|
I saw they recently repressed all of The Beatles' albums in mono for some reason and they're horrendously expensive, is there some appeal to mono that I don't get aside from the nostalgia value?
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:08 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 06:00 |
|
because they were originally recorded in mono and thats how they were meant to be heard /thread
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:10 |
|
poopzilla posted:because they were originally recorded in mono and thats how they were meant to be heard
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:10 |
lol if its not quadrophonic
|
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:14 |
|
They were recorded on 4 track but originally released in mono.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:15 |
|
poopzilla posted:because they were originally recorded in mono and thats how they were meant to be heard that's retarded
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:15 |
|
Heath posted:that's retarded beatles stereo mixes loving suck except for abbey road which was actually recorded in stereo. the beatle didn't givea poo poo about their stereo mixes and all the instrumentals and vocals are hard panned to one channel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtVF4zl_N0U
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:16 |
|
Heath posted:that's retarded It's totally retarded to enjoy things in the format which they were made. I bet OP watches Lawrence of Arabia in pan and scan.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:17 |
|
op buys full screen dvds
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:18 |
|
white ppl talking about music itt
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:18 |
|
Medium Cool posted:beatles stereo mixes loving suck except for abbey road which was actually recorded in stereo. the beatle didn't givea poo poo about their stereo mixes and all the instrumentals and vocals are hard panned to one channel. i have a stereo copy of revolver that sounds totally fine to me
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:19 |
|
Heath posted:i have a stereo copy of revolver that sounds totally fine to me that's cool but the mono version is better https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dchCB-2TPY&t=138s
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:21 |
Yeah, with old music unless it's a special new remix version (which does exist for some of the Beatles stuff, mainly the Yellow Submarine Songbook) mono is usually the way to go, as stereo was more of a novelty and not the standard for the first several years of it's existence. They were throw away extra versions, while the mono was the real mix.
|
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:26 |
|
Heath posted:I saw they recently repressed all of The Beatles' albums in mono for some reason and they're horrendously expensive, you buy music
|
# ? Sep 16, 2014 23:54 |
|
I tried to catch mono in high school, but failed.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:00 |
|
I read somewhere that the Squirrel Nut Zippers record their studio albums with a single mic that is above and front center of the band. (Because that's how the music they play was originally recorded back in the 30's.)
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:04 |
|
Monobrow culture.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:11 |
|
lol if you listen to stereo
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:23 |
|
why would you buy an album? it just encourages lazy people to not find tax-paying jobs
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:52 |
|
lol if you buy media not in software form
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:54 |
|
deaf in one ear not really but it's a reason Medium Cool posted:beatles stereo mixes loving suck except for abbey road which was actually recorded in stereo. the beatle didn't givea poo poo about their stereo mixes and all the instrumentals and vocals are hard panned to one channel.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:55 |
|
Dr. Furious posted:deaf in one ear Me too! My life is mono.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:56 |
|
i heard that brian wilson refused to mix in stereo because he was almost totally deaf in one ear
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:56 |
|
what the gently caress is an album?
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:57 |
|
I still buy CD's AMA.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:58 |
redshirt posted:I still buy CD's AMA. Where do you find room to keep all that poo poo?
|
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 00:58 |
|
Medium Cool posted:beatles stereo mixes loving suck except for abbey road which was actually recorded in stereo. 100% agreed. The new stereo remasters of the mono albums that came out a couple years ago suck, and you can tell they tried too hard separating the channels, I guess so you felt like you got your money's worth for both ears, durr, it's poo poo.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 01:01 |
|
If you're a person who only keeps one earbud in at a time mono music is so much loving better.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 01:02 |
|
TheJoker138 posted:Where do you find room to keep all that poo poo? I have a large house with ample storage space.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 01:02 |
|
i listen to all my phil spector tracks in stereo because once you're convicted of murder all claims to artistic integrity are nullified https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6rdCPJD1Gs
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 01:50 |
|
Mermaid Autopsy posted:i listen to all my phil spector tracks in stereo because once you're convicted of murder all claims to artistic integrity are nullified that is a great pop song. if you listen to it in mono hehhh
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 01:52 |
|
Manifest posted:I bet OP watches Lawrence of Arabia in pan and scan. of course, why would you want those black bars hiding half the screen
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 02:12 |
|
the correct way to consume music is
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 02:14 |
|
you irl posted:the correct way to consume music is through your ear holes
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 02:16 |
|
mono means one and rail means rail
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 02:32 |
|
Buddha. posted:through your ear holes actually this is a common misconception, the correct way to consume music is with one of those toothbrushes that vibrates music through your jawbone
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 02:40 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcZ0IbyIT-M
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 03:13 |
|
life's the same i'm moving in mono life's the same including my shoes
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 03:16 |
|
If you're deaf in one ear, stereo music would still be better than mono.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 03:44 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 06:00 |
|
Are the beatles good? I never really gave them a shot.
|
# ? Sep 17, 2014 04:04 |