|
Tremendous Taste posted:I'm going to break this game for your own good Put me in, I can prevent this sort of insidious play.
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2014 02:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 06:28 |
|
|
Also hi Leper! We missed you!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2014 02:34
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Sure will. What happens when I vote at the start or middle of my post? Is that not valid? These rules are confusing.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2014 21:25
|
|
|
Are we supposed to say if we want the bastard role? I want the loving bastard role.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2014 22:16
|
|
|
##confirm my PM says Fry is a badguy watch out for him
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 03:23
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:I have an irrational and intense dislike of Ricky Gervais
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 19:37
|
|
|
I want to vote someone for having poor taste, but there are just too many targets.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 19:49
|
|
|
Kumbamontu posted:I've watched everything but the finale. Some of it was pretty good but I feel like the focus on individual characters per episode instead of the normal deal didn't work out as well Yeah, having to film everyone separate really took out a lot of the great interactions that made the show great, unfortunately. I didn't think it was terrible, it just didn't feel like it was necessary since it added nothing to the original show really.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 19:57
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:season 4 is a masterpiece in storytelling, and much more than any of the other seasons benefits from a rewatch because it really is a puzzle that fits together in goofy funny ways Fine, I'll rewatch it then! If this is like the time you told Grandi to go to that restaurant though... I can just see you now, "Oh, Season 4? No I never watched that. Or any season of the show"
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 19:59
|
|
|
Idris Elba makes Prometheus worth watching
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 21:01
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:You know what movie was RAD , The Disorderlies with the fat boys Cpig knows his poo poo
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 21:16
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:Hey, I did go to that restaurant, I did not say that I knew capps. It was mediocre, but the bread was very good. I enjoy a good bread
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 21:42
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:Is it a ~~~POWER ROLE GAMBIT~~~? Ah the good old days.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2014 21:43
|
|
|
2D Dwarf Fortress forever
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 03:33
|
|
|
There has definitely been a nethack and crawl themed game that I recall. Does't mean we can't have more of them!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 04:52
|
|
|
Nah, you never played with CP, Somber
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 19:58
|
|
|
It's too early to make that kind of analysis on yuming. She's known to flake out a bit regardless of alignment, but given time it'll become apparent if she is scum or not.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 20:24
|
|
|
Mafia theory hasn't evolved, players have just gotten worse at showing up for deadlines
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 20:51
|
|
|
The Science of Suck posted:So it means nothing to you that she's demanding others post stuff while she isn't, and that twice she's talked about how much she wants to find scum instead of actually trying to find scum? Not really, it will in a day or so if she doesn't put in the effort.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2014 22:19
|
|
|
I don't understand why you condemn Cpig and then vote Fry though.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 04:26
|
|
|
Dr. Hurt posted:I am sure this mayor makes laws, but is he really making them for the good of the people? Or is this another dwarf oligarch who just spread a few shiny gems around to curry the public's favor. I for one am not going to leave that up to chance. What if he starts taxing elephants by the ear? What if he decides to open the lava gates and all my hard digging is for naught? Impeach Mayor Suck. It's the Dwarven thing to do. This sounds like you are backup Mayor or Assistant Mayor trying to grab power.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 04:28
|
|
|
Philip J. Fry posted:I didn't think much of this when it happened, and I tried to just joke about it since it was still joke phase (apparently it was awkward) but the fact that he hasn't commented about me once since then, especially given that I'm the cleary vote leader and have been for most of the day, why hasn't he said at least something about me? I've barely said anything about anyone so far, I haven't really been putting in much effort yet. That original vote was obviously a joke though and not something that really needed following up on. I just woke up so it'll be a bit but I'll start paying more attention here.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 04:34
|
|
|
The Science of Suck posted:i didn't pick fry because he's the vote leader anyway and it didn't make me lol But if Cpig is only hated for one day and Fry is the person you want dead this still makes no sense at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 04:39
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I can't decide if Fry's that dumb or if this was manufactured Man, I have a hard time believing that Fry doesn't know what BP is.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 15:45
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:already called him out as scum ha I think tearshed's definitely got a scummier tone to him than 3E. The worst thing about 3E is that he seems overly worried about nobles when there is no evidence that they are a threat (or at least a threat greater than the scum) but tearshed's posts just smack of fake reads. Although now that I think about it scum might be incentivized to get rid of nobles since they seem to be some sort of wildcard. Still, I feel better about ##vote tearshed for now.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 17:54
|
|
|
Philip J. Fry posted:Oh and who ever asked me about when I was frustrated, I think someone reposted my post when I asked someone what was up their dick. It's around that point I just don't get WHY you've been so frustrated this game. You got a few votes on you early but you are experienced enough to know that being the early vote leader doesn't actually lead to you being lynched in most cases if the momentum dies down and you were never even halfway to being lynched. You've been way more defensive this game than I recollect you ever being.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 17:56
|
|
that one and the post two before it. I'm phone posting so quoting is kind of a bitch
|
Somberbrero posted:great awesome, now do it  ##vote The Betrayer
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 22:46
|
|
toot toot all a-board the murder train
|
Somberbrero posted:What happened with that guy? He was a good poster and a beautiful soul. I guess the meds that cured his schizophrenia also made him a terrible poster with a bankrupt soul
|
|
#
¿
Jul 23, 2014 22:50
|
|
|
Twilight powers???
|
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2014 03:18
|
|
|
Now that I am all caught up, ##vote Dr. Hurt
|
|
#
¿
Jul 27, 2014 03:15
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Could you guys do your loving work out loud once in a while? I agree, I have no idea what the slip was. The Jefe case was pretty bad though, and I haven't liked how he's reacted to pretty much everything.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 27, 2014 03:19
|
|
|
Juanito posted:What do you think about Dr. Hurt though? Isn't that implied in his whole case?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 27, 2014 19:11
|
|
|
I would not lynch Somber, I like his responses.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2014 04:54
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:is this seriously all you got No, not at all! I still think Hurt is a badguy. Hence my vote on him still. I don't feel very good about Fry, a lot of his posts doesn't seem to come from a town perspective. Things like: Philip J. Fry posted:Im still most happy with lynching Big Nothing today. So much flying under the radar but still posting enough to keep himself relevant. In this post he seems to find BN to be scum for popping in to post just enough to appear active, but then tearshed is ok for popping in on occasion to comment on what's relevant (but it's usually just a quick hit and then out again). I don't see very much difference between the two of them and I don't like Fry making what feels like arbitrary declarations here. I get a weird vibe from Kumba, something I have to explore more. A little too much snark with no meat. Finally, I'm of the opinion that the nobles should be essentially treated as a distraction for the time being. I suspect they have some sort of alternate win condition that is entirely independent of any scum/town goals.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2014 06:08
|
|
|
Also it's cool chaoslord, real life is nothing to apologize for
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2014 06:09
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:This is a completely fake read. It takes all of 2 seconds to click on either poster's post history and realize there's a world of difference between the two. It's not even a straight read on BN/Tearshed but rather used as content to call someone a Fry in their reads (not in hal's words, he just says Fry is not a good feeling). Why does his BP claim have to factor into it at all? I also disagree, I don't like teardshed's content and I don't think it's much better than BN's, it's merely a bit more eloquent.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:It speaks towards motivation of his play. If his content is scummy, then you should want to go back and ask yourself why would a scum claim BP on d1 under the context of "I THOUGHT IT'D PROTECT ME FROM MY LYNCH" when he was at something like 4-5 votes. It's a question of town mentality. yeah, tearshed is way more eloquent than BN, what of it? Also I still maintain (as I did at the time) that I think it's very odd that Fry who is extremely experienced would be so confused about BP. I can't really find the town motivation behind Fry panicking and claiming at that point either, maybe we just see things differently.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2014 19:55
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:also several people have blasted BN already for not taking a stance, you can't be that out of touch with the thread This is starting to get away from the point I was trying to make in my case. It's not even about tearshed vs. BN and who's scummier, it's about how Fry's casing felt really superficial and were just surface opinions. Combine that with what I feel like was overly defensive early play and unfocused opinions that didn't seem to come from the perspective of town trying to find scum and I don't like Jake's play. The post I quoted was just a recent example and wasn't intended to be the entire crux of my point.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2014 20:29
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:The crux of your point was that BN/Tear were equal and you were reading Fry in a negative light on the fact he was reading one person differently than the other. It's a pretty generic "hypocrite" case. Because I was just quickly jotting down my thoughts before I headed to my lovely overnight shift of working (which I have just returned from and am now I am in a bad mood) so there weren't the most coherent and well-realized thoughts, just general senses of how I was feeling at the moment (as you specifically requested).
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2014 20:55
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 06:28 |
|
|
Really though every time I see your avatar it makes me smile a little so I can't really be in that bad of a mood.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2014 20:56
|
|