|
Oh hell yes.
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2014 16:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 11:13 |
|
|
Rarity posted:90s Joe Kelly Deadpool is the best Deadpool Howard the Duck!
|
|
#
¿
Aug 1, 2014 05:41
|
|
IMPORTANT QUESTION
|
Confirming that the X-men are pretty rad!
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2014 00:36
|
|
|
Are you hairy blue beast, pink skin beast, or pink skin beast that hulks out to blue?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2014 03:08
|
|
|
I've always been vanilla town, so no scum tell yet.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2014 05:24
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I like Byers case a lot. It makes sense, uses past information, and fits in well with how Meinberg would act as scum. (I assume, I don't think I've ever played with Meinberg but I drink a lot so who knows.) I really like it too. It is the only thing on the table I can find myself voting for at the moment. I have no qualms about doing so. ##vote Meinberg Tremendous Taste posted:That was some really nice digging but I don't think it really makes a worthy case tbh I may be easily impressed, but for day 1 I'm super stoked to see that kind of effort. It certainly is the best case on the table currently, 1 out of 1. 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2014 06:22
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Um there is also my "TT I have a vendetta against you" case. But you told us you were settling that one yourself by shooting him, no?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2014 06:25
|
|
|
merk posted:welp, I read my role PM. Are you sad now?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2014 21:40
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:I'm genuinely concerned I might come back as Dark Phoenix if I'm killed. I thought this was funny, not sure why everyone is jumping on you for it. You've claimed Jean Grey, it would be hilarious if Rarity actually put something like that into the game. Poison Mushroom posted:Confirming that I have the dumbest hero name ever This I disagree with however.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2014 16:53
|
|
|
Dr. Hurt posted:Her content. I feel like the "dark Phoenix" quote wasn't really a scummy thing, more of a joke and another way to reveal her role. I think people already got it in their mind that she was a bad guy, and used that post immediately to confirm their suspicions for them. The way both you and Pinterest responded was so hyperbolically over-the-top I feel like her post seems normal in comparison. This is where I'm still at with this. I just don't get it. The mushroom doesn't seem scummy to me at all. The Science of Suck posted:Is anyone besides me interested in lynching keane or pinterest? I'm not seeing Keane. I'd consider swapping to PinMom, I agree with your read so far. I'm also still happy with the Byers case on Meinberg.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2014 19:34
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:if you want later on I can map out the game theory behind it Please do this.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2014 20:35
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:Okay, Science of Suck looks pretty bad. Also, he's a pretty big jerk. I don't think this vote counted. So technically it might have already happened.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2014 22:03
|
|
|
merk posted:Dude looked 100% lock for scum in a meltdown and didn't even claim at -2. I thought it was a winner. I wasn't interested in him as scum, but I'll admit by the time of the flip I was convinced since he didn't fight very hard or claim.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 5, 2014 23:51
|
|
|
I'm still super happy with Byers effort case from yesterday, so I'm totally down with Meinberg. But I'm going to wait till he at least has a moment to talk to us before I join since he is at -2.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 6, 2014 04:12
|
|
|
bowmore posted:What's the fun in that? SK's don't have team mates they can dob in by accident I just always prefer more info to less. And there is always the chance he'll be able to prove he isn't what you say he is. I don't think that is likely. He was already at the top of my list, but it isn't like it hurts anything. We've still got more than 2 days and I like to actually have posts in the thread to research when I am hunting for scum.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 6, 2014 04:35
|
|
|
rofl. ##vote meinberg -1
|
|
#
¿
Aug 6, 2014 05:39
|
|
|
Man, so many dead. We need to turn this ship around. Bowmore, you are bumming me out a little man. I can't deny that I agreed with you, but you made it seem so certain. Byers2142 posted:##vote merk Yeah, after spending the whole start of the game pretending he was beast to generate content while he supposedly did not read his role PM. (This part may be true, he felt town to me before he announced he read his role PM, he's felt scum to me since) He hounded the heck out of Poison Mushroom for what never seemed to me to be scummy behavior, pretended not to get her dark phoenix post, etc. Tries to school Taste on the proper way to play Mafia when he defends Mushroom's posting. Jumped on Science of Suck for asking someone a leading question that actually made sense. The only point I'll give him since he announced he read his role PM is that suck did indeed look scummy once he got to -1 and didn't claim/put up a fight. I can quote all the posts involved if someone needs me to, but trying to keep this succinct. I'm totally on this one. Merk is scum. ##vote merk
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 16:30
|
|
|
merk posted:I got the Dark Phoenix post. Where did you read confusion in what I was posting on that? This was your response to the Dark Phoenix post: merk posted:what This is you schooling taste, both of these are responses to his posts: merk posted:Role claims on day 1 very rarely move me: 1) Scum Doctor is a thing; 2) if it's a fakeclaim, I hope a Town Doctor doesn't/wouldn't claim anyway; 3) Scum were probably provided with fakeclaims so the lack of a Jean Grey counterclaim is not worth mentioning. merk posted:As a general mafia matter, never counterclaim on day 1. That's the whole point of scum fakeclaiming, to get information out of the town before they go down. Stopping here for a moment since you are still posting when I'm trying to research.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 16:38
|
|
|
merk posted:I looked back. My 'what' post was in reaction to the softclaim, not any confusion over X-Men. I knew exactly what he was doing (softclaiming) and was reacting to it being scummy. Really? It seems odd for you to post "what" to that post in light of the other posts Mushroom made way before that: Poison Mushroom posted:I'm Jean Grey. Poison Mushroom posted:I'm both. The PM says I'm "Jean Grey, MARVEL GIRL". If you're so town, what's the town alignment called? Your reaction looks manufactured to me. You were trying to get the Mushroom vote based on nothing worthwhile. And then you double down on it hard: merk posted:Yeah, I'm going to be voting Mushroom today. That latest post is the 'can't go back' point for me. Let's make this lynch happen. That looks awful to me no matter how many times I reread that sequence of events. And now, you are trying to trump up charges on Dr. Hurt based in part on him calling you out on this same sequence started by the "joke" post/soft claim. This to me makes you look even more scummy given how much I agreed with Hurt's post.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 16:47
|
|
|
Also, check out this flailing...merk posted:I think bowmore needs to full claim after whatever happened yesterday. This comes early today, immediately after Byers makes a case and vote on him. Then, in response to PM's question about insta-lynching Bowmore, only 11 minutes later, but after he decided to make a real case on Hurt: merk posted:The only way I think he's scum is if he's legitimately a Scum Tracker who followed Meinberg to Opopanax on n1, but it looks like Meinberg didn't have a targeting role. Any gambit involving faking a night action result as Scum doesn't make any sense this early in the game to me. So, you want bowmore to full claim even though you don't think it is likely he is scum. Yup. Look over there! Oh poo poo, look over there! Now here!
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 16:55
|
|
|
merk posted:Yes, I want bowmore to full claim but feel like it is unlikely he is scum except in one instance. I'm not calling bowmore scum by asking him to full claim - I'm asking for information because apparently whatever he used yesterday to tell us Meinberg was the SK was incorrect. I've analyzed everything. Nice try deflecting my research? Unless something new comes up to look at, my work here is done. merk posted:Hi guys Good Morning, Merk!
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 17:03
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Yes let's turbo merk it worked so well when we went and turboed Meinberg. Take your time, this isn't a turbo. You either think Byers and I are right, or you don't. Let's let this one go until the end so we can have lot's of discussion.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 17:44
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Man you're totally scum aren't you? Nope. You think I'm scum for wanting us to really hash this out this time rather than making the same mistake we did last time? I also noticed you called what was happening a Turbo, even though it is nothing like a turbo at all. Honestly, your behavior is reading scummy to me for the first time this game, but I was holding off mentioning it since we already have so much on the table to talk about(Bowmore, Merk, Hurt). Care to explain yourself?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 18:18
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:KB, why are you so verbose suddenly? You haven't really been involved in the game up until now, and you're jumping on my merk case and riding it, hard. I'm always verbose. If I wasn't towards the beginning of a game it might have been for meta reasons(I honestly thought I was active, but looking back I can see what you are saying, I was posting but I wasn't saying a lot). I had a couple of explosions in two other Mafia games I was in, so I was a bit divided. Both things have passed and I'm back down to two games now.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 19:01
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:and you're jumping on my merk case and riding it, hard. Also, unlike how much I liked your meinberg case and rode THAT, this one I had already decided on my own, you just beat me to posting. And I personally like my own version of the case just fine and I feel like I added a ton to the conversation.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 19:05
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:What do you think about Met? I think he's insane? I guess? Seems super scummy. Is there some kind of scum role that let's him somehow suicide bomb us if we lynch him? Because he seems to be trying really hard to make that happen. At the moment I would also be totally fine voting him at the end of the day.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 19:06
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Yeah, it's called a bomb. He'd kill the last person voting him. So if he had this bomb role, wouldn't it make more sense for him to wait till later in the game and catch us when we are down more town? Like, I don't get why he'd be doing it now, but that would certainly explain what he's been up to with the self vote, sk claim, etc.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:So if he had this bomb role, wouldn't it make more sense for him to wait till later in the game and catch us when we are down more town? Ok, actually, I have a thought. Like, this still wouldn't exactly explain why he was trying earlier, but it would explain the drive by vote and "come at me bro" style poo poo he did just now. Maybe he is scum buddies with Merk and is trying to draw attention away from him using his already established craziness and potential scum cred? Like busses Merk, we vote him and blow up, and it distances him from Merk and Merk from him? I'll admit, this may be a stretch.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 19:21
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:But we'd have to kill him at some point anyway, unless we trust the SK to do it for us? I appreciate this PM, I'd like to take you up on it if we go that way. Right now I'm fine with lynching Merk or Met at day's end.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 19:24
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Hngggggg If he turns out to be town after we lynch him, he will have been the worst town I ever worked with. And in my 2 completed games so far, I've already worked with some really lovely town.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 19:37
|
|
|
merk posted:I'm not going to be around very much over the next few days. I'm leaving on a work trip tonight and will have only phone-based play tomorrow at best. Since I seem to be getting some heat (and would like people to consider my Hurt case), I'm going to claim: I killed Opopanax. Hrmmmmph. What do people with more experience than me think of this? Could this be a fake claim? It seems really impressive, if so. Like I like how he tied it to truthful meta at the end there. So good work if fake.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 22:09
|
|
|
bowmore posted:If you only had the one kill why wasn't there 3 kills night 1? It's been a consistent 2 every night even though you said you didn't kill last night This is a fantastic point, thank you Bowmore. Merk had me doubting myself for a moment there and almost had me thinking I was somehow wrong about him, I'm really gullible when it comes to claims. I'm standing by my read/case. Merk is scum. His cases have been poo poo. Merk is a really good player. I'm normally really on board when I read his posts and he is trying. That isn't the case here.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 22:22
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:okay can we lynch bowmore now ##vote bowmore I don't think he is an imminent threat to town now that we know not to listen to his voting choices. I'm not saying voting him is bad, who knows, maybe it was a super brazen scum play. But if he is scum, he'd know it would come back on him when meinberg flipped town and his excuse didn't seem to even have much thought behind it. I'd think he would have prepared. I'm leaning dumb town. I think the other two are much better targets.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 22:36
|
|
|
I slept on it and I'm still feeling most confident about my read/case on Merk, so that is where I'll sit till nearer the end of the day. I'm also feeling pretty good about Byers as town given his independently coming to the same decision and I agree with most of his calls so far. Less sure about the others. Given Merk is one of the champions on it, I'm a little worried about the Pinterest Mom case, but I suppose it could be bussing. I do think Pin has acted scummy. Met is a crazy person and probably scum or SK or something, so I'm still down for that near the end of the day. Bowmore still seems like dumb town, unless I get crazy wifomy, I can't see a scum reason for him to act like that.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2014 20:51
|
|
|
merk posted:Your entire read of the game is based on me being Scum, which is wrong. You must treat every case you make independent of flips you do not know. Thanks, Scum Daddy? I mean, Mafia Daddy? In all seriousness, your point is a fair one. Farbror posted:I'm getting serious tunnel vision on merk and Byers and it's messing up my read through. I can't stop thinking at least one is scum. But it could be that they're just active players and I've noticed them more. Of course, because one IS scum. Merk. Pinterest Mom posted:What do you think of TT? He's acting super ditzy and it seems to me he's better than that I don't know how he plays normally, but in the last game I was in with TT he thunderdomed a town and then did nothing for the rest of the game out of guilt. He was town. In terms of this game, he is doing a bit more, so yay? But he is also playing a game of Awful Survivor right now, and it's been pretty drama filled. I just did a reread on TT and he seems town. One thing I'd like to see though: Tremendous Taste posted:I might even make a case Also, while going back through his posts I saw this: Tremendous Taste posted:Er, you doubling down on PM, the claimed doc TT was asking Merk to explain himself on the mushroom thing. Merk didn't understand the question, so Taste clarified with the above. Merk still hasn't answered him.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2014 03:00
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Is Met a jester. Has nobody suggested that yet. I just looked it up. That sounds like a horrible role. Like, even with some of the modifiers, that is one of the easiest win conditions ever.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
Deadline in about 9 hours. Would be nice if those without a real opinion would come back and weigh in. Would especially be nice if the following actually committed to something: Not Voting (3): CCKeane, CommaToes, Dr. Hurt Also, not just voting, but I started to make a call out list of people who haven't posted in real life days, but the list was really long so I stopped. 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2014 17:18
|
|
|
I'm willing to hop on Met if we don't have end up with the numbers for Merk. I'll be around until deadline, so I can swap any time.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
Based on just today's posts, we currently have 6 votes available for both Merk and Met. So we can be at -1 on either relatively quickly.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2014 18:22
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 11:13 |
|
|
CCKeane posted:Okay, gently caress it, full claim time from me: Well, this is getting exciting. For what it's worth, if you feel that way about Merk, even without shooting, we are at 7 votes for him, he can be lynched. If you ALSO feel that way about Met, and if we were honestly worried he was lynch proof or a jester or something, you could shoot him. I am not advocating for what course to take here, I just wanted to make sure I put all of my thoughts out there. Merk is still my number one target.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2014 18:34
|
|