kept on bungling poo poo up in the debt crisis because he couldn't keep his mouth shut. I honestly am not convinced any of the 'candidates' are acceptable.

b-but what about Keller/Bové??

LemonDrizzle
Mar 28, 2012

neoliberal shithead

Lagotto posted:

The general view of Juncker is that he's an alcoholic who is passed his prime and who kept on bungling poo poo up in the debt crisis because he couldn't keep his mouth shut. I honestly am not convinced any of the 'candidates' are acceptable.

When you say "acceptable", do you mean to you personally or to the council? AFAIK, our government's not-very-secret position is that they'll tolerate Juncker or whichever EPP candidate takes his place after the voting's done but they'll do whatever they can to prevent Schulz from getting the Presidency - that's part of the reason our press has been quietly talking up Thorning-Schmidt as a compromise S&D candidate if the S&D take a plurality of the votes.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

YF-23
Feb 17, 2011

My god, it's full of cat!


NihilismNow posted:

It is almost as if Portugal/Greece and Germany shouldn't be in the same economical union because their societies and economies are nothing alike.

I don't know, replace Portugal and Greece with random southern states and Germany with, say, New York, and I think you get the same for the USA. The problem with the union is that it's pretty much only monetary; the EU needs stronger central economic control and planning to make the Eurozone work.

I mean yeah you could get rid of the problems the Euro causes by getting rid of the Euro, but the problems are not so much a result of different societies and economies being under one system than it is different societies and economies being under a weak system.

  • Locked thread