|
jackyl posted:I'm still trying to work out why I should be angry at the internet
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2014 11:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 22:52 |
|
|
There's a lot of anger and bad attitudes in QCS, and I hope we may one day go back to having positive vibes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2014 11:47
|
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:There's a lot of anger and bad attitudes in QCS, and I hope we may one day go back to having positive vibes. i appreciate this post
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2014 16:37
|
|
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:There's a lot of anger and bad attitudes in QCS, and I hope we may one day go back to having positive vibes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2014 17:15
|
|
|
Whirlwind Jones posted:There's a forum specifically designed for this mindset. You should check it out. It does not do a good job.
|
|
#
?
Jun 19, 2014 18:50
|
|
|
Ralp gay Also Twee is like the worst poster for years
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 00:35
|
|
|
Ralp Gay
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 00:35
|
|
|
Doing real-deal bans over jokes is no good. I can elaborate on this idea.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 08:05
|
|
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:There's a lot of anger and bad attitudes in QCS, and I hope we may one day go back to having positive vibes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 08:16
|
|
|
lol that ralp has been so retarded about pedos he's now been made to look like a defender of them by lowtax
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 08:18
|
|
|
Somebody explain why they like Ralp.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 08:31
|
|
|
hello i think ralp is bad and gay like most of the admins/mods okay thanks
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 09:10
|
|
|
what did ralp do tho??
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 09:12
|
|
|
KewlBiens posted:Somebody explain why they like Ralp. Ralp sends me the good lolicon pics via pm, the ones in which he can actually tell its a child portrayed.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 09:50
|
|
|
Ralp waited. The lights above him blinked and sparked out of the air. There were pedos in the forums. He didn’t see them, but had expected them now for years. His warnings to Lowtax were not listenend to and now it was too late. Far too late for now, anyway. Ralp was a mod for fourteen years. When he was young he watched the somethingawful and he said to dad “I want to be on the forums daddy.”Dad said “No! You will BE STALKED BY PEDO!” There was a time when he believed him. Then as he got oldered he stopped. But now in the anime zone he knew there were pedos. “This is Lowtax” the radio crackered. “You must fight the pedos!” So Ralp gotted his probation button and blew up the wall. “HE GOING TO BAN US” said the trolls “I will shoot at him” said the shitposter and he fired the rocket missiles. Ralp plasmaed at him and tried to blew him up. But then the ceiling fell and they were trapped and not able to kill. “No! I must kill the pedos” he shouted The radio said “No, Ralp. You are the pedos” And then Ralp was a Badmin.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 10:20
|
|
|
Jose posted:lol that ralp has been so retarded about pedos he's now been made to look like a defender of them by lowtax No way, Jose! He was always against them, just look back 4 months and you'll see how preferred to just let the admin Zorak handle those kind of decisions.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 11:42
|
|
|
serious norman posted:Ralp Gay ralp's finger hovers indecisively over the "ban" button for a moment, weighing the fate of a "serious norman" in the balance. with a smirk, he shakes his head and scrolls further down the page. "not today serious norman," he mumbles to himself as he scrawls the name down on his list.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 21:24
|
|
|
ripped0ff posted:ralp's finger hovers indecisively over the "ban" button for a moment, weighing the fate of a "serious norman" in the balance. with a smirk, he shakes his head and scrolls further down the page. Ralp is on a list of mine: My buddy list! 
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 21:26
|
|
|
I IMed Ralp to get his side of the story, and the results are fairly condemning:quote:(16:35:29) Lowtax: explain yourself NOW
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 22:40
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:I IMed Ralp to get his side of the story, and the results are fairly condemning: It took you 3 minutes to type out those 3 messages? All those let's plays must have hosed up your hands really badly or something. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 22:44
|
|
|
Matoi Ryuko posted:It took you 3 minutes to type out those 3 messages? All those let's plays must have hosed up your hands really badly or something.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 22:50
|
|
|
Make Ralp do a lets play, if he refuses change my vote in the poll to 'no'
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 22:53
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:In the interest of fairness I was giving him time to respond. This jonaug issue came up like 5 months ago, Ralp's slow rear end response time is the reason we had to get you to come in and clean house.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 22:54
|
|
|
Matoi Ryuko posted:This jonaug issue came up like 5 months ago, Ralp's slow rear end response time is the reason we had to get you to come in and clean house. well, in fairness it isn't like we spent 200 posts trying to convince ralp to ban a pretty obvious pedo which he ignored while continuing to ban people instantly for hurting his feelings
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 23:02
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:I IMed Ralp to get his side of the story, and the results are fairly condemning: the prosecution rests
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 23:10
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:In the interest of fairness I was giving him time to respond. It doesn't seem like many people like Ralp, what is the reason for keeping him on the staff? Actually, why keep anyone on staff that the majority of forum users (apparently, nearly 3/4) do not like? I think a big problem with SA is keeping moderators and administrators on staff for far too long, especially the bad ones over the years. Maybe you could have some sort of periodic forum elections or something?
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 23:20
|
|
|
I reserve judgement and thus won't vote, I am just disheartened to see a man walk this path.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 23:22
|
|
|
It would be great if people could vote on if they wanted a man to be the mod, and then if he was winning the vote he would get to do it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 23:24
|
|
|
that's a bad idea instead we should bring back garbage day from helldump where every friday you get to vote on someone to get banned and you can make posts like "heh can't wait until this friday chump"
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 23:32
|
|
|
Matoi Ryuko posted:This jonaug issue came up like 5 months ago, Ralp's slow rear end response time is the reason we had to get you to come in and clean house. The admins seem scared of making a decision about punishing people if it wasn't from a report despite the fact they seem to be in charge of the forums. Unless somebody insulted them anyway
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 23:39
|
|
|
g0lbez posted:that's a bad idea instead we should bring back garbage day from helldump where every friday you get to vote on someone to get banned and you can make posts like "heh can't wait until this friday chump" I want to read that post. Please bring back Helldump
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 23:53
|
|
|
g0lbez posted:that's a bad idea instead we should bring back garbage day from helldump where every friday you get to vote on someone to get banned and you can make posts like "heh can't wait until this friday chump" imo thats a bad idea
|
|
#
?
Jun 20, 2014 23:59
|
|
|
Forum elections are always ridiculous. Just rotate mods out every 6 months.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2014 00:09
|
|
|
Angstrom posted:It doesn't seem like many people like Ralp, what is the reason for keeping him on the staff? Actually, why keep anyone on staff that the majority of forum users (apparently, nearly 3/4) do not like? please tell me you don't seriously think a qcs poll represents a majority of the forums There's 500 votes after over a week, this place is loving empty. The majority of forums users probably don't have any opinion on ralp.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2014 00:13
|
|
|
Gils posted:please tell me you don't seriously think a qcs poll represents a majority of the forums 500 is a hell of a lot more than I expected for a QCS poll.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2014 00:32
|
|
|
Breadallelogram posted:500 is a hell of a lot more than I expected for a QCS poll. The majority of which are probably the underclasses that have been allowed to vote. Generally speaking, only the wealthy should have been allowed to vote, that is: Those with platinum.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2014 00:34
|
|
|
So out of the 180000 people registered, why the gently caress would anyone care about what less than 1% of the forums is bitching about. If the forums are so awful now, maybe the people complaining would find something sensitive more to their liking
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2014 00:53
|
|
|
Lowtax posted:I IMed Ralp to get his side of the story, and the results are fairly condemning: Give me my plat and archives back because you banned me accidbndly and never unbanned me, despite a twitter promise
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2014 01:00
|
|
|
Booourns posted:So out of the 180000 people registered, why the gently caress would anyone care about what less than 1% of the forums is bitching about. If the forums are so awful now, maybe the people complaining would find something sensitive more to their liking gently caress u
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2014 03:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 22:52 |
|
|
Booourns posted:So out of the 180000 people registered, why the gently caress would anyone care about what less than 1% of the forums is bitching about. If the forums are so awful now, maybe the people complaining would find something sensitive more to their liking spoiler that poo poo man what if a mod reads this
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2014 04:32
|
|