|
Greed is eternal posted:Now how do I extend the zeta function to s<0? \zeta(s) = 2^s \pi^{s-1} \sin \left(\dfrac{\pi s}2\right) \Gamma(1-s) \zeta(1-s)
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 21:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 04:41 |
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:\zeta(s) = 2^s \pi^{s-1} \sin \left(\dfrac{\pi s}2\right) \Gamma(1-s) \zeta(1-s) thanks dude!!11
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 22:05
|
|
|
that seems a bit over the top doesn't it? like when you're doing maths to that level, its a bit like, poo poo, what am i doing with my life?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 22:07
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:that seems a bit over the top doesn't it? like when you're doing maths to that level, its a bit like, poo poo, what am i doing with my life? math, would be the answer to that question, i would think
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 22:12
|
|
|
um looks like there is moer than one math ni that equation buddy
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 22:15
|
|
|
hmm, like "math" but plural, eh?
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 22:57
|
|
|
favorite function: y=sin(x^-1) graph that poo poo and have your mind blown
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 23:40
|
|
|
i'm posting on a treadmill and hoping you take off eh
|
|
#
?
Nov 1, 2014 23:42
|
|
|
Bloody posted:i think u mean phoenix
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
sarehu posted:x^0 is always 1 when the 0 is in N, but not when the 0 is in R. what are N and R i have only heard of x!!! what is this bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 00:41
|
|
|
Tin Gang posted:favorite function: y=sin(x^-1) I`m looking at this HOT non analytic function in her bra and panties and I`m hard as heck! But is this a sin?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 00:48
|
|
|
Broken Machine posted:I don't believe that counting is really that critical to problem solving. You have to know how to phrase a problem, and how to solve for a value manually, but developing a numeric solution is something that computers are much better at than humans. If you actually end up needing to add complex fractions by hand on a regular basis, you'll learn. I don't know how much value there is in teaching kids their times tables by rote these days. Learning algebra - how to manipulate variables - has value but even then it's just the language you use to describe things that are actually interesting. i like dis essay its good
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 00:57
|
|
|
check out dis relation: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=cos%28x%21%2B1%29%3Da%5E2 wonder what sort of shenanigans are going on to make a graph that looks like this
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 03:15
|
|
|
ol qwerty bastard posted:check out dis relation: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=cos%28x%21%2B1%29%3Da%5E2 our alien masters left us a message  and it looks like ... some kind of schematics?
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 03:30
|
|
|
what blows my mind about math is that n!!!=(n!)!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 11:32
|
|
|
sarehu posted:what blows my mind about math is that n!!!=(n!)! for a moment I thought you were talking about multifactorials (which are bullshit btw)
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 12:06
|
|
|
Symbolic Butt posted:for a moment I thought you were talking about multifactorials (which are bullshit btw) i was, n!! != (n!)!
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 12:22
|
|
|
BONGHITZ posted:i like dis essay its good word
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 14:37
|
|
|
sarehu posted:i was, n!! != (n!)! goddamn I was so close
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 15:26
|
|
|
Symbolic Butt posted:for a moment I thought you were talking about multifactorials (which are bullshit btw) I just looked at the wiki article, I think I'm the pickover superfactorial
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 16:12
|
|
|
what's up Math thread i got my numerics code to work so I gues im not a complete piece of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 04:53
|
|
|
bump_fn posted:what's up Math thread i got my numerics code to work so I gues im not a complete piece of poo poo guess again!!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 04:54
|
|
|
Captain Foo posted:guess again!!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 04:57
|
|
|
ol qwerty bastard posted:check out dis relation: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=cos%28x%21%2B1%29%3Da%5E2 thats not a great plot imo
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 13:02
|
|
|
Wow skolem's paradox is some weird poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 17:05
|
|
|
this is a good article if you like the simpsons http://boingboing.net/2014/10/17/homers-last-theorem.html
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 20:05
|
|
|
Tin Gang posted:get an fx-115 dummy I did and it owns I'm using it right now at my job
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 23:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 04:41 |
|
|
You know, they say all men are created equal, but you look at me and you look at Samoa Joe, and you can see that statement is not true! See, normally if you go one-on-one with another wrestler, you got a 50-50 chance of winnin'. But I'm a genetic freak, and I'm not normal, so you got a 25% at best at beatin' me! And then you add Kurt Angle to the mix? Your chances of winnin' drasticy go down. See the three-way, at Sacrifice, you got a 33 1/3 chance of winnin'. But I, I got a 66 2/3 chance of winning, cause Kurt Angle KNOWS he can't beat me, and he's not even gonna try! So, Samoa Joe, you take your 33 1/3 chance, minus my 25 percent chance, and you got an 8 1/3 chance of winnin' at Sacrifice! But then you take my 75 perchance chance at winnin', if we was to go one-on-one, and to add 66 2/3 ch... percents, I got a 141 2/3 chance of winnin' at Sacrifice! See, McJoe; the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at Sacrifice!
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 23:54
|
|
