Should avatar space be limited? This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
YES. I do not like the large avatars. | 1123 | 49.51% | |
NO. I don't care if an avatar is large. | 1145 | 50.49% | |
Total: | 2268 votes |
|
i support giant text blocks instead of avatars
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 21:55 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 17:17 |
|
Make it work like this:
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 21:58 |
|
I can't handle pressing the "page down" button one extra time - nor flicking the wheel of my mouse, I might get broken wrists or something. Something awful, if you will.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 21:59 |
|
Leperflesh posted:Make it work like this: this but no scroll on overflow and detect where the eyes are and make it so everyone is peeking over the edge of the avatar window
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:02 |
|
Coffee Wolf posted:I can't handle pressing the "page down" button one extra time - nor flicking the wheel of my mouse, I might get broken wrists or something. Something awful, if you will.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:05 |
|
SpiderHyphenMan posted:As long as the abnormal largeness is vertical and not horizontal so as to maintain the integrity of my precious tables, I don't give a poo poo. This post accurately reflects my opinion on the subject.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:05 |
|
Lowtax posted:I don't believe anybody ever said they "can't handle" it, I said it was unnecessarily annoying and was why the initial dimensional limits on avatars was originally set. You're never going to be able to make the CSS code to shrink bigavs because I'm going to tell Yospos not to help you.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:06 |
|
zen death robot posted:You say this like it's a bad thing. The ability to shrink avs is a power that only a select few know, and they're all on my side!
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:10 |
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:You're never going to be able to make the CSS code to shrink bigavs because I'm going to tell Yospos not to help you.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:12 |
|
Does lowtax realize yet that some unscrupulous admins sell large avs on the side?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:12 |
|
Lowtax posted:Okay you want to play that game then I'll do it the old fashioned way. GAME ON. no lowtax the forums will break again!
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:13 |
|
John Kruk posted:Does lowtax realize yet that some unscrupulous admins sell large avs on the side?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:13 |
|
the wildest rear end posted:no lowtax the forums will break again! Haven't you been paying attention? The forums break because of Radium NOT Lowtax.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:14 |
|
John Kruk posted:Haven't you been paying attention? The forums break because of Radium NOT Lowtax.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:14 |
|
Lowtax posted:Okay you want to play that game then I'll do it the old fashioned way. GAME ON. Change it back before something bad happens. #threats
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:15 |
|
Lowtax posted:I thought it was because of Ralp and the Syrian Electronic Army Ralp Radium #whoah
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:15 |
|
Lowtax posted:I realize it, I just believe some of them are far too big. thats not a nice thing to say about ozma
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:15 |
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:Change it back before something bad happens. #threats lol
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:16 |
|
the wildest rear end posted:Ralp
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:17 |
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:Change it back before something bad happens. #threats
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:18 |
|
idgi
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:18 |
|
bring back big avs
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:24 |
|
lowtax what have you done to my friend peanut's avatar, change it back at once
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:25 |
|
i am he posted:lowtax what have you done to my friend peanut's avatar, change it back at once Change it back or I'll do something realllly bad.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:28 |
|
I don't like to scroll, Lowtax, please make it stop! Can't you just implement a feature where the forums scroll for me?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:28 |
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:Change it back or I'll do something realllly bad. it's still a big av tho
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:31 |
|
instead of working on dire forums problems, like "the ralp problem," let's make it so users don't have to scroll an eextra 1 second per 100 posts its a fuckin outrage
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:32 |
|
I only post in chat threads so i'm hoping my av doesnt annoy anyone but if it does I'd love to have this, smaller av
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:33 |
|
zen death robot posted:You're mad yes, lowtax give me the biggest av you have, or face the consequences
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:35 |
|
fixed for filesize constraints
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:36 |
|
i am he posted:yes, lowtax give me the biggest av you have, or face the consequences Lowtax is cruisin for a bruisin. He's asking for some serious hurt.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:36 |
|
i am he posted:instead of working on dire forums problems, like "the ralp problem," let's make it so users don't have to scroll an eextra 1 second per 100 posts
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:36 |
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:Lowtax is cruisin for a bruisin. He's asking for some serious hurt. If lowtax does not right these wrongs, he will find himself in a world of pain
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:37 |
|
EMILY BLUNTS posted:fixed for filesize constraints
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:37 |
|
or back to wreck it ralp
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:37 |
|
Lowtax posted:how about we compromise and I rename Ralp to "dire forums problem" I can accept these terms.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:37 |
|
Lowtax posted:how about we compromise and I rename Ralp to "dire forums problem" i would enjoy that
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:38 |
|
i am he posted:I can accept these terms.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:40 |
|
Lowtax posted:*shakes hand electronically* I will hold you to this, I believe you already understand what could happen to you if you do not do this *gestures towards Peanut and the Gang's posts*
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:42 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 17:17 |
|
i am he posted:I will hold you to this, I believe you already understand what could happen to you if you do not do this *gestures towards Peanut and the Gang's posts*
|
# ? Jul 1, 2014 22:42 |