|
sure, experiments are fun
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2014 21:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 15:16 |
|
|
confirmed
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 01:36
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:I look forward to having some challenge data to analyze. I want to gauge the effectiveness of my skills in this new context. i think buying stuff is good just to try and make sure scum doesn't have it.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2014 16:58
|
|
|
Mills posted:Hi. I'm at work / busy day / deadline in Beard Mafia. I'll read and contribute tomorrow morning AEST. Thanks. i have also been horribly busy all day. this will get my attention when i get home.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 01:10
|
|
|
Harold Krell posted:Regardless of whether you're at work or at home, if you can post a message like this, you can post an actual response. These types of messages in Mafia are absolutely pointless. bullshit. i can't access pms from my phone, and i wanted to be able to take a look at my own stats before i jumped on the train of casing people based on contribution to the challenge, or lack thereof. i'd rather let people know i'm reading and keeping up than just being totally awol, especially when this game has been so ACTION-PACKED.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 06:35
|
|
|
oh hey, now that i look at it, literally your only contribution since 'confirmed' was that little gem. i think that makes you even less productive than tastee. anyway, i'm in the camp that just doesn't understand why rascyc would be so eager to claim his meager contribution if he was scum. something about that doesn't sit right. then again, he's been both offering and denying more information than anybody has asked of him, which isn't quite sitting right. i don't even with merk. and i'd raise an eyebrow at rarity's aggression, but the numbers did add up, but there were compelling enough arguments for scum to want to pass the first couple of these, so it's turning real wifom real fast with her.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 06:51
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:What's your point here about merk? context suggests there is a serious meta with him and i will not pretend to understand it.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 18:26
|
|
|
Harold Krell posted:Okay, it's been two days without a single person posting. Can you guys put in a little more effort now since the deadline is coming up tomorrow? this type of post is useless. you may as well not post at all. to be clear: just because you used 500x more words than i did doesn't mean you said anything different than i did.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 19:10
|
|
|
Harold Krell posted:However, now that you're here, I'd like some more questions answered. How experienced are you at playing mafia? Is this your first game? Do you know what evidence is and how to use it in order to make decisive facts? I want to know what level of ignorance you have regarding this game in general. a) not very b) no c) wow. rude. d) wow. rude. i did actually check you out on votefinder, and you are not that much more experienced than i am. way to be condescending, flippant, and completely unhelpful.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 19:37
|
|
|
hey taste you're not wrong.Harold Krell posted:It is impossible to 100% correctly determine scum without a shadow of a doubt on day 1 due to the fact that there is so little evidence to be aware of. However, such a behavior is incredibly detrimental to the game and regardless of whether or not this person is scum, their actions are still outright disrespectful and people like this should be open to scrutiny if they continue to act in such a way. i dunno dude. this guy should practice what he preaches before slamming me with baseless attacks.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 19:52
|
|
|
Rarity posted:Krell, can we go back to the time when you didn't play mafia? 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 20:03
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I don't really see anything wrong with that post. At least he's doing something no he isn't. his posting is the model of how to be verbose without actually saying anything. it's meant to look like he's putting in effort, but he's passing the buck hardcore.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 20:19
|
|
|
Harold Krell posted:I am not being rude. I am just not letting my emotions get the better of me. The key to finding scum is to think RATIONALLY and not be flippant anytime makes an accusation. You would benefit from knowing that fact. no was the truthful answer. rude calls them dumb questions. poo poo talk all you wish, but do not insult my intelligence.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 22:35
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:##vote krell torn between him and rascyc
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2014 22:41
|
|
|
Kerro posted:I don't know about 'we', but I'm voting him because he's been actively responding with meaningless posts to some of the posts calling him out for being mean, while ignoring/not responding to any of the posts (including my own) asking for commentary on who he thinks is scum/the outcome of the challenge etc. Harold Krell posted:No. That is NOT a truthful answer. You are either not understanding what I am saying or you are deliberately bypassing the issue. this guy is hilarious. he is also apparently "a lot of people." finally, today i learned that d1 is "a critical time." [b]##vote krell[b]
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 01:54
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:this guy is hilarious. he is also apparently "a lot of people." finally, today i learned that d1 is "a critical time." oh god dammit. [b]##vote krell
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 01:55
|
|
|
... ##vote krell also my diplomacy is too low for me to be able to volunteer in good conscience. good luck, guys!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 01:56
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:I forgot add "But at least the ones on ras have reasoning behind them" i was sorely tempted. also, you haven't voted yet. you've basically just been telling everybody that their reads and votes are stupid. whatcha thinking?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 03:14
|
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 05:56
|
|
|
Kerro posted:Somehow 6/25 which I mentioned beforehand so that people could plan around it looks more scummy to you than 6/27 or 5/27 which are not announced? I don't even know what to say to that. in addition to what merk pointed out, this seems like it's meant to look quite humble, reasonable, etc., not to mention the longish post later where he ends by insisting a challenge participant should be lynched. as scum, it would guarantee him to nail a town death and buy some time for somebody else to look bad. feels like a calculated gambit. Poison Mushroom posted:Mea culpa. I didn't read the thread well enough and didn't fully understand the mechanics of the challenge. Still not sure I do, but I agree that there's guaranteed scum here. this seems genuine. granted, i've never played with pm before. anyway ##vote krell
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 15:58
|
|
|
hahaha oops. those k names  i just woke up, okay? vote kerro
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 15:59
|
|
|
... ##vote kerro
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 15:59
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:let it not be said that I do not also blow. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 16:18
|
|
|
merk posted:I want to vote PM because I am pretty sure that I'm right about the Mills meta. this is fair, but it's possible that they both takes the challenge, especially if pm didn't have the chance to check scumdoc before volunteering. which case do you like better?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 18:23
|
|
|
merk posted:I want to vote PM because I am pretty sure that I'm right about the Mills meta. *tanked (phone post)
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2014 18:24
|
|
|
yeah, that's what people think happened. i think it's more unlikely just from benefit of the doubt for the replacement, but it's still one of the three of you.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 15:11
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:It's either you, or merk, or we're all just phenomenally stupid and someone hit the wrong key when sending their volunteer PM to somber. at least the townie we lynched admitted that votes on him would be valid.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 15:13
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Why rarity instead of aC? There is for sure at least 1 scum on that last mission. yeah, rarity claimed high in the challenge that succeeded. what's your case, pm?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 15:28
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:at least the townie we lynched admitted that votes on him would be valid. merk posted:I'm pretty sure it's apostateCourier. He's hiding in plain sight by fronting the contribution of 8 points. With this bid, he knows other people will bid less and when the challenge fails he won't get immediate scrutiny. yeah, i buy it. ##vote aC
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 15:35
|
|
|
...i should know better than to cast morning votes, but i'm going to be hella busy all day, so... ##vote aC
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 15:37
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Well, I contributed my full 5, so someone's definitely lying. a "full 5" is not valid if only four people can contribute.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 15:44
|
|
|
ugggggh yeah, i'm with you guys on this one. sorry i wasn't around to volunteer in time. losing challenges stinks. and that was very, very openly reckless of pmush. if she knows she looks suspicious anyway, it seems like she's trying to tank us while she still can. ##vote mushroom
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 21:04
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Stop voting good loving lord fine. ##unvote
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 22:04
|
|
|
eh, just wait for the next mission. then it's lynch time.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2014 22:27
|
|
|
merk posted:In other news, I think Harold Krell might be a parachute account. any idea who?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2014 19:05
|
|
|
##volunteer I am contributing the average acceptable amount (6).
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2014 20:13
|
|
|
sorry i'm a bit late here but i'm an intelligence specialist. i actually pmed somber with a contribution before i had to leave home for the day yesterday. by the time i had a chance to check the thread on my phone, the intel challenge had been declared and all the volunteer spots had been filled.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2014 00:23
|
|
|
Crossover from Mafia Discussion Thread... This game was just unfortunately timed, I think. A lot of people are burning out on Mafia, many others (including myself) are getting a bit too busy for it, and there have been a bunch of non-traditional games recently so even if people are keen to play, they're getting a bit wacked out in the head trying to navigate each new game and its weirdo-awesome rules. I don't sign up for things I'm not willing or able to stick with through the end. Obviously, whatever happens with those three will have an impact on the game, so I'm just going to cool my heels until we know stuff about them and their roles one way or the other. Anyway, even if this game ends up being a bust, Somberbrero was very upfront about its experimental nature, and I really appreciate how the challenges have really driven early maneuvering and scumhunting. That's cool. ... okay screw that back to mafia
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2014 04:34
|
|
|
##volunteer i can definitely help with that. somber, just dump all of my violence points into that check. i'm just a bit busy getting something else together at this precise moment. and yes, i am an intelligence specialist. i thought i claimed that. maybe not. gotta love phone posting.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2014 23:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 15:16 |
|
|
Harold Krell posted:Where are you getting your information from? What does it mean to say that I have intelligence? um, your role should have you listed as some kind of specialist. maybe if you're scum you are not noted as any kind of specialist. this is very interesting.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2014 03:12
|
|