|
For those of you who work with numbers, this may come as a huge relief - or a massive worry. I'm sorry.
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 07:41 |
|
|
no they will not posted:For those of you who work with numbers, this may come as a huge relief - or a massive worry. I'm sorry. How'd you do it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:20
|
|
|
Al Borland posted:How'd you do it? For 1-10 I used my fingers; from 11-100 was a bigger challenge entirely. Thanks to my not insubstantial brain power, I was able to complete the task.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:22
|
|
|
no they will not posted:For 1-10 I used my fingers; from 11-100 was a bigger challenge entirely. Thanks to my not insubstantial brain power, I was able to complete the task. I dunno like if you used m&ms or somethin physical are you sure whatever you used was real? Cause that could throw a lot of poo poo off. I mean have you heard of phantom limbs? Its like where you think you have a limb but you don't. You can still feel it there! What if you have phantom fingers?
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:24
|
|
|
no they will not posted:For those of you who work with numbers, this may come as a huge relief - or a massive worry. I'm sorry. prove it. i dont believe you
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:24
|
|
|
i need the mathematical proof or i refuse to accept the validity of this
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:28
|
|
|
and i will NOT accept the "1 2 skip a few 99 100" methodology
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:29
|
|
|
What about 0? How can you have something of nothing? When nothing is nothing? How can nothing be nothing? Because then its kind of something....
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:29
|
|
|
Tiler Kiwi posted:i need the mathematical proof or i refuse to accept the validity of this 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=100
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:30
|
|
|
no they will not posted:1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=100 Cross checked this with your 'post 100 99 times' thread and you're good
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:31
|
|
|
no they will not posted:1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=100 i tried this and all im getting is 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:32
|
|
|
no they will not posted:1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=100 Oh my God...I just...ok bear with me here. I think..woah ok. Um I don't know tell me what you guys think. 1x100=100 gently caress maybe I should stop smoking so much weed, I'm getting worried about my mental health. I'm seeing patterns where there are none.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:34
|
|
|
op was probably cucked 100 times
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:35
|
|
|
Prude posted:op was probably cucked 100 times :iamafag:
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:38
|
|
|
its easier in binary
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:38
|
|
|
no they will not posted:1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=100 This does not look right. I'm looking through it and I can't see where you get the two 0s?
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:39
|
|
|
SirEvelynTremble posted:its easier in binary  Humans and their foolish system of numbers. It doesn't even start at 0. HAH.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:39
|
|
|
Prude posted:op was probably cucked 100 times lol cuck
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:39
|
|
|
i cant even imagine the number 100. imagine a hunded of something, in your mind. i try to imagine 100 ants and they just crawl everywhere in there and now i cant get them out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:41
|
|
|
i tried to think of a dozen apples to give a sense of scale but now there are even more ants crawling over them mother gently caress i hate ants! why did i think of ants!?
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:42
|
|
|
your filthy 100 is my 99. Think about that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:44
|
|
|
Prude posted:op was probably cucked 100 times LOL!!!!!!!!  lmao
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:46
|
|
|
Who needs numbers? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirah%C3%A3_language#Numerals_and_grammatical_number They dont
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:47
|
|
|
Prude posted:op was probably cucked 100 times 
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:56
|
|
|
Prude posted:op was probably cucked 100 times like a bawss
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 12:08
|
|
|
Prude posted:op was probably cucked 100 times Nice meme, friend. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 12:13
|
|
|
Do numbers really exist or are they just a way to trick your brain into a child like understanding of one of the almost infinite complexities of the universe?
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 12:17
|
|
|
4outof5 posted:Do numbers really exist or are they just a way to trick your brain into a child like understanding of one of the almost infinite complexities of the universe? They do exist, I checked.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 12:19
|
|
|
nuh uh, what about 27?
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 12:20
|
|
|
holy crap numbers
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 12:21
|
|
|
Im still finding this to be a dubious claim. What's next? You're going to tell us that there is a negative 1-100? Lets just stick to what we know is true, the good ol' American 1-10.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 12:23
|
|
|
i am trying to create new methods of counting to accomadate this info. i have found if i face my hand upsidedown (with the fingers facing down), i can count an additional five of both hands. but that still only gets me to twenty. i am going to experiment with various orientations o fthe hand.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 12:28
|
|
|
Tiler Kiwi posted:i am trying to create new methods of counting to accomadate this info. i have found if i face my hand upsidedown (with the fingers facing down), i can count an additional five of both hands. but that still only gets me to twenty. i am going to experiment with various orientations o fthe hand. your research is on the edge as it is, don't push it
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 12:30
|
|
|
Tiler Kiwi posted:i am trying to create new methods of counting to accomadate this info. i have found if i face my hand upsidedown (with the fingers facing down), i can count an additional five of both hands. but that still only gets me to twenty. i am going to experiment with various orientations o fthe hand. other things you could count: toes, pennies, toothpicks that have fallen on the ground
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 13:15
|
|
|
trying to keep it simple
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 13:46
|
|
|
Numbers dont exist theyre not real like you or me You might as well try to confurm the existence of god
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 13:51
|
|
|
that's bullshit man 24 is the highest number
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 13:51
|
|
|
why would you have to verify real numbers? Someone failed highschool algebra.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 13:54
|
|
|
numbers are the devil's work
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 13:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 07:41 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 14:33
|
|