|
We are weak. Our morality requires outside force to keep us from eating feces and raping each other's holes. We need a god to tell us how to live. Which is the best god?
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 17:40 |
|
|
I am the best god.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:48
|
|
|
jk buy plat and ill tell u
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:48
|
|
|
BeefThief posted:I am the best god. hmmm
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:48
|
|
|
BeefThief posted:jk buy plat and ill tell u i am pooor
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:49
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS5g-z2xLHg hth OP
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:50
|
|
|
God needs humanity in his butt. Because he's a human being.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:50
|
|
|
Cardiovorax posted:God needs humanity in his butt. Because he's a human being. same
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:51
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:We are weak. Our morality requires outside force to keep us from eating feces and raping each other's holes. We need a god to tell us how to live. The only thing God cares about is blessing people at random with wealth and power so they can do that stuff and not have it happen to them
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:53
|
|
|
what if i told u everybody already has god in their lives and this is what we get for it
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:55
|
|
|
5er posted:what if i told u woah what if get a new god like a cool god who is all like you know "haha its all good bro" do whatever you want especially murder, eat feces, rape and steal reverse psychology it could work
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:00
|
|
|
Let's get this out here right now. I'm a 23 year old law graduate with an IQ of 155. My political beliefs are liberal and leftist, I listen to Metal and I enjoy violent movies, books and videogames, and I've been a Christian since birth. Baptised, confirmed of my own free will, son of a priest (who are pretty notorious for rebelling against their father's religious beliefs just for the sake of it). I'm part of the Anglican Church of England, which is pretty much the result of Henry the 8th getting pissed off with the catholics not allowing him to divorce his wife(s). We're the state religion of the UK, if you could even say the UK has one, we're pretty liberal about most things, women priests, gay priests, homosexuals in general, sex before marriage, contraception, we take the modern, reasonable way of looking at all of them. At the end of the day, the Bible taught us about forgiveness and being excellent to one another. It had a bit of a round-about way of doing it but what do you expect for a 2000 year old book written entirely by clerical males? It's gonna be a bit out of date, you've gotta read it in context. I have no problems with anyone's beliefs. Be whatever you want, as long as you believe (or don't believe) for a good reason. But here's what I really don't like, trend-atheism/trend-theism (also referred to as e-atheism, since it seems to be most prevelant in the domain of anonymous blogspammers and Digg-users). In my late teens, I spent a long time thinking. Yeah, just sitting around and thinking, thinking about faith. Thinking about what it is that I believe in. Rationalizing the various conflicts and contradictions that faith presents us with, looking at the viewpoints of other faiths, or those with no faith at all, taking into account the new things we discover every day and factoring in the influence of science. Some people would claim that, if I had indeed done that, I'd have come to the conclusion, as an intellectual, rational thinker, that God does not exist. They would of course, be wrong. My beliefs center around several factors. Firstly, it is important for us as human-beings to realize our own limits, and the limits of our understanding. Centuries ago we believed the world was flat. "The Bible told us so!", would be the first cry. Wrong, it really didn't. In the Old Testament, Job 26:7 explains that the earth is suspended in space, the obvious comparison being with the spherical sun and moon. The Old Testament, you remember that one? The one with the fiery bushes, the pillar's of salt, the cool plagues and such? Even that managed to get it right. There's a few more references as well to the 'round' earth (and before you say anything, flat is not a shape, it could have been a flat octagon for all they knew) but I'm not going to go into that yet. We've had computers for less than a century, powered flight for just over a century and of course our amazing horseless carriages. Genetics, electricity, nuclear-bombs, toaster-strudel, the world is in the palm of our hands! And it didn't take us too long did it? Reality-check, we're still primitives. In the great scheme of things this technology is a mere blip on the historical radar. We've got an awful long way to go before we're able to dissect and understand the mysteries of the universe. We haven't even put a man on Mars yet, let alone left our solar system to find out what exactly is out there. How can it be that we have suddenly, so recently, become so arrogant as to believe we know more than we really do? The Laws of Science are written by man, based on our understanding of how things work. They are theories that, while prove true today, may be debunked by another amazing discovery tomorrow. Which leads onto my next point. Name this quote "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Arthur C Clarke, physicist and author, smart fellow. It also hilights the point I'm making. Our understanding of the universe is peerless only amongst ourselves. We are not as smart as we think we are. Just as fire wowed the neanderthals, what would it take to wow us? What would make our jaws drop and our minds boggle? Well, any sufficiently advanced technology of course. And what is technology after-all? Man-made machines. The concept of technology is a human concept, a concept that may, in other parts of the universe, not even exist, replaced by something even more advanced than that, so advanced that we cannot comprehend it. Not surprising really as we mammals only use 10% of our brains. So where am I going with this? Simple really, take yourself off of your high-horse, you, and the human race, is not as smart as it thinks it is. Now, open your mind a little, and let's explore some possibilities. The definition of a God. Let us turn to the good book. Wikipedia. "God most commonly refers to the deity worshipped by followers of monotheistic and monolatrist religions, whom they believe to be the creator and ruler of the universe. Theologians have ascribed a variety of attributes to the various conceptions of God. The most common among these include omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence, perfect goodness, divine simplicity, and eternal and necessary existence. God has also been conceived as being incorporeal, a personal being, the source of all moral obligation, and the "greatest conceivable existent" Hmm, a tall order one might think. Could such a being exist? Some argue that logically, he could not, however, there is very little logic in denying the possibility that a being or beings of such power and advancement exist that they could indeed, be considered 'God' within our definition. That's not to say that God is a small green alien with a flying saucer and a phaser though that would give some of the overzealous fundamentalists something to sweat over, much to our amusement. But what is this God? A creator? Sure, we create. We create technology, we're getting to the stage of being able to create life in one form or another, using the basic building blocks of nature. Could it not be surmised therefore that it is entirely within the realms of possibility that someone or something created those building blocks? Like a programmer creates a new program, someone must have also created the coding language in which he created it. We scramble for answers. We come up with theories. Some believe in the beginning there was nothing, which exploded. Some believe a man in the sky created it everything in 6 days and then mooched around on the 7th. Which is valid? Neither, and both. They attempt to apply meaning to something where meaning may, or may not exist. Creationism and the Big Bang are in that sense, as bad as each other. They are both merely attempts for us to explain the unexplainable. The Big Bang contradicts our laws of physics (something most catalyse an explosion, therefore something must have been there in the first place, where did that come from, at which point your brain melts). The Creation Story contradicts our laws of physics (Same reasons, who created God after all?). Everything we've so far managed to come up with, from the sublime to the ridiculous, the complex to the simplistic, it's an exercise in desperate straw-clutching. At the end of the day, we don't know jack. And that's ok. Someone once said that the journey matters more than the destination, it's not the winning, it's the taking part, at least ya tried sport. These explanations of where it all comes from, be they ancient or modern all boil down to the same need. To know. Who'd have thunk it, we've got brains for a reason, and they rather like being used. Those neurons like to be fired, the little grey matter likes a little exercise every once in a while. Just as the Creation Story was a way to explain an unexplainable concept, so is the Big Bang theory. If one were to compare the human mind to a computer, try feeding the Big Bang theory to the medieval man, and it's like trying to shove Bioshock into a Commodore Vic20. Good luck. And what will our children's children's children's grandchildren's children think of our Big Bang theory? My money's on exactly the same thing. So what am I trying to tell you, stop asking questions, stop looking for answers and just believe whatever the hell suits ya? Absolutely not. Believe whatever suits you, but question it, never stop thinking, never stop asking or learning. In this day and age it seems people are way too willing to believe, or not believe. Belief, or non-belief should be a life-long arduous process and it should end involuntarily, when you fall over dead. Someone (there's a lot of talkative someone's aren't there?) once said 'Never stop believing', I say, "Never stop trying asking yourself what you believe, and why". It's time to criticize, so let me load port and starboard cannon and fire a volley at both atheists and theists alike. Believing, or not believing, does not make you intelligent. Smart people do not come to a conclusion on the basis of insubstantial evidence. Smart people do not mindlessly attack other people's beliefs just because they don't comform to their own. Smart people do not assume that their own rigid, poorly formed definitions of logic and faith, reason and belief are mutually exclusive and that if one exists, the other cannot. Smart people think outside the box, not pick fights with those poor souls trapped in it. What makes you intelligent, is knowing why you believe what you believe. Knowing that you are but one mind, and knowing that at any time you could be proven wrong, only for that person to be proven wrong ad infinitum as we as a race advance. I suppose you're waiting for my personal beliefs, waiting for this to be some kind of sermon, preaching why my God is better than your God, or non-God. You'll be waiting a long time, because it's not coming. My personal beliefs are just that, personal, they're mine, they belong to me. You cannot take them away from me, only I can. What I can give you though, are my opinions. Right now shots are being fired. They're not physical shots, they're bullets and shells of ignorance and bigottry. And it's no one-sided battle let me tell you that much. Factionalized camps everywhere you can imagine. Atheists, Theists, Satanists, Christians, Republicans, Democrats, Capitalists, Communists, every group you can imagine, all shouting 'Your God/Non-God sucks, mine is better!'. These days, the internet's become their battleground. So much for sharing knowledge, we're sharing ignorance. The bigottry and the condemnation has to stop. The sad thing is, I'm having to condemn the condemners. Isn't it lowsy how you generally have to be a hypocrite in order to make a point these days? Food for thought. We can look at the extremes and see the simplistic, secular vs sacred, trend-atheists vs fundamentalist evangelical christians, the most common stereotypes. But in reality, it's so much more complicated than that. It's this stereotyping and narrow-minded attitude that prevents us as a race from achieving the greatness we can. I could make as many decrees as I wanted till I was blue in the face, and I'm going to just to let off a little steam mind you, "Trend-atheist Digg users, shove your agendas where the sun don't shine, refusing the possibility of a supreme-being does not make you a genius or a radical thinker, it makes you a bloody sheep hiding behind a cloak of anonymity" "Evangelical Fundamentalist morons, get your overly simplistic, judgmental, dogmatic Crayola God out of my face, you have about as much understanding of the universe as a wet lettuce. That does not make you holy, pure, or guaranteed a private booth at the big game in the sky, it makes you a bloody sheep hiding behind a cloak of propaganda that you only believe because you're told to" Wow, that feels good, I can understand why you internet-bound condemners like it so much. Gives you that warm, fuzzy feeling doesn't it? What, I'm not allowed to indulge in such a guilty pleasure every once in a while? Play fair Where's my conclusion? Hell if I know. Did you have the mistaken impression this was some carefully constructed plea for tolerance? Absolutely not, it's an angry slap in the face to my peers. Wake the hell up and use your brain, because my God/Non-god/Explosion/Man-in-the-sky/Vic20 gave you it for a reason.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:03
|
|
|
Dongattack posted:Let's get this out here right now. I'm a 23 year old law graduate with an IQ of 155. My political beliefs are liberal and leftist, I listen to Metal whoops, stopped reading right there
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:04
|
|
|
God is an abstract energy field that is fragmented into countless different existences among collective and independent forms of conscious and non-consciousness. Whatever you think God is, is what God is, or is a part of God.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:05
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:woah what if i told u it's that one also
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:05
|
|
|
5er posted:what if i told u mind loving blown
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:07
|
|
|
Most gods condone rape though. Im personally not sure what humanity needs. A swift kick in the rear end??
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:07
|
|
|
i don't even know why atoms decided to show up, you say god did it? i'm cool with that. i don't believe it, but i'm cool with it you know?
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:08
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Most gods condone rape though. Im personally not sure what humanity needs. A swift kick in the rear end?? is there a god that wants us to constantly have sex? sounds like a god i can get behind.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:10
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:is there a god that wants us to constantly have sex? sounds like a god i can get behind. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:12
|
|
|
Top City Homo posted:is there a god that wants us to constantly have sex? sounds like a god i can get behind. Um the devil He wants to turn us into a bunch of bonobos with guns if he can.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:13
|
|
|
I need god up my rear end
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:25
|
|
|
any human being would be better off with a dog in their life than they would be with god in their life
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:26
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Um the devil what if i told you that ayn rand is the founder of the church of satan?  i dont think she wanted sex
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:28
|
|
|
A small price to pay for sanity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:29
|
|
|
Well the problem is society depends on ignoring that human relations are actually all about sex in one way or another. So the more honest you get about sex the more society crumbles. And no i didnt know that about the church of satan but the christian satan predates that by a lil bit.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:30
|
|
|
But at the same time the arabs repress sex like no other and theyre beheading each other in the streets now. But at the same time islam is stronger than ever, aka society there is stronger than ever. Theyve just doubled down on their current one. Thats how i see it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:33
|
|
|
that's a really stupid way to see it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:38
|
|
|
Cardiovorax posted:that's a really stupid way to see it. Oh ok
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:41
|
|
|
Spoken like a man completely hamstrung by his sexual impulses.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:42
|
|
|
Knowledge is just the barrier between and adjudicator of sexual relations. There is no platonic relationship, not to say every relationship is gay or straight. But nothing that humans do in society is devoid of sexual energy. Guess this is more jungian than anything. Or more junkian??
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:46
|
|
|
Are you gay OP? You type gay.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:48
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Knowledge is just the barrier between and adjudicator of sexual relations. There is no platonic relationship, not to say every relationship is gay or straight. But nothing that humans do in society is devoid of sexual energy. Guess this is more jungian than anything. Or more junkian??
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:50
|
|
|
Cardiovorax posted:you ever hear the word "projection" before? Im just realizing the extent of the problem. Whats in me is in you. Youre on this earth too. You can get carried away by it forever or see it for what it is.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:56
|
|
|
InterFaced posted:Are you gay OP? You type gay. very gay im gay
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:57
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:Im just realizing the extent of the problem. Whats in me is in you. Youre on this earth too. You can get carried away by it forever or see it for what it is.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:58
|
|
|
Cardiovorax posted:the only thing you've got in you is my dick There's that fag talk we talked about
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 22:00
|
|
|
Tautologicus posted:There's that fag talk we talked about Cardiovorax fucked around with this message at 22:03 on Oct 15, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 22:00
|
|
|
I had to fix the quote 
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 22:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 17:40 |
|
|
you got owned. fag.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 22:03
|
|