|
I love experimenting 
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2014 00:19
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 00:14 |
|
|
Confirmed. Am I reading the rules wrong or it going to be super easy to confirm everyone based on the shop?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 01:16
|
|
|
Right, but if I vig someone (which is the cheapest one, for some reason), I am 100% mod confirmed town at that point
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 01:29
|
|
|
Oh, scum can buy town items. That makes more sense
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 01:39
|
|
|
Do the challenge now, while I'm here. Do itttt
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 01:47
|
|
|
Rarity posted:Confirmed. quit, that'll show him
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 04:33
|
|
|
I'm kind of middle of the road on tech so I can take this or leave it
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 17:11
|
|
|
If ras were scum he'd lie, I think you're all barking up the wrong tree
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 21:02
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Literally made three posts. You should post more
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 01:37
|
|
|
Merk, give me a believable reason why ras didn't just go "I put in 7". Why give a low number and draw attention?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 15:33
|
|
|
That seems like a stupid plan
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 15:35
|
|
|
But he could just say "I did 8" and take the heat off, I can't see the advantage in putting in a low number like that. Bear in mind too that scum are supposed to put in wrong points or none at all, and if he'd done that you never would have been able to complete the challenge amongst the three of you. Just putting in a low number and hoping it fails is pointless, and the fact that it passed proves ras put in at least something.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 15:44
|
|
|
I don't really see anything wrong with that post. At least he's doing something
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 20:10
|
|
|
Rarity posted:He's being a dick. Hi Rarity, welcome to Mafia on the somethingawful.com forums, I hope you have fun here
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 20:27
|
|
|
What game am I in? Where am I? What is this place where being rude and mean automatically means you're scum
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 23:26
|
|
|
Why are we voting him for saying nothing vs all the other people saying nothing?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 23:49
|
|
|
I'm out, not diplomatic at all
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 01:18
|
|
|
The votes on krell are absolute poo poo, as are the votes on ras. Also, someone changed Krell to me, which is odd. If you want to put your lovely on votes on him you'll have to do it again
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 02:58
|
|
|
merk posted:My vote on Ras is a good, content-driving vote. I forgot add "But at least the ones on ras have reasoning behind them"
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 03:06
|
|
|
merk posted:I remember how to break this game now. We need to win this challenge so I can confirm myself as Town. Scum can buy town items, I already thought of that
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 03:07
|
|
|
Kerro posted:##volunteer Why would you volunteer if you don't feel you can contribute enough?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 03:30
|
|
|
I want to see immediate numbers from the volunteers
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 03:32
|
|
|
Actually going forward I like claiming in the volunteer post like AC did, I think that's smart as it will dissuade people who can't contribute enough, and someone with a high number could perhaps save some for later
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 03:33
|
|
|
Kerro posted:Why would you only contribute 5 points for something that needed 27 between four people, especially with no prior communication in thread? I'm pretty sure it's Kerro. Pulls the same maneuver here that he chastised ras for, possibly hoping to slip under the wire with it. Then comes out swinging with a (possibly prepared) case. I don't like any of it
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 03:45
|
|
|
You handicapped the town. You forced people to pour in points knowing full well we might not make it. And as an added bonus any high point diplomats you pulled in now lost a bunch for nothing. Now this I see the scum reasoning for ##vote kerro
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 03:51
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:would lynch: Thanks for the update
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 04:02
|
|
|
merk posted:Yeah, that's a good case on Kerro reading it again and looking at the context. I may vote with it. Yeah I guess it pays to look at what people have written instead of just firing off a snap vote huh
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 04:41
|
|
|
Yep ##vote rarity Reads like she went for an easy kill and was surprised by the push back
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 05:45
|
|
|
Rarity posted:You what? I don't even get this. Explain. I believe you felt Krell would be an easy lynch, started to push for it and then met resistance from him and other people in the thread, and then went into a tailspin. You're going after him with baseless personal attacks that don't jive with his play in this game, and you are not handling how it's going well at all
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 05:52
|
|
|
Ad is the only one out of the four I wouldn't vote at this time, but Kerro looks like a slam dunk to me
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 15:52
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:I'm at work and won't be here for deadline, so giving a quick look at the others, I think Kerro is probably the lynch that's going to happen. Don't know if it's my first choice or not, but if that is the way the wind blows, let it not be said that I do not also blow. Would switch to PM
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 16:34
|
|
|
Odd ##vote kerro
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
It's got to be merk or Pmush, by my thinking. And I'm inclined to think merk
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 04:07
|
|
|
I can't tell if this is town merk being mopey and defeatist, or scum merk trying a new tactic
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 05:34
|
|
|
##vote mushroom Ok I guess merk is being a legit sad sack and I don't see that happening as scum
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 14:51
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Merk has been pushing weird cases at least since I joined. Been too busy to read the thread. Including a weak Mills meta thing on me. Why rarity instead of aC? There is for sure at least 1 scum on that last mission.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 15:20
|
|
|
I have a low amount of points but I think it's best if I go. If mushroom is telling the truth I'll have enough to make up the difference, and if she's lying I'm not a big loss ##volunteer
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 18:00
|
|
|
No? You and pig put in 6 each, mush put in 8, I put in 3 to cover the spread
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 18:11
|
|
|
I wouldn't lie about putting in 3. It's either mushroom doing a scum Hail Mary, or one of you setting her up
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 18:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 00:14 |
|
|
apostateCourier posted:Don't they have to be in the challenge to use anti-points? That was my understanding
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 19:03
|
|