|
People are so lazy now they don't even play video games, they just watch other people do it.
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 15:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 06:40 |
|
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:i've sometimes enjoyed watching someone who isn't a complete idiot play a game i know i'd be terrible at/not enjoy playing The whole "watching videos of games" just rubs me the wrong way for some reason, back when I cared about LPs I wouldn't bother with the video ones. Screenshots only.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 15:21
|
|
|
Miley Virus posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq6pGJbd6Iw I have no idea what is happening here.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 15:55
|
|
|
I'm the visible kidney or liver damage from drug abuse
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 20:14
|
|
|
pram posted:bioshock and halo are both art Custer's Revenge is art.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 20:45
|
|
|
stoutfish posted:you pay a lady for her to go on an internet date with you, yes haha, is this what passes as a strip club for milenials?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2014 21:15
|
|
|
I don't understand any of this stuff.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2014 01:05
|
|
|
Breakfast All Day posted:the funny thing is you're the person who doesn't. every time this comes up anywhere on the forums you have a red siren that goes off and quote the wikipedia article you read and incessantly chant "THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS CONTRACTS CONTRACTS CONTRACTS" because you're an autistic moron that can't looking past definition a part iii and completely miss the debate grown ups are having about the actual social context, the actual outcomes of equivocation of personhood, and why that operant definition may or may not be socially desirable in general. we know what it loving is, we're arguing about whether it should be that because of things that are actually happening in the world, because we as a society have agency to reformulate our understanding of legal personhood. because we loving made it that. haha, you are literally a moron and your posts are all bad and embarassing.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2014 01:20
|
|
|
Breakfast All Day posted:the funny thing is you're the person who doesn't. every time this comes up anywhere on the forums you have a red siren that goes off and quote the wikipedia article you read and incessantly chant "THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS CONTRACTS CONTRACTS CONTRACTS" because you're an autistic moron that can't looking past definition a part iii and completely miss the debate grown ups are having about the actual social context, the actual outcomes of equivocation of personhood, and why that operant definition may or may not be socially desirable in general. we know what it loving is, we're arguing about whether it should be that because of things that are actually happening in the world, because we as a society have agency to reformulate our understanding of legal personhood. because we loving made it that. Thank you for the insightful essay on the legal system, fat computer man who posts about Star Wars and video games.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 8, 2014 01:30
|
|
|
He looks like he knows about computers.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2014 04:22
|
|
|
someone add jowls
|
|
#
¿
Aug 25, 2014 21:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 06:40 |
|
|
rotor posted:you've already added enough just by posting you're old enough to be my dad.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 25, 2014 23:47
|
|