Beige posted:

drat, what a way to mar your looks; to cut off that beautiful hair and get a forehead tattoo.





He still found a girlfriend though so...

MOOBS! posted:

jarvis cocker posted:

good enough for a conjugal visit and too good for you

texaholic posted:

Legally speaking can you conceive children on a conjugal visit?

edit: wow just realized that was a stupid question, no way they watch to see if pulls out/wears a condom etc.... At least I hope not.

MOOBS! posted:

olylifter posted:

A woman in London, ON got 'Paul's Girl' tattooed on her leg and is trying to marry Paul Bernardo, calling him a kind, Christian man.

Some people are loving nuts.

jscolon2.0 posted:

She's p cute. No wonder her dad couldn't keep his hands off of her.

waitwhatno posted:

i have no idea who paul bertado is, but the bar for what makes a good old-testament christian is really low. he really may be one of the good ones

olylifter posted:

A woman in London, ON got 'Paul's Girl' tattooed on her leg and is trying to marry Paul Bernardo, calling him a kind, Christian man.

Some people are loving nuts.

quote:

Between May and September 1990, the police had submitted more than 130 suspects' samples for DNA testing when they received two reports that the person they were seeking was Paul Bernardo. The first, in June, had been called in by a bank employee. The second call was received from Tina Smirnis, the wife of one of the three Smirnis brothers who were among Bernardo's closest friends. Smirnis told the detectives that Bernardo "had been 'called in' on a previous rape investigation – once in December, 1987 – but he had never been interviewed."[2] He frequently talked about his sex life to Smirnis and liked analingus, rough sex and anal sex.[2]

Smirnis's phrasing was awkward and stilted and consequently left the detectives unsure of whether to take her seriously. But after cross-checking several files the detectives decided to interview Bernardo. The interview, on November 20, 1990, lasted 35 minutes and Bernardo voluntarily gave samples for forensic testing. When the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man could not be responsible for the vicious crimes; he "was far more credible than...Smirnis who, with his awkward, strange way of speaking, might just be trying to collect the reward." Bernardo was released the following day.[2]

quote:

Citing the need to protect Bernardo's right to a fair trial, a publication ban was imposed on Homolka's preliminary inquiry.[11]

The Crown had applied for the ban imposed on 5 July 1993, by Mr. Justice Francis Kovacs of the Ontario Court (General Division). Homolka, through her lawyers, supported the ban, whereas Bernardo's lawyers argued that he would be prejudiced by the ban since Homolka previously had been portrayed as his victim. Four media outlets and one author also opposed the application. Some lawyers argued that rumours could be doing more damage to the future trial process than the publication of the actual evidence.[12]

Public access to the Internet effectively nullified the court's order, however; as did proximity to the American border, since a publication ban by an Ontario Court cannot apply in New York, Michigan, or anywhere else outside of Ontario. American journalists cited the First Amendment in editorials and published details of Homolka's testimony, which were widely distributed by many "electronic ban-breakers", primarily on the alt.fan.karla-homolka[13] Usenet newsgroup.

Newspapers in Buffalo, Detroit, Washington, New York and even Britain, together with border radio and television stations, reported details gleaned from sources at Homolka's trial. The syndicated series A Current Affair aired two programs on the crimes. Canadians bootlegged copies of The Buffalo Evening News across the border, prompting orders to NRP to arrest all those with more than one copy at the border. Extra copies were confiscated. Copies of other newspapers, including The New York Times, were either turned back at the border or were not accepted by distributors in Ontario.[12] Gordon Domm, a retired police officer who defied the publication ban by distributing details from the foreign media, was charged and convicted on two counts of contempt of court.[14]

ashgromnies posted:

Isn't an "Old Testament Christian" a Jew? There's no "Christ" in the Old Testament.

waitwhatno posted:

there is a difference: jews do not go to haven, at all

i think the old testament still applies to all christians, so you're a good christian by following it. of course, you always get a pity invite to the party upstairs anyways, but don't be an rear end in a top hat and at least try to follow the rules.

psyopmonkey posted:

She looks like how I used to...

Bitch be cray.

jarvis cocker posted:

good enough for a conjugal visit and too good for you