Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Aurubin posted:

BREAKING: House GOP reveals plan to fight global climate change



There's no Bible :colbert:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Magres
Jul 14, 2011

disheveled posted:

Yeah, paleo is more well-balanced and healthy than a typical American diet by far, but the rationale behind is it ridiculous and unscientific. A lot of the stuff they get right is by accident.

You put it a lot better than me. But yeah paleo works in that it's not smashing down three Big Mac combo meals a day for your food intake, but is not in any way some magical secret 'unlock your inner caveman' diet. And honestly, I don't really care if the rationale for a diet is 'unlock your health through the power of NUTRIMITES AND VITAGROWS' if it results in people eating more healthily. The issue is when they get to the idiotic raw foodism, which I suppose goes part and parcel with the NUTRIMITES AND VITAGROWS stupidity. Bluh.

I don't understand why people can't get "yo if you eat healthy stuff it's good for you and you'll be healthy" and need everything to be some trick. I used to be a fat guy and dropped a ton of weight just by not eating entire boxes of Cheezits in single sittings and jogging like 3-5 miles a week. idgi, it just takes time :shrug:

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

Magres posted:

I don't understand why people can't get "yo if you eat healthy stuff it's good for you and you'll be healthy" and need everything to be some trick. I used to be a fat guy and dropped a ton of weight just by not eating entire boxes of Cheezits for a snack and jogging like 3-5 miles a week.

Not at all by coincidence, look forward to the article I'm coauthoring that will hopefully start answering some parts of this question once it gets published. The current theory is it's partially caused by a form of psychology's information dilution effect. We're starting pilot data collection this week.

BRAKE FOR MOOSE
Jun 6, 2001

withak posted:

The driving force would have been that you can make your product sweeter, and thus more appealing to the customer, by adding a bunch of government-funded corn syrup for very little increase in cost. If the cost of the added sweetness isn't subsidized then the math works out differently and we likely would have fewer sweetness-based calories going up on grocery store shelves.

I suppose that's true, but I'm also not sure HFCS is cheap enough that it's an instant add. I could be wrong because I don't know the prices or the market. I would put far more blame on the hangover from the original food pyramid and "low fat" craze.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Joementum posted:

Keep in mind that their alternatives include several governors under active investigation and Rand Paul.

And Rick Perry, Glasses Edition.

Magres
Jul 14, 2011

Discendo Vox posted:

Not at all by coincidence, look forward to the article I'm coauthoring that will hopefully start answering some parts of this question once it gets published. The current theory is it's partially caused by a form of psychology's information dilution effect. We're starting pilot data collection this week.

What's the information dilution effect? A quick googling said it's something about how you can break down people's pre-conceived notions by including extraneous details to 'flesh out' the picture you're presenting.

Is the idea that by presenting a diet that actually has a reasonable core set of instructions (ala the 'eat lean meat and veggies' paleo stuff) with a bunch of extraneous details (in the case of paleo the 'caveman' bullshit) you can get people to bite more easily? It would certainly explain why people love fad diets that generally don't work (well, this and the fact that a lot of fad crash diets promise to make you drop like 15 pounds in a week and a half) instead of actual working "EAT HEALTHY GOD DAMNIT" diets that a doctor will tell you?

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Evil Fluffy posted:

What makes you think that congress has the authority to micromanage the Commander in Chief? Unless those 120 are going to war with Somalia their authority begins and ends with funding.

Watch Congress defund the CIA. Both publicly and privately. That's happened, when? And I'm not saying there's a Hoover, but, with the NSA/CIA programs, do you really want to take that risk? I'm really not a believer in conspiracy; only that which has been documented in the press. Its data, not metadata, that you can get. What safeguards exist to prevent this from being used against an outside agent?

spunkshui
Oct 5, 2011



Magres posted:

I don't understand why people can't get "yo if you eat healthy stuff it's good for you and you'll be healthy" and need everything to be some trick. I used to be a fat guy and dropped a ton of weight just by not eating entire boxes of Cheezits in single sittings and jogging like 3-5 miles a week. idgi, it just takes time :shrug:

Everyone is fat as hell for the same reason they have tons of credit card debt.

People are lazy, stupid, and impatient.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

sleepingbuddha posted:

Yep, they sound much worse (and dangerous) than Juggalos. I didn't notice any females mentioned either.

I noticed a good many. The lesbian organizer, a bunch of moms complaining about topless folks (presumably female), a vendor-wife.

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006

Jarmak posted:

I don't know, because it wasn't? did you read those articles beyond the headlines?

http://www.thenation.com/article/secret-us-war-pakistan

quote:

At a covert forward operating base run by the US Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) in the Pakistani port city of Karachi, members of an elite division of Blackwater are at the center of a secret program in which they plan targeted assassinations of suspected Taliban and Al Qaeda operatives, "snatch and grabs" of high-value targets and other sensitive action inside and outside Pakistan, an investigation by The Nation has found. The Blackwater operatives also assist in gathering intelligence and help direct a secret US military drone bombing campaign that runs parallel to the well-documented CIA predator strikes, according to a well-placed source within the US military intelligence apparatus.

The source, who has worked on covert US military programs for years, including in Afghanistan and Pakistan, has direct knowledge of Blackwater's involvement. He spoke to The Nation on condition of anonymity because the program is classified. The source said that the program is so "compartmentalized" that senior figures within the Obama administration and the US military chain of command may not be aware of its existence.

A former senior executive at Blackwater confirmed the military intelligence source's claim that the company is working in Pakistan for the CIA and JSOC, the premier counterterrorism and covert operations force within the military. He said that Blackwater is also working for the Pakistani government on a subcontract with an Islamabad-based security firm that puts US Blackwater operatives on the ground with Pakistani forces in counter-terrorism operations, including house raids and border interdictions, in the North-West Frontier Province and elsewhere in Pakistan. This arrangement, the former executive said, allows the Pakistani government to utilize former US Special Operations forces who now work for Blackwater while denying an official US military presence in the country. He also confirmed that Blackwater has a facility in Karachi and has personnel deployed elsewhere in Pakistan. The former executive spoke on condition of anonymity.

"It wouldn't surprise me because we've outsourced nearly everything," said Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, who served as Secretary of State Colin Powell's chief of staff from 2002 to 2005, when told of Blackwater's role in Pakistan. Wilkerson said that during his time in the Bush administration, he saw the beginnings of Blackwater's involvement with the sensitive operations of the military and CIA. "Part of this, of course, is an attempt to get around the constraints the Congress has placed on DoD. If you don't have sufficient soldiers to do it, you hire civilians to do it. I mean, it's that simple. It would not surprise me."

Do you want to keep putting your foot in your mouth? It's a complete non-secret that the intelligence community uses contractors on a regular basis. Yes, most PMCs are running mess halls and providing base security, but pretending that's the extent of it is just blind naivete.

AreWeDrunkYet fucked around with this message at 22:38 on Jul 3, 2014

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.
drat it, nutrition policy chat when I need to study for the bar- last one before I go. Approximately speaking, and modified to fit our study, dilution effect theory is that the provision of additional distractor information of low diagnostic importance (eat like a caveman, processed foods, low carb, etc) dilutes the perceived importance of central, high diagnostic information (consume fewer calories, burn more calories). I've linked one of the original publications that spawned it. As you can see, it's been modified and applied in a wide array of settings, with varying effect.

It's not the exact fad diet question, but if it turns out to be strongly supported it would explain one part of why people follow paleo, juice purges, Atkins etc when the actual practices necessary for weight loss (eat less and get off your rear end) are rigorously documented and well-known.

Torka
Jan 5, 2008

People eating healthy for scientifically incorrect reasons would still be a huge step up from what we have right now!

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

withak posted:

I think the problem with HFCS is that it so cheap that it can put in anything in great quantities. If sweetened foods had to be made with sugar instead then people wouldn't be able to afford as many high-calorie snacks.

It isn't that it is cheap, it is that if you use it you then you get a tax credit. Hence why it is loaded into everything

Then to offset the taste (since it gets added to things that don't call for sugar) they dump in a bunch of salt.

So you get the 1-2 punch of a bunch of sugar and high sodium

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Fried Chicken posted:

It isn't that it is cheap, it is that if you use it you then you get a tax credit. Hence why it is loaded into everything

Then to offset the taste (since it gets added to things that don't call for sugar) they dump in a bunch of salt.

So you get the 1-2 punch of a bunch of sugar and high sodium

It seems there's a growing trend to replace with, literally, wood.

JonathonSpectre
Jul 23, 2003

I replaced the Shermatar and text with this because I don't wanna see racial slurs every time you post what the fuck

Soiled Meat

Fried Chicken posted:

It isn't that it is cheap, it is that if you use it you then you get a tax credit. Hence why it is loaded into everything

Then to offset the taste (since it gets added to things that don't call for sugar) they dump in a bunch of salt.

So you get the 1-2 punch of a bunch of sugar and high sodium

We quite literally pay companies to put poo poo food that makes people fat on the shelf but then fight to the death over the idea of paying in any way to help make those people healthy again. Follow the logic:

Pay a corn-producing multinational to make us all unhealthy? FREEDOM.

Pay for someone's preventative treatment and nutrition advice? SOCIALISM.

What the gently caress is this? COGNITIVE DISSONANCE or in many cases just STUPIDITY.

Islam is the Lite Rock FM
Jul 27, 2007

by exmarx
Yeah but what about all the job creators that own places that make lovely food?

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

JonathonSpectre posted:

We quite literally pay companies to put poo poo food that makes people fat on the shelf but then fight to the death over the idea of paying in any way to help make those people healthy again. Follow the logic:

Pay a corn-producing multinational to make us all unhealthy? FREEDOM.

Pay for someone's preventative treatment and nutrition advice? SOCIALISM.

What the gently caress is this? COGNITIVE DISSONANCE or in many cases just STUPIDITY.

No, We quite literally pay companies to put poo poo food that results in steady employment in a toss up state that kicks off the presidential primary.


Don't confuse their motivations. It isn't stupidity or cognitive dissonance, it is having a different agenda

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005

AreWeDrunkYet posted:

http://www.thenation.com/article/secret-us-war-pakistan


Do you want to keep putting your foot in your mouth? It's a complete non-secret that the intelligence community uses contractors on a regular basis. Yes, most PMCs are running mess halls and providing base security, but pretending that's the extent of it is just blind naivete.

quote:

The source said that the program is so "compartmentalized" that senior figures within the Obama administration and the US military chain of command may not be aware of its existence.

Yup that totally sounds like "common knowledge".

Congrats you found an anonymous source claiming there's a super secret program where the CIA outsourced some of its blackest of black bag stuff... maybe. Its the same program that those 4 other sources you posted said never happened. This all has jack poo poo to do with "US running a mercenary war in Iraq".

Gynocentric Regime
Jun 9, 2010

by Cyrano4747

Fried Chicken posted:

No, We quite literally pay companies to put poo poo food that results in steady employment in a toss up state that kicks off the presidential primary.


Don't confuse their motivations. It isn't stupidity or cognitive dissonance, it is having a different agenda

Yeah, you cannot overestimate how import Iowa is in Presidential politics, especially for Republicans.

Fried Chicken
Jan 9, 2011

Don't fry me, I'm no chicken!

Hasters posted:

Yeah, you cannot overestimate how import Iowa is in Presidential politics, especially for Republicans.

Democrats too, remember that winning Iowa is what lit a fire for Obama

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009

Once every four years, people remember Iowa exists.

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006

Jarmak posted:

Congrats you found an anonymous source claiming there's a super secret program where the CIA outsourced some of its blackest of black bag stuff... maybe. Its the same program that those 4 other sources you posted said never happened.

quote:

The previously unreported program, the military intelligence source said, is distinct from the CIA assassination program that the agency's director, Leon Panetta, announced he had canceled in June 2009. "This is a parallel operation to the CIA," said the source.

Yes, it's an anonymous source, but The Nation is not some rag.

Jarmak posted:

This all has jack poo poo to do with "US running a mercenary war in Iraq".

No, this has to do with your categorical denial the US would ever use any private contractors in anything beyond a security role. There's a variety of evidence that they are definitely used in roles like interrogating prisoners, planning operations, launching drones, and that using them for assassinations was considered seriously enough to spend a few million dollars on. There's less verifiable evidence that they were put in an active combat role, but this is a far cry from the security guards you're trying to characterize them as.

quote:

According to the former executive, Blackwater operatives also integrate with Kestral's forces in sensitive counterterrorism operations in the North-West Frontier Province, where they work in conjunction with the Pakistani Interior Ministry's paramilitary force, known as the Frontier Corps (alternately referred to as "frontier scouts"). The Blackwater personnel are technically advisers, but the former executive said that the line often gets blurred in the field. Blackwater "is providing the actual guidance on how to do [counterterrorism operations] and Kestral's folks are carrying a lot of them out, but they're having the guidance and the overwatch from some BW guys that will actually go out with the teams when they're executing the job," he said. "You can see how that can lead to other things in the border areas." He said that when Blackwater personnel are out with the Pakistani teams, sometimes its men engage in operations against suspected terrorists. "You've got BW guys that are assisting... and they're all going to want to go on the jobs--so they're going to go with them," he said. "So, the things that you're seeing in the news about how this Pakistani military group came in and raided this house or did this or did that--in some of those cases, you're going to have Western folks that are right there at the house, if not in the house." Blackwater, he said, is paid by the Pakistani government through Kestral for consulting services. "That gives the Pakistani government the cover to say, 'Hey, no, we don't have any Westerners doing this. It's all local and our people are doing it.' But it gets them the expertise that Westerners provide for [counterterrorism]-related work."

AreWeDrunkYet fucked around with this message at 23:47 on Jul 3, 2014

Eugene V. Deadlift
Apr 8, 2013

Jarmak posted:

Yup that totally sounds like "common knowledge".

Congrats you found an anonymous source claiming there's a super secret program where the CIA outsourced some of its blackest of black bag stuff... maybe. Its the same program that those 4 other sources you posted said never happened. This all has jack poo poo to do with "US running a mercenary war in Iraq".


If you Google Blackwater, one of the first autocompletes is Blackwater Massacre Fallujah. Not many cooks and transportation specialists have the opportunity to do that.

Femur
Jan 10, 2004
I REALLY NEED TO SHUT THE FUCK UP

Magres posted:

Is the idea that by presenting a diet that actually has a reasonable core set of instructions (ala the 'eat lean meat and veggies' paleo stuff) with a bunch of extraneous details (in the case of paleo the 'caveman' bullshit) you can get people to bite more easily? It would certainly explain why people love fad diets that generally don't work (well, this and the fact that a lot of fad crash diets promise to make you drop like 15 pounds in a week and a half) instead of actual working "EAT HEALTHY GOD DAMNIT" diets that a doctor will tell you?

I believe it is the same mental process as in getting "free" thing.

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005

AreWeDrunkYet posted:

Yes, it's an anonymous source, but The Nation is not some rag.


No, this has to do with your categorical denial the US would ever use any private contractors in anything beyond a security role. There's a variety of evidence that they are definitely used in roles like interrogating prisoners and planning operations, and less verifiable evidence that they were put in an active combat role.

I actually listed a bunch of other poo poo contractors do besides security roles so that would be a weird assertion, I asked you "for doing what" in response to your first post as an honest question because I wasn't sure what capacity you were talking about and didn't want to say no in case you were referring to interrogations and non combat poo poo. I literally said in my first post on the subject they do a lot of supporting jobs.

But go ahead and move the goal posts some more.

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005

ImAMinister posted:

If you Google Blackwater, one of the first autocompletes is Blackwater Massacre Fallujah. Not many cooks and transportation specialists have the opportunity to do that.

They were grabbed while providing security for a civilian convoy?

edit: To be clear I mean civilian as in "not military" not "Iraqi civilians" (though the first couple articles don't go into detail on the convoy so they could have been Iraqi civilians being paid to transport something, which happens allot)

Willie Tomg
Feb 2, 2006

ImAMinister posted:

If you Google Blackwater, one of the first autocompletes is Blackwater Massacre Fallujah. Not many cooks and transportation specialists have the opportunity to do that.

In that instance the mercs were the ones massacred. And its a shame you put that out there to get jumped on, because Blackwater is unbelievably loving sketchy and the GM of Iraq operations makes offhand "jokes" about killing state actors who could feasibly rein them in

Eugene V. Deadlift
Apr 8, 2013

Jarmak posted:

They were grabbed while providing security for a civilian convoy?

edit: To be clear I mean civilian as in "not military" not "Iraqi civilians" (though the first couple articles don't go into detail on the convoy so they could have been Iraqi civilians being paid to transport something, which happens allot)

You know what? You're certainly right about the circumstances behind that and I was off base.

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005

Willie Tomg posted:

In that instance the mercs were the ones massacred. And its a shame you put that out there to get jumped on, because Blackwater is unbelievably loving sketchy and the GM of Iraq operations makes offhand jokes about killing state actors who could feasibly rein them in

Oh agreed, I never meant to defend blackwater as a company or their personal, I was correcting the way people seem to have gotten an understanding of how contractors are used in Iraq/Afghanistan from playing Metal Gear Solid 4.

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006

Jarmak posted:

I actually listed a bunch of other poo poo contractors do besides security roles so that would be a weird assertion, I asked you "for doing what" in response to your first post as an honest question because I wasn't sure what capacity you were talking about and didn't want to say no in case you were referring to interrogations and non combat poo poo. I literally said in my first post on the subject they do a lot of supporting jobs.

But go ahead and move the goal posts some more.

Do we really need to pull up the original quote?

Jarmak posted:

You guys seems to not really understand how PMCs are utilized at all, they aren't mercs that are sent out to do the job soldiers are. The most offensive operations they ever did was acting as body guards for VIPs working for/with the state department (what blackwater was doing when it caused all its trouble).

How in the world are running drones and planning missions in close cooperation with intelligence services (and again, that is the bare minimum that has been independently verified) not "offensive operations"?

Here, have another link:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/oct/29/afghanistan.usa

Is "tracking terrorists" in the mountains of Afghanistan also "non combat poo poo"? I guess they were just playing hide and seek or something?

quote:

Two CIA agents have been ambushed and killed in a mountainous border region of Afghanistan, the US military said today.
The CIA confirmed that William Carlson, 43, of Southern Pines, North Carolina, and Christopher Glenn Mueller, 32, of San Diego, California were killed on Saturday near the village in Shkin in Paktika province while "tracking terrorists".

The ambush happened on the same day and in the same area as a six-hour firefight in which US-led forces and Afghan militia killed 18 alleged al-Qaida fighters, US military spokesman Col Rodney Davis said. Coalition airpower was called in, and six Afghan militiamen were wounded in the fighting.

Col Davis declined to comment on the CIA deaths, or to say whether the two men were involved in the same battle.

quote:

At its annual memorial ceremony this morning, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) honored 83 employees who died in service to their country, including Christopher Glenn Mueller and William "Chief" Carlson, two civilian contractors killed in an ambush in Afghanistan last fall.

AreWeDrunkYet fucked around with this message at 00:02 on Jul 4, 2014

ToxicSlurpee
Nov 5, 2003

-=SEND HELP=-


Pillbug

disheveled posted:

I suppose that's true, but I'm also not sure HFCS is cheap enough that it's an instant add. I could be wrong because I don't know the prices or the market. I would put far more blame on the hangover from the original food pyramid and "low fat" craze.

Corn is currently so cheap it's literally impossible to actually make money at all from corn. The only reason corn can be grown profitably is massive government subsidies. The way it works is farmers get paid to grow poo poo loads of corn by the government. The amount of money is not based on demand for corn, the need for corn, or how much corn people it. It's literally just "we will give you $X if you grow corn on Y amount of land." This leads to gigantic amounts of overproduction so high that you can buy corn far, far below cost on the market. This is why corn is in pretty much everything right now. The food industry responded to "corn is disturbingly cheap" with "all of our food is now corn."

It isn't that corn in and of itself is unhealthy or that HFCS is a death potion it's that our food is becoming increasingly corn. The human body can't thrive on just corn and the massive intake of simple carbs is causing increased calorie consumption, increased diabetes, and increased obesity. There are nutritional problems as well, as a lack of proper nutrients can cause more overeating, as can easy availability of simple, carb-heavy foods with little nutrition beyond carbs. That and the food industry keeps trying to make foods that you can eat five bags of every day and not feed satisfied. Different story though, and totally disconnected from what the food is being made out of.

It's a complex thing. The simplest solution to it, though, is "buy things that are not junk food, do not live on corn chips and soda."

Willie Tomg
Feb 2, 2006

Jarmak posted:

Oh agreed, I never meant to defend blackwater as a company or their personal, I was correcting the way people seem to have gotten an understanding of how contractors are used in Iraq/Afghanistan from playing Metal Gear Solid 4.

Yeah that's also real dumb (on their part) because there's a lot of room to be Really Concerned about how infrastructural contractors are employed by the pentagon before you even get to the layer of "oh, btw, some of these dudes are also unaccountable cowboys who murder with impunity"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9a31lfDDvA

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

withak posted:

I think the problem with HFCS is that it so cheap that it can put in anything in great quantities. If sweetened foods had to be made with sugar instead then people wouldn't be able to afford as many high-calorie snacks.

Not only cheap, but artificially so. There are a bunch of ag subsidies that trigger whenever a certain amount of corn/corn derivative is included as an ingredient, so this creates incentives to add HFCS to a whole bunch of food products in order to get the subsidies.

e; fb several times, but yeah, It isn't just that corn is dirt cheap, there are direct incentives for companies to add it to their recipes. It isn't a matter of 'so cheap it's an automatic add', it's 'add it and you'll get paid for doing so'.

Ron Paul Atreides fucked around with this message at 00:37 on Jul 4, 2014

Femur
Jan 10, 2004
I REALLY NEED TO SHUT THE FUCK UP
Why do we want so much corn? I thought corn was harsh on the soil?

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005

AreWeDrunkYet posted:

Do we really need to pull up the original quote?


How in the world are running drones and planning missions in close cooperation with intelligence services (and again, that is the bare minimum that has been independently verified) not "offensive operations"?

Here, have another link:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/oct/29/afghanistan.usa

Is "tracking terrorists" in the mountains of Afghanistan also "non combat poo poo"? I guess they were just playing hide and seek or something?

Yes? Non combat people get ambushed and killed all the time, sometimes they even work with combat people and get killed during fights. It was very clear what was being discussed, what I was referring to, and what I was correcting. now you're just trying to play pedantic games to try and produce a "gotcha"

I mean gently caress you tried to spring "gotcha" on me when I asked for clarification but you didn't check your sources.

quote:

Yeah that's also real dumb (on their part) because there's a lot of room to be Really Concerned about how infrastructural contractors are employed by the pentagon before you even get to the layer of "oh, btw, some of these dudes are also unaccountable cowboys who murder with impunity"

Even the most die hard war junkie Iraq invasion fanboy should be concerned about the mismanagement of the contracting issue. Its only anecdotal but the reputation I always heard about blackwater (including from guys working with different PMC groups) was that they were a bunch of assholes and they paid the best but the company didn't give a gently caress about you and just threw you into dangerous spots without care or support. This is exactly the type of the environment that breeds the "gently caress everything I'm gonna do whatever it takes" cowboy attitudes that are evidenced in their shenanigans.

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

Femur posted:

Why do we want so much corn? I thought corn was harsh on the soil?

Because Iowa is where presidential primaries start and it's all corn out there. The agriculture lobby, while commanding a less hefty chunk of the budget than Military Contractors, is a huge force in pushing policy.

Ron Paul Atreides fucked around with this message at 00:40 on Jul 4, 2014

Alec Bald Snatch
Sep 12, 2012

by exmarx

Femur posted:

Why do we want so much corn? I thought corn was harsh on the soil?

Because the corn lobby has money. Also something like 90% of it's used for feed or industrial products.

e: also the influence of Earl Butz when he was Ag Secretary

mastershakeman
Oct 28, 2008

by vyelkin

ToxicSlurpee posted:

Corn is currently so cheap it's literally impossible to actually make money at all from corn. The only reason corn can be grown profitably is massive government subsidies. The way it works is farmers get paid to grow poo poo loads of corn by the government. The amount of money is not based on demand for corn, the need for corn, or how much corn people it. It's literally just "we will give you $X if you grow corn on Y amount of land." This leads to gigantic amounts of overproduction so high that you can buy corn far, far below cost on the market. This is why corn is in pretty much everything right now. The food industry responded to "corn is disturbingly cheap" with "all of our food is now corn."

It isn't that corn in and of itself is unhealthy or that HFCS is a death potion it's that our food is becoming increasingly corn. The human body can't thrive on just corn and the massive intake of simple carbs is causing increased calorie consumption, increased diabetes, and increased obesity. There are nutritional problems as well, as a lack of proper nutrients can cause more overeating, as can easy availability of simple, carb-heavy foods with little nutrition beyond carbs. That and the food industry keeps trying to make foods that you can eat five bags of every day and not feed satisfied. Different story though, and totally disconnected from what the food is being made out of.

It's a complex thing. The simplest solution to it, though, is "buy things that are not junk food, do not live on corn chips and soda."

This isn't true at all. Corn's still above $4/bushel. Are you getting confused because it hit $8 a few years ago?

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene
People talk a lot of poo poo about adding non-nutritive products to our food, but since we live in an environment where excess calories are the norm, using non-caloric bulking products makes sense to me. There are other ways of solving the problem but they don't offer a competitive price advantage.

To me, it is the same thing as taxing soda. My more "rational" friends will argue that giving a government subsidy at the start and then an additional tax at the end is inefficient and doesn't make a whole hell of a lot of sense. I agree. But going after things like corn and soy is a political non-starter. So we've got to work with the system we've got until the Revolution.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006

Jarmak posted:

Yes? Non combat people get ambushed and killed all the time, sometimes they even work with combat people and get killed during fights. It was very clear what was being discussed, what I was referring to, and what I was correcting. now you're just trying to play pedantic games to try and produce a "gotcha"

So in other words, if you define a combat role in the most narrow way possible, then PMCs weren't used in combat roles. What a convincing argument you've got there.

Seriously, you've got an article in front of you where two civilian contractors were killed in action while, in the CIA's own words, "tracking terrorists" on the ground in a remote part of Afghanistan in close coordination with special operations forces. What kind of mental gymnastics does it take to convince yourself that this is not a combat role?

  • Locked thread