|
In retrospect, the Bears in reverse eliminator was idiotic.
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 04:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 05:48 |
|
|
Damnable Harbaugh.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 04:46
|
|
|
Eliminator Week 1: Bears over Bills.  Eliminator Week 2: Saints over Rams. gently caress it, new plan: 0-17 in Eliminator, 17-0 in Reverse Eliminator.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 05:24
|
|
|
Welp,
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 05:36
|
|
|
Current pickem record: 17-14. I am about as good as a coin flip.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 06:28
|
|
|
Kwik posted:Eliminator Week 1: Bears over Bills. I believe the double reverse may be a genuinely new gambit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 06:29
|
|
|
I've managed to go 0-2 in reverse eliminator (largely because I forgot about it until Monday last week), so I might as well attempt 0-17.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 06:47
|
|
|
I picked the bears in pickem reverse pickem and spread pickem. Got 2 out of 3.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 07:27
|
|
|
gently caress you Kaepernick
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 13:38
|
|
|
axeil posted:In retrospect, the Bears in reverse eliminator was idiotic. I dunno, the Bears are pretty bad...but bad teams win more than good?? Makes you think. I'm sitting at 15-16 in picks and I'm out of reverse eliminator. Thank goodness for regular and kicker eliminator because I obviously have no idea what any teams are going to do this season.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 16:36
|
|
|
ROSS MY SALAD posted:If ya'll don't go with Denver you're playing with fire So glad I did this too. How many people did we lost to the Saints, Hawks, and Niners upsets?
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 16:54
|
|
|
This is spectacular, 0-2 in Eliminator, Reverse Eliminator, and Spread Eliminator, 2-0 in Reverse Spread Eliminator. Good to know my policy of taking all sure bets early to avoid a week 1 or 2 loss is paying off this year.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 16:55
|
|
|
I'm eliminated from everything but spread already. I'm 0-2 in most everything else. What percent of players are already eliminated after week 2?
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 17:02
|
|
|
Spintzel posted:I'm eliminated from everything but spread already. I'm 0-2 in most everything else. Let's see: 243 are 2-0 60 are 1-0, presuming most of those just forgot to pick. and ~300ish are 1-1, 0-1 or 0-2. For reverse: 139 are 2-0 28 are 1-0 ~180 ish are out. For spread: 32 are 2-0 9 are 1-0 ~110 are out. So yeah, at least 50% out in everything after two weeks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 17:49
|
|
|
I just don't have a handle on anything at all this year! 
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 17:50
|
|
|
New England at home against Oakland has to be the Stone Cold Lock of the Century of the Week™, right?
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 17:59
|
|
|
Mind_Taker posted:New England at home against Oakland has to be the Stone Cold Lock of the Century of the Week™, right? I miss the old website picks on the side feature.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 18:14
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:So glad I did this too. How many people did we lost to the Saints, Hawks, and Niners upsets?  Pour a 40 out for your fallen bros Chich
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 18:17
|
|
|
Mind_Taker posted:New England at home against Oakland has to be the Stone Cold Lock of the Century of the Week™, right? Yeah, Oakland playing New England on the east coast? Oakland doesn't win this game 100/100 times
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 18:23
|
|
|
axeil posted:I miss the old website picks on the side feature. Haha, the lock of the week was always my pick, shoe-in of the week was japtor's, and the gambletron was a ridiculous algorithm I made up. I actually have disabled code in current eliminator that would hypothetically allow users to build their own gambletron, but it's a performance nightmare so I doubt it'll ever see the light of day.
|
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2014 20:28
|
|
|
evenworse username posted:I just don't have a handle on anything at all this year! Weeks 1 (and basically up to 4) are madness. If I were a betting man, I'd just avoid betting the first few weeks of the NFL until some clear trends start to emerge. That being said, I am eliminated from eliminator, reverse elim, spread and reverse spread eliminator. And now to dig myself out of the funbucks hole.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 18:08
|
|
|
Madcosby posted:Weeks 1 (and basically up to 4) are madness. If I were a betting man, I'd just avoid betting the first few weeks of the NFL until some clear trends start to emerge. That being said, I am eliminated from eliminator, reverse elim, spread and reverse spread eliminator. I'm starting with a money line bet on Atlanta. At least we'll have ~$700 to blow on a Sunday parlay instead of ~$500  I'm taking the Patriots this week in Eliminator because there's no point saving them for a later point in the season at which I'll likely already be eliminated anyway. I'll save the Raiders for a later week in Reverse though lol, thinking I'll take either Vikings or Buccaneers there. In hindsight this might have been the best opportunity to use Atlanta in Eliminator.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 18:18
|
|
|
Randandal posted:I'm starting with a money line bet on Atlanta. At least we'll have ~$700 to blow on a Sunday parlay instead of ~$500 I did the same thing. Gotta get start that bank roll so I can bet like a saudi prince come sunday
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 19:07
|
|
|
Set myself up a 3,4,and 5 way Parlay bet for this week. One of them has to pay out right?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 19:42
|
|
|
Marshmallow Blue posted:Set myself up a 3,4,and 5 way Parlay bet for this week. One of them has to pay out right? Only if you used same 3 bets in the others and the 4 in the 5 way.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
Dunno if it will fix itself or not but I've somehow picked the Falcons twice in pickem
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 19:26
|
|
|
Bet the loving house on the Patriots this week
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 03:04
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:Bet the loving house on the Patriots this week Trap game
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 04:26
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:Bet the loving house on the Patriots this week I remember another time the pats were favored by two touchdowns.... https://saseliminator.com/bet/view/eliminator/2012/team-graph/REG/2/public/h/reg https://saseliminator.com/game/info/2012091602
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 04:30
|
|
|
The 2014 Oakland Raiders are not going into New England for their early game Home Opener and winning I will cut my hair in the style of Mark Davis if the Raiders win which they won't
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 05:09
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:The 2014 Oakland Raiders are not going into New England for their early game Home Opener and winning Quoting this just in case.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 05:12
|
|
|
Blitz7x posted:The 2014 Oakland Raiders are not going into New England for their early game Home Opener and winning Look, the Raiders probably won't win, but I'm still taking the Bengals in eliminator and the Steelers in reverse. Raiders and Browns can upset the Pats and Saints respectively, but the loving Titans sure as poo poo can't beat the Bengals. Sankey for 150 yards and 3 TDs
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 05:19
|
|
|
Things must be screwed up this year if I'm first in Spread Pick'em after two weeks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 18, 2014 16:51
|
|
|
Lazerbeam posted:Dunno if it will fix itself or not but I've somehow picked the Falcons twice in pickem Sweet I got double points for the win
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2014 17:56
|
|
|
Lazerbeam posted:Sweet I got double points for the win Fixed. drat race condition I'm too lazy to fix...
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2014 18:48
|
|
|
As a Seahawks fan I know you don't want to gently caress around with the Cardinals in Arizona. So I went with '9ers as reverse eliminator and got that to pay off. True story.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2014 01:46
|
|
|
Shouldn't the standings be sorted by win pct? Obviously you should be required to have picked a minimum number of games, but I have a 29-15 record but I'm behind someone who is 30-17
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2014 03:40
|
|
|
Things people in the world apparently actually care about: Their standings in week 3 of SAS pick ems
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2014 05:22
|
|
|
actionjackson posted:Shouldn't the standings be sorted by win pct? Obviously you should be required to have picked a minimum number of games, but I have a 29-15 record but I'm behind someone who is 30-17 Yeah but 30 > 29
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2014 16:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 05:48 |
|
|
Betting 717 on Da Beeeerrs tonight. Since I suck, everyone should put all their fun-bucks on the jets for easy $.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2014 16:36
|
|