Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Red Pyramid
Apr 29, 2008

A Buttery Pastry posted:

Russians might have been, but Russia itself? Maybe I'm wrong, but it never seemed like Russia tried to portray the USSR as a bad thing which they too were victims off, which kinda seems like a prerequisite for co-victim status. Why should it anyway, given the heavily pro-Russian character of the state?

What "Russia" would have spoken out against the USSR? The Politburo? Dissenting Russians had no voice, that's the thing about an authoritarian state with no free press. I can guarantee you the million+ Russians murdered in Stalin's purges and the Gulags would've had some critiques of the USSR. Regardless, asking an entire people to account for the actions of a regime that came into power in 1917, underwent dramatic changes and reforms in the ensuing decades, and collapsed twenty years ago is nonsensical.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread