|
That whole thing was just too much for a humpday morning before coffee.
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2014 23:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 21:09 |
|
|
poopkitty posted:LOL. My last advancement numbers were 7%. MUTHERFUCKING SEVEN. gently caress you guys and your entitled wives and nicer housing. Isn't this in a community that often can't remember how to administer chewable Motrin
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2014 23:57
|
|
|
Snowdens Secret posted:Isn't this in a community that often can't remember how to administer chewable Motrin Please tell me they don't have to read the directions seriously.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:02
|
|
|
Navy accelerating the gently caress outta some lives
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:04
|
|
|
orange juche posted:Please tell me they don't have to read the directions seriously. Depends on if you're talking the bottle or the MRC
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:04
|
|
|
Snowdens Secret posted:Isn't this in a community that often can't remember how to administer chewable Motrin Really? Have I not been spelling correctly? I am not a corpsman.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:17
|
|
|
It always goes in the butt
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:28
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:Really? Have I not been spelling correctly? I am not a corpsman. Coulda sworn you were one of our clinic criers, my bad
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:31
|
|
|
WTF am I missing here? so, only 50% of those eligible got promoted? Are they not eligible to pick up next cycle and now they are just hosed or what? I mean, if its just a matter of waiting another year to be promoted then suck it up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:33
|
|
Gunktacular posted:WTF am I missing here? so, only 50% of those eligible got promoted? Are they not eligible to pick up next cycle and now they are just hosed or what? For O-4, you only get two failures to select before the Navy tells you to go home. They've used up one, so if they don't pick it up next year, they're done.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:39
|
|
|
Snowdens Secret posted:Coulda sworn you were one of our clinic criers, my bad Poopkitty is one of our 
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:40
|
|
|
Octopode posted:For O-4, you only get two failures to select before the Navy tells you to go home. They've used up one, so if they don't pick it up next year, they're done. Well, that particular rule would make sense at a 90% advancement rate. I would hope (lol) that the navy would adjust that rule (maybe 3-4 chances?) if the 50% range holds steady, but who am I kidding? Navy is probably doing it intentionally in order to force people out. Would you get severance pay if you missed advancement twice?
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:LOL. My last advancement numbers were 7%. MUTHERFUCKING SEVEN. gently caress you guys and your entitled wives and nicer housing. Also this, when I put on ET2 the advancement was 4.5%. So, what I'm trying to say is burn all nobles.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:47
|
|
|
Gunktacular posted:Well, that particular rule would make sense at a 90% advancement rate. "probably"? quote:Would you get severance pay if you missed advancement twice? lol
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:51
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Poopkitty is one of our Fine, fine, my bad, chief
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:52
|
|
Gunktacular posted:Well, that particular rule would make sense at a 90% advancement rate. Officer promotions are generally governed by law, rather than Navy policies. In this case, it's the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act (DOPMA) which sets the rule, and isn't likely to change anytime soon. They are eligible for severance pay, generally, at least.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:52
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Poopkitty is one of our If it helps, I'm bitter and jaded and tapping out on May 31st, 2016.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:53
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:If it helps, I'm bitter and jaded and tapping out on May 31st, 2016. Congrats!!
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:55
|
|
|
Does SWO generally have decent advancement to O-4?
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 00:57
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Congrats!! Thanks. Looking so forward to freedom. (I'm also the CPO that sits next to seqenenra. And the CMEO, but mostly because I was the only female at the time.)
poopkitty fucked around with this message at 01:05 on Jul 16, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 01:02
|
|
|
SpaceJustice posted:Does SWO generally have decent advancement to O-4? It's better due to attrition rates.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 01:09
|
|
|
SpaceJustice posted:Does SWO generally have decent advancement to O-4? Short answer, yes. The majority of JO SWOs get out after their initial obligation. To even fill the open department head spots they give people $75k and a free master's degree just for another 3-4 years of service. After that point, it makes little sense to not advance most of them. I don't know the exact numbers, but yes, most SWOs that stick around will pick up O-4, but I would say the number actually advanced is probably similar to pilots. It's just that pilots aren't jumping to leave so the excess has to be cut somehow. SWOs already get rid of their excess numbers past the O-3 level.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 01:30
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:Thanks. Looking so forward to freedom. Even as a civilian I get
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 01:37
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:Thanks. Looking so forward to freedom. "Ok, we need a CMEO to show that we are a diverse organization that does not make decisions based on gender, race, or religion" /picks the only female chief because she is female
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 01:38
|
|
|
Sir Lucius posted:"Ok, we need a CMEO to show that we are a diverse organization that does not make decisions based on gender, race, or religion" Its usually a black guy, so I feel like this is progress.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 02:16
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:Its usually a black guy, so I feel like this is progress. We once had a fat white CMEO for some reason. He was also as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 02:24
|
|
|
Stultus Maximus posted:We once had a fat white CMEO for some reason. He was also Probably because PRT coordinator was taken.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 02:26
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:Probably because PRT coordinator was taken. At least we now know that the CPO community sees the irony.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 02:29
|
|
|
Poopkitty you're an HMC? That's pretty cool.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 03:01
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:Probably because PRT coordinator was taken. Fat PRT coordinators are way better than skinny, former fat girl, noble coordinator. Fucker screwed over one of the best Sailors we had because of BCA even though he is in-shape and it was 1%. Bonus was said PRT coordinated had to redo an entire group PRT the next drill because she made so many mistakes in a process that is entirely regulation driven.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 03:08
|
|
|
Nick Soapdish posted:Fat Was her name Marcia?
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 03:11
|
|
|
Nick Soapdish posted:Fat So what I am getting from this is we should "burn all nobles"? 
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 04:04
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:Was her name Marcia? No, but that would be good. orange juche posted:So what I am getting from this is we should "burn all nobles"? Yes, except for CWO/LDOs.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 04:55
|
|
|
The CWO that was MPA on my first ship got fired by the CO because he was useless and just made the electro. The JG that was running that division took over as MPA and things went much much better.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 05:03
|
|
|
Nick Soapdish posted:No, but that would be good. LDOs and CWOs are p chill dudes. More chill than for sure.Realchat it's time to update my security clearance and the security manager wants me to sign away access to my medical records for the investigation, when I haven't been involved with mental health at any point in my life, and that is specifically mentioned on the form as the only time that they would need access to my medical records and to talk with providers etc. Am I correct in pointing to the spot on the form that says "ONLY SIGN IF YOU ARE CRAZY" and using that as the reason why I won't sign it? Respectfully, of course.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 05:10
|
|
|
But then how would they know if you've been injected with Communism????
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 05:22
|
|
|
orange juche posted:Am I correct in pointing to the spot on the form that says "ONLY SIGN IF YOU ARE CRAZY" and using that as the reason why I won't sign it? Respectfully, of course. Had the same thing come up because all security managers are terrible. Point it out, they will probably say, "Sign it anyway," you'll say no, they'll say, "welp, not sending it even though you're right," and you'll sign it. Enjoy
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 05:22
|
|
|
Nick Soapdish posted:
LOL. We just had a terrible LDO retire. Super loving creepy dude. Literally said he applied for LDO because he couldn't make Chief.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 05:42
|
|
|
poopkitty posted:LOL. We just had a terrible LDO retire. Super loving creepy dude. Literally said he applied for LDO because he couldn't make Chief. Firsts like that just need to quickly and quietly turn to dust and not continue along instead. Or, better yet, be a Warrant in the Army.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 06:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 21:09 |
|
|
Biggest prick of a JO I ever knew was some E6 (nuke EM I think) that got out, went to school, and came back as an officer. gently caress that guy. If we burn all nobles, he should be the first in the fire.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2014 06:13
|
|
