|
j.s. bach is the greatest musician who ever lived and probably better at the thing he did than anybody else in the history of the world has been. maybe shakespeare and euler are comparable. who do you think is better than bach? i will tell you why you're wrong.
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2014 18:00
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 18:34 |
|
|
sam cooke is actually a pretty good answer. daft punk are good like the same way the beatles are good. yeah they make good poo poo but it's not like they are anywhere close pushing the boundaries of human experience with their work. mozart was obviously an artist of singular genius but to me he never saturates the bounds of the art in the way bach does. admittedly he comes as close as anyone, i'd put him with people like rembrandt, bernini, milton who made things that were obviously beyond the abilities of mortals but whose work never coalesced to a perfect unified whole.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2014 18:18
|
|
|
uG posted:who is better guicci mane or bach? gucci mane is one of the best rappers of our era but not a timeless genius.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2014 20:26
|
|