|
flies have four legs and two hands
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 7, 2024 02:09 |
|
|
that's funny as hell coming from a couple of washed-up gay for pay bitches
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
Prokhor Zakharov posted:that's funny as hell coming from a couple of washed-up gay for pay bitches hmm misogynsit much?
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:18
|
|
|
Porn isn't eroticism. Porn is porn. A picture of two guys kissing and touching each others butts is maybe an erotic depiction, but barely, and it is mostly porn. The erotic is subtle, but these days we've forgotten subtlety of portrayal. Overt portrayal is basically the essence of pornography.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:22
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Porn isnt made to tell you anything or portray anything or depict anything. In porn, everyone knows what is going on. There is no wonder. It is the crudest of art forms, if we have to call it one at all. For someone to call gay porn "aesthetically pleasing" to infer that it did anything at all for him other than get his subtly get his rocks off because he is attracted to men, that person is lying to himself and everyone around him. What else could it have done for him, who is he trying to fool. This isn't complicated. I can find pictures of naked women aesthetically pleasing, despite having no sexual attraction to women. Pretty people being sexual together is frequently a pleasant sight. Beauty exists as more than masturbation material.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:22
|
|
|
Wow, this thread took the express to gaytown.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:26
|
|
|
Cream_Filling posted:is this more gbs seriousposting or some sort of double secret fakeposting It's text-based art-form theater that expresses the image of two idiots butting heads together eternally. All I know is that half of my porn collection is wank material, and the other half is pictures of nude/sexy girls I think look pretty. I don't think college roomates hang pictures of hot babes on their wall so they can all jerk it together. Tautologicus posted:Porn isn't eroticism. Porn is porn. A picture of two guys kissing and touching each others butts is maybe an erotic depiction, but barely, and it is mostly porn. The erotic is subtle, but these days we've forgotten subtlety of portrayal. Overt portrayal is basically the essence of pornography.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:27
|
|
|
wanna smash that mona lisa chick
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
you irl posted:wanna smash that mona lisa chick It's probably Leonardo in drag, to be honest.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
Hobohemian posted:It's probably Leonardo in drag, to be honest. would
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:29
|
|
|
heres some actual art for you fags:
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
Dead.juice posted:
But i am gay
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
Hobohemian posted:Wow, this thread took the express to gaytown. Cheew CHHEEEEEEEW! 
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:31
|
|
|
Prokhor Zakharov posted:that's funny as hell coming from a couple of washed-up gay for pay bitches Actually given how many sex workers are lesbians I suspect way more people are "straight for pay" than gay for pay 
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:31
|
|
|
People tell themselves their fetishes are artistic and aesthetic to feel better about themselves. Theyre just expressing themselves, they say.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:35
|
|
|
Only rapists enjoy porn or the aesthetic of human nakedness
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:37
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:People tell themselves their fetishes are artistic and aesthetic to feel better about themselves. Theyre just expressing themselves, they say. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:37
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:People tell themselves their fetishes are artistic and aesthetic to feel better about themselves. Theyre just expressing themselves, they say. You just can't handle all the sexy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:40
|
|
|
Jew Macklemore posted:Only rapists enjoy porn or the aesthetic of human nakedness Eh just admit it gets you off and is not about some obscure artistic sensibility
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:40
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Eh just admit it gets you off and is not about some obscure artistic sensibility Sir, sir. The proper term is "esoteric", not "obscure".
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:43
|
|
|
David is art because it is an amazing sculpture not because it is a sexy dude you faggots are seriously retarded
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:45
|
|
|
Dead.juice posted:Sir, sir. The proper term is "esoteric", not "obscure". Perhaps the truth is somewhere in the middle
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:45
|
|
|
Miltank posted:David is art because it is an amazing sculpture not because it is a sexy dude you faggots are seriously retarded That is pretty much what I said when I mentioned the David statue.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:46
|
|
|
They don't say bad things about the motherland. They know what's good for them.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:48
|
|
|
Miltank posted:David is art because it is an amazing sculpture not because it is a sexy dude you faggots are seriously retarded David is an amazing sculpture because of how well it captures the beauty of the male form. Whether or not you find that form sexually exciting is a different question.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:51
|
|
|
Dead.juice posted:That is pretty much what I said when I mentioned the David statue. A&F posters are porn though
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:51
|
|
|
Miltank posted:A&F posters are porn though So I'm not the only one who gets an erection walking by...
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:54
|
|
|
probably don't actually enjoy seeing two dudes kiss probably enjoy feeling really progressive you're a progressive fetishist
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:54
|
|
|
argondamn posted:probably don't actually enjoy seeing two dudes kiss when everyone gets equally aroused by all porn then we will know the revolution is won apart from furry and animes that poo poo is weird
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:57
|
|
|
CountButtula posted:when everyone gets equally aroused by all porn then we will know the revolution is won what about childrens
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 19:59
|
|
|
solovyov posted:David is an amazing sculpture because of how well it captures the beauty of the male form. Whether or not you find that form sexually exciting is a different question.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 20:02
|
|
|
Cream_Filling posted:what about childrens falls under "anime" so gross, goddamn you I have a moral code
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 20:03
|
|
|
remember when pedos were trying to crawl under the progressive sex banner that was a werid time inhistory (gently caress boomers)
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 20:04
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Because of how well it captures the male form and its power and finesse, if he was going for beauty he would have given him a wig and a dress or sculpted the guys sister. And you aren't supposed to find the sculpture sexually exciting, michelangelo didn't devote his incredible talents towards art and sculpture so trivial little men could get their rocks off due to some festering fetish of theirs. The statue of David is about David seeing Goliath for the first time. If you look at it from a certain angle, David looks really scared. And his dick is small because it shrunk up from fear (also, Greeks thought big dicks were ugly, something only monsters had). Also, Greek people walked around and did stuff naked all the time. Maybe they didn't see the nude body as solely a sexual thing.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 20:07
|
|
|
Cream_Filling posted:remember when pedos were trying to crawl under the progressive sex banner the occasional wacko radical feminist brings up that it took a bit for people to realise that NAMBLA/whatever the UK equivalent was were gross paedophiles back in the like 1950s to smear gays/bis/queers/troons/whoever they don't like. It is kinda creepy that they didn't all realise straight away I mean NAMBLA the clue is in the name
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 20:08
|
|
|
hmm are we going to start arguing in here that homoeroticism was absent from ancient greek culture?
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 20:09
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Because of how well it captures the male form and its power and finesse, if he was going for beauty he would have given him a wig and a dress or sculpted the guys sister. And you aren't supposed to find the sculpture sexually exciting, michelangelo didn't devote his incredible talents towards art and sculpture so trivial little men could get their rocks off due to some festering fetish of theirs. I dunno, man. Michelangelo was pretty loving gay. I bet he wouldn't mind too much if someone filed an image of David away in the ol spank bank.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 20:11
|
|
|
a hole-y ghost posted:hmm are we going to start arguing in here that homoeroticism was absent from ancient greek culture? Also, from Florence and Michelangelo's head.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 20:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 7, 2024 02:09 |
|
|
Greeks liked guys with little boy dicks.
|
|
#
?
Sep 20, 2014 20:12
|
|